AzTrials
AzTrials

RehabilitationNCT06838858

Effects of Motor Imagery Training After Muscle Lengthening Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy

A study testing Motor Imagery Training and Conventional Post-operative Exercises in people with Rehabilitation and Cerebral Palsy (CP), run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In children with cerebral palsy (CP), spasticity occurs in the muscles due to upper motor neuron lesions. The muscle groups that are mostly spastic in the lower extremity are; the hip adductor and flexors, hamstrings, and ankle plantar flexors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Rehabilitation, Cerebral Palsy (CP), Exercise
What is being tested?
Motor Imagery Training and Conventional Post-operative Exercises
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Mar 2024to 15 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis with Cerebral Palsy
  • Being between the ages of 7-18
  • Being able to walk with or without support
  • Not having received botulinum toxin injections into the ankle plantar flexor muscles in the last 6 months
  • Being at the GMFCS level of 1,2 or 3
  • Having an indication for ankle muscle release surgery and having a surgical plan
  • Being receiving a developmental rehabilitation program
  • Being able to follow given commands

Who cannot join

  • Having dyskinetic, ataxic or hypotonic involvement
  • Having any neurosurgery before
  • Having any bone surgery for the foot or ankle before
  • Having a bone surgery in the same session
  • Mental retardation and not being able to take commands

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • University of Health Sciences

    Istanbul

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Investigation of the Early Effects of Motor Imagery Training on Balance, Walking and Quality of Life After Ankle Plantar Flexor Muscle Lengthening Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy

In children with cerebral palsy (CP), spasticity occurs in the muscles due to upper motor neuron lesions. The muscle groups that are mostly spastic in the lower extremity are; the hip adductor and flexors, hamstrings, and ankle plantar flexors. Spasticity in the ankle plantar flexor muscles of these muscle groups causes contracture over time and restricts ankle dorsiflexion. Limitations in ankle dorsiflexion present as toe walking problems, balance loss, and various functional difficulties in children. Children with spasticity of the ankle plantar flexor muscles gastrocnemius and soleus are initially treated conservatively with exercise and positioning. However, after contracture occurs, treatment is performed using surgical methods. Surgical release of plantar flexor muscles is a method that has been proven to be effective and is frequently applied in the clinic. This surgery aims to remove the ankle dorsiflexion joint range of motion restriction, prevent toe walking, and improve the functional status of the child. However, since the plantar flexor muscles are in the antigravity muscle group, excessive release of these muscles can cause loss of balance and crouch gait. Therefore, it is important for this surgery to be performed by an experienced surgical team at the right time and to provide an exercise protocol aimed at stabilization by working both muscle groups in the postoperative period. In addition, after these surgeries, the patient is immobilized with a cast and orthosis for a while and the patient's active and passive movements are restricted with these devices. Motor Imagery; It is the process of learning a new movement or improving the quality of a known movement by visualizing it in a planned and intensive way in the mind of the person without performing any motor activity. This study hypothesized that the motor imagery training in the early rehabilitation process with movement restrictions after plantar flexor muscle relaxation operations will be effective on the patient's balance, walking, and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a pathology that occurs as a result of a non-progressive lesion in the brain that develops due to various risk factors that may occur before, during, or after birth. The spastic type is the most common type of CP. Children with CP experience various problems in physical, psychological, mental, and social areas depending on the affected area of the brain and the degree of involvement. Motor function losses are the primary problem in individuals with CP. Children are classified according to the level of involvement with the gross motor function scale (GMFCS). While GMFCS level 1 indicates the mildest involvement, GMFCS level 5 indicates the most severe involvement.

Spasticity that occurs in the affected areas of the body after upper motor neuron lesions directly negatively affects the child's muscle and joint functions. The muscle groups where spasticity is commonly and frequently seen in the lower extremities are the hip adductor muscles, hamstrings, and ankle plantar flexor muscles. Ankle plantar flexor muscle spasticity can be seen in children of all GMFCS levels and negatively affects the child's functional status and reduces compliance with orthosis use. Increased ankle plantar flexor spasticity causes contracture in the ankle plantar flexors over time, which restricts ankle dorsiflexion. This condition often causes toe walking in children. Toe walking disrupts the child's general body balance and also negatively affects other upper segments, especially the knee joint.

The primary treatment option in the presence of ankle plantar flexor muscle spasticity is conservative treatment. Conservative treatment includes positioning the ankle in dorsiflexion and strengthening the dorsiflexor muscles, stretching the ankle plantar flexor muscles, performing relaxation exercises on the same muscle group, transferring weight in the appropriate position, and walking exercises.

In addition, in the presence of dynamic spasticity, the effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin injection applied to the ankle plantar flexor muscles in cases where conservative treatment is inadequate has been shown in the literature. In cases where all these methods are inadequate, plantar flexor muscle contracture is present, and the child is functionally negatively affected, lengthening surgeries performed on the plantar flexor muscles are indicated. This operation can be performed only on the gastrocnemius muscle or on the Achilles tendon, which includes both the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles.

The ankle plantar flexor muscles are included in the antigravity muscle group and have an important role in general body balance. The length and strength of these muscles at a certain rate provide stabilization of the body segments. While the increased tone of these muscles disrupts this stabilization, the inability of the elongated muscle to provide sufficient core support after relaxations results in excessive dorsiflexion and suggests that it may cause walking problems and ultimately loss of balance. Therefore, when deciding on plantar flexor muscle relaxation operations applied to children with CP, it is thought that the right timing should be provided and the surgery should be performed with an experienced team in sufficient and correct amounts, and post-operative rehabilitation protocols that include intensive studies on gaining balance and stabilization in the post-operative period will increase balance and walking control.

Motor Imagery; It is the process of learning a new movement or increasing the quality of a known movement by visualizing it in a planned and intensive manner in the mind without performing any motor activity. In imagery, while not actually doing any activity; it is possible to experience it through mental imagery by seeing the image in the mind, feeling the movement as in the image, sensing the taste or smell of the image, and hearing its sound. The effectiveness of motor imagery training has been shown in children with CP. There is no study on its effectiveness in the postoperative period.

This study hypothesizes that motor imagery training, which will be applied in addition to the post-operative rehabilitation program, is effective on balance, walking, and quality of life, especially in children with CP, in the rehabilitation process where there is a mandatory restriction with plaster and orthosis after ankle plantar flexor muscle lengthening surgeries. The primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of motor imagery training, which will be applied in addition to post-operative rehabilitation after ankle plantar flexor muscle release operations in individuals with CP, on balance, gait, and quality of life.

Being tested
Motor Imagery Training, Conventional Post-operative Exercises
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Post-operative Rehabilitaton, Cerebral Palsy, Surgery, Tenotomy, Motor Imagery Training
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Palsy, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Motor Imagery TrainingProcedure or surgery

    The study group will receive motor imagery training in addition to control group's exercise program. This process will proceed as follows; In motor imagery training videos taken with a 9-year-old healthy child will be watched.• The content of the videos will include exercises such as ankle dorsiflexion, heel tapping while walking, climbing and descending stairs, walking on a ramp, standing on a ramp, walking on soft ground, and walking on a treadmill.• The patients will watch these videos and then the relaxation, imagination and return to environment phases of motor imagery will be applied respectively.

  • Conventional Post-operative ExercisesProcedure or surgery

    This group will receive conventional exercises in the post-op process. The exercises included in the conventional exercise program are;

    • Balance board exercises
    • Balance disc exercises
    • Bosu exercises
    • Balance pad exercises
    • Wobble board exercises
    • Walking on soft ground
    • Balance exercises on soft ground
    • Apraximations and tractions
    • Target angle exercise for ankle
    • General standing balance exercises (Eyes open and closed - single foot, double foot)
    • Ankle bidirectional ROM
    • Ankle bidirectional strengthening
    • Exercises to increase foot intrinsic muscle strength and balance
    • Functional exercises
Study groups in NCT06838858
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Motor Imagery Training Group in Addition to Post-Operative ExerciseActive comparatorThe study group will receive motor imagery exercises in addition to the post-op rehabilitation received by the comparison group. The exercises will given in a hibrit method (a face to face therapy session and 2 telerehabilitation session in an online platform in a week). The telerehabilitation sessions will given under the supervision of a remote physiotherapist. This group will take therapy sessions during 8 weeks. All the patients will have totally 8 face to face therapy sessions and 16 telerehabilitation sessions.
Receives: Procedure: Motor Imagery Training; Procedure: Conventional Post-operative Exercises
Post-Operative Exercise GroupActive comparatorThis group will be included in a conventional post-operative rehabilitation program that includes intensive foot intrinsic muscle balance, bilateral ankle strengthening and range of motion exercises, and general body balance studies after plantar flexor muscle relaxation operations. In the rehabilitation program of the case group, exercises are planned under the supervision of a remote physiotherapist, with the telerehabilitation method (online live sessions) 2 days and 1 face to face therapy session will be done in a week. face therapy sessions and 16 telerehabilitation sessions.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional Post-operative Exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Range of Motion Measurement

    Range of Motion will be measured with using an universal goniometer for knee and ankle.

    Measured: Baseline, week 4, week 8

  2. Muscle Strength

    Manuel muscle testing will be done. It will graded 0 to 5. Five represents full strength.

    Measured: Baseline, week 4, week 8

  3. Gait Assessment

    It will be asseessed with using Edinburg Visual Gait Scorring (EVGS). EVGS is a video based gait scorring system. It consist of 17 items. A gait video will be taken from sagital and coronal plan. It will scorred later.

    Additionally, pedobarographic measurements for temporospatial gait parameters will be obtained with Enertor foot scanning system (RSscan Lab Ltd; UK).

    The temporospatial gait parameters are; step length, stride length, Step width, cadance, double support time, single support time.

    Measured: Baseline and week 8

  4. Balance Assessment

    It will done by using Pediatric Balance Scale. There are 14 items in this scale. The Pediatric Balance Scale is a modified version of the Berg Balance Scale that is used to assess functional balance skills during tasks that mimic experiences of everyday living in school-aged children. The scale consists of 14 balance-related test items that are scored from 0 points (lowest function) to 4 points (highest function) with a maximum score of 56 points.

    Additionally, pedobarographic measurements for static balance assessment will be obtained with Enertor foot scanning system (RSscan Lab Ltd; UK).

    Measured: Baseline, week 8

  5. Quality of Life Assessment

    Quality of life assessments of patients will be made using the Quality of Life Scale for Children. The first version of the scale (PedsQL TM 1.0) is a general quality of life scale developed for use in various pediatric populations. The most powerful version, the fourth version's core scale (PedsQL TM 4.0 Generic Core Scale), is a scale that evaluates the basic physical, mental and social health components determined by the World Health Organization in healthy children or those with acute or chronic diseases, together with school functionality. This scale consists of a total of 23 items and 4 subscales, including 8 items measuring physical functionality, 5 items measuring emotional functionality, 5 items measuring social functionality and 5 items evaluating school functionality.

    Measured: Baseline and week 8

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Functional Mobility

    Functional status and ambulation assessment of patients will be made with the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). The Functional Mobility Scale is a scale that evaluates how patients walk 5, 50 and 500 meters and ultimately divides them into 6 groups.

    Measured: Baseline, week 4, week 8

  2. Foot pressure measurement

    The pedobarograph is a device displaying and recording the instantaneous distribution of the pressure under the entire surface of the soles of the feet. The subject stands or walks on a transparent plate, in which light is conducted by total internal reflections. For the assessment of foot pressure, pedobarographic measurements will be obtained with the Enertor foot scanning system (RSscan Lab Ltd; UK).

    Measured: Baseline and week 8

  3. Movement imagery

    It will be assessed by usisng Movement imagery questionnaire for children-MIQ-C. This questionnaire was used to measure visual (internal, external skills) and kinesthetic imagery. It contains a total of 12 items, 4 items internal, 4 items external, and 4 items kinesthetic imagery skills. Within the scope of the questionnaire, the individual is asked to imagine 4 different movements from 3 different visual perspectives. During this test applied with the evaluator, the individual is asked to do the movement in the instructions once in reality and then to imagine doing the movement, and the clarity of this imagery is scored using a Likert-type scale between 1 (very difficult to feel) and 7 (very easy to feel). The questionnaire was developed by Martini et al..

    Measured: Baseline, week 8

  4. Motor Imagery Training Fun and Clarity

    An additional evaluation will be made with the Motor Imagery Training Fun and Clarity Scale. The fun level of motor imagery sessions and imagery training for individuals will be evaluated using a 0-10 point numerical rating scale (fun scale). There will be numbers from 0 to 10 on a 10 cm horizontal line. On the scale, 0 on the line means "not fun at all" and 10 means "very fun". The degree of fun will be recorded numerically between 0 and 10. Similarly, how clearly they can visualize the tasks imagined during the imagery sessions will be evaluated with a 0-10 point numerical rating scale (clarity scale). Individuals will be asked to evaluate clarity by stating that 0 on a 10 cm horizontal line means that imagery is not clear at all, and 10 means it is very clear.

    Measured: After each therapy sessions

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2025
  2. Study start1 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion5 May 2024
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06838858
Sponsor's protocol ID
MCDT-2025
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
16 Feb 2025
Last updated
12 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract. 2003 Dec;3(4):310-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03034.x.

    PubMed 17166126
  • 29. Crichton, N. (2001). Visual analogue scale (VAS). J Clin Nurs, 10(5), 706-6.

  • 28. Doussoulin, A., & Rehbein, L. (2011). Motor imagery as a tool for motor skill training in children. Motricidade, 7(3), 37-43.

  • Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.

    PubMed 11468499
  • Ottenbacher KJ, Taylor ET, Msall ME, Braun S, Lane SJ, Granger CV, Lyons N, Duffy LC. The stability and equivalence reliability of the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM). Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996 Oct;38(10):907-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15047.x.

    PubMed 8870612
  • Xu C, Wen XX, Huang LY, Shang L, Cheng XX, Yan YB, Lei W. Normal foot loading parameters and repeatability of the Footscan(R) platform system. J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jul 17;10:30. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0209-2. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28725271
  • Franjoine MR, Gunther JS, Taylor MJ. Pediatric balance scale: a modified version of the berg balance scale for the school-age child with mild to moderate motor impairment. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2003 Summer;15(2):114-28. doi: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000068117.48023.18.

    PubMed 17057441
  • Graham HK, Harvey A, Rodda J, Nattrass GR, Pirpiris M. The Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). J Pediatr Orthop. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):514-20. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200409000-00011.

    PubMed 15308901
  • 22. Abd El-Raheem, R. M., Kamel, R. M., & Ali, M. F. (2015). Reliability of using Kinovea program in measuring dominant wrist joint range of motion. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 10(4), 224.

  • Read HS, Hazlewood ME, Hillman SJ, Prescott RJ, Robb JE. Edinburgh visual gait score for use in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003 May-Jun;23(3):296-301.

    PubMed 12724590
  • Rodda JM, Graham HK, Carson L, Galea MP, Wolfe R. Sagittal gait patterns in spastic diplegia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Mar;86(2):251-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.13878.

    PubMed 15046442
  • 19. Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett, D., Livingston, M., Walter, S., & Russell, D. (2007). GMFCS-E&R. CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, 200(7).

  • Verschuren O, Ketelaar M, Takken T, Van Brussel M, Helders PJ, Gorter JW. Reliability of hand-held dynamometry and functional strength tests for the lower extremity in children with Cerebral Palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1358-66. doi: 10.1080/09638280701639873.

    PubMed 18850351
  • Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, Spence C, Baron C, Lee L. Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther. 1978 Nov;58(11):1355-60. doi: 10.1093/ptj/58.11.1355.

    PubMed 704684
  • 15. Cohen, J, (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2. Edition, Taylor & Francis INC, New York, US.)

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Motor Imagery Training and Conventional Post-operative Exercises in people with Rehabilitation and Cerebral Palsy (CP), run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Range of Motion Measurement (time frame: Baseline, week 4, week 8). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06838858, which also lists 28 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in