Sacral Erector Block Versus Pericapsular Block Versus Lumber Plexus BlockNCT06842342
The Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-guided Sacral Erector Spinae, Pericapsular Nerve Block and Lumber Plexus Block for Pain Relief for Hip Surgery: Randomized Controlled Study
A study testing Lumber plexus block, Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®) and PENG Block in people with Sacral Erector Block Versus Pericapsular Block Versus Lumber Plexus Block, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of this study to evaluate the effect of The analgesic effect of Ultrasound-guided Sacral erector spinae, Pericapsular nerve block and Lumber Plexus block for pain relief after hip surgery. The primary outcome will be the collective morphine consumption on the 1st day post-operatively. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sacral Erector Block Versus Pericapsular Block Versus Lumber Plexus Block
- What is being tested?
- Lumber plexus block, Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®) and PENG Block
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2025to 10 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged between 18 and 75 years old without cognitive dysfunction
- Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 30 kg/m 2 and the weight ≥ 50 kg
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
Who cannot join
- Refuse to general anesthesia (GA) with tracheal intubation
- Nerve block is contraindicated due to various reasons, such as open trauma, hematoma or skin infection at the blocking area, lower limb neuro-muscular disorders
- Coagulation dysfunction or anticoagulation therapy
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to local anesthetics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this study to evaluate the effect of The analgesic effect of Ultrasound-guided Sacral erector spinae, Pericapsular nerve block and Lumber Plexus block for pain relief after hip surgery.
The primary outcome will be the collective morphine consumption on the 1st day post-operatively.
Secondary end points Early postoperative pain scores including static pain and passive movement pain (at PACU, at 6 ,12,18 and 24 h after surgery) will be evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain Intraoperative consumption of fentanyl Intraoperative adverse reactions (hypotension, bradycardia, etc.) Complications related with anesthesia (local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax, hematoma, etc.) Performance time of block (defined as the time from ultrasound scanning to the end of injection)
Read the detailed description
The hip joint connects the femur and pelvis and is responsible for multidimensional motion and mechanical stability [ 1 ]. Most hip pain is caused by the joint capsule [ 2 ]. Furthermore, the joint is largely controlled by the femoral, sciatic, and obturator nerves [ 3 ]. Patients may experience incomplete analgesia with techniques such as femoral nerve (FN) block alone due to the proximal locations of these nerves. Blocking the proximal innervation of all terminal branches innervating the hip joint (femoral, sciatic, obturator, etc.) causes significant weakness in the leg [ 1 ]. With the growth of the elderly population, more patients are undergoing hip surgeries. However, although methods are improving, no gold standard has been established for anesthesia or, more specifically, for analgesia in operations with high morbidity and high mortality [4]. Hip surgeries include hip arthroplasty (HA) (partial hip replacement, total hip replacement) and proximal femur operations (proximal femoral nailing) [5]. In fact, HA is one of the most successful orthopedic procedures in terms of improving patients' functional status and quality of life [ 6 ]. Appropriate pain management for surgical patients contributes to early mobilization, shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and increased patient satisfaction.
Therefore, minimizing postoperative pain has become increasingly important for healthcare providers in recent years [ 7 ]. For this purpose, various analgesia techniques have been used. Although opioids typically provide effective pain relief, their use is limited due to serious side effects [ 8 ]. In recent years, peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been used in the management of postoperative pain following hip surgery. The 2021 procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) guideline for total HA recommends several perioperative interventions to alleviate postoperative pain [9].
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block are the main safe and proven blocks used in hip operations [ 10 , 11 ]. PENG block is a novel regional analgesia technique that preserves motor function while reducing pain after HA. This technique involves injecting local anesthetic (LA) into the fascial plane between the psoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus [ 11 , 12 ].
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was first described as an interfascial plane block performed at the upper thoracic levels to alleviate neuropathic pain [13]. Later, its use has been reported in many thoracic procedures including mastectomy, video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS), heart surgery, at lumbar levels for abdominal surgery, prostatectomy, lumbar spine surgery, total hip arthroplasty, and proximal femur surgery [14].
Sacral ESPB has been recently described. Case reports are showing that it is useful in various types of surgery. In case presentations, it has been reported as effective in providing analgesia in the posterior branches of the sacral nerves in pilonidal sinus surgery, in the treatment of radicular pain at the L5 - S1 level, after a sex reassignment operation hypospadias surgery, and its use in combination with lumbar ESPB for analgesia was reported after hip prosthesis surgery [15-20].
As a frequently used regional anesthesia technique for low limb surgery, lumbar plexus block (LPB) can provide effective analgesia and reduce opioid consumption for the patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) [20-22]. The lumbar plexus occasionally originates from T12 to L4. The three main branches of lumbar plexus that innervate the hip region, including the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, can be blocked with a single-level LPB at L3 [21] observed the spread of local anesthetic with MRI in the volunteers underwent LPB at L4. The injectate was mainly confined between L2 and L4 and barely diffused to T12-L1. Thus, insufficient of analgesia of the incision area may occur due to the failure block of the branches derive from T12 and L1, such as iliohypogastric and subcostal nerve [23]. As we know, the effect of regional block depends on the coverage of related nerve branches at the surgical area. Therefore, to provide a more comprehensive coverage on the wide range of lumbar plexus, multiple-level block techniques, e.g., LPB at L2 and L3, at L3 and L4, or even combined with T12 L1 paravertebral block (PVB), were applied in some studies [24-27]. However, it is conceivable that these expert techniques may require more operator expertise, consume more performance time, increase the discomfort of the patients, and have a greater risk of complications [ 28-32]. Thus, a both effective and convenient method should be investigated.
- Being tested
- Lumber plexus block, Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®), PENG Block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lumber plexus blockProcedure or surgery
LPB Group: All members of this group will receive ipsilateral lumber plexus after induction of general anesthesia. The LPB will be performed by using 30 ml mixture of lidocaine 2% (10 ml), bupivacaine 0.25%(10 ml) and 10-mL normal saline will be injected at that point after repeated negative aspiration.
Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®)Procedure or surgery
ESB Group: All members of this group will receive ipsilateral sacral erector spinae block after induction of general anesthesia. The ESB will be performed by using 30 ml mixture of lidocaine 2% (10 ml), bupivacaine 0.25%(10 ml) and 10-mL normal saline will be injected at that point after repeated negative aspiration.
PENG BlockProcedure or surgery
PENG block: All members of this group will receive PENG block in the supine position after general anesthesia, The PENG will be performed by using 40 ml mixture of, 20 mL of 0.5 bupivacaine,10 mL of 2% lidocaine, and 10 mL of normal saline.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group LPB | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Lumber plexus block |
| Group ESB | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®) |
| Group PENG | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: PENG Block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Morphine consumption over 24 hours
will be the collective morphine consumption on the 1st day post-operatively
Measured: 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (1)
Pain score
Early postoperative pain scores including static pain and passive movement pain (at PACU, at 6 ,12,18 and 24 h after surgery) will be evaluated.
Measured: During and after operation within 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2025
- Study start10 Jan 2025
- Primary completion10 Jun 2025
- Study completion10 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sacral Erector Block Versus Pericapsular Block Versus Lumber Plexus BlockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tanta UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Zakarea Wfa, Tanta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06842342
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 36264PR977
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-guided Sacral Erector Spinae, Pericapsular Nerve Block and Lumber Plexus Block for Pain Relief for Hip Surgery: Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06842342
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 36264PR977
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study to evaluate the effect of The analgesic effect of Ultrasound-guided Sacral erector spinae, Pericapsular nerve block and Lumber Plexus block for pain relief after hip surgery.
The primary outcome will be the collective morphine consumption on the 1st day post-operatively.
Secondary end points Early postoperative pain scores including static pain and passive movement pain (at PACU, at 6 ,12,18 and 24 h after surgery) will be evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain Intraoperative consumption of fentanyl Intraoperative adverse reactions (hypotension, bradycardia, etc.) Complications related with anesthesia (local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax, hematoma, etc.) Performance time of block (defined as the time from ultrasound scanning to the end of injection)
Detailed description
The hip joint connects the femur and pelvis and is responsible for multidimensional motion and mechanical stability [ 1 ]. Most hip pain is caused by the joint capsule [ 2 ]. Furthermore, the joint is largely controlled by the femoral, sciatic, and obturator nerves [ 3 ]. Patients may experience incomplete analgesia with techniques such as femoral nerve (FN) block alone due to the proximal locations of these nerves. Blocking the proximal innervation of all terminal branches innervating the hip joint (femoral, sciatic, obturator, etc.) causes significant weakness in the leg [ 1 ]. With the growth of the elderly population, more patients are undergoing hip surgeries. However, although methods are improving, no gold standard has been established for anesthesia or, more specifically, for analgesia in operations with high morbidity and high mortality [4]. Hip surgeries include hip arthroplasty (HA) (partial hip replacement, total hip replacement) and proximal femur operations (proximal femoral nailing) [5]. In fact, HA is one of the most successful orthopedic procedures in terms of improving patients' functional status and quality of life [ 6 ]. Appropriate pain management for surgical patients contributes to early mobilization, shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and increased patient satisfaction.
Therefore, minimizing postoperative pain has become increasingly important for healthcare providers in recent years [ 7 ]. For this purpose, various analgesia techniques have been used. Although opioids typically provide effective pain relief, their use is limited due to serious side effects [ 8 ]. In recent years, peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been used in the management of postoperative pain following hip surgery. The 2021 procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) guideline for total HA recommends several perioperative interventions to alleviate postoperative pain [9].
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block are the main safe and proven blocks used in hip operations [ 10 , 11 ]. PENG block is a novel regional analgesia technique that preserves motor function while reducing pain after HA. This technique involves injecting local anesthetic (LA) into the fascial plane between the psoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus [ 11 , 12 ].
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was first described as an interfascial plane block performed at the upper thoracic levels to alleviate neuropathic pain [13]. Later, its use has been reported in many thoracic procedures including mastectomy, video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS), heart surgery, at lumbar levels for abdominal surgery, prostatectomy, lumbar spine surgery, total hip arthroplasty, and proximal femur surgery [14].
Sacral ESPB has been recently described. Case reports are showing that it is useful in various types of surgery. In case presentations, it has been reported as effective in providing analgesia in the posterior branches of the sacral nerves in pilonidal sinus surgery, in the treatment of radicular pain at the L5 - S1 level, after a sex reassignment operation hypospadias surgery, and its use in combination with lumbar ESPB for analgesia was reported after hip prosthesis surgery [15-20].
As a frequently used regional anesthesia technique for low limb surgery, lumbar plexus block (LPB) can provide effective analgesia and reduce opioid consumption for the patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) [20-22]. The lumbar plexus occasionally originates from T12 to L4. The three main branches of lumbar plexus that innervate the hip region, including the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, can be blocked with a single-level LPB at L3 [21] observed the spread of local anesthetic with MRI in the volunteers underwent LPB at L4. The injectate was mainly confined between L2 and L4 and barely diffused to T12-L1. Thus, insufficient of analgesia of the incision area may occur due to the failure block of the branches derive from T12 and L1, such as iliohypogastric and subcostal nerve [23]. As we know, the effect of regional block depends on the coverage of related nerve branches at the surgical area. Therefore, to provide a more comprehensive coverage on the wide range of lumbar plexus, multiple-level block techniques, e.g., LPB at L2 and L3, at L3 and L4, or even combined with T12 L1 paravertebral block (PVB), were applied in some studies [24-27]. However, it is conceivable that these expert techniques may require more operator expertise, consume more performance time, increase the discomfort of the patients, and have a greater risk of complications [ 28-32]. Thus, a both effective and convenient method should be investigated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group LPB | Active comparator | Procedure: Lumber plexus block |
| Group ESB | Active comparator | Procedure: Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®) |
| Group PENG | Active comparator | Procedure: PENG Block |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients aged between 18 and 75 years old without cognitive dysfunction
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Refuse to general anesthesia (GA) with tracheal intubation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lumber plexus blockLPB Group: All members of this group will receive ipsilateral lumber plexus after induction of general anesthesia. The LPB will be performed by using 30 ml mixture of lidocaine 2% (10 ml), bupivacaine 0.25%(10 ml) and 10-mL normal saline will be injected at that point after repeated negative aspiration. | Procedure or surgery | Group LPB |
| Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®)ESB Group: All members of this group will receive ipsilateral sacral erector spinae block after induction of general anesthesia. The ESB will be performed by using 30 ml mixture of lidocaine 2% (10 ml), bupivacaine 0.25%(10 ml) and 10-mL normal saline will be injected at that point after repeated negative aspiration. | Procedure or surgery | Group ESB |
| PENG BlockPENG block: All members of this group will receive PENG block in the supine position after general anesthesia, The PENG will be performed by using 40 ml mixture of, 20 mL of 0.5 bupivacaine,10 mL of 2% lidocaine, and 10 mL of normal saline. | Procedure or surgery | Group PENG |
Primary outcome
Morphine consumption over 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively
will be the collective morphine consumption on the 1st day post-operatively
1 secondary outcome
Pain score
Time frame: During and after operation within 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lumber plexus block, Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®) and PENG Block in people with Sacral Erector Block Versus Pericapsular Block Versus Lumber Plexus Block, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Morphine consumption over 24 hours (time frame: 24 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2026.