AzTrials
AzTrials

Adductor Magnus Plain Injection for Sciatic Nerve BlockNCT06852118

Using the Adductor Magnus Plain Block as an Innovative Approach for Sciatic Nerve Block for Lower Limb Surgeries.

A study testing AMM Group: Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane approach + Femoral Nerve Blocks and SG Group: Sciatic nerve block by sub-gluteal approach + Femoral nerve blocks in people with Adductor Magnus Plain Injection for Sciatic Nerve Block, run by Mohammed Gaber Saad at 1 site in Egypt.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

the goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of adductor magnus muscle plane injection as an approach for sciatic nerve block to sub-gluteal approach in combination with femoral nerve blocks as perioperative analgesia in knee surgeries. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
AMM Group: Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane approach + Femoral Nerve Blocks and SG Group: Sciatic nerve block by sub-gluteal approach + Femoral nerve blocks
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Oct 2024to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) Physical Status I-III.
  • Patients who consent to receive regional anesthesia.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a history of allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Pre-existing neurological deficits in the lower extremities.
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulation therapy that cannot be safely discontinued.
  • Infection at the site of block injection.
  • Severe obesity (BMI > 40).
  • Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia.
  • peripheral neuropathy.
  • Psychiatric disorders and communication difficulties.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculity of medicine - Al-Azhar University hospitals

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11884

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane Injection for Sciatic Nerve Block Versus Subgluteal Approach in Combination With Femoral Nerve Block in Knee Surgeries- A Randomized Control Study.

the goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of adductor magnus muscle plane injection as an approach for sciatic nerve block to sub-gluteal approach in combination with femoral nerve blocks as perioperative analgesia in knee surgeries.

Being tested
AMM Group: Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane approach + Femoral Nerve Blocks, SG Group: Sciatic nerve block by sub-gluteal approach + Femoral nerve blocks
Keywords
sciatic nerve block, Femoral nerve, Adductor magnus muscle, knee surgeries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AMM Group: Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane approach + Femoral Nerve BlocksProcedure or surgery

    In the supine position, the femoral nerve block will be conducted using a high-frequency ultrasound probe to identify the femoral nerve just below the fascia iliaca. After proper sterilization, the needle will be advanced in-plane to inject 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5% around the nerve. After performing the femoral nerve block, the adductor magnus muscle plane block will be performed using a low-frequency ultrasound probe positioned 6 cm distal to the inguinal crease to identify the sartorius muscle, femoral artery, femoral vein, and femoral nerve on the deep side of the sartorius muscle, the probe will be slide by about 2-2.5 cm distally, where we could identify the plane between the adductor magnus and the semimembranosus muscles, and after proper sterilization, the needle will be slowly advanced until the needle tip is close to the posterior surface of the AMM, 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% will be injected while observing fluid distribution under the posterior surface of the AMM, Then GA.

  • SG Group: Sciatic nerve block by sub-gluteal approach + Femoral nerve blocksProcedure or surgery

    While the patient is in the supine position, the femoral nerve block will be conducted using a high-frequency ultrasound probe to identify a cross-sectional view of the femoral nerve just below the fascia iliaca. After proper sterilization, the needle will be advanced in-plane to inject 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5% around the nerve. the patient will be turned on their sides with the operative side uppermost and flexed, the sub-gluteal sciatic nerve will be identified using a low-frequency probe, and then the same needle will be advanced the in-plane to inject 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% around the nerve., then GA will be conducted as the other group

Study groups in NCT06852118
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AMM Group: Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane approach + Femoral Nerve BlocksExperimentalConduct the sciatic nerve block via adductor magnus plain injection. the femoral nerve block will be conducted as well
Receives: Procedure: AMM Group: Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane approach + Femoral Nerve Blocks
SG Group: Sciatic nerve block by sub-gluteal approach + Femoral nerve blocksActive comparatorConduct the sciatic nerve block via sub-gluteal approach. the femoral nerve block will be conducted as well
Receives: Procedure: SG Group: Sciatic nerve block by sub-gluteal approach + Femoral nerve blocks

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of sciatic sensory block

    It will be assessed by evaluating the sharp sensation with pinprick testing, and the presence or loss of cold-warm feeling as (2 for normal sensory perception, 1 for loss of cold-warm feeling, and 0 for loss of pinprick sensation) for ciatic in the sole of foot.

    Measured: At 30 minutes after the block

  2. Assessment of sciatic motor block

    Sciatic block will be evaluated by the motion of the foot and ankle joint (3 for normal movement, 2 for unable to push or flex the foot against external resistance, 1 for unable to push or flex the foot against gravity and 0 for no motion

    Measured: At 30 minutes after the block

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Postoperative pain scores

    Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Measured: At 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours post-operative

  2. The onset of sciatic sensory blockades

    Time in minutes from removing of the local anesthesia needle to the start of sensory changes

    Measured: Every 3 minutes with maximum time 30 minutes (if no changes within 30 min the patient will be excluded from the study)

  3. The duration of the sciatic nerve block procedure

    the time in minutes from the start of the sonographic examination for the sciatic nerve block until local anaesthetic administration.

    Measured: during sciatic nerve block conduction

  4. Visibility scores for the sciatic nerve

    using a 6-point visibility scale: 0: No nerve was identified

    1. Nerve identified with a high probability
    2. Nerve identified but most of it was not visible
    3. Nerve identified and more than 50% of its borders were precisely distinguished from the surrounding structures
    4. Nerve completely visible but fascicles poorly defined
    5. Nerve completely visible and multiple fascicles identifiable

    Measured: during sciatic nerve block using sub gluteal approach conduction

  5. Visibility scores for Adductor magnus muscle (AMM)

    using a 6-point visibility scale for AMM: 0: No muscle was identified

    1. Muscle identified with a high probability
    2. Muscle identified but most of it was not visible
    3. Muscle identified and more than 50% of its epimysium were precisely distinguished from the surrounding structures
    4. Muscle completely visible but perimysium poorly defined
    5. Muscle completely visible and multiple perimysium identifiable

    Measured: during sciatic nerve block using adductor magnus muscle plain block conduction

  6. Patient satisfaction

    Using 4 degrees scale: excellent, good, sufficient, insufficient

    Measured: Before the patient discharge

  7. The onset of the Sciatic motor block

    Time in minutes from removing of the local anesthesia needle to the start of motor changes

    Measured: Every 3 minutes with maximum time 30 minutes (if no changes within 30 min the patient will be excluded from the study)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Feb 2025
  2. Study start1 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06852118
Sponsor's protocol ID
Anesth-.0435/2024 Med Research
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
22 Feb 2025
Last updated
28 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Ben-David B, Schmalenberger K, Chelly JE. Analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: is continuous sciatic blockade needed in addition to continuous femoral blockade? Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):747-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000096186.89230.56.

    PubMed 14980931
  • Shanthanna H, Singh B, Guyatt G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudal block as compared to noncaudal regional techniques for inguinal surgeries in children. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:890626. doi: 10.1155/2014/890626. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

    PubMed 25162033
  • Wang L, Qu Y, Deng Y, Li J, Liu Y, Wu C. Evaluation of a New Method of Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Pain Res. 2023 Jun 16;16:2091-2099. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S404489. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37346396

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AMM Group: Adductor Magnus Muscle Plane approach + Femoral Nerve Blocks and SG Group: Sciatic nerve block by sub-gluteal approach + Femoral nerve blocks in people with Adductor Magnus Plain Injection for Sciatic Nerve Block, run by Mohammed Gaber Saad at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of sciatic sensory block (time frame: At 30 minutes after the block). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06852118, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in