StudentsNCT06849700
Effects of Active Gamification in Primary School Children
A study testing Active gamification in people with Students and Mental Health Issue, run by University of Jaén at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Active gamification, which incorporates game elements with physical interaction, is presented as an innovative strategy to address children's physical and mental health. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an active gamification program on these variables in primary school children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 11 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Students, Mental Health Issue, Physical Condition
- What is being tested?
- Active gamification
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 8 Oct 2024to 3 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 11 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age between 8 and 11 years
- No medical contraindication for physical activity
- No intellectual disability that could interfere with understanding or compliance with the study procedures; and iv) informed consent from parents or legal guardians.
- Those students who did not meet the inclusion criteria were able to participate in the intervention with their peers, but were not considered in the analysis.
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of neuromotor disorder or severe physical disability that limits participation in the scheduled physical activity
- Presence of severe psychological or behavioral disorders that make integration into group activities difficult.
- Use of medication that significantly affects physical or cognitive performance.
- Failure to attend more than 20% of the intervention program sessions
- Withdrawal of informed consent by parents or legal guardians during the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Can Active Gamification Improve the Physical and Mental Health of Primary School Children?
Active gamification, which incorporates game elements with physical interaction, is presented as an innovative strategy to address children's physical and mental health. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an active gamification program on these variables in primary school children. To this end, a randomized clinical trial will be conducted with 120 children between the ages of 8 and 11. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: an experimental group, which will participate in a program designed to promote physical activity through game-based dynamics for 12 weeks, and a control group, which will continue with traditional physical education classes without modifications to their usual methodology. The program implementation includes structured sessions with activities designed to encourage interaction, movement, and decision-making in a playful environment, with the aim of improving children's engagement and adherence to the intervention.
- Conditions
- Students, Mental Health Issue, Physical Condition
- Being tested
- Active gamification
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active gamificationOther
The experimental group participated in a physical exercise program for primary school children, with 45-minute sessions three times a week, including warm-up, main activities, and awards. Designed to enhance engagement through game mechanics, the program progressed in three phases: Explorers in Action (Weeks 1-4) focused on coordination, agility, and teamwork with games like "Conquering Territories"; Movement Heroes (Weeks 5-8) emphasized endurance, collaboration, and strategy through activities like "Quest for the Gems"; and Health Guardians (Weeks 9-12) incorporated strength, planning, and teamwork challenges, culminating in a final integrated skills circuit. The program promoted continuous improvement in physical and cooperative abilities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | The control group continued with their traditional Physical Education classes. |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | The experimental group participated in a program based on the gamification of physical exercise Receives: Other: Active gamification |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anxiety
Anxiety will be assessed using the short version of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale for Spanish children (SCAS-C-8), in its version validated in Spanish. This scale consists of 18 items, each of them rated on a Likert-type scale from 0 to 3 (0 = Never, 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often and 3 = Always), where higher scores indicate a greater presence of anxiety symptoms.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Sleep quality
The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) assesses sleep quality in children using 33 items rated on a Likert scale (1-3), with total scores ranging from 33 to 99, where higher scores indicate more sleep problems. The Spanish-validated version was used in this study. The questionnaire is divided into eight subscales: Bedtime Resistance, Sleep Onset Delay, Sleep Duration, Sleep Anxiety, Night Wakings, Parasomnias, Sleep-Disordered Breathing, and Daytime Sleepiness. The CSHQ Global Score is the sum of all items.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Self-Esteem
The self-esteem test for schoolchildren, in its Spanish version, evaluates how the student perceives themselves through 25 items, of which 23 are statements that are answered with either "YES" or "NO." Scoring is done using a template provided by the author, where the correct answers for a high self-esteem level are indicated. If the student's answer matches the template, 1 point is awarded; if it does not, no points are given. The items with "NO" answers are 1, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, and 21, while the "YES" answers are 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 22, and 23. Based on the total score (PD), the self-esteem level is determined: 22-25 points, high self-esteem; 17-21 points, tendency toward high self-esteem; 16 points, at-risk self-esteem; 12-15 points, tendency toward low self-esteem; and 11 or fewer points, low self-esteem.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Self-Concept
The Garley Self-Concept Questionnaire, validated in Spanish for primary school students, consists of 48 statements divided into six dimensions: (a) physical self-concept, (b) social acceptance, (c) family self-concept, (d) intellectual self-concept, (e) personal self-evaluation, and (f) sense of control. Each dimension has 8 items. Responses are measured on a 5-point Likert scale: never (1), rarely (2), I could not say (3), often (4), and always (5). The questionnaire includes both direct (items 1-2, 4-7, 9-10, etc.) and inverse (items 3, 8, 11, etc.) items. For direct items, scoring follows the standard scale, while for inverse items, the scale is reversed. The scores for each subscale range from 8 to 40 points, with higher scores indicating a better self-concept. The overall score is calculated by summing the individual items.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Social Skills
The Matson Evaluation of Social Skills in Youngsters (MESSY), in its Spanish version, was used to assess social skills in students. The questionnaire includes a four-step response format: never, sometimes, often, and always. It evaluates five factors: appropriate social skills (24 items) such as making friends and emotional expressiveness (e.g., "I look at people when I talk to them"); inappropriate assertiveness (16 items) addressing aggressive behaviors (e.g., "I take things that are not mine without permission"); impulsivity (5 items) such as getting easily angry (e.g., "I interrupt others when they are speaking"); overconfidence (6 items) involving self-overvaluation (e.g., "I like to brag to others about the things I have"); and jealousy/loneliness (4 items) exploring feelings of isolation (e.g., "I feel lonely"). Only the student version of MESSY was used in this study.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Concentration and Selective Attention
The D2 test, in its Spanish version, assesses selective attention and concentration in the school context. The participant's task is to carefully check, starting from left to right, what is written on each line and must mark all the letters that have two small lines (two lower, two upper, or one lower and one upper) with a "d". These elements are considered relevant. The other combinations (the "d" and the "p", with and without lines) are known as irrelevant, and should not be marked. The participant has 20 s for each line. This test has demonstrated excellent reliability, with ranges between 0.90 and 0.97 for both Cronbach's α and the test-retest, and has also shown convergent and divergent validity.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Creativity
The Creative Intelligence Test (CREA) is used to assess creative intelligence by cognitively assessing creativity on an individual basis by reproducing question indicators within a theoretical context of research and problem solving. The procedure consists of showing a photograph to the child and asking him to fill in the blank spaces at the top of the copy with the data that appear. The task is based on writing, briefly, as many pre-questions as possible about what it shows. The CREA test has been found to meet the standards of reliability and validity required for a psychological test (Cronbach's α = 0.875).
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Memory
To assess memory, a 1-minute ad hoc test was used, based on the original ideas of the memory test included in the Spanish adaptation of the Reynolds Intelligence Scale [RIAS]. A poster of 15 randomly selected Spanish playing cards was projected for 20 seconds on a 3 x 2 meter screen. Immediately afterward, participants had 40 seconds to record on a standardized sheet the greatest number of cards they could remember. The total number of correct answers was counted (range 0-15). Before the test, it was verified that all participants knew the structure and content of the 40 cards in the Spanish deck.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Aerobic capacity
This will be determined using the 20-meter Course Navette Test, an incremental test in which participants must run from end to end over a distance of 20 meters, following an audible signal and increasing their speed in 0.5 km/h intervals every minute. The test will begin at a speed of 8.5 km/h and will end when the participant fails to maintain the pace on two consecutive attempts or stops. In each case, the number of periods passed will be recorded at the end of the test. This test will be administered only once at the end of the data collection session.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Speed and agility
The 4x10-meter shuttle test will be used, in which students must cover the distance four times at maximum speed.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Muscular strength
This will be measured through three tests: i) upper body strength will be assessed using a handheld dynamometer, in which a handheld dynamometer will be used for each limb; ii) lower body strength will be analyzed using the horizontal jump test without momentum; and iii) a muscular endurance test will also be performed with a 30-second sit-up test.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Flexibility
This test will be assessed using the Sit-and-Reach test. The test will be performed using a special 33 cm box with a sliding ruler attached to the top. Participants will sit on the floor with their knees extended, shoulder-width apart, and their feet in contact with the bottom of the box. They will be asked to bend their torso and extend their arms forward as far as possible, holding the final position for at least two seconds. The test will be performed twice, and the best result in centimeters will be recorded.
Measured: Up to twelve weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2025
- Study start8 Oct 2024
- Primary completion10 Oct 2024
- Study completion3 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StudentsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Jaén
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Agustín Aibar Almazán, University of Jaén
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06849700
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- *University of Jaén*
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Can Active Gamification Improve the Physical and Mental Health of Primary School Children?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06849700
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- *University of Jaén*
- Conditions
- Students, Mental Health Issue, Physical Condition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of JaénUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Active gamification, which incorporates game elements with physical interaction, is presented as an innovative strategy to address children's physical and mental health. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an active gamification program on these variables in primary school children. To this end, a randomized clinical trial will be conducted with 120 children between the ages of 8 and 11. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: an experimental group, which will participate in a program designed to promote physical activity through game-based dynamics for 12 weeks, and a control group, which will continue with traditional physical education classes without modifications to their usual methodology. The program implementation includes structured sessions with activities designed to encourage interaction, movement, and decision-making in a playful environment, with the aim of improving children's engagement and adherence to the intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | –The control group continued with their traditional Physical Education classes. |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Other: Active gamificationThe experimental group participated in a program based on the gamification of physical exercise |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 11 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age between 8 and 11 years
- No medical contraindication for physical activity
- No intellectual disability that could interfere with understanding or compliance with the study procedures; and iv) informed consent from parents or legal guardians.
- Those students who did not meet the inclusion criteria were able to participate in the intervention with their peers, but were not considered in the analysis.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of neuromotor disorder or severe physical disability that limits participation in the scheduled physical activity
- Presence of severe psychological or behavioral disorders that make integration into group activities difficult.
- Use of medication that significantly affects physical or cognitive performance.
- Failure to attend more than 20% of the intervention program sessions
- Withdrawal of informed consent by parents or legal guardians during the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active gamificationThe experimental group participated in a physical exercise program for primary school children, with 45-minute sessions three times a week, including warm-up, main activities, and awards. Designed to enhance engagement through game mechanics, the program progressed in three phases: Explorers in Action (Weeks 1-4) focused on coordination, agility, and teamwork with games like "Conquering Territories"; Movement Heroes (Weeks 5-8) emphasized endurance, collaboration, and strategy through activities like "Quest for the Gems"; and Health Guardians (Weeks 9-12) incorporated strength, planning, and teamwork challenges, culminating in a final integrated skills circuit. The program promoted continuous improvement in physical and cooperative abilities. | Other | Experimental Group |
Primary outcome
Anxiety
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
Anxiety will be assessed using the short version of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale for Spanish children (SCAS-C-8), in its version validated in Spanish. This scale consists of 18 items, each of them rated on a Likert-type scale from 0 to 3 (0 = Never, 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often and 3 = Always), where higher scores indicate a greater presence of anxiety symptoms.
Sleep quality
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) assesses sleep quality in children using 33 items rated on a Likert scale (1-3), with total scores ranging from 33 to 99, where higher scores indicate more sleep problems. The Spanish-validated version was used in this study. The questionnaire is divided into eight subscales: Bedtime Resistance, Sleep Onset Delay, Sleep Duration, Sleep Anxiety, Night Wakings, Parasomnias, Sleep-Disordered Breathing, and Daytime Sleepiness. The CSHQ Global Score is the sum of all items.
Self-Esteem
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
The self-esteem test for schoolchildren, in its Spanish version, evaluates how the student perceives themselves through 25 items, of which 23 are statements that are answered with either "YES" or "NO." Scoring is done using a template provided by the author, where the correct answers for a high self-esteem level are indicated. If the student's answer matches the template, 1 point is awarded; if it does not, no points are given. The items with "NO" answers are 1, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, and 21, while the "YES" answers are 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 22, and 23. Based on the total score (PD), the self-esteem level is determined: 22-25 points, high self-esteem; 17-21 points, tendency toward high self-esteem; 16 points, at-risk self-esteem; 12-15 points, tendency toward low self-esteem; and 11 or fewer points, low self-esteem.
Self-Concept
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
The Garley Self-Concept Questionnaire, validated in Spanish for primary school students, consists of 48 statements divided into six dimensions: (a) physical self-concept, (b) social acceptance, (c) family self-concept, (d) intellectual self-concept, (e) personal self-evaluation, and (f) sense of control. Each dimension has 8 items. Responses are measured on a 5-point Likert scale: never (1), rarely (2), I could not say (3), often (4), and always (5). The questionnaire includes both direct (items 1-2, 4-7, 9-10, etc.) and inverse (items 3, 8, 11, etc.) items. For direct items, scoring follows the standard scale, while for inverse items, the scale is reversed. The scores for each subscale range from 8 to 40 points, with higher scores indicating a better self-concept. The overall score is calculated by summing the individual items.
Social Skills
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
The Matson Evaluation of Social Skills in Youngsters (MESSY), in its Spanish version, was used to assess social skills in students. The questionnaire includes a four-step response format: never, sometimes, often, and always. It evaluates five factors: appropriate social skills (24 items) such as making friends and emotional expressiveness (e.g., "I look at people when I talk to them"); inappropriate assertiveness (16 items) addressing aggressive behaviors (e.g., "I take things that are not mine without permission"); impulsivity (5 items) such as getting easily angry (e.g., "I interrupt others when they are speaking"); overconfidence (6 items) involving self-overvaluation (e.g., "I like to brag to others about the things I have"); and jealousy/loneliness (4 items) exploring feelings of isolation (e.g., "I feel lonely"). Only the student version of MESSY was used in this study.
Concentration and Selective Attention
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
The D2 test, in its Spanish version, assesses selective attention and concentration in the school context. The participant's task is to carefully check, starting from left to right, what is written on each line and must mark all the letters that have two small lines (two lower, two upper, or one lower and one upper) with a "d". These elements are considered relevant. The other combinations (the "d" and the "p", with and without lines) are known as irrelevant, and should not be marked. The participant has 20 s for each line. This test has demonstrated excellent reliability, with ranges between 0.90 and 0.97 for both Cronbach's α and the test-retest, and has also shown convergent and divergent validity.
Creativity
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
The Creative Intelligence Test (CREA) is used to assess creative intelligence by cognitively assessing creativity on an individual basis by reproducing question indicators within a theoretical context of research and problem solving. The procedure consists of showing a photograph to the child and asking him to fill in the blank spaces at the top of the copy with the data that appear. The task is based on writing, briefly, as many pre-questions as possible about what it shows. The CREA test has been found to meet the standards of reliability and validity required for a psychological test (Cronbach's α = 0.875).
Memory
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
To assess memory, a 1-minute ad hoc test was used, based on the original ideas of the memory test included in the Spanish adaptation of the Reynolds Intelligence Scale [RIAS]. A poster of 15 randomly selected Spanish playing cards was projected for 20 seconds on a 3 x 2 meter screen. Immediately afterward, participants had 40 seconds to record on a standardized sheet the greatest number of cards they could remember. The total number of correct answers was counted (range 0-15). Before the test, it was verified that all participants knew the structure and content of the 40 cards in the Spanish deck.
Aerobic capacity
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
This will be determined using the 20-meter Course Navette Test, an incremental test in which participants must run from end to end over a distance of 20 meters, following an audible signal and increasing their speed in 0.5 km/h intervals every minute. The test will begin at a speed of 8.5 km/h and will end when the participant fails to maintain the pace on two consecutive attempts or stops. In each case, the number of periods passed will be recorded at the end of the test. This test will be administered only once at the end of the data collection session.
Speed and agility
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
The 4x10-meter shuttle test will be used, in which students must cover the distance four times at maximum speed.
Muscular strength
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
This will be measured through three tests: i) upper body strength will be assessed using a handheld dynamometer, in which a handheld dynamometer will be used for each limb; ii) lower body strength will be analyzed using the horizontal jump test without momentum; and iii) a muscular endurance test will also be performed with a 30-second sit-up test.
Flexibility
Time frame: Up to twelve weeks
This test will be assessed using the Sit-and-Reach test. The test will be performed using a special 33 cm box with a sliding ruler attached to the top. Participants will sit on the floor with their knees extended, shoulder-width apart, and their feet in contact with the bottom of the box. They will be asked to bend their torso and extend their arms forward as far as possible, holding the final position for at least two seconds. The test will be performed twice, and the best result in centimeters will be recorded.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2025.
Related trials for Students
Recruiting
Momentary Coping Prompts and Hair Steroids in College Students
Emotional Regulation, Alcohol Drinking in College
Not yet recruitingObservational study
End of Term vs. End of Module Examinations in the Preclinical Stage: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Student and Faculty Perspectives
Student and Faculty Perspectives About Examinations
Recruiting
Personalization of Visual Characters and Text-to-Speech (TTS) to Support Learning in Students With Reading Difficulties
Developmental Dyslexia, Reading Problem
Not yet recruiting
Web-Based Sustainable Food Literacy Program for University Students
Food Literacy, Healthy Eating
Recruiting
AI-Powered Virtual Human Simulation in Students
Respiratory Therapy Techniques, Artificial Intelligence in Education
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active gamification in people with Students and Mental Health Issue, run by University of Jaén at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anxiety (time frame: Up to twelve weeks). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2025.