AnalgesiaNCT06848452
Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone for ICU Analgesia
An observational study of Analgesia and ICU Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, run by Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study is a prospective, single-center clinical study to evaluate the advantages, extensibility and safety of hydromorphone as an analgesic drug in ICU, and to compare it with remifentanil, a traditional sedative drug. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Analgesia, ICU Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
- What is being tested?
- no-intervention
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Mar 2025to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation requiring analgesia and sedation
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years and ≤75 years;
- For patients requiring sedation and analgesia in ICU, invasive mechanical ventilation time is expected to be ≥24 hours;
- Obtain informed consent from patients or family members.
Who cannot join
- Under 18 years of age, or over 75 years of age;
- pregnancy or breastfeeding;
- Known or suspected allergy to opioids (e.g., fentanyl, remifentanil, hydromorphone), butorphanol, midazolam.
- General anesthesia surgery within 48 hours;
- Acute bronchial asthma.
- Acute intestinal obstruction.
Show all 19Show fewer
- General anesthesia surgery within 48 hours;
- ECG QT interval: male >450 mm seconds, female >470 ms.
- Failure to obtain informed consent or authorization;
- Participate in other exploratory clinical trials within 6 months prior to screening;
- Severe hemodynamic instability (requires epinephrine greater than 0.5ug/kg/min to maintain MAP>65mmHg, or malignant arrhythmias frequently occur)
- Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors.
- Chronic pain requires long-term analgesics (>3 months).
- Severe, pre-existing substantial liver disease with clinically significant portal hypertension, Child-Pugh grade C cirrhosis, or acute liver failure;
- Patients with acute and chronic renal insufficiency requiring dialysis treatment;
- Severe craniocerebral injury, brain tumor, increased intracranial pressure, cerebrovascular accident, coma, epileptic status, etc.
- Patients with a history of alcohol or drug abuse;
- Any condition that prevents the correct assessment of cognitive function, such as speech and sensory disorders or mental disorders (language difficulties or organic mental dysfunction);
- any other conditions which the investigator considers inappropriate for registration.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
Emergency Department of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
Nantong, Jiangsu, 226000
Xiaoyu Yuan, 13390940060, yxy11238@163.com
About this study
This study is a prospective, single-center clinical study to evaluate the advantages, extensibility and safety of hydromorphone as an analgesic drug in ICU, and to compare it with remifentanil, a traditional sedative drug. These conclusions can guide us to understand the characteristics of analgesic drugs, carry out appropriate pain management, improve the status of ICU patients, and improve the quality of life of patients.
Read the detailed description
This study will be carried out in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University. It is expected that 300 ICU patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation and needed analgesia and sedation will be included. The RASS and CPOT scores of 300 patients after using hydromorphone or remifentanil were collected and stored in the clinical trial sample database to evaluate and record the relevant indicators of the subjects. The relevant medical records in clinical treatment were analyzed and studied. Each subject will be numbered and a separate medical record established.
The purpose of this prospective single-center observational clinical study is to : 1 ) evaluate the advantages, extensibility and safety of hydromorphone as an ICU analgesic ; 2 ) Compared with the traditional sedative drug remifentanil. Including gastrointestinal dysfunction, respiratory depression, sedative use, mechanical ventilation time, ICU hospitalization time, extubation failure rate, etc.
- Being tested
- no-intervention
- Keywords
- ICU, hydromorphone, analgesia, remifentanil, sedation, respirator support
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
no-interventionOther
no-intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients treated with hydromorphone and midazolam | Not described Receives: Other: no-intervention | |
| Patients treated with remifentanil and midazolam | Not described Receives: Other: no-intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
RASS score
Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale score was used to assess the patient's calm state.The maximum value of the score table is 5 and the minimum value is - 4, indicating that the patient 's sedation level changes from ' coma ' to ' aggressive '.The higher the score, the worse the patient 's sedation depth and sedation quality.
Measured: The RASS score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.
CPOT score
Critical care Pain Observation Tool score is used to evaluate the degree of pain in critically ill patients.The maximum value of the score table is 10, and the minimum value is 0.The higher the score, the more serious the pain of the patient.
Measured: The CPOT score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2025
- Study startMar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnalgesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Affiliated Hospital of Nantong UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06848452
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NTFY-YXY-01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Researchers hope to study data confidentiality.
Publications
Muellejans B, Lopez A, Cross MH, Bonome C, Morrison L, Kirkham AJ. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial [ISRCTN43755713]. Crit Care. 2004 Feb;8(1):R1-R11. doi: 10.1186/cc2398. Epub 2003 Nov 20.
PubMed 14975049Telekes A. [The role of hydromorphone in pain killing]. Lege Artis Med. 2008 Oct;18(10):675-9. Hungarian.
PubMed 19227610Hagen N, Thirlwell MP, Dhaliwal HS, Babul N, Harsanyi Z, Darke AC. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of hydromorphone and hydromorphone-3-glucuronide in cancer patients after immediate and controlled-release hydromorphone. J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Jan;35(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04743.x.
PubMed 7538514Inturrisi CE. Clinical pharmacology of opioids for pain. Clin J Pain. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(4 Suppl):S3-13. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200207001-00002.
PubMed 12479250Christrup LL. Morphine metabolites. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Jan;41(1 Pt 2):116-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04625.x.
PubMed 9061094Panzer O, Moitra V, Sladen RN. Pharmacology of sedative-analgesic agents: dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, ketamine, volatile anesthetics, and the role of peripheral mu antagonists. Crit Care Clin. 2009 Jul;25(3):451-69, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2009.04.004.
PubMed 19576524Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
PubMed 30113379Lombardi RA, Pereira EM, Amaral S, Medeiros HJS, Alrayashi W. Erector spinae plane block versus intravenous opioid for analgesia in pediatric cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Jan;35(1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/pan.15027. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
PubMed 39403896Rahu MA, Grap MJ, Ferguson P, Joseph P, Sherman S, Elswick RK Jr. Validity and sensitivity of 6 pain scales in critically ill, intubated adults. Am J Crit Care. 2015 Nov;24(6):514-23. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015832.
PubMed 26523009Hinkelbein J, Lamperti M, Akeson J, Santos J, Costa J, De Robertis E, Longrois D, Novak-Jankovic V, Petrini F, Struys MMRF, Veyckemans F, Fuchs-Buder T, Fitzgerald R. European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jan;35(1):6-24. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000683.
PubMed 28877145Bauerschmidt A, Al-Bermani T, Ali S, Bass B, Dorilio J, Rosenberg J, Al-Mufti F. Modern Sedation and Analgesia Strategies in Neurocritical Care. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Apr;23(4):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01261-7. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
PubMed 36881257Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gelinas C, Dasta JF, Davidson JE, Devlin JW, Kress JP, Joffe AM, Coursin DB, Herr DL, Tung A, Robinson BR, Fontaine DK, Ramsay MA, Riker RR, Sessler CN, Pun B, Skrobik Y, Jaeschke R; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
PubMed 23269131
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone for ICU Analgesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06848452
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NTFY-YXY-01
- Keywords
- ICU, hydromorphone, analgesia, remifentanil, sedation, respirator support
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a prospective, single-center clinical study to evaluate the advantages, extensibility and safety of hydromorphone as an analgesic drug in ICU, and to compare it with remifentanil, a traditional sedative drug. These conclusions can guide us to understand the characteristics of analgesic drugs, carry out appropriate pain management, improve the status of ICU patients, and improve the quality of life of patients.
Detailed description
This study will be carried out in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University. It is expected that 300 ICU patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation and needed analgesia and sedation will be included. The RASS and CPOT scores of 300 patients after using hydromorphone or remifentanil were collected and stored in the clinical trial sample database to evaluate and record the relevant indicators of the subjects. The relevant medical records in clinical treatment were analyzed and studied. Each subject will be numbered and a separate medical record established.
The purpose of this prospective single-center observational clinical study is to : 1 ) evaluate the advantages, extensibility and safety of hydromorphone as an ICU analgesic ; 2 ) Compared with the traditional sedative drug remifentanil. Including gastrointestinal dysfunction, respiratory depression, sedative use, mechanical ventilation time, ICU hospitalization time, extubation failure rate, etc.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients treated with hydromorphone and midazolam | – | Other: no-intervention |
| Patients treated with remifentanil and midazolam | – | Other: no-intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation requiring analgesia and sedation
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥18 years and ≤75 years;
- For patients requiring sedation and analgesia in ICU, invasive mechanical ventilation time is expected to be ≥24 hours;
- Obtain informed consent from patients or family members.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Under 18 years of age, or over 75 years of age;
- pregnancy or breastfeeding;
- Known or suspected allergy to opioids (e.g., fentanyl, remifentanil, hydromorphone), butorphanol, midazolam.
- General anesthesia surgery within 48 hours;
- Acute bronchial asthma.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| no-interventionno-intervention | Other | Patients treated with hydromorphone and midazolam, Patients treated with remifentanil and midazolam |
Primary outcome
RASS score
Time frame: The RASS score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.
Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale score was used to assess the patient's calm state.The maximum value of the score table is 5 and the minimum value is - 4, indicating that the patient 's sedation level changes from ' coma ' to ' aggressive '.The higher the score, the worse the patient 's sedation depth and sedation quality.
CPOT score
Time frame: The CPOT score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.
Critical care Pain Observation Tool score is used to evaluate the degree of pain in critically ill patients.The maximum value of the score table is 10, and the minimum value is 0.The higher the score, the more serious the pain of the patient.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 14975049Muellejans B, Lopez A, Cross MH, Bonome C, Morrison L, Kirkham AJ. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial [ISRCTN43755713]. Crit Care. 2004 Feb;8(1):R1-R11. doi: 10.1186/cc2398. Epub 2003 Nov 20.
- Background: PubMed 19227610Telekes A. [The role of hydromorphone in pain killing]. Lege Artis Med. 2008 Oct;18(10):675-9. Hungarian.
- Background: PubMed 7538514Hagen N, Thirlwell MP, Dhaliwal HS, Babul N, Harsanyi Z, Darke AC. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of hydromorphone and hydromorphone-3-glucuronide in cancer patients after immediate and controlled-release hydromorphone. J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Jan;35(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04743.x.
- Background: PubMed 12479250Inturrisi CE. Clinical pharmacology of opioids for pain. Clin J Pain. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(4 Suppl):S3-13. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200207001-00002.
- Background: PubMed 9061094Christrup LL. Morphine metabolites. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Jan;41(1 Pt 2):116-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04625.x.
- Background: PubMed 19576524Panzer O, Moitra V, Sladen RN. Pharmacology of sedative-analgesic agents: dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, ketamine, volatile anesthetics, and the role of peripheral mu antagonists. Crit Care Clin. 2009 Jul;25(3):451-69, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2009.04.004.
- Background: PubMed 30113379Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
- Background: PubMed 39403896Lombardi RA, Pereira EM, Amaral S, Medeiros HJS, Alrayashi W. Erector spinae plane block versus intravenous opioid for analgesia in pediatric cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Jan;35(1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/pan.15027. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
- Background: PubMed 26523009Rahu MA, Grap MJ, Ferguson P, Joseph P, Sherman S, Elswick RK Jr. Validity and sensitivity of 6 pain scales in critically ill, intubated adults. Am J Crit Care. 2015 Nov;24(6):514-23. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015832.
- Background: PubMed 28877145Hinkelbein J, Lamperti M, Akeson J, Santos J, Costa J, De Robertis E, Longrois D, Novak-Jankovic V, Petrini F, Struys MMRF, Veyckemans F, Fuchs-Buder T, Fitzgerald R. European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jan;35(1):6-24. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000683.
- Background: PubMed 36881257Bauerschmidt A, Al-Bermani T, Ali S, Bass B, Dorilio J, Rosenberg J, Al-Mufti F. Modern Sedation and Analgesia Strategies in Neurocritical Care. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Apr;23(4):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01261-7. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
- Background: PubMed 23269131Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gelinas C, Dasta JF, Davidson JE, Devlin JW, Kress JP, Joffe AM, Coursin DB, Herr DL, Tung A, Robinson BR, Fontaine DK, Ramsay MA, Riker RR, Sessler CN, Pun B, Skrobik Y, Jaeschke R; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Researchers hope to study data confidentiality.
Related trials for Analgesia
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Pain After Bunion Removal Surgery (MK-6916-007)
Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Analgesia and ICU Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, run by Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xiaoyu Yuan (13390940060, yxy11238@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
RASS score (time frame: The RASS score at 5, 10, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 hours post- dose and before and after each dose adjustment.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06848452, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2025.