AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeGLORIANCT06839482

Robotic Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Subacute Stroke

A study testing Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation in people with Stroke, run by IRCCS San Raffaele Roma at 21 sites in 6 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This multicenter international randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the effectiveness of the Gloreha Sinfonia® robotic exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation in individuals with subacute post-stroke paresis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
130 participants
Where
21 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
6 Feb 2025to 31 Jan 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Both sexes
  • Age 18-90 years
  • Paresis of the upper limb following a recent cerebrovascular event (subacute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)
  • Moderate to mild muscle weakness in the thumb opponens, common finger flexors, and wrist flexors, assessed with complete joint movement in absence of gravity, Medical Research Council Scale (MRC) ≥ 2
  • Time from acute event <90 days
  • Ability to understand and sign the study informed consent
  • Ability to perform study procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of other overlapping neurological disorders
  • Presence of osteoarticular or neuromuscular disorders affecting upper limb mobility
  • Severe psychiatric disorders
  • Severe cognitive (MMSE ≤ 17) and/or language impairment compromising exercise comprehension
  • Botulinum toxin injection in the affected upper limb within the last 60 days or planned during the study and follow-up period
  • Open wounds, infections, or unprotected skin lesions on the upper limb
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Severe spasticity of the upper limb (biceps and wrist and finger flexors) (MAS > 3)
  • Inability to adhere to the exercise program due to low compliance
  • Participants who have not signed the informed consent for the study

Trial locations and contacts

21 sites in 6 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

21 sites in 6 countries

Italy13 sites, 12 recruiting
  • ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII

    Bergamo, 24127

    Serena Monteleone, MD, PhD, smonteleone@asst-pg23.it

    Serena Monteleone, MD, PhD

    Not yet recruiting
  • University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia"

    Catanzaro

    Alessandro De Sire, MD, PhD, alessandro.desire@unicz.it

    Antonio Ammendolia, MD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Valduce Hospital, Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center

    Costa Masnaga, LC

    Eleonora Guanziroli, Ing. PhD, eleonora.guanziroli@gmail.com

    Franco Molteni, MD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, AUSL Piacenza

    Fiorenzuola d'Arda, PC, 29017

    Gianfranco Lamberti, MD, PhD, g.lamberti2@ausl.pc.it

    Gianfranco Lamberti, MD, PhD

    Not yet recruiting
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi

    Florence

    Active, not recruiting
  • Riuniti Hospital, Neurorehabilitation, Spinal Cord Rehab. and Functional Recovery Section

    Foggia, 7100

    Stefania Spina, MD, PhD, spinastefania.ss@gmail.com

    Salvatore Facciorusso, MD, PhD

    Not yet recruiting
  • IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Innovation Technology Laboratory

    Messina, 98123

    Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, MD, PhD, roccos.calabro@irccsme.it

    Maria Grazia Maggio, PsyD, mariagrazia.maggio@irccsme.it

    Not yet recruiting
  • Passignano Hospital, Department of Specialized Medicine, Usl Umbria 1

    Passignano sul Trasimeno, Perugia, 06065

    Maurizio Massucci, MD, PhD, maurizio.massucci@gmail.com

    Maurizio Massucci, MD, PhD

    Not yet recruiting
  • European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, SISC in New Technologies and Robotics in Rehabilitation

    Rome, Choose One...

    Alessandro Giustini, MD, alessandro.giustini@ntc.it

    Alessandro Giustini, MD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, UOC di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa-CESA

    Rome, RM, 00128

    Federica Bressi, MD, PhD, f.bressi@policlinicocampus.it

    Federica Bressi, MD, PhD

    Not yet recruiting
  • IRCCS San Raffaele Roma

    Rome, RM, 00163

    Sanaz Pournajaf, DPT, PhD, 0652252405 ext. 32405, sanaz.pournajaf@sanraffaele.it

    Carrie Louise Thouant, OT, MSc, carrielouise.thouant@sanraffaele.it

    Recruiting
  • San Vito Hospital, Rehabilitation Unit

    San Vito sullo Ionio, CZ, 88067

    Andrea Parente, MD, parenteandrea3@gmail.com

    Andrea Parente, MD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Istituto Clinico Tiberino

    Ummbertide, PG, 06019

    Enrolling by invitation

Other trials in Italy

Czechia4 sites, 4 recruiting
  • Rehabilitation Center of Kladruby

    Kladruby, 257 62

    Mgr. Lukas Chobot, PT, lukas.chobot@rehabilitace.cz

    Mgr. Lukas Chobot, PT

    Not yet recruiting
  • Lázně Bělohrad a.s., Centrum komplexní rehabilitace

    Lázně Bělohrad, 50781

    Kateřina Macháčková, MgR, PhD, katerina.machackova@belohrad.cz

    Kateřina Macháčková, MgR, PhD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Agel Hospital Prostějov, Rehabilitation Centre, Mathonova 1, Clinical Rehabilitation Centre FZV UP, Hněvotínská 3

    Olomouc, 77900

    Petr Konečný, MD, PhD, petr.konecny@upol.cz

    Petr Konečný, MD, PhD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague

    Prague

    Kristýna Hoidekrová, OT, PhD, kristyna.hoidekrova@gmail.com

    Kristýna Hoidekrová, OT, PhD

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Czechia

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Jefferson Moss-Magee Rehabilitation, Department of PMR

    Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, 19027

    Alberto Esquenazi, MD, PhD, alberto.esquenazi@jefferson.edu

    Alexey Nastaskin, OT

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in United States

Russia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Medical Centre for Rehabilitation Treatment "Consilium"

    Moscow, 141052

    Vyacheslav Anatolievich Filimonov, MD, PhD, mcvlconsilium@mail.ru

    Vyacheslav Anatolievich Filimonov, MD, PhD

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Russia

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Centro Lescer, Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy Department

    Madrid, 28050

    Estefania Morcillo de Mercado, OT, emorcillo@lescer.es

    Estefania Morcillo de Mercado, OT

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Spain

Thailand1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Chiang Mai University, Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences

    Chiang Mai, 50200

    Sopida Apichai, OT, PhD, Jananya, sopida.apichai@cmu.ac.th

    Dhippa, OT, PhD

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Robotic Rehabilitation for Neuro Recovery of the Upper Limb in Subacute Stroke Survivors: An International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

This multicenter international randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the effectiveness of the Gloreha Sinfonia® robotic exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation in individuals with subacute post-stroke paresis. The study aims to determine whether robotic-assisted therapy improves voluntary motor control and coordination more effectively than conventional rehabilitation, as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for the upper limb (motor component).

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

Read more
  • Experimental Group (EG): Robotic-assisted upper limb rehabilitation combined with conventional therapy.
  • Control Group (CG): Conventional therapy alone including upper limb rehabilitation.

Clinical assessments will be conducted at baseline (T1), post-treatment (T2), and at a 3-month follow-up (T3) using remotely administered scales.

Secondary objectives include evaluating improvements in muscle strength, range of motion, eye-hand coordination, manual dexterity, and functional independence. The study will also assess prognostic factors influencing response to robotic therapy, patient satisfaction, and potential adverse events.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with hemiparesis impairing upper limb function in 75% of affected patients. This deficit significantly reduces patients' independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and limits social participation. Recovery of upper limb motor function is a primary goal in post-stroke rehabilitation. In recent years, robotic devices for hand rehabilitation have been introduced. The Gloreha Sinfonia® (R-Touch Pro, BTL Robotics) is a robotic exoskeleton that enables repetitive, intensive movements in passive, assisted, and active modes. Despite growing evidence supporting robotics in upper limb rehabilitation, significant gaps remain, including the lack of standardized protocols and the challenge of identifying patient subgroups that would benefit most. This multicenter international RCT aims to address these gaps by evaluating the short- and long-term effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy compared to conventional therapy. The primary objective is to measure the efficacy of robotic rehabilitation using the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (0-66) for the upper limb, a validated scale assessing improvements in strength, active range of motion, eye-hand coordination, and dexterity. This outcome allows for a direct connection between robotic therapy results and motor function, ensuring a precise and replicable evaluation of treatment efficacy relative to conventional therapy. It is hypothesized that robotic treatment with Gloreha Sinfonia R-Touch Pro will significantly improve strength, active range of motion, eye-hand coordination, and manual dexterity, while also promoting autonomy in ADLs and social participation. The study also aims to identify clinical and prognostic factors that influence the response to robotic therapy, assess patient acceptance and satisfaction with the treatment, and monitor for any adverse events. Specifically, secondary objectives of the study are: to assess the impact of robotic treatment on muscle strength, active range of motion, hand-eye coordination, fine motor skills, and dexterity; to examine the effect of treatment on independence in daily living activities and social participation.

Identify clinical characteristics, such as severity of neurological impairment and time from acute event, that best respond to robot-assisted hand therapy; to investigate the influence of treatment initiation timing in relation to the acute event on rehabilitation effectiveness; to assess patient acceptance and satisfaction with the treatment, monitor the occurrence of adverse events, and analyze the effect of treatment on upper limb spasticity. Participants with a stroke diagnosis who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Experimental Group (EG) - robotic treatment for upper limb rehabilitation using the GS robotic device or Control Group (CG) - conventional treatment for upper limb rehabilitation. The study will span 36 months and includes two phases as follows: Phase 1 - Recruitment, baseline evaluations, randomization, rehabilitation intervention, final evaluations, and Phase 2 - Follow-up.

Eligible patients will be randomized into one of two treatment groups (Phase 1): EG or CG. All subjects will be evaluated (Phase 1) with a series of clinical assessments at baseline (T1) and the same assessments will be repeated at the end of the treatment (T2). A 3-month follow-up (Phase 2, T3) will be conducted either through an in-person clinical assessment or a phone interview, based on patient availability, using only remote-administered clinical scales. As for the rehabilitation treatments, the Experimental Group (EG) will receive upper limb rehabilitation assisted by the Gloreha Sinfonia R-Touch Pro device, in addition to conventional therapy, which includes physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) and the Control Group (CG) will undergo the same upper limb rehabilitation with only conventional PT and OT treatments, matching the EG's duration for a total of 90 minutes. Both groups will engage in individualized rehabilitation programs, potentially incorporating additional personalized interventions based on each patient's clinical-neurological profile. Randomization will be conducted in a blind manner by an independent collaborator who is not involved in recruitment, intervention, or data collection. Sequentially numbered, opaque, and randomly ordered envelopes containing group assignments will be opened after the initial evaluation, in the participant's presence. Therapists involved will be informed of each patient's group assignment. All data will be collected in compliance with privacy regulations and anonymized on a dedicated platform called RedCAP (Research Electronic Data Capture) https://redcap.sanraffaele.it/. Each center will have access to its own data, with the ability to independently modify and update it. Data will be recorded through the Clinical Report Form (CRF), ensuring systematic and standardized data collection. Descriptive statistical analysis will be performed to adequately represent the clinical and demographic characteristics of the sample, with data presented as frequency (percentage), mean and standard deviation, and median (5th and 95th percentile) for categorical, continuous, and ordinal variables, respectively. Descriptive statistics will ensure score comparability between groups at baseline; an inferential analysis of variables (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) will be conducted to verify the normality of data distributions. Parametric or non-parametric tests will be applied based on data distribution. The significance level will be set at p<0.05.

In conclusion, the main expected results are: to identify a standardized, reproducible rehabilitation protocol with robotic hand assistance to implement highly customizable rehabilitation protocols; to achieve improved motor recovery in terms of both range of motion and muscle recruitment following upper limb rehabilitation through the Gloreha Sinfonia® (R-Touch Pro) robotic system; to achieve better motor performance following upper limb rehabilitation through the Gloreha Sinfonia® robotic system; to obtain improved eye-hand coordination, manual dexterity, and fine motor skills; to attain greater autonomy in ADL and, consequently, greater participation; to identify any clinical and functional characteristics that impact the rehabilitation outcome with Gloreha Sinfonia R-Touch Pro.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation, Control Group (CG)
Keywords
Stroke, Upper Limb, Hand, Rehabilitation, Robotic- Assisted Therapy, Subacute phase, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Quality of Life
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Robotic Assisted Upper Limb RehabilitationDevice

    Also called Gloreha Simfonia (R-TOUCH), Robotic treatment for upper limb rehabilitation using the Gloreha Sinfonia (R-Touch)

    The EG will follow a mixed rehabilitation approach for the upper limb, combining Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation and conventional physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT) with a total daily duration of 90 minutes. The Robotic Assisted UL Rehabilitation's session will last 30 minutes, with the following procedure provided:

    • First week: alternate between passive mobilization exercises, bilateral mode, and therapist-driven mode.
    • Second week: alternate between therapist-driven mode and active-assisted mobilization.
    • Third week: alternate between active-assisted mobilization and active mobilization.
    • Fourth week: alternate between active-assisted mobilization and active mobilization.
    • Fifth week: exclusively perform active mobilization. However, if this proposed progression does not match the patient's motor capabilities, the therapist will optimize the therapeutic program by selecting personalized exercises, following a progressive difficulty approach.
  • Control Group (CG)Other

    Also called Conventional treatment for upper limb rehabilitation

    The CG will follow a conventional occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) program for upper limb rehabilitation, with a total daily duration of 90 minutes. Upper limb rehabilitation exercises will be performed with a therapist who will tailor the treatment according to the patient's clinical characteristics and needs. Specifically, upper limb treatment will consist of motor exercises (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand) through a mix of individual sessions with both passive and active interventions where possible.

Study groups in NCT06839482
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental Group (EG)ExperimentalParticipants assigned to Experimental Group (EG) will follow 18+/-3sessions (from a minimum of 3 times to a maximum of 5 times/week) of robotic-assisted treatment for upper limb rehabilitation using the Gloreha Sinfonia (R-Touch Pro; BTL Robotics, USA) robotic device in addition to the standard rehabilitation program.
Receives: Device: Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation
Control Group (CG)Active comparatorParticipants assigned to Control Group (CG) will follow 18+/-3 sessions (from a minimum of 3 times to a maximum of 5 times/week) of conventional tratment for upper limb rehabilitation in addition to the standard rehabilitation program.
Receives: Other: Control Group (CG)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugle Meyer Assessment for Upper Limb - Motor Part (score range: 0-66)

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index designed to evaluate motor function, balance, sensation, and joint integrity in individuals with post-stroke hemiplegia. It is widely used in both clinical and research settings to assess disease severity, track motor recovery, and guide treatment planning.

    In this study, the Motor Part of the FMA for the Upper Limb is the primary outcome measure, with scores ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 66. A higher score indicates better motor function on the impaired side.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NHISS)

    The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a systematic, quantitative assessment tool to measure stroke-related neurological deficit. Its score ranges from 0 to 42, where higher scores indicate greater neurological impairment. In clinical practice it can be used to evaluate and document neurological status in acute stroke patients, determine appropriate treatment and assist in standardizing communication between healthcare practitioners. The NIHSS has been shown to be a predictor of both short and long term outcomes of stroke patients.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  2. Pain scale (NRS 0-10) - at passive mobilization

    Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 represents the worst pain intensity the individual has ever experienced.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  3. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is used to assess spasticity. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) has been utilised in the following populations: stroke, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury, paediatric hypertonia and central nervous system lesions. The test is performed by extending the patients limb's first from a position of maximal possible flexion to maximal possible extension (the point at which the first soft resistance is met). Afterwards, the modified Ashworth scale is assessed while moving from extension to flexion. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no increase in muscle tone and 4 represents a limb that is rigid in flexion or extension.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  4. Medical Research Council Scale (MRC)

    The Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength is a commonly used scale for assessing muscle strength from Grade 5 (normal) to Grade 0 (no visible contraction). The Criteria requires that each of the six muscle groups listed in the table are examined bilaterally, each with a score from 0 to 5 according to the scale in the right hand column.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  5. Box and Block test (BBT)

    The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity. It can be used with a wide range of populations, including clients with stroke.The BBT is composed of a wooden box divided in two compartments by a partition and 150 blocks. The BBT administration consists of asking the client to move, one by one, the maximum number of blocks from one compartment of a box to another of equal size, within 60 seconds.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  6. Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is used to measure finger dexterity in patients with various neurological diagnoses. The Nine-Hole Peg Test is administered by asking the client to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and place them into holes on the board as quickly as possible. Participants must then remove the pegs from the holes, one by one, and replace them back into the container.Scores are based on the time taken to complete the activity, recorded in seconds.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  7. Modified Barthel Index (mBI)

    The modified Barthel Index (mBI) is a well-established patient-centered outcome measure commonly administrated in rehabilitation settings to evaluate the functional status of patients at admission and discharge.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  8. ABILHAND questionnaire

    The ABILHAND questionnaire is an interview-based, patient-reported measure assessing perceived difficulty in performing manual activities in daily life. It evaluates the active function of the upper limbs and the ability to perform bimanual tasks, regardless of how they are executed. This assessment represents the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).

    Validated versions are available for chronic stroke, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and hand surgery. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 46, with higher scores indicating better performance. All versions, along with assessment details, downloadable materials, and a link to the Rasch analysis, can be accessed through the official website.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  9. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

    The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates the biopsychosocial aspects of life after stroke. Developed by Duncan et al. at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) in 1999, it was first published as version 2.0. The original 64-item tool was later refined through Rasch analysis to 59 items, resulting in the current version 3.0. The SIS includes multiple domains, each scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function and quality of life. For patients unable to self-report, a proxy version called the Stroke Impact Scale-16 is available.

    Measured: Day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)

  10. Robotic Therapy Acceptance Assessment

    The Robotic Therapy Acceptance Assessment is a questionnaire designed to evaluate patients' perceptions of robotic therapy. It includes items related to various aspects of the experience, namely 'Comfort,' 'Absence of pain,' 'Fatigue,' 'Enjoyment,' 'Advantages,' 'Desire to continue,' and 'Willingness to recommend it to others.' Each item is scored using a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 7, where 0 indicates strong disagreement and 7 represents complete agreement.

    Measured: Day 35 (T2 - After treatment)

  11. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure scale

    The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is an evidence-based outcome measure designed to assess a client's self-perception of performance in daily activities over time. As a semi-structured interview, it facilitates open dialogue between the client and therapist, focusing on issues most relevant to the client.

    The COPM evaluates two domains: Performance and Satisfaction, both scored on a scale from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10. Each domain score represents the mean of 10 items, with each item rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 10. A higher score (10) indicates the best outcome.

    Measured: Day 0 (T1- basline), and day 35 (T2 - After treatment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2025
  2. Study start6 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2026
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
130 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06839482
Sponsor's protocol ID
266/IRE/24
Acronym
GLORIA
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
7 Feb 2025
Last updated
23 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) will be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request, following ethical and regulatory approvals.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation in people with Stroke, run by IRCCS San Raffaele Roma at 21 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 21 sites in Italy, Czechia, United States, Russia, Spain and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sanaz Pournajaf, DPT, PhD (+39 0652252405 ext. 32405, sanaz.pournajfa@sanraffaele.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fugle Meyer Assessment for Upper Limb - Motor Part (score range: 0-66) (time frame: Day 0 (T1- basline), day 35 (T2 - After treatment), and day 125 (T3 - 3 months after treatment Follow-Up)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in