Coronary Artery DiseaseAMPHIPOLISNCT06839755
The Positive Prognostic Value of Stress Echocardiography - AMPHIPOLIS STUDY
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Ischemia, run by Hellenic Society of Cardiology at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with recent stress echocardiography positive for myocardial ischemia. Up to now 25 echocardiography labs form Greece and Cyprus have declared their intention to participate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischemia
- How many people
- 390 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2024to 31 Dec 2027
- How long will I take part?
- 12 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with known or unknown coronary artery disease, regardless of symptoms undergoing stress echocardiography.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with recent stress echocardiography positive for any extent of myocardial ischemia
Who cannot join
- HFrEF requiring viability study.
- Any symptomatic valvular disease causing symptoms.
- Established or suspected cardiomyopathy.
- Concomitant chronic diseases reducing life expectancy (active cancer, severe liver impairment, auto-immune diseases etc).
- Recent acute coronary syndrome the last week.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Ioanna Metaxa contact
Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hellenic Society of Cardiology
Athens, Attica
About this study
Official title: The Prognostic Value of Positive Stress Echocardiography and Its Relationship with Invasive Coronary Angiography: the AMPHIPOLIS Study
This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with recent stress echocardiography positive for myocardial ischemia. Up to now 25 echocardiography labs form Greece and Cyprus have declared their intention to participate. The investigators will enroll 390 patients with a positive stress echo, who will undergo invasive coronary angiogram and then will be followed up for at least 6 months. The objectives are the following:
- To assess the prognostic value of positive stress echo by monitoring for cardiovascular death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during the follow-up.
- To investigate the relationship of stress echo findings with invasive coronary angiography anatomical findings.
- The association of cardiovascular risk profile of participants with stress echo and coronary angiography findings.
Read the detailed description
The stress echo-Amphipolis trial (NCT…) is a prospective, multicenter, self-controlled, open-label trial to evaluate the positive prognostic value of stress echocardiography and its relationship with ICA in patients with established or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The study is organized by the Working Group of Echocardiography (WGE) and it is endorsed by the Hellenic Cardiology Society (HCS), which has undertaken the structure of a common web-based platform to connect all echo labs.
Recruitment: The stress echo-Amphipolis trial will consecutively enroll adults with a positive SE based on echocardiographic findings. Then eligible patients will be asked to participate in the study and all their clinical and demographic parameters will be recorded in a web-based platform. Participants will undergo ICA within 6 weeks, and the results will be added in the platform. It will be conducted at 25 echocardiography labs in Greece and Cyprus. An open invitation has been previously sent to high-volume centers performing annually a significant number of SE (>250) to participate.
Therapy: Decision of therapy, either revascularization or conservative, will be at the discretion of the cardiologist of each patient. Post-SE pharmaceutical therapy will be prescribed in all patients according to current international guidelines.
Follow-up: Then patients will be followed up for at least 12 months to collect structured data regarding MACE: cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), revascularization interventions (re-stenosis or new cases of myocardial ischemia), developing symptoms (angina relapse or new onset). The time interval between SE and MACE will be recorded. Within follow-up period, all patients will be contacted by phone or with on-site visit for at least once. Surveillance data will be retrieved from medical records and patients will be asked for new symptoms onset of symptoms relapse. The total duration of the study is expected to be 2 years.
Committees: Besides this, the study will be monitored by 2 independent scientific groups: 1) The organizing committee (OC) consisting of the members of the core of the WGE, which will be responsible for the conduction of the study, data collection and monitoring/guiding of centers. 2) The Adjudication Committee (AC) which is comprised of cardiologists with high experience in SE coming from Greece and other countries. Moreover, written report and digital images should be available to the AC. This committee will decide in ambiguous cases of clinical endpoints achievement or will provide an expert opinion when there is a mismatch between SE and ICA findings. A 5% of cases will be randomly selected for a blind cross check from the AC.
Primary objectives
It is structured to investigate the following primary objectives:
- The clinical outcomes-related to CAD in the long-term follow-up and their association with true positive and false positive results of SE. Up to now only a few large studies have examined the long-term occurrence of MACE, while two studies examined the prognostic value of false positive results of SE.
- The relationship between functional (SE) and anatomical (ICA) findings and which parameters affect this relationship. Keeping ICA as the gold standard method for diagnosis of significant CAD, we will comparatively evaluated those modalities. A great advantage of the proposed study is to obtain the detailed information regarding medical therapy, type of revascularization and location of target vessel of patients with a positive SE result. Only a few studies have attempted a head-to-head comparison of those two different modalities concluding that SE and ICA are not the appropriate comparators for myocardial ischemia . Presumably, other factors or co-morbidities may considerably influence the functional behavior of stenotic coronary arteries. This has confused to some extent the decision-making work-up of interventional and non-interventional therapy of patients with CAD.
- The long-term prognostic value of impaired CFR in case of either obstructed LAD stenosis or coronary microvascular disease (CMVD).
Secondary objectives
Additionally, the investigators have set some secondary objectives, since the large database will be available for subgroup analysis:
- Investigation of the influence of certain conditions on the prognostic value and the ability of SE to detect significant coronary artery stenosis, like atrial fibrillation, bundle branch block, past revascularization, implanted pacemaker, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, medications during test (β-blockers, nitrates etc).
- The association of related symptoms during test with the echocardiographic and ICA results. The relation of symptoms appearance during test with the diagnosis of CAD is subject of debate.
- The comparative evaluation of SE and FFR findings, when they are available. Due to financial reasons, the FFR measurements will be obtained only when they are available.
- The contributory role of SE to coronary microvascular disease (CMVD) diagnosis. The latter will be based on 4 criteria: a) symptoms of myocardial ischemia, (2) absence of obstructive CAD, (3) objective findings of myocardial ischemia (echocardiography and/or ECG) and (4) indication of impaired CFR.
- Comparative evaluation of DSE and ESE in relation to prognostic value and relationship to ICA.
Study population - selection criteria The target group are adults with recent SE positive for myocardial ischemia regardless of its extent, symptoms during the test or previous history of CAD, who are keen to be followed-up for at least 1 year. Before SE the referral reasons can be suspected myocardial ischemia or screening of asymptomatic individuals with or without history of CAD. Underlying rhythm will not be a selection criterion, which means that in addition to individuals with sinus rhythm, patients presenting during the test atrial arrhythmias (fibrillation or flutter), frequent ventricular or supraventricular extra-systoles, bundle brunch block (BBB), pacing rhythm will be still eligible.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischemia
- Keywords
- stress echocardiography, myocardial ischemia, prognosis, coronary artery disease
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with stress echocardiography positive for ischemia | patients with unknown and known CAD will undergo stress echocardiography for screening or monitoring purposes respectively. Patients with findings indicating myocardial ischemia will be considered eligible |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
cardiovascular death
The number of patients died during follow-up period due to cardiovascular reasons (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke)
Measured: 12 months
Major cardiovascular events
Number of patients presented with any of the following during the follow-up: acute coronary syndromes, new revascularization, angina recurrence or new myocardial ischemia diagnosis, arteries restenosis in interventional coronary angiography
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
anatomical findings in coronary angiography
The number of coronary arteries with at least moderate stenosis (>50%) and the precise degree of anatomical stenosis in each of them according to coronary angiography
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2025
- Study start1 Oct 2024
- Primary completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 390 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 12 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hellenic Society of Cardiology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Cyprus
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nikolaos Kadoglou, Hellenic Society of Cardiology
- Investigators
- Nikolaos Kadoglou, Principal investigator, University of Cyprus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06839755
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20240901
- Acronym
- AMPHIPOLIS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD are not to be shared with other researchers
Publications
Picano E, Pierard L, Peteiro J, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Sade LE, Cortigiani L, Van De Heyning CM, Celutkiene J, Gaibazzi N, Ciampi Q, Senior R, Neskovic AN, Henein M. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes and beyond coronary artery disease: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jan 29;25(2):e65-e90. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead250.
PubMed 37798126Woodward W, Dockerill C, McCourt A, Upton R, O'Driscoll J, Balkhausen K, Chandrasekaran B, Firoozan S, Kardos A, Wong K, Woodward G, Sarwar R, Sabharwal N, Benedetto E, Spagou N, Sharma R, Augustine D, Tsiachristas A, Senior R, Leeson P; EVAREST Investigators; EVAREST Investigators; Boardman H, d'Arcy J, Abraheem A, Banypersad S, Boos C, Bulugahapitiya S, Butts J, Coles D, Easaw J, Hamdan H, Jamil-Copley S, Kanaganayagam G, Mwambingu T, Pantazis A, Papachristidis A, Rajani R, Rasheed MA, Razvi NA, Rekhraj S, Ripley DP, Rose K, Scheuermann-Freestone M, Schofield R, Sultan A. Real-world performance and accuracy of stress echocardiography: the EVAREST observational multi-centre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Apr 18;23(5):689-698. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab092.
PubMed 34148078Kadoglou NPE, Papadopoulos CH, Papadopoulos KG, Karagiannis S, Karabinos I, Loizos S, Theodosis-Georgilas A, Aggeli K, Keramida K, Klettas D, Kounas S, Makavos G, Ninios I, Ntalas I, Ikonomidis I, Sahpekidis V, Stefanidis A, Zaglavara T, Athanasopoulos G, Karatasakis G, Kyrzopoulos S, Kouris N, Patrianakos A, Paraskevaidis I, Rallidis L, Savvatis K, Tsiapras D, Nihoyannopoulos P. Updated knowledge and practical implementations of stress echocardiography in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac diseases: An expert consensus of the Working Group of Echocardiography of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022 Mar-Apr;64:30-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
PubMed 34329766Zhuravleva OA, Ryabova TR, Vrublevsky AV, Svyazova NN, Margolis NY, Boshchenko AA. Stress Echocardiography by the ABCDE Protocol ln the Assessment of Prognosis of Stable Coronary Heart Disease. Kardiologiia. 2024 Apr 30;64(4):22-30. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2024.4.n2572. English, Russian.
PubMed 38742512
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Prognostic Value of Positive Stress Echocardiography and Its Relationship with Invasive Coronary Angiography: the AMPHIPOLIS Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06839755
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMPHIPOLIS / 20240901
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischemia
- Keywords
- stress echocardiography, myocardial ischemia, prognosis, coronary artery disease
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 390 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hellenic Society of CardiologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Cyprus
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with recent stress echocardiography positive for myocardial ischemia. Up to now 25 echocardiography labs form Greece and Cyprus have declared their intention to participate. The investigators will enroll 390 patients with a positive stress echo, who will undergo invasive coronary angiogram and then will be followed up for at least 6 months. The objectives are the following:
- To assess the prognostic value of positive stress echo by monitoring for cardiovascular death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during the follow-up.
- To investigate the relationship of stress echo findings with invasive coronary angiography anatomical findings.
- The association of cardiovascular risk profile of participants with stress echo and coronary angiography findings.
Detailed description
The stress echo-Amphipolis trial (NCT…) is a prospective, multicenter, self-controlled, open-label trial to evaluate the positive prognostic value of stress echocardiography and its relationship with ICA in patients with established or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The study is organized by the Working Group of Echocardiography (WGE) and it is endorsed by the Hellenic Cardiology Society (HCS), which has undertaken the structure of a common web-based platform to connect all echo labs.
Recruitment: The stress echo-Amphipolis trial will consecutively enroll adults with a positive SE based on echocardiographic findings. Then eligible patients will be asked to participate in the study and all their clinical and demographic parameters will be recorded in a web-based platform. Participants will undergo ICA within 6 weeks, and the results will be added in the platform. It will be conducted at 25 echocardiography labs in Greece and Cyprus. An open invitation has been previously sent to high-volume centers performing annually a significant number of SE (>250) to participate.
Therapy: Decision of therapy, either revascularization or conservative, will be at the discretion of the cardiologist of each patient. Post-SE pharmaceutical therapy will be prescribed in all patients according to current international guidelines.
Follow-up: Then patients will be followed up for at least 12 months to collect structured data regarding MACE: cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), revascularization interventions (re-stenosis or new cases of myocardial ischemia), developing symptoms (angina relapse or new onset). The time interval between SE and MACE will be recorded. Within follow-up period, all patients will be contacted by phone or with on-site visit for at least once. Surveillance data will be retrieved from medical records and patients will be asked for new symptoms onset of symptoms relapse. The total duration of the study is expected to be 2 years.
Committees: Besides this, the study will be monitored by 2 independent scientific groups: 1) The organizing committee (OC) consisting of the members of the core of the WGE, which will be responsible for the conduction of the study, data collection and monitoring/guiding of centers. 2) The Adjudication Committee (AC) which is comprised of cardiologists with high experience in SE coming from Greece and other countries. Moreover, written report and digital images should be available to the AC. This committee will decide in ambiguous cases of clinical endpoints achievement or will provide an expert opinion when there is a mismatch between SE and ICA findings. A 5% of cases will be randomly selected for a blind cross check from the AC.
Primary objectives
It is structured to investigate the following primary objectives:
- The clinical outcomes-related to CAD in the long-term follow-up and their association with true positive and false positive results of SE. Up to now only a few large studies have examined the long-term occurrence of MACE, while two studies examined the prognostic value of false positive results of SE.
- The relationship between functional (SE) and anatomical (ICA) findings and which parameters affect this relationship. Keeping ICA as the gold standard method for diagnosis of significant CAD, we will comparatively evaluated those modalities. A great advantage of the proposed study is to obtain the detailed information regarding medical therapy, type of revascularization and location of target vessel of patients with a positive SE result. Only a few studies have attempted a head-to-head comparison of those two different modalities concluding that SE and ICA are not the appropriate comparators for myocardial ischemia . Presumably, other factors or co-morbidities may considerably influence the functional behavior of stenotic coronary arteries. This has confused to some extent the decision-making work-up of interventional and non-interventional therapy of patients with CAD.
- The long-term prognostic value of impaired CFR in case of either obstructed LAD stenosis or coronary microvascular disease (CMVD).
Secondary objectives
Additionally, the investigators have set some secondary objectives, since the large database will be available for subgroup analysis:
- Investigation of the influence of certain conditions on the prognostic value and the ability of SE to detect significant coronary artery stenosis, like atrial fibrillation, bundle branch block, past revascularization, implanted pacemaker, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, medications during test (β-blockers, nitrates etc).
- The association of related symptoms during test with the echocardiographic and ICA results. The relation of symptoms appearance during test with the diagnosis of CAD is subject of debate.
- The comparative evaluation of SE and FFR findings, when they are available. Due to financial reasons, the FFR measurements will be obtained only when they are available.
- The contributory role of SE to coronary microvascular disease (CMVD) diagnosis. The latter will be based on 4 criteria: a) symptoms of myocardial ischemia, (2) absence of obstructive CAD, (3) objective findings of myocardial ischemia (echocardiography and/or ECG) and (4) indication of impaired CFR.
- Comparative evaluation of DSE and ESE in relation to prognostic value and relationship to ICA.
Study population - selection criteria The target group are adults with recent SE positive for myocardial ischemia regardless of its extent, symptoms during the test or previous history of CAD, who are keen to be followed-up for at least 1 year. Before SE the referral reasons can be suspected myocardial ischemia or screening of asymptomatic individuals with or without history of CAD. Underlying rhythm will not be a selection criterion, which means that in addition to individuals with sinus rhythm, patients presenting during the test atrial arrhythmias (fibrillation or flutter), frequent ventricular or supraventricular extra-systoles, bundle brunch block (BBB), pacing rhythm will be still eligible.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 12 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with stress echocardiography positive for ischemia | – | –patients with unknown and known CAD will undergo stress echocardiography for screening or monitoring purposes respectively. Patients with findings indicating myocardial ischemia will be considered eligible |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with known or unknown coronary artery disease, regardless of symptoms undergoing stress echocardiography.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with recent stress echocardiography positive for any extent of myocardial ischemia
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- HFrEF requiring viability study.
- Any symptomatic valvular disease causing symptoms.
- Established or suspected cardiomyopathy.
- Concomitant chronic diseases reducing life expectancy (active cancer, severe liver impairment, auto-immune diseases etc).
- Recent acute coronary syndrome the last week.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
cardiovascular death
Time frame: 12 months
The number of patients died during follow-up period due to cardiovascular reasons (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke)
Major cardiovascular events
Time frame: 12 months
Number of patients presented with any of the following during the follow-up: acute coronary syndromes, new revascularization, angina recurrence or new myocardial ischemia diagnosis, arteries restenosis in interventional coronary angiography
1 secondary outcome
anatomical findings in coronary angiography
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 37798126Picano E, Pierard L, Peteiro J, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Sade LE, Cortigiani L, Van De Heyning CM, Celutkiene J, Gaibazzi N, Ciampi Q, Senior R, Neskovic AN, Henein M. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes and beyond coronary artery disease: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jan 29;25(2):e65-e90. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead250.
- Background: PubMed 34148078Woodward W, Dockerill C, McCourt A, Upton R, O'Driscoll J, Balkhausen K, Chandrasekaran B, Firoozan S, Kardos A, Wong K, Woodward G, Sarwar R, Sabharwal N, Benedetto E, Spagou N, Sharma R, Augustine D, Tsiachristas A, Senior R, Leeson P; EVAREST Investigators; EVAREST Investigators; Boardman H, d'Arcy J, Abraheem A, Banypersad S, Boos C, Bulugahapitiya S, Butts J, Coles D, Easaw J, Hamdan H, Jamil-Copley S, Kanaganayagam G, Mwambingu T, Pantazis A, Papachristidis A, Rajani R, Rasheed MA, Razvi NA, Rekhraj S, Ripley DP, Rose K, Scheuermann-Freestone M, Schofield R, Sultan A. Real-world performance and accuracy of stress echocardiography: the EVAREST observational multi-centre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Apr 18;23(5):689-698. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab092.
- Background: PubMed 34329766Kadoglou NPE, Papadopoulos CH, Papadopoulos KG, Karagiannis S, Karabinos I, Loizos S, Theodosis-Georgilas A, Aggeli K, Keramida K, Klettas D, Kounas S, Makavos G, Ninios I, Ntalas I, Ikonomidis I, Sahpekidis V, Stefanidis A, Zaglavara T, Athanasopoulos G, Karatasakis G, Kyrzopoulos S, Kouris N, Patrianakos A, Paraskevaidis I, Rallidis L, Savvatis K, Tsiapras D, Nihoyannopoulos P. Updated knowledge and practical implementations of stress echocardiography in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac diseases: An expert consensus of the Working Group of Echocardiography of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022 Mar-Apr;64:30-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
- Background: PubMed 38742512Zhuravleva OA, Ryabova TR, Vrublevsky AV, Svyazova NN, Margolis NY, Boshchenko AA. Stress Echocardiography by the ABCDE Protocol ln the Assessment of Prognosis of Stable Coronary Heart Disease. Kardiologiia. 2024 Apr 30;64(4):22-30. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2024.4.n2572. English, Russian.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD are not to be shared with other researchers
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ioanna Metaxa contact
Nikolaos Kadoglou principal investigator
University of Cyprus
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Ischemia, run by Hellenic Society of Cardiology at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nikolaos Kadoglou (+306973275750, nikoskad@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
cardiovascular death (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06839755, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2025.