Respiration, ArtificialEpVAr-VMNINCT06837402
Epidemiology of Non- Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Argentina: a Multicenter Observational Study
An observational study of Respiration, Artificial and Noninvasive Ventilation, run by Argentinian Intensive Care Society at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
Introduction Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is a fundamental strategy in the management of acute respiratory failure, preventing intubation and reducing complications. However, the epidemiology of its use in Argentina is not well understood, motivating this study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiration, Artificial, Noninvasive Ventilation, Intensive Care Units
- How many people
- 246 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- 1 May 2025to 1 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients admitted to the ICU with NIMV requirements
Who may be able to join
- Patients over 18 years of age.
- Requirement of NIMV in ICU due to acute respiratory failure (hypoxemic or hypercapnic or mixed) or as part of the process of weaning from mechanical ventilation.
- Patients who receive NIMV as a palliative or as part of end-of-life care.
- Patients as a routine treatment who require an increase in the time of use, or the level of support, or both due to increased demand.
- Informed consent signed by the patient or his/her legal representative in the event that the patient is incapacitated.
Who cannot join
- Patients admitted to the ICU with NIV as standard treatment for chronic lung disease, neuromuscular disease, obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, or obesity hypoventilation syndrome without additional respiratory compromise.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Introduction Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is a fundamental strategy in the management of acute respiratory failure, preventing intubation and reducing complications. However, the epidemiology of its use in Argentina is not well understood, motivating this study.
Justification Unequal access to ICU resources in Argentina affects the quality of care. This study aims to describe the implementation, effectiveness, and outcomes of NIMV across different regions of the country to improve clinical decision-making and healthcare policies.
Read more
Objectives
- Primary: Analyze the survival of ICU patients receiving NIMV.
- Secondary: Evaluate success/failure factors, regional disparities in resource availability, the impact of healthcare staff training, comparison between public and private sectors, and establish a national database.
Methods Study Design Observational, multicenter, prospective, and analytical study. Both public and private hospitals in Argentina will be included. Data will be collected over seven months, with patient follow-up until discharge or death.
Study Population Adult patients (>18 years) admitted to the ICU requiring NIMV for acute respiratory failure or as part of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation.
Inclusion Criteria
- Age >18 years.
- Use of NIMV in the ICU for respiratory failure or during weaning.
- Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients using home NIMV without exacerbation.
- Patients without acute respiratory impairment.
Data Collection and Management
- Data will be recorded using an electronic form in RedCap®, with restricted access.
- Confidentiality will be ensured through alphanumeric coding.
- A monitoring committee will supervise data quality.
Statistical Analysis
- Continuous variables: Mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range.
- Comparisons: Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi² test, or Fisher's exact test.
- Multivariate models: Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Bias Control and Data Quality Strategies will be implemented to minimize selection, information, and investigator bias. Data will be periodically reviewed by the monitoring committee.
Study Feasibility The study is supported by the British Hospital of Buenos Aires and the Argentine Society of Intensive Care Medicine, ensuring its viability.
Ethical Considerations The study will comply with national and international health research regulations, ensuring participant confidentiality.
Publication and Funding The study will be funded by the Argentine Society of Intensive Care Medicine, with no external financial support. Authorship in publications will depend on the number of patients included per center.
Conclusion This study aims to generate key information on NIMV use in Argentina, optimizing its application and improving ICU care nationwide.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) has become a crucial treatment in managing acute respiratory failure, preventing the need for endotracheal intubation and its associated complications. Numerous studies have demonstrated that timely and appropriate NIMV use reduces mortality, decreases the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and minimizes hospital length of stay. However, the epidemiology of NIMV use in Argentina remains largely undocumented, particularly regarding regional disparities in access, implementation, and patient outcomes.
This multicenter observational study aims to fill this knowledge gap by analyzing NIMV utilization in intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. The study will evaluate patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and factors influencing NIMV success or failure. Additionally, it will assess the impact of healthcare staff training and the differences between public and private healthcare settings.
Study Objectives Primary Objective
- Analyze the survival rates of ICU patients receiving NIMV.
Secondary Objectives
- Identify factors associated with NIMV success or failure, including the need for intubation.
- Describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients requiring NIMV.
- Compare mortality rates between successful and failed NIMV cases.
- Evaluate regional disparities in resource availability and NIMV usage.
- Analyze the impact of staff training levels on patient outcomes.
- Compare NIMV practices between public and private hospitals.
- Establish a national database to facilitate ongoing assessment of NIMV in Argentina.
Study Design This is a prospective, multicenter, observational, and analytical study that will collect data from ICUs in both public and private hospitals across different regions of Argentina. The study will be conducted over seven months to capture seasonal variations in respiratory diseases. All enrolled patients will be followed until discharge or death.
Population and Setting The study will include adult patients (≥18 years old) admitted to ICUs and requiring NIMV for acute respiratory failure or as part of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Participating hospitals must have the capacity to provide NIMV and record detailed patient data.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients ≥18 years old requiring NIMV in ICU for acute respiratory failure (hypoxemic, hypercapnic, or mixed) or as part of IMV weaning.
- Patients receiving palliative NIMV or as part of end-of-life care.
- Patients requiring increased duration or level of NIMV support due to worsening condition.
- Signed informed consent from the patient or a legal representative.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients using home NIMV for chronic respiratory conditions (e.g., COPD, neuromuscular diseases, obesity hypoventilation syndrome) without acute respiratory deterioration.
- Patients without acute respiratory distress at ICU admission.
Data Collection and Variables Data Management System
- Data will be collected using an electronic form in RedCap® with restricted access.
- Each participating ICU will have a designated site coordinator responsible for data collection and entry.
- To ensure data accuracy, a monitoring committee will review a random 5% sample of enrolled patients.
Key Variables Baseline Data
- Demographics: Age, sex, weight, height.
- ICU admission data: Date of hospital and ICU admission.
- Charlson Comorbidity Index and APACHE II score at ICU admission.
- Previous NIMV or oxygen therapy use (home or pre-ICU).
NIMV Implementation
- Date of NIMV initiation in ICU.
- Initial arterial blood gas (ABG) values: pH, PaCO₂, PaO₂, SaO₂, FiO₂.
- Primary reason for NIMV: COPD exacerbation, asthma, pneumonia, ARDS, post-operative respiratory failure, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, neuromuscular disease, etc.
- Ventilator settings: Mode (e.g., PSV, PCV), inspiratory pressure, PEEP, FiO₂, respiratory rate, tidal volume.
- Interface used: Helmet, oronasal mask, nasal mask, mouthpiece.
- Humidification use (active/passive).
- Adjunct therapies: Sedation, analgesia, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO).
Monitoring and Outcomes
- Daily ABG values and ventilator settings during NIMV use.
- Signs of respiratory distress: Tachypnea, accessory muscle use, paradoxical breathing.
- Complications: Facial pressure ulcers, barotrauma, pneumonia, gastric distension.
- Failure criteria: Need for intubation or death during NIMV.
- Length of NIMV use and ICU/hospital stay duration.
- Mortality at day 28 and at hospital discharge.
- Final disposition: Discharge to home, rehabilitation center, or another hospital unit.
Statistical Analysis
- Descriptive statistics:
- Continuous variables: Mean ± SD or median (IQR).
- Categorical variables: Frequency and percentages.
- Comparative analysis:
- Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables.
- Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.
- Multivariate analysis:
- Logistic regression to identify predictors of NIMV failure.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model to assess survival outcomes.
- Missing data handling: Patients with >10% missing key variables will be excluded from the final analysis.
- Software: All statistical analyses will be performed using R 4.3.3, with ggplot2 for visualizations and Survival package for survival analysis.
Bias Control and Quality Assurance
- Selection bias: Consecutive patient recruitment to minimize inclusion bias.
- Information bias: Standardized electronic data collection with training for investigators.
- Investigator bias: Use of predefined diagnostic criteria and cut-off values.
Ethical Considerations
- The study will comply with international research ethics standards (Helsinki Declaration, ICH-GCP).
- Data will be anonymized and securely stored, following Argentina's Data Protection Law (25.326/00).
- Ethical approval will be obtained from the Ethics Committee of the British Hospital of Buenos Aires and participating institutions.
Study Feasibility
- The study will be coordinated by the British Hospital of Buenos Aires with support from the Argentine Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SATI).
- No external funding; the study is supported by SATI.
- Participating centers will be invited via SATI networks and social media, with a structured training program to ensure compliance with data collection protocols.
Conclusion This study will provide essential insights into NIMV epidemiology in Argentina, helping to optimize its implementation and improve ICU care nationwide. By identifying key predictors of success or failure, the study will contribute to evidence-based clinical practice and inform national health policies regarding ventilatory support strategies.
- Keywords
- mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory failure, noninvasive ventilation, intensive care unit
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Aspiration
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ICU Mortality
Death that occurs during Hospital stay
Measured: 28 days
Hospital Mortality
Death that occurs during ICU stay
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2025
- Study start1 May 2025
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (39)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiration, ArtificialStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Argentinian Intensive Care Society
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gustavo Plotnikow, Argentinian Intensive Care Society
- Investigators
- Gustavo Plotnikow, RT, Principal investigator, Hospital Británico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06837402
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14770
- Acronym
- EpVAr-VMNI
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 31 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS, Nava S, Navalesi P Members Of The Steering Committee, Antonelli M, Brozek J, Conti G, Ferrer M, Guntupalli K, Jaber S, Keenan S, Mancebo J, Mehta S, Raoof S Members Of The Task Force. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 31;50(2):1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016. Print 2017 Aug.
PubMed 28860265Chawla R, Dixit SB, Zirpe KG, Chaudhry D, Khilnani GC, Mehta Y, Khatib KI, Jagiasi BG, Chanchalani G, Mishra RC, Samavedam S, Govil D, Gupta S, Prayag S, Ramasubban S, Dobariya J, Marwah V, Sehgal I, Jog SA, Kulkarni AP. ISCCM Guidelines for the Use of Non-invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure in Adult ICUs. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(Suppl 1):S61-S81. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-G23186.
PubMed 32205957Fujishima S. Guideline-based management of acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Intensive Care. 2023 Mar 10;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00658-3.
PubMed 36895001Nava S, Navalesi P, Conti G. Time of non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Mar;32(3):361-70. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0050-0. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
PubMed 16477416Klefti G, Hill AT. The benefits of non-invasive ventilation for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A meta-analysis. QJM. 2020 Mar 30:hcaa106. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa106. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 32227219Burns KEA, Stevenson J, Laird M, Adhikari NKJ, Li Y, Lu C, He X, Wang W, Liang Z, Chen L, Zhang H, Friedrich JO. Non-invasive ventilation versus invasive weaning in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2022 Aug;77(8):752-761. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216993. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
PubMed 34716282Osadnik CR, Tee VS, Carson-Chahhoud KV, Picot J, Wedzicha JA, Smith BJ. Non-invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):CD004104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004104.pub4.
PubMed 28702957Farhan H, Moreno-Duarte I, Latronico N, Zafonte R, Eikermann M. Acquired Muscle Weakness in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Nosology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Prevention. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):207-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000874.
PubMed 26445385Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Kudlow P, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Cheung AM; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802.
PubMed 21470008Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Sedrakyan A, Mendez-Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Herridge MS, Needham DM. Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2005 May;31(5):611-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2592-6. Epub 2005 Apr 1.
PubMed 15803303Combes A, Costa MA, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Mokhtari M, Gibert C, Chastre J. Morbidity, mortality, and quality-of-life outcomes of patients requiring >or=14 days of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1373-81. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065188.87029.C3.
PubMed 12771605Cuthbertson BH, Hull A, Strachan M, Scott J. Post-traumatic stress disorder after critical illness requiring general intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):450-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2004-8. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
PubMed 12961065Jubran A, Lawm G, Duffner LA, Collins EG, Lanuza DM, Hoffman LA, Tobin MJ. Post-traumatic stress disorder after weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Dec;36(12):2030-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1972-8. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
PubMed 20661726Jubran A, Lawm G, Kelly J, Duffner LA, Gungor G, Collins EG, Lanuza DM, Hoffman LA, Tobin MJ. Depressive disorders during weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2010 May;36(5):828-35. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1842-4. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
PubMed 20232042Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Speroff T, Truman B, Dittus R, Bernard R, Inouye SK. The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Dec;27(12):1892-900. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1132-2. Epub 2001 Nov 8.
PubMed 11797025
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Epidemiology of Non- Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Argentina: a Multicenter Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06837402
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EpVAr-VMNI / 14770
- Keywords
- mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory failure, noninvasive ventilation, intensive care unit
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Argentinian Intensive Care SocietyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is a fundamental strategy in the management of acute respiratory failure, preventing intubation and reducing complications. However, the epidemiology of its use in Argentina is not well understood, motivating this study.
Justification Unequal access to ICU resources in Argentina affects the quality of care. This study aims to describe the implementation, effectiveness, and outcomes of NIMV across different regions of the country to improve clinical decision-making and healthcare policies.
Objectives
- Primary: Analyze the survival of ICU patients receiving NIMV.
- Secondary: Evaluate success/failure factors, regional disparities in resource availability, the impact of healthcare staff training, comparison between public and private sectors, and establish a national database.
Methods Study Design Observational, multicenter, prospective, and analytical study. Both public and private hospitals in Argentina will be included. Data will be collected over seven months, with patient follow-up until discharge or death.
Study Population Adult patients (>18 years) admitted to the ICU requiring NIMV for acute respiratory failure or as part of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation.
Inclusion Criteria
- Age >18 years.
- Use of NIMV in the ICU for respiratory failure or during weaning.
- Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients using home NIMV without exacerbation.
- Patients without acute respiratory impairment.
Data Collection and Management
- Data will be recorded using an electronic form in RedCap®, with restricted access.
- Confidentiality will be ensured through alphanumeric coding.
- A monitoring committee will supervise data quality.
Statistical Analysis
- Continuous variables: Mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range.
- Comparisons: Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi² test, or Fisher's exact test.
- Multivariate models: Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Bias Control and Data Quality Strategies will be implemented to minimize selection, information, and investigator bias. Data will be periodically reviewed by the monitoring committee.
Study Feasibility The study is supported by the British Hospital of Buenos Aires and the Argentine Society of Intensive Care Medicine, ensuring its viability.
Ethical Considerations The study will comply with national and international health research regulations, ensuring participant confidentiality.
Publication and Funding The study will be funded by the Argentine Society of Intensive Care Medicine, with no external financial support. Authorship in publications will depend on the number of patients included per center.
Conclusion This study aims to generate key information on NIMV use in Argentina, optimizing its application and improving ICU care nationwide.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) has become a crucial treatment in managing acute respiratory failure, preventing the need for endotracheal intubation and its associated complications. Numerous studies have demonstrated that timely and appropriate NIMV use reduces mortality, decreases the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and minimizes hospital length of stay. However, the epidemiology of NIMV use in Argentina remains largely undocumented, particularly regarding regional disparities in access, implementation, and patient outcomes.
This multicenter observational study aims to fill this knowledge gap by analyzing NIMV utilization in intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. The study will evaluate patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and factors influencing NIMV success or failure. Additionally, it will assess the impact of healthcare staff training and the differences between public and private healthcare settings.
Study Objectives Primary Objective
- Analyze the survival rates of ICU patients receiving NIMV.
Secondary Objectives
- Identify factors associated with NIMV success or failure, including the need for intubation.
- Describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients requiring NIMV.
- Compare mortality rates between successful and failed NIMV cases.
- Evaluate regional disparities in resource availability and NIMV usage.
- Analyze the impact of staff training levels on patient outcomes.
- Compare NIMV practices between public and private hospitals.
- Establish a national database to facilitate ongoing assessment of NIMV in Argentina.
Study Design This is a prospective, multicenter, observational, and analytical study that will collect data from ICUs in both public and private hospitals across different regions of Argentina. The study will be conducted over seven months to capture seasonal variations in respiratory diseases. All enrolled patients will be followed until discharge or death.
Population and Setting The study will include adult patients (≥18 years old) admitted to ICUs and requiring NIMV for acute respiratory failure or as part of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Participating hospitals must have the capacity to provide NIMV and record detailed patient data.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients ≥18 years old requiring NIMV in ICU for acute respiratory failure (hypoxemic, hypercapnic, or mixed) or as part of IMV weaning.
- Patients receiving palliative NIMV or as part of end-of-life care.
- Patients requiring increased duration or level of NIMV support due to worsening condition.
- Signed informed consent from the patient or a legal representative.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients using home NIMV for chronic respiratory conditions (e.g., COPD, neuromuscular diseases, obesity hypoventilation syndrome) without acute respiratory deterioration.
- Patients without acute respiratory distress at ICU admission.
Data Collection and Variables Data Management System
- Data will be collected using an electronic form in RedCap® with restricted access.
- Each participating ICU will have a designated site coordinator responsible for data collection and entry.
- To ensure data accuracy, a monitoring committee will review a random 5% sample of enrolled patients.
Key Variables Baseline Data
- Demographics: Age, sex, weight, height.
- ICU admission data: Date of hospital and ICU admission.
- Charlson Comorbidity Index and APACHE II score at ICU admission.
- Previous NIMV or oxygen therapy use (home or pre-ICU).
NIMV Implementation
- Date of NIMV initiation in ICU.
- Initial arterial blood gas (ABG) values: pH, PaCO₂, PaO₂, SaO₂, FiO₂.
- Primary reason for NIMV: COPD exacerbation, asthma, pneumonia, ARDS, post-operative respiratory failure, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, neuromuscular disease, etc.
- Ventilator settings: Mode (e.g., PSV, PCV), inspiratory pressure, PEEP, FiO₂, respiratory rate, tidal volume.
- Interface used: Helmet, oronasal mask, nasal mask, mouthpiece.
- Humidification use (active/passive).
- Adjunct therapies: Sedation, analgesia, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO).
Monitoring and Outcomes
- Daily ABG values and ventilator settings during NIMV use.
- Signs of respiratory distress: Tachypnea, accessory muscle use, paradoxical breathing.
- Complications: Facial pressure ulcers, barotrauma, pneumonia, gastric distension.
- Failure criteria: Need for intubation or death during NIMV.
- Length of NIMV use and ICU/hospital stay duration.
- Mortality at day 28 and at hospital discharge.
- Final disposition: Discharge to home, rehabilitation center, or another hospital unit.
Statistical Analysis
- Descriptive statistics:
- Continuous variables: Mean ± SD or median (IQR).
- Categorical variables: Frequency and percentages.
- Comparative analysis:
- Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables.
- Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.
- Multivariate analysis:
- Logistic regression to identify predictors of NIMV failure.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model to assess survival outcomes.
- Missing data handling: Patients with >10% missing key variables will be excluded from the final analysis.
- Software: All statistical analyses will be performed using R 4.3.3, with ggplot2 for visualizations and Survival package for survival analysis.
Bias Control and Quality Assurance
- Selection bias: Consecutive patient recruitment to minimize inclusion bias.
- Information bias: Standardized electronic data collection with training for investigators.
- Investigator bias: Use of predefined diagnostic criteria and cut-off values.
Ethical Considerations
- The study will comply with international research ethics standards (Helsinki Declaration, ICH-GCP).
- Data will be anonymized and securely stored, following Argentina's Data Protection Law (25.326/00).
- Ethical approval will be obtained from the Ethics Committee of the British Hospital of Buenos Aires and participating institutions.
Study Feasibility
- The study will be coordinated by the British Hospital of Buenos Aires with support from the Argentine Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SATI).
- No external funding; the study is supported by SATI.
- Participating centers will be invited via SATI networks and social media, with a structured training program to ensure compliance with data collection protocols.
Conclusion This study will provide essential insights into NIMV epidemiology in Argentina, helping to optimize its implementation and improve ICU care nationwide. By identifying key predictors of success or failure, the study will contribute to evidence-based clinical practice and inform national health policies regarding ventilatory support strategies.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients admitted to the ICU with NIMV requirements
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients over 18 years of age.
- Requirement of NIMV in ICU due to acute respiratory failure (hypoxemic or hypercapnic or mixed) or as part of the process of weaning from mechanical ventilation.
- Patients who receive NIMV as a palliative or as part of end-of-life care.
- Patients as a routine treatment who require an increase in the time of use, or the level of support, or both due to increased demand.
- Informed consent signed by the patient or his/her legal representative in the event that the patient is incapacitated.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients admitted to the ICU with NIV as standard treatment for chronic lung disease, neuromuscular disease, obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, or obesity hypoventilation syndrome without additional respiratory compromise.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
ICU Mortality
Time frame: 28 days
Death that occurs during Hospital stay
Hospital Mortality
Time frame: 28 days
Death that occurs during ICU stay
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 28860265Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS, Nava S, Navalesi P Members Of The Steering Committee, Antonelli M, Brozek J, Conti G, Ferrer M, Guntupalli K, Jaber S, Keenan S, Mancebo J, Mehta S, Raoof S Members Of The Task Force. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 31;50(2):1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016. Print 2017 Aug.
- Background: PubMed 32205957Chawla R, Dixit SB, Zirpe KG, Chaudhry D, Khilnani GC, Mehta Y, Khatib KI, Jagiasi BG, Chanchalani G, Mishra RC, Samavedam S, Govil D, Gupta S, Prayag S, Ramasubban S, Dobariya J, Marwah V, Sehgal I, Jog SA, Kulkarni AP. ISCCM Guidelines for the Use of Non-invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure in Adult ICUs. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(Suppl 1):S61-S81. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-G23186.
- Background: PubMed 36895001Fujishima S. Guideline-based management of acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Intensive Care. 2023 Mar 10;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00658-3.
- Background: PubMed 16477416Nava S, Navalesi P, Conti G. Time of non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Mar;32(3):361-70. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0050-0. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 32227219Klefti G, Hill AT. The benefits of non-invasive ventilation for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A meta-analysis. QJM. 2020 Mar 30:hcaa106. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa106. Online ahead of print.
- Background: PubMed 34716282Burns KEA, Stevenson J, Laird M, Adhikari NKJ, Li Y, Lu C, He X, Wang W, Liang Z, Chen L, Zhang H, Friedrich JO. Non-invasive ventilation versus invasive weaning in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2022 Aug;77(8):752-761. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216993. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
- Background: PubMed 28702957Osadnik CR, Tee VS, Carson-Chahhoud KV, Picot J, Wedzicha JA, Smith BJ. Non-invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):CD004104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004104.pub4.
- Background: PubMed 26445385Farhan H, Moreno-Duarte I, Latronico N, Zafonte R, Eikermann M. Acquired Muscle Weakness in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Nosology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Prevention. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):207-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000874.
- Background: PubMed 21470008Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Kudlow P, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Cheung AM; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802.
- Background: PubMed 15803303Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Sedrakyan A, Mendez-Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Herridge MS, Needham DM. Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2005 May;31(5):611-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2592-6. Epub 2005 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 12771605Combes A, Costa MA, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Mokhtari M, Gibert C, Chastre J. Morbidity, mortality, and quality-of-life outcomes of patients requiring >or=14 days of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1373-81. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065188.87029.C3.
- Background: PubMed 12961065Cuthbertson BH, Hull A, Strachan M, Scott J. Post-traumatic stress disorder after critical illness requiring general intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):450-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2004-8. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiration, Artificial
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingObservational study
Predicting Extubation Failure Using Machine Learning
Extubation Failure, Critical Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Sleep Staging and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening Based on a Large-Scale Model Trained on Multimodal Physiological Signals From Diverse Populations
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Sleep Staging
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Prospective Validation of the AutoEIT Foundation Model for ARDS
ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), Respiratory Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Gustavo Plotnikow, RT principal investigator
Hospital Británico
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Respiration, Artificial and Noninvasive Ventilation, run by Argentinian Intensive Care Society at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ICU Mortality (time frame: 28 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06837402, which also lists 39 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2025.