AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal Cord InjuryNCT06839300

The International Spinal Cord Injury Blood Biomarker Longitudinal Evaluation (I-SCRIBBLE) Study

An observational study of Spinal Cord Injury, run by AO Foundation, AO Spine at 8 sites in 8 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine the accuracy of serum NF-L and GFAP levels (ie the biomarkers) at different time points postinjury for predicting the severity of neurologic impairment at 6 months postinjury as either motor complete (AIS grade A/B) or motor incomplete (AIS grade C/D) a group of patients who suffer traumatic spinal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Cord Injury
How many people
260 participants
Where
8 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
9 Feb 2026to 1 Dec 2029
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 240 SCI patients with AIS grade A, B, C and D. And 20 non-SCI spine trauma control participants.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 19 years
  • Blunt (non-penetrating) traumatic SCI
  • Baseline neurologic impairment deemed "complete" (AIS grade A) or "incomplete" (AIS grade B, C, or D) based on clinical history/examination and/or diagnostic imaging
  • Bony spinal level involvement between C0 and L1, inclusive
  • Ability to have initial blood sample drawn within 24 hours of injury
  • Treated either surgically or non-surgically
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Ability to provide informed consent according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures
  • Inclusion criteria for non-spinal cord injury spinal trauma control participants:
  • Age ≥ 19 years
  • Traumatic spinal fracture and/or dislocation between C0 and L1 (inclusive) without SCI
  • Treated either surgically or nonsurgically
  • Ability to have initial blood sample drawn within 24 hours of injury
  • Ability to provide informed consent according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures

Who cannot join

  • Penetrating SCI (eg, gunshot, stab)
  • Previous SCI
  • Isolated spinal injury below L1
  • Isolated radiculopathy without fracture
  • Isolated cauda equina injury
  • Patients with known diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
  • Preexisting thromboembolic disease or coagulopathy (disorders related to blood clotting), such as hemophilia or von Willebrand disease
  • Patients who in the investigator's opinion will not be compliant with the study procedures and patients who have any other conditions/injuries that in the investigator's opinion would render the study procedures dangerous

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 8 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

8 sites in 8 countries

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Medical College of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

    Aditya Vedantam, avedantam@mcw.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

Australia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Sydney, Randwick NSW, 2031

    Ralph Stanford, MD, Ralph.Stanford@health.nsw.gov.au

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Australia

Brazil1 site
  • Cajuru University Hospital

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80050-350

    Terminated

Other trials in Brazil

Chile1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Clinica Alemana de Santiago

    Santiago, Vitacura, 5951

    Ratko Yurac, ryurac@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Chile

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Charité Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

    Vanessa Hubertus, vanessa.hubertus@charite.de

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Germany

India1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute

    New Delhi, 110063

    Harvinder Singh Chhabra, drhschhabra@gmail.com

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in India

New Zealand1 site, 1 recruiting
  • MIddlemore Hospital

    Auckland, Otahuhu, 1640

    Alpesh Patel, alpesh.patel@middlemore.co.nz

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in New Zealand

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • King's College Hospital

    London, SE5 9RS

    Aminul Ahmed, aminul.ahmed@kcl.ac.uk

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

To determine the accuracy of serum NF-L and GFAP levels (ie the biomarkers) at different time points postinjury for predicting the severity of neurologic impairment at 6 months postinjury as either motor complete (AIS grade A/B) or motor incomplete (AIS grade C/D) a group of patients who suffer traumatic spinal fracture and/or dislocation of the spinal column but without neurologic injury will be enrolled as non-SCI spine trauma control participants.

Read the detailed description

Patients (≥19 years old) with acute blunt non-penetrating traumatic SCI of AIS grade A, B, C, or D will be enrolled at participating sites. The first blood samples will be drawn within 24 hours of injury (the baseline/enrollment visit); afterwards, blood samples are drawn within each successive 24-hour period postinjury until Day 7, and then at 6 months and 12 months postinjury. Blood samples will be drawn from existing lines (eg, arterial line, central venous catheter [CVC] lines, and intravenous [IV] line) that are inserted as part of standard of care. If an existing line has been discontinued, blood will be drawn via venipuncture.

At each time point, one 15 mL sample of blood will be drawn, which will be divided into: 6 mL for serum, 4 mL for plasma, and 5 mL for RNA isolation (for transcriptomics). At any of these time points, an additional 1 mL blood sample will also be drawn for DNA extraction (for the purpose of ApoE genotyping). The samples will first be processed and temporarily stored by the sites and then sent to the coordinating center at UBC, Vancouver, Canada, for central storage and analyses. Levels of NF-L and GFAP in serum and plasma will be analyzed on the Quanterix Simoa instrument (Lexington, KY, US) for each time point collected to determine the accuracy of these biomarkers to stratify injury severity and to predict outcome.

To the extent that is possible, a full ISNCSCI examination will be completed at enrollment. A motor-only exam of the upper and lower extremities will be completed at Day 4 and Day 7 postinjury. A full ISNCSCI examination will be repeated at 6- and 12-month visits. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III will be completed at 6- and 12-month visits to assess functional recovery.

A group of patients who suffer traumatic spinal fracture and/or dislocation of the spinal column but without neurologic injury will be enrolled as non-SCI spine trauma control participants. For these participants, one 15 mL sample of blood (6 mL for serum, 4 mL for plasma, and 5 mL for RNA isolation) will be drawn within 24 hours of injury (Day 1) and either at discharge or at Day 7 postinjury, whichever comes first. No additional follow-ups (FUs) are required for these control participants.

Medical subject headings
Spinal Cord Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06839300
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SCI patientsPatients with traumatic SCI
Non-SCI patients (control group)Non-SCI spine trauma control participants

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of serum NF-L and GFAP biomarkers postinjury for predicting the severity of neurologic imapairement at 6 months postinjury as either motor complete or motor incomplete.

    To determine the accuracy of serum NF-L and GFAP levels (ie, the biomarkers) at different time points postinjury for predicting the severity of neurologic impairment at 6 months postinjury as either motor complete (AIS grade A/B) or motor incomplete (AIS grade C/D).

    The primary time points of the serum biomarker levels to be investigated are Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, and Day 4 postinjury (section 5.2). Secondary time points to be explored are Day 5, Day 6, and Day 7 postinjury. These assessment time points also apply to the secondary objectives wherever applicable

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Accuracy of serum biomarker levels at different time points postinjury for classifying the baseline injury severity, ie, the AIS grade (A, B, C, and D).

    To determine the accuracy of serum biomarker levels at different time points postinjury for classifying the baseline injury severity, ie, the AIS grade (A, B, C, and D).

    Measured: 1 Day - 12 months

  2. Accuracy of serum biomarker levels for predicting other neurologic outcomes at 6 months postinjury

    To determine the accuracy of serum biomarker levels for predicting other neurologic outcomes at 6 months postinjury. Other neurologic outcomes (apart from the one in the primary objective) include:

    • AIS grade conversion in those with baseline AIS grade A injuries
    • Motor score improvement (ie, ≤ vs > 8-point improvement in total motor score)

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Investigate which time point(s) postinjury is/are the most accurate for classifying the baseline AIS grade and predicting neurologic outcomes at 6 months postinjury

    To investigate which time point(s) postinjury is/are the most accurate for classifying the baseline AIS grade and predicting neurologic outcomes at 6 months postinjury (ie, motor complete vs motor incomplete, AIS grade conversion, and ≤ vs > 8-point improvement in total motor score).

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Investigate whether accuracy of classification and prediction of neurologic outcomes at 6 months postinjury can be enhanced by combining serum NF-L and GFAP levels

    To investigate whether accuracy of classification and prediction of neurologic outcomes at 6 months postinjury can be enhanced by combining serum NF-L and GFAP levels.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Investigate whether accuracy of prediction of neurologic outcomes at 6 months postinjury can be enhanced by evaluating the change in serum biomarker levels over time during the first 7 days postinjury.

    To investigate whether accuracy of prediction of neurologic outcomes at 6 months postinjury can be enhanced by evaluating the change in serum biomarker levels over time during the first 7 days postinjury.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Investigate the relationship between the accuracy of serum biomarker levels for classification of baseline AIS grade and the perceived reliability of baseline ISNCSCI examination

    To investigate the relationship between the accuracy of serum biomarker levels for classification of baseline AIS grade and the perceived reliability of baseline ISNCSCI examination

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Determine the accuracy of serum biomarker levels for predicting neurologic outcomes at 12 months postinjury

    To determine the accuracy of serum biomarker levels for predicting neurologic outcomes at 12 months postinjury

    Measured: 12 months

  8. Determine the accuracy of serum biomarker levels for distinguishing acute traumatic SCI from acute spine trauma without neurologic deficit

    To determine the accuracy of serum biomarker levels for distinguishing acute traumatic SCI from acute spine trauma without neurologic deficit via the following:

    • Comparing serum biomarker levels during the first week postinjury between these two groups of patients.
    • Investigating the influence of the severity of spinal column trauma on serum biomarker levels in patients with spine fracture but without neurologic deficit.

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Effect of associated trauma on serum biomarker levels

    To investigate the effect of associated trauma on serum biomarker levels.

    • Two groups of associated trauma will be investigated: 1) concomitant major injuries to the pelvis, abdomen, chest, or appendicular skeleton, and 2) concomitant TBI.
    • Serum biomarker levels will be compared between patients with and without the two groups of associated trauma.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Relationship between serum and plasma levels of the biomarkers

    To investigate the relationship between serum and plasma levels of the biomarkers.

    Measured: 12 months

  11. Accuracy of ApoE genotype

    To determine the accuracy of ApoE genotype, ie, presence vs absence of the ApoE ɛ4 allele, for predicting neurologic outcomes at 6 months and 12 months postinjury, either standalone or in combination with the biomarkers

    Measured: 6 and 12 months

  12. Accuracy of measures of injury severity on baseline MRI

    To investigate the accuracy of measures of injury severity on baseline MRI for classifying baseline AIS grade and predicting neurologic outcomes at 6 months and 12 months postinjury, either standalone or in combination with the biomarkers.

    • To compare the accuracy between MRI measures and serum biomarker levels for classifying baseline AIS grade.
    • To compare the accuracy between MRI measures and serum biomarker levels for predicting neurologic outcomes.
    • To determine whether the accuracy of classification and prediction can be enhanced by combining MRI measures and serum biomarker levels.

    Measured: 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2025
  2. Study start9 Feb 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
260 participants (estimated)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06839300
Sponsor's protocol ID
I-SCRIBBLE
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
17 Feb 2025
Last updated
1 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Spinal Cord Injury, run by AO Foundation, AO Spine at 8 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Germany and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alix Frischknecht (+41 79 606 41 48, alix.frischknecht@aofoundation.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of serum NF-L and GFAP biomarkers postinjury for predicting the severity of neurologic imapairement at 6 months postinjury as either motor complete or motor incomplete. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in