Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)ReeVoidNCT06845904
Study on Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Epidural Electrical Stimulation to Manage Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing WaveWriter Alpha™ neurostimulation system in people with Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) and Spinal Cord Injury, run by Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
This clinical trial aims to assess the preliminary safety and efficacy of Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) therapy in managing lower urinary tract dysfunction in individuals with sub-acute or chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- WaveWriter Alpha™ neurostimulation system
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2025to Feb 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 or older;
- Must provide and sign the Informed Consent Form prior to any study-related procedures;
- Spinal cord injury lesion level above T11 (inclusive);
- SCI graded as AIS- B, C or D;
- SCI ≥ 6 months;
- Confirmed lower urinary tract dysfunction during urodynamic assessment (NDO, DSD);
Show all 11Show fewer
- Intolerant, refractory or inefficient to conservative treatment options such as medications and behavioural management;
- Using intermittent self-catheterization;
- Stable medical, physical and psychological condition as considered by the investigators;
- Able to understand and interact with the study team in French or English;
- Agrees to comply in good faith with all conditions of the study and to attend all scheduled appointments;
Who cannot join
- Botulinum toxin vesical injections in the previous 6 months;
- Presence of non-pharmacological treatments for lower urinary tract dysfunction (e.g. sacral nerve stimulation);
- Does have or needs a suprapubic catheter or bladder indwelling catheter;
- Presence of upper urinary tract dilatation or bladder or renal stones;
- Presence of urethral stricture or significant benign prostate hyperplasia;
- Presence of significant pressure ulcers;
Show all 22Show fewer
- Previous lower urinary tract surgery;
- Presence of Autonomic Dysreflexia during urodynamic test;
- Recurrent and symptomatic urinary tract infection (more than 3 per year);
- Presence of intrathecal baclofen pump;
- Diseases and conditions that would increase the morbidity and mortality of spinal surgery;
- Other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., syringomyelia, bladder cancer, renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.);
- The inability to withhold antiplatelet/anticoagulation agents perioperatively;
- Presence of pacemakers for cardiac conditions;
- Other conditions that would make the subject unable to participate in testing in the judgement of the investigators;
- Women who are pregnant (pregnancy test obligatory for woman of childbearing potential) or breast feeding;
- Lack of acceptable or highly effective method of contraception for women of childbearing capacity;
- Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study;
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, mental illness, psychological disorders, or dementia of the participant;
- Participation in another study with investigational drug or device within the 30 days preceding and during the present study;
- Have any indication that would require Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Is the investigator himself, his/her family members, employees or other dependent persons.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011
Jocelyne Bloch, Prof. Dr., jocelyne.bloch@chuv.ch
About this study
This clinical trial aims to assess the preliminary safety and efficacy of Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) therapy in managing lower urinary tract dysfunction in individuals with sub-acute or chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The study evaluates the therapy's potential to improve urinary function and prevent neurogenic detrusor overactivity, ultimately seeking to enhance quality of life for individuals with SCI.
Read the detailed description
The consequences of a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) are dramatic. SCI leads to impairment of motor, sensory, and autonomic systems, dysregulating almost every bodily function below the level of injury. The majority of research on SCI focuses on the restoration of movement. However, the disruption of pathways controlling the bladder leads to less-appreciated symptoms that require life-long clinical management, are the one of the main cause of rehospitalization, and incurred the largest healthcare costs after SCI. Neurogenic bladder issues, such as neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) leading to incontinence, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) and decreased bladder compliance, are currently treated with intermittent catheterization, anticholinergic medications, botulinum toxin injections directly into the detrusor and ultimately irreversible major surgical interventions. Despite improvement in bladder management provided by these clinical and interventional tools, people with SCI still experience recurrent urinary tract infections from repeated catheterization, incontinence events impacting their professional and intimate life, side-effects from anti-cholinergic medication. It therefore comes as no surprise that people with spinal cord injury prioritize the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction as one of their top health priorities.
The investigators reasoned that the neuroprosthetic management of micturition and urinary continence may overcome many of the existing limitations of current clinical management strategies. To test this idea, the investigators have developed a neuroprosthetic system based on Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord that restored micturition (EESVOIDING) and improve urinary continence by reducing detrusor overactivity (EESSTORAGE) in preclinical models of SCI. Development of this neuroprosthetic system combined with rigorous experiments led to the identification of the locations and parameters of EES that can activate the detrusor while relaxing the external urethral sphincter (EUS). The investigators also gathered preliminary evidence on the key features of this therapeutic strategy in one patient with low-thoracic motor-complete SCI (T10, AIS-B) who was implanted with a neuroprosthetic system on the lumbosacral spinal cord (covering T12 to S1) to restore walking (STIMO clinical Trial, NCT02936453). Stimulation of the sacral spinal cord of this participant resulted in controlled detrusor contraction leading to voiding. Consequently, the investigators hypothesize that EES has the potential to become the first-line treatment for bladder dysfunction in people with chronic or sub-acute SCI. However, its clinical deployment relies on selective stimulation paradigms and development of medical-grade implantable spinal-cord stimulation technologies that are optimized for bladder management.
The ReeVoid clinical study will enroll 3 participants, who will be implanted with a system to apply EES to stimulate the spinal circuits involved in the control of the bladder. The aim of the study is to manage lower urinary tract functions with EES, including supporting voiding and preventing neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence (NDOI) in individuals with sub-acute or chronic spinal cord injury located above T11 and who suffer from lower urinary tract dysfunction. Two electrode paddle leads will be implanted. The first one will cover the dorsal root entry zone of the lumbosacral segments (L4-S5), while the second will aim to target the S1-S4 roots where they exit the spinal canal in the lower vertebras, and thus to maximise selective recruitment of the dorsal roots involved in the control of the detrusor and urethral sphincter muscles. Each paddle lead will be connected to a neurostimulator located subcutaneously in the region of the abdomen.
This therapy aims also to have a positive impact on other neurological functions such as sexual function, bowel management and muscle tone normalization (reduced spasticity).
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- WaveWriter Alpha™ neurostimulation system
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
WaveWriter Alpha™ neurostimulation systemDevice
Two Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha™ Implantable Pulse Generators (IPGs) will be implanted and connected to CoverEdge™ or CoverEdge™ X 32 Surgical Paddle Leads. The leads are positioned to enable targeted stimulation of the spinal cord to optimize control of urinary functions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| All participants | Experimental | All participants enrolled in the study will receive the same intervention. This clinical trial evaluates a novel therapy using a CE-marked medical device employed off-label. Participants will undergo implantation of a neurostimulation system designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the spinal cord. The therapy aims to improve control over detrusor and urethral sphincter muscles by targeting the associated nerves. Receives: Device: WaveWriter Alpha™ neurostimulation system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Occurrence of serious adverse events and adverse events.
Occurrence of serious adverse events and adverse events that are deemed related or possibly related to the use of the investigational.
Measured: From enrolment through study completion, an average of 10 months.
Secondary outcomes (12)
ASIA impairment scale - International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)
Clinical examination used to assess the motor and sensory impairment and severity of a spinal cord injury.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks pre-implantation) and at the End of Study phase (lasting up to 1 week at 9 months)
Spasticity assessment (Modified Ashworth Scale - MAS)
Resistance of a muscle to a passive range of motion about a single joint, measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), a 6-point scale with scores of 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4. A score of 0 indicates no increase in muscle tone, while a score of 4 indicates the affected part is rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores indicate worse spasticity.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 2 weeks pre-implantation) and at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Daily Bladder related diary
Self-reported measures including urinary related events (voiding volume by catheterization and electrical stimulation, frequency, daytime and during night frequency, catheterization and volume of residual volume after stimulation, symptomatic urinary tract infection, use of stimulation) reported on a tracking app to quantify changes before and after implantation.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3 and 6 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Renal ultrasound
Renal ultrasound is used to monitor the kidneys, ureters, and bladder, providing valuable information about kidney size, shape, and position.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks before implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Urine sampling
Urine sampling is taken to confirm the absence of any urinary tract.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks pre-implantation) and upon suspicion
24 hours urine collection
24 hours urine collection is taken to quantify the spot albumin and creatinine in the urine. These parameters are used to confirm the absence of any renal dysfunctions.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks pre-implantation) and at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Blood samples
Blood sampling (max 20mL) is taken to quantify creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and cystatin C. These parameters are used to confirm the absence of any renal dysfunctions.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks pre-implantation) and at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Cystometry
A catheter is inserted into the bladder to measure intravesical pressure while the bladder is filled with sterile fluid at a controlled rate. Simultaneously, abdominal pressure is monitored to assess detrusor pressure and bladder compliance. Cystometry helps identify neurogenic detrusor overactivity, bladder capacity, and compliance.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Imaging (with contrast agent)
X-Ray (or fluoroscopy) can be taken, with imaging contrast agents, to provide visualization of the urinary tract and/or catheter placements (optional).
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Pressure-flow study
During voiding, simultaneous measurements of detrusor pressure and urinary flow rate are recorded. This aids in diagnosing detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD), evaluating voiding efficiency, and identifying obstructive patterns.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Electromyography (EMG)
Surface electrodes or specialized catheters are used to record electrical activity in the bladder and external urethral sphincter muscles. EMG helps detect detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) by assessing the coordination between detrusor and sphincter activity during filling and voiding.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Flowmetry - Urethral pressure profile (UPP)
A catheter-mounted pressure sensor is withdrawn slowly from the bladder through the urethra, recording pressure changes along the urethral length. UPP assists in evaluating sphincter function and diagnosing urethral obstruction.
Measured: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2025
- Study start10 Mar 2025
- Primary completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single-site, single-arm, non-blinded, non-randomized, interventional
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jocelyne Bloch, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
- Investigators
- Jocelyne Bloch, MD, Principal investigator, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06845904
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ReeVoid
- Acronym
- ReeVoid
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Perrouin-Verbe B, Labat JJ, Richard I, Mauduyt de la Greve I, Buzelin JM, Mathe JF. Clean intermittent catheterisation from the acute period in spinal cord injury patients. Long term evaluation of urethral and genital tolerance. Paraplegia. 1995 Nov;33(11):619-24. doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.131.
PubMed 8584294Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3. Epub 2011 May 19.
PubMed 21601270Herrity AN, Williams CS, Angeli CA, Harkema SJ, Hubscher CH. Lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation improves voiding function after human spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 6;8(1):8688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26602-2.
PubMed 29875362Walter M, Lee AHX, Kavanagh A, Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Acutely Modulates Lower Urinary Tract and Bowel Function Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report. Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 18;9:1816. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01816. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30618826Rowald A, Komi S, Demesmaeker R, Baaklini E, Hernandez-Charpak SD, Paoles E, Montanaro H, Cassara A, Becce F, Lloyd B, Newton T, Ravier J, Kinany N, D'Ercole M, Paley A, Hankov N, Varescon C, McCracken L, Vat M, Caban M, Watrin A, Jacquet C, Bole-Feysot L, Harte C, Lorach H, Galvez A, Tschopp M, Herrmann N, Wacker M, Geernaert L, Fodor I, Radevich V, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Pralong E, Roulet M, Ledoux JB, Fornari E, Mandija S, Mattera L, Martuzzi R, Nazarian B, Benkler S, Callegari S, Greiner N, Fuhrer B, Froeling M, Buse N, Denison T, Buschman R, Wende C, Ganty D, Bakker J, Delattre V, Lambert H, Minassian K, van den Berg CAT, Kavounoudias A, Micera S, Van De Ville D, Barraud Q, Kurt E, Kuster N, Neufeld E, Capogrosso M, Asboth L, Wagner FB, Bloch J, Courtine G. Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis. Nat Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):260-271. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01663-5. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
PubMed 35132264Jantz MK, Gopinath C, Kumar R, Chin C, Wong L, Ogren JI, Fisher LE, McLaughlin BL, Gaunt RA. High-density spinal cord stimulation selectively activates lower urinary tract nerves. J Neural Eng. 2022 Nov 22;19(6):066014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aca0c2.
PubMed 36343359Squair JW, Gautier M, Mahe L, Soriano JE, Rowald A, Bichat A, Cho N, Anderson MA, James ND, Gandar J, Incognito AV, Schiavone G, Sarafis ZK, Laskaratos A, Bartholdi K, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Moerman C, Vaseghi B, Scott B, Rosentreter R, Kathe C, Ravier J, McCracken L, Kang X, Vachicouras N, Fallegger F, Jelescu I, Cheng Y, Li Q, Buschman R, Buse N, Denison T, Dukelow S, Charbonneau R, Rigby I, Boyd SK, Millar PJ, Moraud EM, Capogrosso M, Wagner FB, Barraud Q, Bezard E, Lacour SP, Bloch J, Courtine G, Phillips AA. Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury. Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7845):308-314. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03180-w. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
PubMed 33505019Soriano JE, Squair JW, Cragg JJ, Thompson J, Sanguinetti R, Vaseghi B, Emery CA, Grant C, Charbonneau R, Larkin-Kaiser KA, Phillips AA, Dujic Z. A national survey of physical activity after spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07927-5.
PubMed 35292668Hoey RF, Medina-Aguinaga D, Khalifa F, Ugiliweneza B, Zdunowski S, Fell J, Naglah A, El-Baz AS, Herrity AN, Harkema SJ, Hubscher CH. Bladder and bowel responses to lumbosacral epidural stimulation in uninjured and transected anesthetized rats. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 8;11(1):3268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81822-3.
PubMed 33558526Herrity AN, Aslan SC, Mesbah S, Siu R, Kalvakuri K, Ugiliweneza B, Mohamed A, Hubscher CH, Harkema SJ. Targeting bladder function with network-specific epidural stimulation after chronic spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 1;12(1):11179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15315-2.
PubMed 35778466Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PubMed 30382197Kathe C, Skinnider MA, Hutson TH, Regazzi N, Gautier M, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Ceto S, James ND, Cho N, Baud L, Galan K, Matson KJE, Rowald A, Kim K, Wang R, Minassian K, Prior JO, Asboth L, Barraud Q, Lacour SP, Levine AJ, Wagner F, Bloch J, Squair JW, Courtine G. The neurons that restore walking after paralysis. Nature. 2022 Nov;611(7936):540-547. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05385-7. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
PubMed 36352232Anderson MA, Squair JW, Gautier M, Hutson TH, Kathe C, Barraud Q, Bloch J, Courtine G. Natural and targeted circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Nat Neurosci. 2022 Dec;25(12):1584-1596. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01196-1. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
PubMed 36396975McGee MJ, Amundsen CL, Grill WM. Electrical stimulation for the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 Mar;38(2):135-46. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000299. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
PubMed 25582564Groenendijk IM, Groen J, Scheepe JR, Blok BFM. Acute effect of sacral neuromodulation for treatment of detrusor overactivity on urodynamic parameters. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Feb;39(2):695-701. doi: 10.1002/nau.24252. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
PubMed 31804759
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study on Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Epidural Electrical Stimulation to Manage Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06845904
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ReeVoid / ReeVoid
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Spinal Cord Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial aims to assess the preliminary safety and efficacy of Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) therapy in managing lower urinary tract dysfunction in individuals with sub-acute or chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The study evaluates the therapy's potential to improve urinary function and prevent neurogenic detrusor overactivity, ultimately seeking to enhance quality of life for individuals with SCI.
Detailed description
The consequences of a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) are dramatic. SCI leads to impairment of motor, sensory, and autonomic systems, dysregulating almost every bodily function below the level of injury. The majority of research on SCI focuses on the restoration of movement. However, the disruption of pathways controlling the bladder leads to less-appreciated symptoms that require life-long clinical management, are the one of the main cause of rehospitalization, and incurred the largest healthcare costs after SCI. Neurogenic bladder issues, such as neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) leading to incontinence, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) and decreased bladder compliance, are currently treated with intermittent catheterization, anticholinergic medications, botulinum toxin injections directly into the detrusor and ultimately irreversible major surgical interventions. Despite improvement in bladder management provided by these clinical and interventional tools, people with SCI still experience recurrent urinary tract infections from repeated catheterization, incontinence events impacting their professional and intimate life, side-effects from anti-cholinergic medication. It therefore comes as no surprise that people with spinal cord injury prioritize the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction as one of their top health priorities.
The investigators reasoned that the neuroprosthetic management of micturition and urinary continence may overcome many of the existing limitations of current clinical management strategies. To test this idea, the investigators have developed a neuroprosthetic system based on Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord that restored micturition (EESVOIDING) and improve urinary continence by reducing detrusor overactivity (EESSTORAGE) in preclinical models of SCI. Development of this neuroprosthetic system combined with rigorous experiments led to the identification of the locations and parameters of EES that can activate the detrusor while relaxing the external urethral sphincter (EUS). The investigators also gathered preliminary evidence on the key features of this therapeutic strategy in one patient with low-thoracic motor-complete SCI (T10, AIS-B) who was implanted with a neuroprosthetic system on the lumbosacral spinal cord (covering T12 to S1) to restore walking (STIMO clinical Trial, NCT02936453). Stimulation of the sacral spinal cord of this participant resulted in controlled detrusor contraction leading to voiding. Consequently, the investigators hypothesize that EES has the potential to become the first-line treatment for bladder dysfunction in people with chronic or sub-acute SCI. However, its clinical deployment relies on selective stimulation paradigms and development of medical-grade implantable spinal-cord stimulation technologies that are optimized for bladder management.
The ReeVoid clinical study will enroll 3 participants, who will be implanted with a system to apply EES to stimulate the spinal circuits involved in the control of the bladder. The aim of the study is to manage lower urinary tract functions with EES, including supporting voiding and preventing neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence (NDOI) in individuals with sub-acute or chronic spinal cord injury located above T11 and who suffer from lower urinary tract dysfunction. Two electrode paddle leads will be implanted. The first one will cover the dorsal root entry zone of the lumbosacral segments (L4-S5), while the second will aim to target the S1-S4 roots where they exit the spinal canal in the lower vertebras, and thus to maximise selective recruitment of the dorsal roots involved in the control of the detrusor and urethral sphincter muscles. Each paddle lead will be connected to a neurostimulator located subcutaneously in the region of the abdomen.
This therapy aims also to have a positive impact on other neurological functions such as sexual function, bowel management and muscle tone normalization (reduced spasticity).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single-site, single-arm, non-blinded, non-randomized, interventional
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| All participants | Experimental | Device: WaveWriter Alpha™ neurostimulation systemAll participants enrolled in the study will receive the same intervention. This clinical trial evaluates a novel therapy using a CE-marked medical device employed off-label. Participants will undergo implantation of a neurostimulation system designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the spinal cord. The therapy aims to improve control over detrusor and urethral sphincter muscles by targeting the associated nerves. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age 18 or older;
- Must provide and sign the Informed Consent Form prior to any study-related procedures;
- Spinal cord injury lesion level above T11 (inclusive);
- SCI graded as AIS- B, C or D;
- SCI ≥ 6 months;
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Botulinum toxin vesical injections in the previous 6 months;
- Presence of non-pharmacological treatments for lower urinary tract dysfunction (e.g. sacral nerve stimulation);
- Does have or needs a suprapubic catheter or bladder indwelling catheter;
- Presence of upper urinary tract dilatation or bladder or renal stones;
- Presence of urethral stricture or significant benign prostate hyperplasia;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| WaveWriter Alpha™ neurostimulation systemTwo Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha™ Implantable Pulse Generators (IPGs) will be implanted and connected to CoverEdge™ or CoverEdge™ X 32 Surgical Paddle Leads. The leads are positioned to enable targeted stimulation of the spinal cord to optimize control of urinary functions. | Device | All participants |
Primary outcome
Occurrence of serious adverse events and adverse events.
Time frame: From enrolment through study completion, an average of 10 months.
Occurrence of serious adverse events and adverse events that are deemed related or possibly related to the use of the investigational.
12 secondary outcomes
ASIA impairment scale - International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks pre-implantation) and at the End of Study phase (lasting up to 1 week at 9 months)
Spasticity assessment (Modified Ashworth Scale - MAS)
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 2 weeks pre-implantation) and at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Daily Bladder related diary
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3 and 6 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Renal ultrasound
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks before implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Urine sampling
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks pre-implantation) and upon suspicion
24 hours urine collection
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks pre-implantation) and at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Blood samples
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks pre-implantation) and at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Cystometry
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Imaging (with contrast agent)
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Pressure-flow study
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Electromyography (EMG)
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Flowmetry - Urethral pressure profile (UPP)
Time frame: Pre-implantation (up to 3 weeks and up to 2 weeks pre-implantation), Mapping phase (1 week post-implantation and lasting up to 1 month), at Follow-up phase and End of Study phase (at months 3, 6 and 9 post-implantation and lasting up to 1 week)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 8584294Perrouin-Verbe B, Labat JJ, Richard I, Mauduyt de la Greve I, Buzelin JM, Mathe JF. Clean intermittent catheterisation from the acute period in spinal cord injury patients. Long term evaluation of urethral and genital tolerance. Paraplegia. 1995 Nov;33(11):619-24. doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.131.
- Background: PubMed 21601270Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3. Epub 2011 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 29875362Herrity AN, Williams CS, Angeli CA, Harkema SJ, Hubscher CH. Lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation improves voiding function after human spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 6;8(1):8688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26602-2.
- Background: PubMed 30618826Walter M, Lee AHX, Kavanagh A, Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Acutely Modulates Lower Urinary Tract and Bowel Function Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report. Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 18;9:1816. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01816. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 35132264Rowald A, Komi S, Demesmaeker R, Baaklini E, Hernandez-Charpak SD, Paoles E, Montanaro H, Cassara A, Becce F, Lloyd B, Newton T, Ravier J, Kinany N, D'Ercole M, Paley A, Hankov N, Varescon C, McCracken L, Vat M, Caban M, Watrin A, Jacquet C, Bole-Feysot L, Harte C, Lorach H, Galvez A, Tschopp M, Herrmann N, Wacker M, Geernaert L, Fodor I, Radevich V, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Pralong E, Roulet M, Ledoux JB, Fornari E, Mandija S, Mattera L, Martuzzi R, Nazarian B, Benkler S, Callegari S, Greiner N, Fuhrer B, Froeling M, Buse N, Denison T, Buschman R, Wende C, Ganty D, Bakker J, Delattre V, Lambert H, Minassian K, van den Berg CAT, Kavounoudias A, Micera S, Van De Ville D, Barraud Q, Kurt E, Kuster N, Neufeld E, Capogrosso M, Asboth L, Wagner FB, Bloch J, Courtine G. Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis. Nat Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):260-271. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01663-5. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
- Background: PubMed 36343359Jantz MK, Gopinath C, Kumar R, Chin C, Wong L, Ogren JI, Fisher LE, McLaughlin BL, Gaunt RA. High-density spinal cord stimulation selectively activates lower urinary tract nerves. J Neural Eng. 2022 Nov 22;19(6):066014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aca0c2.
- Background: PubMed 33505019Squair JW, Gautier M, Mahe L, Soriano JE, Rowald A, Bichat A, Cho N, Anderson MA, James ND, Gandar J, Incognito AV, Schiavone G, Sarafis ZK, Laskaratos A, Bartholdi K, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Moerman C, Vaseghi B, Scott B, Rosentreter R, Kathe C, Ravier J, McCracken L, Kang X, Vachicouras N, Fallegger F, Jelescu I, Cheng Y, Li Q, Buschman R, Buse N, Denison T, Dukelow S, Charbonneau R, Rigby I, Boyd SK, Millar PJ, Moraud EM, Capogrosso M, Wagner FB, Barraud Q, Bezard E, Lacour SP, Bloch J, Courtine G, Phillips AA. Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury. Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7845):308-314. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03180-w. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
- Background: PubMed 35292668Soriano JE, Squair JW, Cragg JJ, Thompson J, Sanguinetti R, Vaseghi B, Emery CA, Grant C, Charbonneau R, Larkin-Kaiser KA, Phillips AA, Dujic Z. A national survey of physical activity after spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07927-5.
- Background: PubMed 33558526Hoey RF, Medina-Aguinaga D, Khalifa F, Ugiliweneza B, Zdunowski S, Fell J, Naglah A, El-Baz AS, Herrity AN, Harkema SJ, Hubscher CH. Bladder and bowel responses to lumbosacral epidural stimulation in uninjured and transected anesthetized rats. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 8;11(1):3268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81822-3.
- Background: PubMed 35778466Herrity AN, Aslan SC, Mesbah S, Siu R, Kalvakuri K, Ugiliweneza B, Mohamed A, Hubscher CH, Harkema SJ. Targeting bladder function with network-specific epidural stimulation after chronic spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 1;12(1):11179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15315-2.
- Background: PubMed 30382197Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
- Background: PubMed 36352232Kathe C, Skinnider MA, Hutson TH, Regazzi N, Gautier M, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Ceto S, James ND, Cho N, Baud L, Galan K, Matson KJE, Rowald A, Kim K, Wang R, Minassian K, Prior JO, Asboth L, Barraud Q, Lacour SP, Levine AJ, Wagner F, Bloch J, Squair JW, Courtine G. The neurons that restore walking after paralysis. Nature. 2022 Nov;611(7936):540-547. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05385-7. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Nerve Transfer Surgery to Restore Upper-limb Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level
Recruiting
Implementing a Decision Support Tool to Prevent Community-Acquired Pressure Injury in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in the Spinal Cord Injury Clinic
Spinal Cord Injury, Pressure Injury
Enrolling by invitation
AI-Guided Multi-Electrode Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in People With Spinal Cord Injury or Stroke
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Not yet recruiting
Functional Electrical Stimulation Plus High Intensity Interval Training at Home
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Recruiting
Physical Therapy Wound Care Modalities in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
Spinal Cord Injuries, Pressure Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jocelyne Bloch, MD principal investigator
Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing WaveWriter Alpha™ neurostimulation system in people with Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) and Spinal Cord Injury, run by Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jocelyne Bloch, MD (+41 79 556 29 51, jocelyne.bloch@chuv.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Occurrence of serious adverse events and adverse events. (time frame: From enrolment through study completion, an average of 10 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06845904, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.