AzTrials
AzTrials

Locally Advanced Rectal CarcinomaLARCNCT06843655

Radiological Markers in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

An observational study of Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of radiological markers, including the Likert Score derived from diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma
How many people
179 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
21 Mar 2025to 15 Dec 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study includes patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) followed by surgery at our institution between 2009 and 2022. MRI imaging was performed both at initial staging and after TNT before surgery. The follow-up period extends until July 31, 2024, with survival outcomes being analyzed retrospectively.

Who may be able to join

  • Risonanza Magnetica informed consent signed
  • All patients that received total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) (chemo/radiotherapy followed by surgery), between 2009 and 2022 at our institution
  • Staging and re-staging MRI available

Who cannot join

  • Staging and re-staging MRI not available

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

    Milan, 20132

Other trials in Italy

About this study

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of radiological markers, including the Likert Score derived from diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Specifically, the study investigates the association between the Likert Score on restaging MRI and key clinical outcomes, such as overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Furthermore, it examines the impact of other MRI-derived markers-extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumor deposits (TDs), and mesorectal fascia invasion (MFI)-on disease progression and patient prognosis. This study retrospectively analyzes 179 patients who underwent TNT followed by surgery between 2009 and 2022. Participants were required to have pre- and post-treatment MRI scans. MRI imaging data and patient outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP), will be analyzed over a follow-up period extending until July 31, 2024. Findings from this study may help refine MRI-based prognostic tools for personalized treatment strategies in rectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

This study investigates the prognostic role of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), using the Likert Score and other radiological markers, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) followed by radical surgery. The study cohort consists of 179 patients who received TNT between 2009 and 2022 at our institution. Inclusion criteria required patients to have biopsy-confirmed stage II-III LARC, available MRI at both staging and restaging time points, and completion of the TNT protocol.

The TNT regimen included up to three cycles of modified XELOX chemotherapy (oxaliplatin and capecitabine), with the first cycle administered as induction chemotherapy and the remaining two cycles administered concurrently with radiotherapy (total dose: 46.2 Gy in 18 fractions). Surgical resection was performed at a median of 11 weeks post-radiotherapy, with adjuvant chemotherapy administered based on histopathology findings.

MRI acquisition was standardized using a 1.5-T scanner, with DWI sequences applied to assess key prognostic markers, including extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumor deposits (TDs), and mesorectal fascia invasion (MFI). The Likert Score, a five-point grading system based on DWI findings, was applied to restaging MRI to stratify treatment response, with scores of 0-2 indicating a favorable response and 3-4 indicating a poor response.

The study's primary objective is to evaluate the impact of the Likert Score on overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Secondary objectives include assessing the prognostic significance of EMVI, TDs, and MFI in predicting OS and TTP. The statistical analysis will include Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate OS and TTP, stratified according to the presence/score of radiological markers, Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the impact of prognostic factors on survival outcomes, Fisher's exact test to evaluate associations between categorical variables, and Cohen's Kappa to measure interobserver agreement in MRI assessments..

This study aims to refine MRI-based prognostic assessment tools to enhance personalized treatment strategies for rectal cancer. Findings from this research may support the integration of DWI-based Likert Score evaluation into clinical practice to improve risk stratification and treatment decision-making in patients with LARC undergoing TNT. The follow-up period extends until July 31, 2024, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of long-term outcomes.

Keywords
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC), Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT), Diffusion-Weighted MRI (DWI), Likert Score, Radiological Prognostic Markers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time To Progression (TTP) Stratified by Likert Score

    TTP will be measured as the time from diagnosis to disease progression, as assessed through clinical, radiological, or pathological criteria. Patients will be stratified based on the Likert Score derived from diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) at restaging. Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be used to estimate progression-free probabilities, with comparisons between groups performed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression will be used to evaluate the prognostic significance of the Likert Score. TTP will be measured in months, defined as the time from diagnosis to documented disease progression based on clinical, radiological, or pathological criteria.

    Measured: 5 years

  2. Overall Survival (OS) Stratified by Likert Score

    OS will be measured as the time from diagnosis to death from any cause in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Patients will be stratified based on the Likert Score derived from diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) at restaging. Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be used to estimate survival probabilities, and differences between groups will be compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression will be performed to assess the prognostic value of the Likert Score. OS will be measured in months, defined as the time from diagnosis to death. Patients alive at the end of the study period or lost to follow-up will be censored at their last recorded visit.

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Prognostic Value of EMVI Score on Time to Progression (TTP)

    The study will evaluate the impact of extramural venous invasion (EMVI) on time to progression (TTP) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TTP, measured in months, will be defined as the time from diagnosis to documented disease progression based on clinical, radiological, or pathological criteria. Patients will be stratified by EMVI Score, assessed on staging MRI. Progression-free probabilities will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with group comparisons performed via the log-rank test. The prognostic value of the EMVI Score will be examined through Cox proportional hazards regression.

    Measured: 5 years

  2. Prognostic Value of Tumor Deposits on Time to Progression (TTP)

    The study will evaluate the impact of tumor deposits (TDs) on time to progression (TTP) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TTP, measured in months, will be defined as the time from diagnosis to documented disease progression based on clinical, radiological, or pathological criteria. Patients will be stratified based on the presence of TDs, identified on staging MRI. Progression-free probabilities will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with group comparisons performed via the log-rank test. The prognostic significance of TDs will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Prognostic Value of Mesorectal Fascia Infiltration on Time to Progression (TTP)

    The study will evaluate the impact of mesorectal fascia infiltration (MFI) on time to progression (TTP) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TTP, measured in months, will be defined as the time from diagnosis to documented disease progression based on clinical, radiological, or pathological criteria. Patients will be stratified based on the presence of MFI, identified on staging MRI. Progression-free probabilities will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with group comparisons performed via the log-rank test. The prognostic significance of MFI will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

    Measured: 5 years

  4. Prognostic Value of EMVI Score on Overall Survival (OS)

    The study will evaluate the impact of the EMVI Score on OS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). OS, measured in months, will be defined as the time from diagnosis to death. Patients will be stratified by EMVI Score, assessed on staging MRI. Survival probabilities will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, with group comparisons performed via the log-rank test. The prognostic significance of the EMVI Score will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

    Measured: 5 years

  5. Prognostic Value of Tumor Deposits on Overall Survival (OS)

    The study will evaluate the impact of tumor deposits (TDs) on OS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). OS, measured in months, will be defined as the time from diagnosis to death. Patients will be stratified based on the presence of TDs, identified on staging MRI. Survival probabilities will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, with group comparisons performed via the log-rank test. The prognostic significance of TDs will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

    Measured: 5 years

  6. Prognostic Value of Mesorectal Fascia Infiltration on Overall Survival (OS)

    The study will evaluate the impact of mesorectal fascia infiltration (MFI) on OS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). OS, measured in months, will be defined as the time from diagnosis to death. Patients will be stratified based on the presence of MFI, assesed on staging MRI. Survival probabilities will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, with group comparisons performed via the log-rank test. The prognostic significance of MFI will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Feb 2025
  2. Study start21 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
179 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06843655
Sponsor's protocol ID
LARC Protocol
Acronym
LARC
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
18 Feb 2025
Last updated
23 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time To Progression (TTP) Stratified by Likert Score (time frame: 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in