Enterococcus Faecalis InfectionMicroEFfAECTNCT06833593
Antimicrobial Combination Therapy for Treatment of Enterococcus Faecalis Bacteremia
An observational study of Enterococcus Faecalis Infection and Blood Stream Infection, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 4 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Prospective, multicenter, national, observational pharmacological study on the evaluation of efficacy of appropriate monotherapy vs combination treatment for non-complicated Enterococcus faecalis (EF) bloodstream infection (BSI) and identification of gut microbiota fingerprint of patients with EF-BSI correlated to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Enterococcus Faecalis Infection, Blood Stream Infection, Gut Microbiomes
- How many people
- 510 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 6 Feb 2021to 26 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All adult patients (≥ 18 years) with primary Enterococcus faecalis monomicrobial bloodstream infection
Who may be able to join
- Adult (≥18 years)
- Monomicrobial EF-BSI
- Receipt of ≥ 5 days of at least one in vitro active drug (ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and linezolid) with or without a synergistic drug (ceftriaxone, gentamycin, streptomycin), at common suggested dosages for EF-BSI in empirical or definitive therapy
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Short term (within 3 days from BSI) mortality
- Other concomitant infection
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ospedale Maggiore "Carlo Alberto Pizzardi" di Bologna
Bologna, Bologna, 40133
Luca Guerra, MD, +390515879975, luca.guerra@ausl.bologna.it
- Recruiting
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Bologna, Bologna, 40138
Maddalena Giannella, MD PhD, +39 0512143199, maddalena.giannella@unibo.it
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Catanzaro "Mater Domini"
Catanzaro, Catanzaro, 88100
Alessandro Russo, MD, +3909613647552, a.russo@unicz.it
- Recruiting
Humanitas Research Hospital
Milan, Milano, 20089
Michele Bartoletti, MD, +390282243568, michele.bartoletti@hunimed.eu
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Optimized Antimicrobial Combination Therapy for Treatment of Enterococcus Faecalis Bacteremia and Identification of Intestinal Microbiota Signature
Prospective, multicenter, national, observational pharmacological study on the evaluation of efficacy of appropriate monotherapy vs combination treatment for non-complicated Enterococcus faecalis (EF) bloodstream infection (BSI) and identification of gut microbiota fingerprint of patients with EF-BSI correlated to antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcome
Read the detailed description
Enterococcus faecalis (EF) is a common commensal of human gastrointestinal tract that can act as opportunistic pathogen causing mild to severe clinical illness. Severe infections due to EF include bacteremia, endocarditis and catheter-related infections. EF is the fourth causative pathogen of bloodstream infection (BSI) in Europe after E. coli, S. aureus and S. pneumoniae. The incidence of infections caused by E. faecalis has increased over the last decades probably as a consequence of the global aging of the population. EF-BSI is associated to a high mortality rate (11-26% of cases).The main factors that may contribute to short-term mortality are the number of comorbidities, the need of admission in intensive care unit and the prompt administration of appropriate antibiotic treatment.
The optimal treatment of EF-BSI uncomplicated with endocarditis is still a matter of debate. Ampicillin is commonly considered the drug of choice, when active in vitro. However, several studies demonstrated the synergistic effect of the combination treatment with an aminoglycosides or ceftriaxone in case of life-threatening infections. To date the efficacy of the combination treatment in patients with EF-BSI was poorly evaluated in clinical studies and most of the data come from very old uncontrolled clinical observations. One strategy for overcoming this uncertainty is to assess the synergistic interaction of different antimicrobial molecules by in vitro tests and to validate in vitro synergisms with clinical studies. Indeed, in vitro evaluation of the drug combination effect has the potentiality for improving treatment by suggesting the possible synergistic or antagonistic interaction of antimicrobial associations. Although, different studies suggested the potential clinical utility of synergy testing, the real prognostic value of these methods is not defined yet. In this context, synergy testing could be used as strategy for improving antibiotic treatment of EF-BSI by suggesting the optimal antimicrobial combination therapy. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole are two novel cephalosporins, which exhibit intrinsic activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Both drugs seem to show a good level of affinity to penicillin binding protein (PBP) 5, a class B, commonly expressed by Enterococcus spp. The use of these drugs in association with ampicillin or daptomycin seems promising. However, clinical efficacy of these combinations is not well defined yet. Gut microbiota of healthy individual is composed by a consortium of bacteria balanced by symbiotic or antagonistic relationships. Antimicrobial treatments altered this equilibrium conferring competitive advantage for different species, including host pathogens. Disruption of the balance in the gut microbial composition has been associated to different pathological conditions (metabolic disease, type 2 diabetes, colorectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease). Also, administration of antimicrobials contributes to increase resistome in the intestinal microbiota and diffusion of antimicrobialresistant pathogens through selective pressure. The central objective of this study is to identify the gut microbiota signature associated to different antimicrobial therapy of EF-BSI and to clinically validate novel diagnostic tools for optimizing antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients.
The primary aim of the study is to compare efficacy of appropriate monotherapy vs combination treatment for EF-BSI and validate clinically the in vitro synergistic/antagonistic interaction of antimicrobial combinations by synergy tests.
Secondary objectives are:
- To define the prognostic and predictive value of EF genotypic and phenotypic traits on the basis of antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcome
- To compare gut microbiota fingerprint of patients with EF-BSI and correlate to antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcome
- Keywords
- Enterococcus faecalis bloodstream infection, Human tissue analysis in vitro, Gut microbiota analysis, Enterococcus faecalis genomic analysis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adult with Enterococcus faecalis monomicrobial bloodstream infection | Adult patients with primary Enterococcus faecalis monomicrobial bloodstream infection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of Clinical Cure and Improvement Rates for EF-BSI
The clinical cure and improvement rates will be evaluated for patients undergoing mono therapy and combination therapy for EF-BSI.
Measured: Up to 6 weeks from patient enrollment, with bacterial strains isolated at baseline
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Mono Therapy and Combination Therapy
A comparison of clinical outcomes between mono therapy and combination therapy in terms of clinical cure, improvement, and any adverse events.
Measured: Up to 6 weeks from patient enrollment, with bacterial strains isolated at baseline
Validation of In Vitro Synergy Tests
To validate the in vitro synergy or antagonism of antimicrobial combinations tested in the laboratory, correlating these results with clinical outcomes. In vitro synergy tests will be conducted to evaluate the interaction between antimicrobial combinations, and the results of these tests will be correlated with the clinical outcomes of the patients.
Measured: Up to 6 weeks from patient enrollment, with bacterial strains isolated at baseline
Secondary outcomes (5)
Genotypic Analysis of E. faecalis
To explore how the genotypic (e.g., resistance and virulence genes) and phenotypic traits of E. faecalis strains influence infection severity, antimicrobial treatment response, and clinical outcomes. Define the prognostic and predictive value of these genotypic and phenotypic traits based on antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcomes. Genomic analyses will be conducted to identify antimicrobial resistance determinants, clonal relationships through multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and virulence factor genes for To explore how the genotypic traits (e.g., antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes) of E. faecalis strains influence infection severity, antimicrobial treatment response, and clinical outcomes. Weekly genomic analyses will be conducted to identify antimicrobial resistance determinants, clonal relationships through multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and virulence factor genes for each E. faecalis genome.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Phylogenetic Relationship and Clonal Diversity
A phylogenetic tree will be constructed based on the core genome of clinical E. faecalis isolates. This will allow the identification of clonal relationships and shared genetic factors among the strains. A deeper genetic analysis will also be performed to explore genetic factors that may influence infection outcomes.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Correlation Between Genotypic/Phenotypic Traits and Clinical Outcome
The prognostic and predictive value of the genotypic (e.g., resistance and virulence genes) and phenotypic traits of E. faecalis will be defined in relation to antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcomes. A comprehensive E. faecalis genomic database will be created to correlate these traits with infection severity, antimicrobial treatment, and clinical outcomes. The correlation will be explored through weekly genomic analyses and clinical data review.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Gut Microbiota Fingerprint Analysis in EF-BSI Patients
To compare the gut microbiota fingerprint of patients with E. faecalis bloodstream infections (EF-BSI) and correlate it with antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcomes. Faecal samples will be collected during antimicrobial therapy and 90 days after therapy withdrawal. These samples will be analyzed for 16S rRNA and the relative microbial composition. Clinical conditions, diet, infection relapse after therapy withdrawal, and their correlation with antimicrobial treatment and faecal abundance will also be evaluated.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Intestinal Microbiota Composition and Its Correlation with Treatment Outcomes
To evaluate the relationship between antimicrobial treatment, gut microbiota composition, and clinical outcomes (such as infection relapse, health status, or disease progression). Faecal samples will be collected from patients with EF-BSI treated with different antimicrobial therapies. These samples will be analyzed for 16S rRNA and relative microbial abundance. The clinical conditions, diet, infection relapse after therapy withdrawal, and their correlation with antimicrobial treatment and faecal abundance will also be assessed.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2025
- Study start6 Feb 2021
- Primary completion26 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion26 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Enterococcus Faecalis InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 510 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Maddalena Giannella, MD PhD, Principal investigator, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06833593
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Micro-EFfAECT
- Other IDs
- "Ricerca Finalizzata 2019"
- Acronym
- MicroEFfAECT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Optimized Antimicrobial Combination Therapy for Treatment of Enterococcus Faecalis Bacteremia and Identification of Intestinal Microbiota Signature
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06833593
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MicroEFfAECT / Micro-EFfAECT
- Keywords
- Enterococcus faecalis bloodstream infection, Human tissue analysis in vitro, Gut microbiota analysis, Enterococcus faecalis genomic analysis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 510 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 26 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, multicenter, national, observational pharmacological study on the evaluation of efficacy of appropriate monotherapy vs combination treatment for non-complicated Enterococcus faecalis (EF) bloodstream infection (BSI) and identification of gut microbiota fingerprint of patients with EF-BSI correlated to antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcome
Detailed description
Enterococcus faecalis (EF) is a common commensal of human gastrointestinal tract that can act as opportunistic pathogen causing mild to severe clinical illness. Severe infections due to EF include bacteremia, endocarditis and catheter-related infections. EF is the fourth causative pathogen of bloodstream infection (BSI) in Europe after E. coli, S. aureus and S. pneumoniae. The incidence of infections caused by E. faecalis has increased over the last decades probably as a consequence of the global aging of the population. EF-BSI is associated to a high mortality rate (11-26% of cases).The main factors that may contribute to short-term mortality are the number of comorbidities, the need of admission in intensive care unit and the prompt administration of appropriate antibiotic treatment.
The optimal treatment of EF-BSI uncomplicated with endocarditis is still a matter of debate. Ampicillin is commonly considered the drug of choice, when active in vitro. However, several studies demonstrated the synergistic effect of the combination treatment with an aminoglycosides or ceftriaxone in case of life-threatening infections. To date the efficacy of the combination treatment in patients with EF-BSI was poorly evaluated in clinical studies and most of the data come from very old uncontrolled clinical observations. One strategy for overcoming this uncertainty is to assess the synergistic interaction of different antimicrobial molecules by in vitro tests and to validate in vitro synergisms with clinical studies. Indeed, in vitro evaluation of the drug combination effect has the potentiality for improving treatment by suggesting the possible synergistic or antagonistic interaction of antimicrobial associations. Although, different studies suggested the potential clinical utility of synergy testing, the real prognostic value of these methods is not defined yet. In this context, synergy testing could be used as strategy for improving antibiotic treatment of EF-BSI by suggesting the optimal antimicrobial combination therapy. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole are two novel cephalosporins, which exhibit intrinsic activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Both drugs seem to show a good level of affinity to penicillin binding protein (PBP) 5, a class B, commonly expressed by Enterococcus spp. The use of these drugs in association with ampicillin or daptomycin seems promising. However, clinical efficacy of these combinations is not well defined yet. Gut microbiota of healthy individual is composed by a consortium of bacteria balanced by symbiotic or antagonistic relationships. Antimicrobial treatments altered this equilibrium conferring competitive advantage for different species, including host pathogens. Disruption of the balance in the gut microbial composition has been associated to different pathological conditions (metabolic disease, type 2 diabetes, colorectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease). Also, administration of antimicrobials contributes to increase resistome in the intestinal microbiota and diffusion of antimicrobialresistant pathogens through selective pressure. The central objective of this study is to identify the gut microbiota signature associated to different antimicrobial therapy of EF-BSI and to clinically validate novel diagnostic tools for optimizing antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients.
The primary aim of the study is to compare efficacy of appropriate monotherapy vs combination treatment for EF-BSI and validate clinically the in vitro synergistic/antagonistic interaction of antimicrobial combinations by synergy tests.
Secondary objectives are:
- To define the prognostic and predictive value of EF genotypic and phenotypic traits on the basis of antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcome
- To compare gut microbiota fingerprint of patients with EF-BSI and correlate to antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcome
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adult with Enterococcus faecalis monomicrobial bloodstream infection | – | –Adult patients with primary Enterococcus faecalis monomicrobial bloodstream infection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All adult patients (≥ 18 years) with primary Enterococcus faecalis monomicrobial bloodstream infection
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult (≥18 years)
- Monomicrobial EF-BSI
- Receipt of ≥ 5 days of at least one in vitro active drug (ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and linezolid) with or without a synergistic drug (ceftriaxone, gentamycin, streptomycin), at common suggested dosages for EF-BSI in empirical or definitive therapy
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Short term (within 3 days from BSI) mortality
- Other concomitant infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Evaluation of Clinical Cure and Improvement Rates for EF-BSI
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks from patient enrollment, with bacterial strains isolated at baseline
The clinical cure and improvement rates will be evaluated for patients undergoing mono therapy and combination therapy for EF-BSI.
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Mono Therapy and Combination Therapy
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks from patient enrollment, with bacterial strains isolated at baseline
A comparison of clinical outcomes between mono therapy and combination therapy in terms of clinical cure, improvement, and any adverse events.
Validation of In Vitro Synergy Tests
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks from patient enrollment, with bacterial strains isolated at baseline
To validate the in vitro synergy or antagonism of antimicrobial combinations tested in the laboratory, correlating these results with clinical outcomes. In vitro synergy tests will be conducted to evaluate the interaction between antimicrobial combinations, and the results of these tests will be correlated with the clinical outcomes of the patients.
5 secondary outcomes
Genotypic Analysis of E. faecalis
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Phylogenetic Relationship and Clonal Diversity
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Correlation Between Genotypic/Phenotypic Traits and Clinical Outcome
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Gut Microbiota Fingerprint Analysis in EF-BSI Patients
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Intestinal Microbiota Composition and Its Correlation with Treatment Outcomes
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up at three months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2025.
Related trials for Enterococcus Faecalis Infection
Recruiting
From Commensalism to Pathogenicity: Exploring the Pathophysiology of Bacteremia to Better Understand Enterococcus Faecalis Infective Endocarditis
Infective Endocarditis (IE)
Not yet recruiting
Moringa Oleifera vs Sodium Hypochlorite for Root Canal Irrigation in Nonvital Primary Molars
Dental Caries, Pulp Necrosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
An Open Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of the Drug Fluorothiazinone, 300 Mg Tablets with the Participation of Adult Patients with Chronic Bacterial Cystitis"
P. Aeruginosa, Baumannii
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Maddalena Giannella, MD PhD principal investigator
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Enterococcus Faecalis Infection and Blood Stream Infection, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 4 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Maddalena Giannella, MD PhD (+39 0512143199, maddalena.giannella@unibo.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of Clinical Cure and Improvement Rates for EF-BSI (time frame: Up to 6 weeks from patient enrollment, with bacterial strains isolated at baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2025.