AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy Older AdultsEOECORT-COM-JPNCT06838481

Effects of Overload Eccentric and Concentric Resistance Training on the Cost of Walking, Muscle-tendon and Jumping Performance in Healthy Older Individuals

A study testing Concentric overload resistance training and Eccentric overload resistance training in people with Healthy Older Adults, run by Hungarian University of Sports Science at 1 site in Hungary.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Normal aging leads to a decline in neuromuscular and mobility functions, including a 60% reduction in maximal voluntary force production, a 25% decrease in muscle volume and quality (sarcopenia), and reduced tendon stiffness by age 70. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Older Adults
What is being tested?
Concentric overload resistance training and Eccentric overload resistance training
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteHungary
Study dates
15 May 2024to 15 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • • Healthy men and women aged 60+ (intervention study).
  • No significant cognitive or cardiovascular impairments.

Who cannot join

  • • Acute injuries or history of severe tendon injuries (Achilles or patellar tendon rupture).
  • Tendinopathy or chronic musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Hypertension, unless controlled with medication.
  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders (dementia, mild cognitive impairment).
  • Metabolic diseases affecting muscle/tendon function,

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hungary1 site
  • Hungarian University of Sports Science, Budapest, Hungary

    Budapest XII., Budapest, 1037

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Normal aging leads to a decline in neuromuscular and mobility functions, including a 60% reduction in maximal voluntary force production, a 25% decrease in muscle volume and quality (sarcopenia), and reduced tendon stiffness by age 70. These changes impair walking speed, balance, and increase the metabolic cost of walking by ~20% in older adults compared to younger individuals. While walking training can reduce metabolic costs, no interventions have successfully addressed the 20% age-related difference. Resistance training, particularly eccentric (muscle-lengthening) training, shows promise for improving muscle strength and mass, but its effects on functional, cognitive abilities, and walking economy in older adults remain unexplored.

Read the detailed description

Normal aging is characterized by a decline in neuromuscular and mobility functions. By the age of 70, maximal voluntary force production decreases by approximately 60%, accompanied by a ~25% reduction in muscle volume and quality, leading to sarcopenia. Alongside changes in muscle protein content, composition, and mitochondrial biochemistry, aging also affects tendon properties. While healthy aging does not significantly alter tendon size, it reduces tendon stiffness, which can delay force transmission. These changes in muscle-tendon function contribute to slower walking speeds and impaired static and dynamic balance.

One of the most significant functional changes with aging is the increased metabolic cost of walking. Older individuals require ~20% more metabolic energy to walk the same distance as younger adults, yet the underlying reasons remain unclear. While walking training has been shown to reduce metabolic costs in older adults, no studies have attempted to reduce this 20% age-related difference using alternative interventions.

Resistance training induces adaptations in muscle-tendon function by requiring participants to overcome external loads. Traditional resistance training combines concentric (muscle shortening) and eccentric (muscle lengthening) contractions, but eccentric training has received increasing attention due to its superior benefits in muscle strength and mass improvement. However, no studies have examined how resistance training, particularly with an eccentric focus, impacts functional and cognitive abilities or walking economy in older adults.

Objectives:

This study aims to:

  1. Investigate the effects of resistance training, particularly eccentric-focused training, on muscle-tendon function and walking economy in older adults.
  2. Examine whether these changes translate into improved neuromuscular and cognitive functions.
  3. Determine if improved tendon stiffness leads to more efficient force transmission, reducing walking energy expenditure.
Being tested
Concentric overload resistance training, Eccentric overload resistance training, Active Control
Keywords
Resistance training, cost of walking, cost of transfer, balance, countermovement jump, SSC

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Concentric overload resistance trainingOther

    Also called active control

    • Resistance training groups will train 2-3 times per week for 3 months using specialized TechnoGym machines.
    • Exercises include Concentric leg press, knee extension, and ankle plantarflexion in a progressive loading program following American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) \& National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) guidelines.
    • Heart rate, blood pressure, and perceived exertion will be monitored during each session.
  • Eccentric overload resistance trainingOther

    • Resistance training groups will train 2-3 times per week for 3 months using specialized TechnoGym machines.
    • Exercises include Eccentric leg press, knee extension, and ankle plantarflexion in a progressive loading program following American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) \& National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) guidelines.
    • Heart rate, blood pressure, and perceived exertion will be monitored during each session.
  • Active ControlOther

    Walking

Study groups in NCT06838481
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Concentric overload resistance trainingActive comparatorReceive Concentric overload resistance training
Receives: Other: Concentric overload resistance training
Eccentric overload resistance trainingExperimentalReceive Eccentric overload resistance training
Receives: Other: Eccentric overload resistance training
Active control groupPlacebo comparatorwalking intervention
Receives: Other: Active Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Walking metabolic cost

    Assessed using spirometry at different speeds (J/kg/m)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Maximum isometric voluntary contraction

    Maximum isometric voluntary force using a dynamometer. (Nm)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  2. Patella and Achilles tendon stiffness

    Stiffness is the slope of the force elongation curve using dynamometer combining with Ultrasound (N/mm)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  3. Vastus lateralis and Gastrocnemius muscle thickness & tendon thickness

    VL, GC, and Achilles tendon \& patellar tendon will be assessed using Ultrasound images (mm)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  4. Whole leg muscle mass

    Whole leg muscle mass via DEXA scan.(Kg)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  5. Jump efficiency

    squat jump and Countermovement jump height (cm) jump efficiency (%)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

  6. Cognitive Assessments

    Cognitive tests: Executive function, working memory, and processing speed using some questionnaires with score values.

    Reaction Time (milliseconds, ms) Score (points or errors) - Based on correct/incorrect responses in tasks Number of correct responses per second (responses/sec)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2025
  2. Study start15 May 2024
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 May 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Cross-Sectional Component: Purpose: To assess baseline muscle-tendon function, metabolic function, and other relevant measures in older adults. Design: Observational, providing a snapshot of the participants' characteristics before the intervention. Longitudinal Intervention Component: Purpose: To examine the effects of different training interventions over time and assess retention effects. Design: A three-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) with pre- and post-intervention assessments.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06838481
Sponsor's protocol ID
TE-KEB/No11/2024
Other IDs
TE-KEB/No11/2024
Acronym
EOECORT-COM-JP
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
9 Feb 2025
Last updated
20 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Malatesta D, Canepa M, Menendez Fernandez A. The effect of treadmill and overground walking on preferred walking speed and gait kinematics in healthy, physically active older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Sep;117(9):1833-1843. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3672-3. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

    PubMed 28687953
  • Thomas EE, De Vito G, Macaluso A. Speed training with body weight unloading improves walking energy cost and maximal speed in 75- to 85-year-old healthy women. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Nov;103(5):1598-603. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00399.2007. Epub 2007 Sep 6.

    PubMed 17823302
  • Valenti G, Bonomi AG, Westerterp KR. Multicomponent Fitness Training Improves Walking Economy in Older Adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jul;48(7):1365-70. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000893.

    PubMed 26848888
  • Hunter GR, Fisher G, Neumeier WH, Carter SJ, Plaisance EP. Exercise Training and Energy Expenditure following Weight Loss. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Sep;47(9):1950-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000622.

    PubMed 25606816
  • Hunter GR, McCarthy JP, Bryan DR, Zuckerman PA, Bamman MM, Byrne NM. Increased strength and decreased flexibility are related to reduced oxygen cost of walking. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Nov;104(5):895-901. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0846-z. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

    PubMed 18758805
  • Godges JJ, MacRae PG, Engelke KA. Effects of exercise on hip range of motion, trunk muscle performance, and gait economy. Phys Ther. 1993 Jul;73(7):468-77. doi: 10.1093/ptj/73.7.468.

    PubMed 8316580

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Concentric overload resistance training and Eccentric overload resistance training in people with Healthy Older Adults, run by Hungarian University of Sports Science at 1 site in Hungary.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Walking metabolic cost (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06838481, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in