Childhood CancerKiKli FitNCT06839794
Effect of Cognitively Challenging Physical Activity on Executive Functions in Pediatric Cancer Patients
A study testing Cognitively challenging physical activity for paediatric cancer patients and Physical activity recommendations in people with Childhood Cancer and Cancer-related Problem/Condition, run by University of Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
When it comes to exercise and sport for children and adolescents with cancer, there is often still the opinion that physical activity has a negative effect on the weakened body suffering from cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Childhood Cancer, Cancer-related Problem/Condition, Cognitive Side Effects of Cancer Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Cognitively challenging physical activity for paediatric cancer patients and Physical activity recommendations
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 10 May 2025to 1 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent of parents / legal guardian and participants, where applicable
- Diagnosis of any type of cancer requiring chemo- and/or radiotherapy, or CNS surgery, expected to last a minimum of at least 6 weeks at the time of recruitment
- Age: 6-17.99 years at time of recruitment
Who cannot join
- Cognitive and physical disabilities that prevent participation in the intervention.
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems.
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons.
- Denied written informed consent from participants.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern
Bern, 3010
Eva Brack, PD Dr. Dr., +41 31 66 4 19 43, eva.brack@insel.ch
Valentin Benzing, Dr., +41 316844548, valentin.benzing@unibe.ch
About this study
Official title: An Investigator Initiated, Non-randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Cognitively Challenging Physical Activity on Executive Functions in Paediatric Cancer Patients
When it comes to exercise and sport for children and adolescents with cancer, there is often still the opinion that physical activity has a negative effect on the weakened body suffering from cancer. Many studies show that the opposite is the case: physical activity for children and adolescents with cancer do not jeopardise the success of treatment, but rather promote it. It has been shown that physical activity has a positive effect on motor skills, physical fitness, sleep quality, fatigue symptoms, body image and general quality of life in children and adolescents with cancer.
In addition, physical activity leads to an improved fat-to-muscle ratio, metabolic status, bone strength and reduces cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, various studies show that oncological patients with sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass) and frailty have a poorer response to their cancer therapy. This broad spectrum of effects of physical activity leads to improved and faster rehabilitation, is directly linked to the success of treatment and has led to exercise being an integral part of treatment in many paediatric oncology centres worldwide.
Read more
Furthermore, more exercise that includes playful cognitive tasks is expected to lead to improved attention, memory and academic achievement. Besides, it is important to try to get children to exercise at home outside of the inpatient setting. Hybrid (on-site and digital meetings) programmes also work for children and adolescents. Additionally, the research project offers sports counselling after the end of therapy to reintegrate the patients into everyday sporting life, be it in a club or at school.
The central question of the research project is: Does cognitive challenging physical activity developed for children and adolescents undergoing acute cancer therapy improve cognitive and motor performance compared to a control group receiving standard care?
- Conditions
- Childhood Cancer, Cancer-related Problem/Condition, Cognitive Side Effects of Cancer Therapy, Physical Activity
- Being tested
- Cognitively challenging physical activity for paediatric cancer patients, Physical activity recommendations
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitively challenging physical activity for paediatric cancer patientsBehavioural
Also called KiKli Fit Study
The intervention is a structured cognitively challenging physical activity (PA) program specifically designed for pediatric cancer patients undergoing acute therapy. It stands out from other interventions by combining motor and cognitive tasks simultaneously. Therefore, the target executive functions are inhibition, shifting, and updating. Additionally, the whole body is addressed by enhancing PA.
The PA program spans 12 weeks, with each participant engaging in guided, supervised 45-minute sessions three times weekly. Each session includes a warm-up, the cognitive challenging PA task and a subsequent multimodal sports programme with a cool-down. Exercises are adaptive and tailored to each participant's physical and health condition by offering three levels of intensity in both cognitive and physical difficulty. In addition, exercise counselling in maintenance therapy or aftercare supports young patients to reintegrate into the life after the disease.
Physical activity recommendationsOther
The children and adolescents receive general physical activity recommendations at the baseline measurement (t0). At the end of the intervention (after 12 weeks), i.e. after the final measurement (t3), they receive individualised and tailored exercise recommendations based on the test results from t0-t3.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Intervention | Other | Participants have access to standard care as usual and receive physical activity recommendations. Receives: Other: Physical activity recommendations |
| Intervention | Experimental | The intervention is a cognitively challenging physical activity (PA) intervention for children and adolescents with cancer undergoing acute therapy. The intervention is based on the "S2k Guideline: Promotion of Exercise and Exercise Therapy in Paediatric Oncology" and the international Paediatric Oncology Exercise Guidelines. And on study results and experience from previous cognitive challenging PA intervention studies. Receives: Behavioral: Cognitively challenging physical activity for paediatric cancer patients |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task
The Hearts and Flowers Task is a cognitive test designed to measure executive functions, particularly inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. The test consists of two types of conditions: In the simple condition (hearts), participants are instructed to respond on the same side as the heart appears. In the complex condition (flowers), they are instructed to respond on the opposite side of the flower's appearance. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task
The Hearts and Flowers Task is a cognitive test designed to measure executive functions, particularly inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. The test consists of two types of conditions: In the simple condition (hearts), participants are instructed to respond on the same side as the heart appears. In the complex condition (flowers), they are instructed to respond on the opposite side of the flower's appearance. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Measured: Interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task
The Hearts and Flowers Task is a cognitive test designed to measure executive functions, particularly inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. The test consists of two types of conditions: In the simple condition (hearts), participants are instructed to respond on the same side as the heart appears. In the complex condition (flowers), they are instructed to respond on the opposite side of the flower's appearance. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Measured: Post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task
The Hearts and Flowers Task is a cognitive test designed to measure executive functions, particularly inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. The test consists of two types of conditions: In the simple condition (hearts), participants are instructed to respond on the same side as the heart appears. In the complex condition (flowers), they are instructed to respond on the opposite side of the flower's appearance. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Measured: Follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Executive function, assessed via Fish-Flanker Task
The Fish-Flanker Task is a cognitive test used to measure inhibitory control. Participants are shown a row of five fish and must respond to the direction of the central target fish while ignoring the surrounding flanker fish. In congruent trials, the flankers face the same direction as the target fish, while in incongruent trials, they face the opposite direction. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis
Executive function, assessed via Fish-Flanker Task
The Fish-Flanker Task is a cognitive test used to measure inhibitory control. Participants are shown a row of five fish and must respond to the direction of the central target fish while ignoring the surrounding flanker fish. In congruent trials, the flankers face the same direction as the target fish, while in incongruent trials, they face the opposite direction. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Measured: Interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline
Executive function, assessed via Fish-Flanker Task
The Fish-Flanker Task is a cognitive test used to measure inhibitory control. Participants are shown a row of five fish and must respond to the direction of the central target fish while ignoring the surrounding flanker fish. In congruent trials, the flankers face the same direction as the target fish, while in incongruent trials, they face the opposite direction. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Measured: Post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline
Executive function, assessed via Fish-Flanker Task
The Fish-Flanker Task is a cognitive test used to measure inhibitory control. Participants are shown a row of five fish and must respond to the direction of the central target fish while ignoring the surrounding flanker fish. In congruent trials, the flankers face the same direction as the target fish, while in incongruent trials, they face the opposite direction. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Measured: Follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Executive function, assessed via Corsi Block Task
The Corsi Block Task is a cognitive test used to measure visuospatial working memory. Participants are shown a series of blocks on a screen, which light up in a specific sequence. The task requires replicating the sequence by tapping the blocks in the same order (forward condition) or in reverse order (backward condition). The length of the sequence increases after each correct attempt. The score is the longest correctly repeated sequence, ranging from 0 (no correct sequences) to 10 or more (longer sequences).
The outcome measures include the total number of correctly recalled sequences, the achieved Block Span, the z-score of the Block Span and the percentile of the Block Span. Additionally, they include a summary score calculated as the product of the Block Span and the total number of correct sequences, the z-score of this total score and the percentile of the total score.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis
Executive function, assessed via Corsi Block Task
The Corsi Block Task is a cognitive test used to measure visuospatial working memory. Participants are shown a series of blocks on a screen, which light up in a specific sequence. The task requires replicating the sequence by tapping the blocks in the same order (forward condition) or in reverse order (backward condition). The length of the sequence increases after each correct attempt. The score is the longest correctly repeated sequence, ranging from 0 (no correct sequences) to 10 or more (longer sequences).
The outcome measures include the total number of correctly recalled sequences, the achieved Block Span, the z-score of the Block Span and the percentile of the Block Span. Additionally, they include a summary score calculated as the product of the Block Span and the total number of correct sequences, the z-score of this total score and the percentile of the total score.
Measured: Interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline
Executive function, assessed via Corsi Block Task
The Corsi Block Task is a cognitive test used to measure visuospatial working memory. Participants are shown a series of blocks on a screen, which light up in a specific sequence. The task requires replicating the sequence by tapping the blocks in the same order (forward condition) or in reverse order (backward condition). The length of the sequence increases after each correct attempt. The score is the longest correctly repeated sequence, ranging from 0 (no correct sequences) to 10 or more (longer sequences).
The outcome measures include the total number of correctly recalled sequences, the achieved Block Span, the z-score of the Block Span and the percentile of the Block Span. Additionally, they include a summary score calculated as the product of the Block Span and the total number of correct sequences, the z-score of this total score and the percentile of the total score.
Measured: Post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline
Executive function, assessed via Corsi Block Task
The Corsi Block Task is a cognitive test used to measure visuospatial working memory. Participants are shown a series of blocks on a screen, which light up in a specific sequence. The task requires replicating the sequence by tapping the blocks in the same order (forward condition) or in reverse order (backward condition). The length of the sequence increases after each correct attempt. The score is the longest correctly repeated sequence, ranging from 0 (no correct sequences) to 10 or more (longer sequences).
The outcome measures include the total number of correctly recalled sequences, the achieved Block Span, the z-score of the Block Span and the percentile of the Block Span. Additionally, they include a summary score calculated as the product of the Block Span and the total number of correct sequences, the z-score of this total score and the percentile of the total score.
Measured: Follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Secondary outcomes (25)
Self-regulation, assessed via Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders-task
Self-regulation will be assessed using the Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders task (HTKS). This task measures self-regulation by requiring participants to follow specific instructions that conflict with automatic responses.
The task involves a series of instructions where participants are asked to perform actions that oppose their natural impulses. For example, they may be asked to touch their head when instructed to touch their toes or to touch their knees when told to touch their shoulders.
For a wrong movement the participant gets 0, for a corrected movement 1 and for a correct movement 2 points.
The score ranges from 0-60.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Frailty, assessed via Frailty Score
The frailty score is calculated to assess an individual's vulnerability and considering 5 different aspects.
Weakness, slowness, shrinkage, exhaustion and diminished physical activity. These are defined by the following corresponding parameters, the hand strength measurement from the Moon Test, the 6 MWT, the triceps skinfold thickness, the PedsQL fatigue scale, as well as the PedsQL core and the BSA as well as the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (GSLTPAQ). All tests are already listed and described in the outcomes.
The frailty score is the composite endpoint of the named tests. The score ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher value indicating greater frailty (meaning higher Frailty worse clinical outcome).
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Cardiovascular Health, assessed via Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Heart rate variability (HRV) will be assessed using an ECG 4 activity sensor. HRV provides insights into how the heart responds to stress and relaxation. A high HRV is typically associated with better cardiovascular fitness, a more adaptable autonomic nervous system, and greater resilience to stress. Conversely, low HRV is often linked to poor health outcomes, such as higher stress levels, cardiovascular issues, and an increased risk of chronic diseases. Monitoring HRV can help assess an individual's overall well-being and autonomic nervous system functioning, as well as their response to various stressors.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Cardiovascular Health, assessed via Aortic Stiffness
Aortic Stiffness will be measured with the Mobil-O-Graph. This test helps to understand how flexible or stiff the aorta is, which is important for blood flow and blood pressure. Aortic stiffness is a key indicator of cardiovascular health, as it reflects the ability of the aorta to expand and contract with each heartbeat. Increased stiffness of the aorta can lead to higher systolic blood pressure and can be a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Cardiovascular Health, assessed via 6-Minute Walk Test
The cardiopulmonary function will be evaluated with the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). This test measures overall endurance and heart-lung efficiency by walking as fast as possible for 6 minutes. A longer distance walked in 6 minutes generally indicates better cardiovascular and pulmonary health, while shorter distances may signal reduced endurance or impaired heart-lung function. The test is particularly useful for evaluating patients with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions, as it provides an objective measure of physical capability and helps track changes in health status over time.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Body composition, assessed via Triceps Skin-Fold Thickness
Triceps skin-fold thickness will be measured with calipers to estimate body fat percentage based on the thickness of the skinfold at the triceps. This will be needed to calculate the frailty score.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life, assessed via PedsQL
Health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL) will be assessed with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales), which measures overall well-being and quality of life.
The score ranges from 0-100. Higher scores signifying better HrQoL.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Cancer related fatigue, assessed via PedsQL Fatigue Module
Cancer-related fatigue will be assessed with the PedsQL Fatigue Module. This questionnaire is designed to evaluate fatigue in pediatric populations, including its impact on physical, emotional, and cognitive functioning. Scores are reversed and linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate less fatigue and better functioning. Subscale scores and a total fatigue score can be calculated by averaging the item responses, providing a comprehensive assessment of fatigue levels.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical Self-Concept, assessed via PSDQ-S
Physical Self-Concept will be measured with the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire - short version (PSDQ-S), focusing on how participants view their physical abilities.
The questionnaire contains 22 questions. The score reaches from 22-132. The higher the score the greater the clinical outcome and physical self-concept.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical Activity Enjoyment, assessed via PACES-S
Physical activity enjoyment will be assessed with Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale - short version (PACES-S) to examine enjoyment levels related to physical activity.
The questionnaire contains 4 questions. The score reaches from 0-16. The higher the score the greater the physical activity enjoyment.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Functional Appreciation, assessed via FAS
Functional Appreciation will be evaluated through the Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS), which measures appreciation for the body's functional abilities.
The score reaches from 7-35. The higher the score the greater the functional appreciation.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Motor abilities, assessed via Moon Test
Motor abilities will be assessed with the Moon Test, which measures across several key areas:
Strength, speed, coordination, and flexibility will be evaluated with the Moon Test, which provides a comprehensive assessment of various motor skills in paediatric cancer patients. The Moon Test includes the following items: inserting pins, static stand, reaction test, stand and reach, medicine ball shot, sit to stand and hand grip strength.
There is no overall score provided for the Moon Test.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Postural Balance, assessed via Force Plate
As a part of the motor abilities the postural balance will be assessed using a force plate to analyse body stability and balance control in bipedal, tandem, monopedal and a semi-tandem stand.
The measurement variables are path length (cm) and the ellipse area (cm2). The higher the values the worse is the postural balance.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical Activity, assessed via BSA
Physical activity will be evaluated through the BSA (Measurement of physical and sports activity) to understand participants' activity levels. The BSA is a self-report questionnaire that assesses the frequency, intensity, and duration of physical and sports activities over a period of one month. Participants are asked to report their engagement in various activities, focused on structured sports, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of their activity profile.
The score ranges from 0 to 15 hours per week, with higher values indicating greater levels of physical activity. This measure captures both the intensity and time commitment to physical activities, providing insights into the participants' physical activity patterns.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical Activity, assessed via GSLTPAQ
Physical activity will be evaluated using the GSLTPAQ (Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire) to assess participants' typical activity levels during their leisure time. This questionnaire asks participants to report the frequency of mild, moderate, and vigorous physical activities they engage in over a typical week. Each category is weighted by its intensity to calculate a total Leisure Score Index (LSI), which provides an overall measure of physical activity.
The theoretical score range for the Leisure Score Index (LSI) in the GSLTPAQ starts at 0 and typically extends up to 100, as most participants report values within this range. However, the scale is open-ended, allowing for higher scores depending on the frequency and intensity of reported physical activities. Higher scores indicate greater physical activity in leisure time.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical activity assessed via movement accelerometers
At T1(6 Weeks after baseline measurement) accelerometers and e-diaries will be used to quantify physical activity (PA) levels objectively (over a period of seven days) and to investigate children's affective experiences after sedentary behaviour and PA with a Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).
Therefore, the Movisens Move4 accelerometers and study smartphones will be used.
The Move 4 accelerometer, is a small three-axis sensor (movisens GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany), which will be attached to the right hip, that captures body position and movement acceleration intensity.
Measured: Only at interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline measurement for 7 consecutive days
Affective experiences, assessed via the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM)
At T1(6 Weeks after baseline measurement) accelerometers and e-diaries will be used to quantify physical activity (PA) levels objectively (over a period of seven days) and to investigate children's affective experiences after sedentary behaviour and PA with a Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). Therefore, the Movisens Move4 accelerometers and study smartphones will be used.
For the e-diaries the investigators will hand out smartphones and instruct the children to take them with them throughout seven days. Participants will be prompted to fill in the e-diary between 8am and 8pm, using a mixed sampling strategy.
The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) will be used to measure the affective experience over the 7 days throughout the day on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Measured: Only at interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline measurement for 7 consecutive days
Affective experiences and cancer related side effects, assessed via Present Functioning Visual Analogue Scales (PEDSQL VAS)
At T1(6 Weeks after baseline measurement) accelerometers and e-diaries will be used to quantify physical activity (PA) levels objectively (over a period of seven days) and to investigate children's affective experiences after sedentary behaviour and PA with a Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).
Therefore, the Movisens Move4 accelerometers and study smartphones will be used.
For the e-diaries the investigators will hand out smartphones and instruct the children to take them with them throughout seven days. Participants will be prompted to fill in the e-diary between 8am and 8pm, using a mixed sampling strategy.
The Present Functioning Visual Analogue Scales (PEDSQL VAS) will be used to measure the affective experience and cancer related side effects over the 7 days throughout the day.
Measured: Only at interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline measurement for 7 consecutive days
Current activity, assessed via e-diaries
At T1(6 Weeks after baseline measurement) accelerometers and e-diaries will be used to quantify physical activity (PA) levels objectively (over a period of seven days) and to investigate children's affective experiences after sedentary behaviour and PA with a Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).
Therefore, the Movisens Move4 accelerometers and study smartphones will be used.
For the e-diaries the investigators will hand out smartphones and instruct the children to take them with them throughout seven days. Participants will be prompted to fill in the e-diary between 8am and 8pm, using a mixed sampling strategy to get information about the current activity.
Measured: Only at interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline measurement for 7 consecutive days
Muscle Mass (Body composition), assessed via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Body composition will be assessed to understand the physical changes of the body. This includes the muscle mass measured by using a Bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Fat-Free Mass (Body composition), assessed via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Body composition will be assessed to understand the physical changes of the body. This includes the fat-free mass measured by using a Bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Fat Mass (Body composition), assessed via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Body composition will be assessed to understand the physical changes of the body. This includes the fat mass measured by using a Bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Feasibility of intervention, assessed via a self-developed questionnaire and semi-structured interviews
Feasibility of the intervention will be assessed to ensure it is practical, safe, and well-received by participants. This includes:
A self-developed questionnaire and semi-structured interviews to evaluate whether the cognitively challenging physical activity intervention is feasible and motivating for the target group. The aim is to understand how manageable and engaging participants find the program.
Measured: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Exercise adherence, assessed via exercise diary
Feasibility of the intervention will be assessed to ensure it is practical, safe, and well-received by participants. This includes exercise adherence. Exercise adherence will be tracked through an exercise diary to monitor participants' commitment to the program.
Measured: During the intervention, expected to be on average 5 minutes
Feasibility of intervention
Feasibility of the intervention will be assessed to ensure it is practical, safe, and well-received by participants. This includes adverse events. Adverse events will be tracked within the exercise diary to monitor any physical or medical problems during intervention program.
Measured: During the intervention, up to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2025
- Study start10 May 2025
- Primary completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Childhood CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- During the first phase, the intervention will commence at the Inselspital Bern, and the University Children's Hospital Basel and Aarau will serve as the control. In the second phase, after 1.5 years, a crossover will take place, and Bern will serve as the control, while the intervention takes place in Basel and Aarau.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Valentin Benzing, Dr., Study chair, University BernEva Brack, Principal investigator, University Children's Hospital Bern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06839794
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-00923
- Acronym
- KiKli Fit
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the published scientific articles will be made openly accessible on (BORIS, osf.io or Zenodo) after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
Publications
Schneider AC, Hillebrecht L, Rehbein L, Schmid J, Pallivathukal S, von der Weid N, Furtwangler R, Brekenfeld RE, Greiner J, Schindera C, Brack EK, Benzing V. Smart exercise in pediatric oncology: enhancing executive functions through cognitively challenging physical activity- a non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2025 Dec 5;26(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-15303-5.
PubMed 41351152
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Investigator Initiated, Non-randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Cognitively Challenging Physical Activity on Executive Functions in Paediatric Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06839794
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KiKli Fit / 2024-00923
- Conditions
- Childhood Cancer, Cancer-related Problem/Condition, Cognitive Side Effects of Cancer Therapy, Physical Activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Study start
- 10 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
When it comes to exercise and sport for children and adolescents with cancer, there is often still the opinion that physical activity has a negative effect on the weakened body suffering from cancer. Many studies show that the opposite is the case: physical activity for children and adolescents with cancer do not jeopardise the success of treatment, but rather promote it. It has been shown that physical activity has a positive effect on motor skills, physical fitness, sleep quality, fatigue symptoms, body image and general quality of life in children and adolescents with cancer.
In addition, physical activity leads to an improved fat-to-muscle ratio, metabolic status, bone strength and reduces cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, various studies show that oncological patients with sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass) and frailty have a poorer response to their cancer therapy. This broad spectrum of effects of physical activity leads to improved and faster rehabilitation, is directly linked to the success of treatment and has led to exercise being an integral part of treatment in many paediatric oncology centres worldwide.
Furthermore, more exercise that includes playful cognitive tasks is expected to lead to improved attention, memory and academic achievement. Besides, it is important to try to get children to exercise at home outside of the inpatient setting. Hybrid (on-site and digital meetings) programmes also work for children and adolescents. Additionally, the research project offers sports counselling after the end of therapy to reintegrate the patients into everyday sporting life, be it in a club or at school.
The central question of the research project is: Does cognitive challenging physical activity developed for children and adolescents undergoing acute cancer therapy improve cognitive and motor performance compared to a control group receiving standard care?
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- During the first phase, the intervention will commence at the Inselspital Bern, and the University Children's Hospital Basel and Aarau will serve as the control. In the second phase, after 1.5 years, a crossover will take place, and Bern will serve as the control, while the intervention takes place in Basel and Aarau.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Intervention | Other | Other: Physical activity recommendationsParticipants have access to standard care as usual and receive physical activity recommendations. |
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Cognitively challenging physical activity for paediatric cancer patientsThe intervention is a cognitively challenging physical activity (PA) intervention for children and adolescents with cancer undergoing acute therapy. The intervention is based on the "S2k Guideline: Promotion of Exercise and Exercise Therapy in Paediatric Oncology" and the international Paediatric Oncology Exercise Guidelines. And on study results and experience from previous cognitive challenging PA intervention studies. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Written informed consent of parents / legal guardian and participants, where applicable
- Diagnosis of any type of cancer requiring chemo- and/or radiotherapy, or CNS surgery, expected to last a minimum of at least 6 weeks at the time of recruitment
- Age: 6-17.99 years at time of recruitment
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Cognitive and physical disabilities that prevent participation in the intervention.
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems.
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons.
- Denied written informed consent from participants.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitively challenging physical activity for paediatric cancer patientsAlso: KiKli Fit StudyThe intervention is a structured cognitively challenging physical activity (PA) program specifically designed for pediatric cancer patients undergoing acute therapy. It stands out from other interventions by combining motor and cognitive tasks simultaneously. Therefore, the target executive functions are inhibition, shifting, and updating. Additionally, the whole body is addressed by enhancing PA. The PA program spans 12 weeks, with each participant engaging in guided, supervised 45-minute sessions three times weekly. Each session includes a warm-up, the cognitive challenging PA task and a subsequent multimodal sports programme with a cool-down. Exercises are adaptive and tailored to each participant's physical and health condition by offering three levels of intensity in both cognitive and physical difficulty. In addition, exercise counselling in maintenance therapy or aftercare supports young patients to reintegrate into the life after the disease. | Behavioural | Intervention |
| Physical activity recommendationsThe children and adolescents receive general physical activity recommendations at the baseline measurement (t0). At the end of the intervention (after 12 weeks), i.e. after the final measurement (t3), they receive individualised and tailored exercise recommendations based on the test results from t0-t3. | Other | Control Intervention |
Primary outcome
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis
The Hearts and Flowers Task is a cognitive test designed to measure executive functions, particularly inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. The test consists of two types of conditions: In the simple condition (hearts), participants are instructed to respond on the same side as the heart appears. In the complex condition (flowers), they are instructed to respond on the opposite side of the flower's appearance. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task
Time frame: Interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline
The Hearts and Flowers Task is a cognitive test designed to measure executive functions, particularly inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. The test consists of two types of conditions: In the simple condition (hearts), participants are instructed to respond on the same side as the heart appears. In the complex condition (flowers), they are instructed to respond on the opposite side of the flower's appearance. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task
Time frame: Post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline
The Hearts and Flowers Task is a cognitive test designed to measure executive functions, particularly inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. The test consists of two types of conditions: In the simple condition (hearts), participants are instructed to respond on the same side as the heart appears. In the complex condition (flowers), they are instructed to respond on the opposite side of the flower's appearance. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task
Time frame: Follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
The Hearts and Flowers Task is a cognitive test designed to measure executive functions, particularly inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. The test consists of two types of conditions: In the simple condition (hearts), participants are instructed to respond on the same side as the heart appears. In the complex condition (flowers), they are instructed to respond on the opposite side of the flower's appearance. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Executive function, assessed via Fish-Flanker Task
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis
The Fish-Flanker Task is a cognitive test used to measure inhibitory control. Participants are shown a row of five fish and must respond to the direction of the central target fish while ignoring the surrounding flanker fish. In congruent trials, the flankers face the same direction as the target fish, while in incongruent trials, they face the opposite direction. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Executive function, assessed via Fish-Flanker Task
Time frame: Interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline
The Fish-Flanker Task is a cognitive test used to measure inhibitory control. Participants are shown a row of five fish and must respond to the direction of the central target fish while ignoring the surrounding flanker fish. In congruent trials, the flankers face the same direction as the target fish, while in incongruent trials, they face the opposite direction. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Executive function, assessed via Fish-Flanker Task
Time frame: Post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline
The Fish-Flanker Task is a cognitive test used to measure inhibitory control. Participants are shown a row of five fish and must respond to the direction of the central target fish while ignoring the surrounding flanker fish. In congruent trials, the flankers face the same direction as the target fish, while in incongruent trials, they face the opposite direction. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Executive function, assessed via Fish-Flanker Task
Time frame: Follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
The Fish-Flanker Task is a cognitive test used to measure inhibitory control. Participants are shown a row of five fish and must respond to the direction of the central target fish while ignoring the surrounding flanker fish. In congruent trials, the flankers face the same direction as the target fish, while in incongruent trials, they face the opposite direction. Reaction time and accuracy are recorded.
Executive function, assessed via Corsi Block Task
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis
The Corsi Block Task is a cognitive test used to measure visuospatial working memory. Participants are shown a series of blocks on a screen, which light up in a specific sequence. The task requires replicating the sequence by tapping the blocks in the same order (forward condition) or in reverse order (backward condition). The length of the sequence increases after each correct attempt. The score is the longest correctly repeated sequence, ranging from 0 (no correct sequences) to 10 or more (longer sequences). The outcome measures include the total number of correctly recalled sequences, the achieved Block Span, the z-score of the Block Span and the percentile of the Block Span. Additionally, they include a summary score calculated as the product of the Block Span and the total number of correct sequences, the z-score of this total score and the percentile of the total score.
Executive function, assessed via Corsi Block Task
Time frame: Interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline
The Corsi Block Task is a cognitive test used to measure visuospatial working memory. Participants are shown a series of blocks on a screen, which light up in a specific sequence. The task requires replicating the sequence by tapping the blocks in the same order (forward condition) or in reverse order (backward condition). The length of the sequence increases after each correct attempt. The score is the longest correctly repeated sequence, ranging from 0 (no correct sequences) to 10 or more (longer sequences). The outcome measures include the total number of correctly recalled sequences, the achieved Block Span, the z-score of the Block Span and the percentile of the Block Span. Additionally, they include a summary score calculated as the product of the Block Span and the total number of correct sequences, the z-score of this total score and the percentile of the total score.
Executive function, assessed via Corsi Block Task
Time frame: Post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline
The Corsi Block Task is a cognitive test used to measure visuospatial working memory. Participants are shown a series of blocks on a screen, which light up in a specific sequence. The task requires replicating the sequence by tapping the blocks in the same order (forward condition) or in reverse order (backward condition). The length of the sequence increases after each correct attempt. The score is the longest correctly repeated sequence, ranging from 0 (no correct sequences) to 10 or more (longer sequences). The outcome measures include the total number of correctly recalled sequences, the achieved Block Span, the z-score of the Block Span and the percentile of the Block Span. Additionally, they include a summary score calculated as the product of the Block Span and the total number of correct sequences, the z-score of this total score and the percentile of the total score.
Executive function, assessed via Corsi Block Task
Time frame: Follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
The Corsi Block Task is a cognitive test used to measure visuospatial working memory. Participants are shown a series of blocks on a screen, which light up in a specific sequence. The task requires replicating the sequence by tapping the blocks in the same order (forward condition) or in reverse order (backward condition). The length of the sequence increases after each correct attempt. The score is the longest correctly repeated sequence, ranging from 0 (no correct sequences) to 10 or more (longer sequences). The outcome measures include the total number of correctly recalled sequences, the achieved Block Span, the z-score of the Block Span and the percentile of the Block Span. Additionally, they include a summary score calculated as the product of the Block Span and the total number of correct sequences, the z-score of this total score and the percentile of the total score.
25 secondary outcomes
Self-regulation, assessed via Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders-task
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Frailty, assessed via Frailty Score
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Cardiovascular Health, assessed via Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Cardiovascular Health, assessed via Aortic Stiffness
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Cardiovascular Health, assessed via 6-Minute Walk Test
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Body composition, assessed via Triceps Skin-Fold Thickness
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Health-Related Quality of Life, assessed via PedsQL
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Cancer related fatigue, assessed via PedsQL Fatigue Module
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical Self-Concept, assessed via PSDQ-S
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical Activity Enjoyment, assessed via PACES-S
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Functional Appreciation, assessed via FAS
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Motor abilities, assessed via Moon Test
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Postural Balance, assessed via Force Plate
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical Activity, assessed via BSA
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical Activity, assessed via GSLTPAQ
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Physical activity assessed via movement accelerometers
Time frame: Only at interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline measurement for 7 consecutive days
Affective experiences, assessed via the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM)
Time frame: Only at interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline measurement for 7 consecutive days
Affective experiences and cancer related side effects, assessed via Present Functioning Visual Analogue Scales (PEDSQL VAS)
Time frame: Only at interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline measurement for 7 consecutive days
Current activity, assessed via e-diaries
Time frame: Only at interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline measurement for 7 consecutive days
Muscle Mass (Body composition), assessed via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Fat-Free Mass (Body composition), assessed via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Fat Mass (Body composition), assessed via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Feasibility of intervention, assessed via a self-developed questionnaire and semi-structured interviews
Time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis; interim measurement (T1) 6 weeks after baseline; post assessment measurement (T2) 12 weeks after baseline; follow-up measurement (T3) 6 month after baseline
Exercise adherence, assessed via exercise diary
Time frame: During the intervention, expected to be on average 5 minutes
Feasibility of intervention
Time frame: During the intervention, up to 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41351152Schneider AC, Hillebrecht L, Rehbein L, Schmid J, Pallivathukal S, von der Weid N, Furtwangler R, Brekenfeld RE, Greiner J, Schindera C, Brack EK, Benzing V. Smart exercise in pediatric oncology: enhancing executive functions through cognitively challenging physical activity- a non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2025 Dec 5;26(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-15303-5.
- Exercise Recommendations for pediatric cancer patientsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the published scientific articles will be made openly accessible on (BORIS, osf.io or Zenodo) after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
Related trials for Childhood Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
RecruitingObservational study
Psychological Benefits of a Normalized Camping Experience for Children With Cancer
Pediatric Cancer
Recruiting
An Exploratory Study to Evaluate Immune Determinants of the Response to Adoptive Cell Therapy (ACT) in Solid and Hematologic Tumors
Solid Tumor, Adult, Solid Tumor, Childhood
RecruitingObservational study
The Decision To Enroll In Therapeutic Clinical Trials In A Pediatric Cancer Clinical Network
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Recruiting
Facial Expression Awareness Training to Understand and Recognize Emotions
Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumors, Pediatric Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Valentin Benzing, Dr. study chair
University Bern
Eva Brack principal investigator
University Children's Hospital Bern
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitively challenging physical activity for paediatric cancer patients and Physical activity recommendations in people with Childhood Cancer and Cancer-related Problem/Condition, run by University of Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Valentin Benzing, Dr. (+ 41316844548, valentin.benzing@unibe.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Executive function, assessed via Hearts and Flowers Task (time frame: Baseline measurement around the first 3 weeks after diagnosis). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06839794, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2025.