Alzheimers DiseaseADELAIDENCT06856681
Clinical Utility of Early vs. Late Blood Biomarker Testing for Alzheimer's Disease
A study testing PrecivityAD2 - Early Testing and PrecivityAD2 - Delayed Testing in people with Alzheimers Disease, run by C2N Diagnostics.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate whether use of the PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker assay with early result disclosure along with discretionary Precivity-ApoE proteotype testing will shorten the time to Alzheimer's Disease or non-Alzheimer's diagnosis as compared to delayed result disclosure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimers Disease
- What is being tested?
- PrecivityAD2 - Early Testing and PrecivityAD2 - Delayed Testing
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2025to Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Minimum age: 50 years.
- Patients presenting with symptoms of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or other cognitive impairments in which the enrolling clinician clinically suspects Alzheimer's pathology as the primary cause of symptomatic presentation
- Patients presenting with mixed brain pathologies including MCI/ cognitive impairments in which the investigator clinically suspects Alzheimer's pathology as the primary or contributing cause of symptomatic presentation
- Patients are able to attend study visits and standard care visits over the period of 1 year from the date of enrollment
- Patients are able to undergo routine phlebotomy and provide up to six (6) 10 ml tube(s) of blood for study related tests plus any additional blood necessary for standard laboratory testing at each study timepoint
- Patients are able to undergo standard care diagnostic procedures to include MRI (or CT), amyloid PET and/or CSF biomarker testing for AD diagnosis if prescribed by investigator
- Patients are able to provide informed consent. Or, if in the opinion of the clinician, the patient is unable to adequately understand the nature of the trial and protocol requirements, a family member or appropriate representative of the patient is present to consent, with additional assent by the patient.
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 50 years of age
- Patients being evaluated for cognitive impairment known to be predominantly the result of a disease or condition other than AD
- Patients previously diagnosed with AD, unless the ADELAIDE investigator has a strong clinical suspicion suggestive of an incorrect initial diagnosis upon referral
- Patients with no cognitive impairment or clinical symptoms of AD
- Patients desiring genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease markers without current cognitive impairment or other relevant clinical symptoms
- Patients who are not able or not willing to undergo standard care diagnostic procedures to include MRI (or CT), amyloid PET and/or CSF biomarker testing for AD diagnosis as prescribed by investigator
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients who are not able to understand the nature of the study nor the study requirements and not represented by a family member or other appropriate representative who is able to consent on behalf of the patient
- Patients who are not able to commit to attending the required study and/or standard care visits
- Patients who are not able to undergo routine phlebotomy or provide blood samples in the quantity required by the study protocol
About this study
Official title: A Study of the Clinical Effect of the Implementation of a Blood Biomarker Into Memory Clinics in the Department of Veterans Affairs and Other Closed System Healthcare Memory and Dementia Sites in the United States
The goal of this study is to evaluate whether use of the PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker assay with early result disclosure along with discretionary Precivity-ApoE proteotype testing will shorten the time to Alzheimer's Disease or non-Alzheimer's diagnosis as compared to delayed result disclosure.
Participants will be randomized into the early PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker test \& disclosure group (Cohort A) or to the later PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker test \& disclosure group (Cohort B) where blood samples will be collected and tested using the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 90). Participants will attend study visits for one year after their enrollment. An optional sub-study will be offered to collect information through questionnaires at each visit regarding participant's and their care-giver's experiences through the AD diagnostic journey.
Read the detailed description
Healthcare providers engaged in memory care and Alzheimer's disease (AD) management have shown significant interest in the performance of plasma tests. A collaboration with Veteran's Affairs (VA) and other closed healthcare systems represents an opportunity to examine the clinical validity and utility of blood biomarkers (BBM). The ADELAIDE study is a prospective, randomized, clinical utility, economic impact and real-world study. The BBM test under study is the PrecivityAD2 blood test that uses high-resolution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry to measure plasma Aβ42/40 and p-tau217/np-tau217 ratios. This study will assess and quantify the impact of BBM testing to overall time-to-diagnosis and time to prescription of an appropriate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) or non-AD therapy. Additionally, this study will assess the impact of BBM testing to procedure utilization and overall costs of healthcare and will assess the diagnostic confidence of clinicians that order the test.
- Conditions
- Alzheimers Disease
- Being tested
- PrecivityAD2 - Early Testing, PrecivityAD2 - Delayed Testing
- Keywords
- Blood biomarkers, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Alzheimers disease
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction, Dementia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PrecivityAD2 - Early TestingDiagnostic test
Participants in Cohort A will receive PrecivityAD2 testing at Visit 1, with results disclosed shortly after testing.
PrecivityAD2 - Delayed TestingDiagnostic test
Participants in Cohort B will receive PrecivityAD2 testing at Visit 2, with results disclosed shortly after testing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early Testing Group (Cohort A) | Experimental | Participants in this group will have blood drawn from the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 1 (Day 0). Physicians will use these results in clinical decision-making from that point forward. Receives: Diagnostic Test: PrecivityAD2 - Early Testing |
| Delayed Testing Group (Cohort B) | Experimental | Participants in this group will have blood drawn for the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 2 (Day 90). Until then, standard clinical decision-making will process without access to PrecivityAD2 results. Receives: Diagnostic Test: PrecivityAD2 - Delayed Testing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to achieve >=90% Diagnostic Confidence for AD or Non-AD
Number of days from enrollment to achieving a diagnostic confidence score of >=90% for AD or non-AD diagnosis (based on physician survey).
Measured: From enrollment until diagnosis, with primary assessment at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180).
Proportion of Patients with AD of Non-AD Diagnosis
Proportion of patients with a confirmed AD or non-AD diagnosis with a diagnostic confidence score of >=90%.
Measured: Assessed at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to Initiation or Modification of AD or Non-AD Therapy
Number of days from enrollment to the prescription, initiation, or modification of an AD or non-AD therapy. Data will be sourced from medical records and recorded in eCRF.
Measured: Measured from enrollment through Visit 4 (Day 365).
Proportion of patients on AD or non-AD prescription
Proportion of patients on AD or non-AD prescription (e.g., DMT, treatments for DLB/PDD or VaD, cholinesterase inhibitors, other) at Visit 3 (150-210).
Measured: Assessed at Visit 3 (150-210)
Number and Type of Diagnostic Tests Ordered
Total number and type of additional diagnostic tests ordered (e.g., amyloid PET, MRI, CSF biomarkers) from Visit 2 (Day 90) through the date of AD or non-AD diagnosis with physician confidence >=90%. Data will be collected via physician-reported case forms.
Measured: Evaluated cumulatively at Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180), and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Change in Physician Diagnostic Confidence
Comparison of physician reported confidence of AD or non-AD diagnosis (0-100%) before and after receiving PrecivityAD2 results. Confidence scores will be collected by physician survey.
Measured: Collected at Enrollment/Baseline (Day 0), Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180) and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2025
- Study startJul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2028 (estimated)
Why it stopped: sponsor decision to cancel project before enrollment.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alzheimers DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study uses a parallel assignment interventional model in which participants are randomized into one of two groups to evaluate the impact of the timing of PrecivityAD2 test on physician diagnostic confidence and clinical decision-making. Participants in the early testing group receive their PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 1, while those in the delayed testing group receive their results at Visit 3 (Day 90). Both groups proceed independently through the study, and assessments occur at standardized time points to measure changes in diagnostic confidence, treatment decision, and diagnostic test utilization.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- C2N Diagnostics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Alzheimer's Association
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vice President, Neurology, Study director, C2N Diagnostics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06856681
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 250
- Acronym
- ADELAIDE
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Meyer MR, Kirmess KM, Eastwood S, Wente-Roth TL, Irvin F, Holubasch MS, Venkatesh V, Fogelman I, Monane M, Hanna L, Rabinovici GD, Siegel BA, Whitmer RA, Apgar C, Bateman RJ, Holtzman DM, Irizarry M, Verbel D, Sachdev P, Ito S, Contois J, Yarasheski KE, Braunstein JB, Verghese PB, West T. Clinical validation of the PrecivityAD2 blood test: A mass spectrometry-based test with algorithm combining %p-tau217 and Abeta42/40 ratio to identify presence of brain amyloid. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3179-3192. doi: 10.1002/alz.13764. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
PubMed 38491912Palmqvist S, Tideman P, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Schindler SE, Smith R, Ossenkoppele R, Calling S, West T, Monane M, Verghese PB, Braunstein JB, Blennow K, Janelidze S, Stomrud E, Salvado G, Hansson O. Blood Biomarkers to Detect Alzheimer Disease in Primary Care and Secondary Care. JAMA. 2024 Oct 15;332(15):1245-1257. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.13855.
PubMed 39068545Schindler SE, Galasko D, Pereira AC, Rabinovici GD, Salloway S, Suarez-Calvet M, Khachaturian AS, Mielke MM, Udeh-Momoh C, Weiss J, Batrla R, Bozeat S, Dwyer JR, Holzapfel D, Jones DR, Murray JF, Partrick KA, Scholler E, Vradenburg G, Young D, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Aubrecht J, Braunstein JB, Hendrix J, Hu YH, Mattke S, Monane M, Reilly D, Somers E, Teunissen CE, Shobin E, Vanderstichele H, Weiner MW, Wilson D, Hansson O. Acceptable performance of blood biomarker tests of amyloid pathology - recommendations from the Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Jul;20(7):426-439. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-00977-5. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
PubMed 38866966
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study of the Clinical Effect of the Implementation of a Blood Biomarker Into Memory Clinics in the Department of Veterans Affairs and Other Closed System Healthcare Memory and Dementia Sites in the United States
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06856681
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADELAIDE / 250
- Conditions
- Alzheimers Disease
- Keywords
- Blood biomarkers, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Alzheimers disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: sponsor decision to cancel project before enrollment.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- C2N DiagnosticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Alzheimer's Association
- Study start
- Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to evaluate whether use of the PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker assay with early result disclosure along with discretionary Precivity-ApoE proteotype testing will shorten the time to Alzheimer's Disease or non-Alzheimer's diagnosis as compared to delayed result disclosure.
Participants will be randomized into the early PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker test \& disclosure group (Cohort A) or to the later PrecivityAD2 blood biomarker test \& disclosure group (Cohort B) where blood samples will be collected and tested using the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 90). Participants will attend study visits for one year after their enrollment. An optional sub-study will be offered to collect information through questionnaires at each visit regarding participant's and their care-giver's experiences through the AD diagnostic journey.
Detailed description
Healthcare providers engaged in memory care and Alzheimer's disease (AD) management have shown significant interest in the performance of plasma tests. A collaboration with Veteran's Affairs (VA) and other closed healthcare systems represents an opportunity to examine the clinical validity and utility of blood biomarkers (BBM). The ADELAIDE study is a prospective, randomized, clinical utility, economic impact and real-world study. The BBM test under study is the PrecivityAD2 blood test that uses high-resolution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry to measure plasma Aβ42/40 and p-tau217/np-tau217 ratios. This study will assess and quantify the impact of BBM testing to overall time-to-diagnosis and time to prescription of an appropriate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) or non-AD therapy. Additionally, this study will assess the impact of BBM testing to procedure utilization and overall costs of healthcare and will assess the diagnostic confidence of clinicians that order the test.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study uses a parallel assignment interventional model in which participants are randomized into one of two groups to evaluate the impact of the timing of PrecivityAD2 test on physician diagnostic confidence and clinical decision-making. Participants in the early testing group receive their PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 1, while those in the delayed testing group receive their results at Visit 3 (Day 90). Both groups proceed independently through the study, and assessments occur at standardized time points to measure changes in diagnostic confidence, treatment decision, and diagnostic test utilization.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early Testing Group (Cohort A) | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: PrecivityAD2 - Early TestingParticipants in this group will have blood drawn from the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 1 (Day 0). Physicians will use these results in clinical decision-making from that point forward. |
| Delayed Testing Group (Cohort B) | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: PrecivityAD2 - Delayed TestingParticipants in this group will have blood drawn for the PrecivityAD2 test at Visit 2 (Day 90). Until then, standard clinical decision-making will process without access to PrecivityAD2 results. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Minimum age: 50 years.
- Patients presenting with symptoms of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or other cognitive impairments in which the enrolling clinician clinically suspects Alzheimer's pathology as the primary cause of symptomatic presentation
- Patients presenting with mixed brain pathologies including MCI/ cognitive impairments in which the investigator clinically suspects Alzheimer's pathology as the primary or contributing cause of symptomatic presentation
- Patients are able to attend study visits and standard care visits over the period of 1 year from the date of enrollment
- Patients are able to undergo routine phlebotomy and provide up to six (6) 10 ml tube(s) of blood for study related tests plus any additional blood necessary for standard laboratory testing at each study timepoint
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients younger than 50 years of age
- Patients being evaluated for cognitive impairment known to be predominantly the result of a disease or condition other than AD
- Patients previously diagnosed with AD, unless the ADELAIDE investigator has a strong clinical suspicion suggestive of an incorrect initial diagnosis upon referral
- Patients with no cognitive impairment or clinical symptoms of AD
- Patients desiring genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease markers without current cognitive impairment or other relevant clinical symptoms
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PrecivityAD2 - Early TestingParticipants in Cohort A will receive PrecivityAD2 testing at Visit 1, with results disclosed shortly after testing. | Diagnostic test | Early Testing Group (Cohort A) |
| PrecivityAD2 - Delayed TestingParticipants in Cohort B will receive PrecivityAD2 testing at Visit 2, with results disclosed shortly after testing. | Diagnostic test | Delayed Testing Group (Cohort B) |
Primary outcome
Time to achieve >=90% Diagnostic Confidence for AD or Non-AD
Time frame: From enrollment until diagnosis, with primary assessment at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180).
Number of days from enrollment to achieving a diagnostic confidence score of >=90% for AD or non-AD diagnosis (based on physician survey).
Proportion of Patients with AD of Non-AD Diagnosis
Time frame: Assessed at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180)
Proportion of patients with a confirmed AD or non-AD diagnosis with a diagnostic confidence score of >=90%.
4 secondary outcomes
Time to Initiation or Modification of AD or Non-AD Therapy
Time frame: Measured from enrollment through Visit 4 (Day 365).
Proportion of patients on AD or non-AD prescription
Time frame: Assessed at Visit 3 (150-210)
Number and Type of Diagnostic Tests Ordered
Time frame: Evaluated cumulatively at Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180), and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Change in Physician Diagnostic Confidence
Time frame: Collected at Enrollment/Baseline (Day 0), Visit 2 (Day 90), Visit 3 (Day 180) and Visit 4 (Day 365)
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2025.
- Background: PubMed 38491912Meyer MR, Kirmess KM, Eastwood S, Wente-Roth TL, Irvin F, Holubasch MS, Venkatesh V, Fogelman I, Monane M, Hanna L, Rabinovici GD, Siegel BA, Whitmer RA, Apgar C, Bateman RJ, Holtzman DM, Irizarry M, Verbel D, Sachdev P, Ito S, Contois J, Yarasheski KE, Braunstein JB, Verghese PB, West T. Clinical validation of the PrecivityAD2 blood test: A mass spectrometry-based test with algorithm combining %p-tau217 and Abeta42/40 ratio to identify presence of brain amyloid. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3179-3192. doi: 10.1002/alz.13764. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 39068545Palmqvist S, Tideman P, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Schindler SE, Smith R, Ossenkoppele R, Calling S, West T, Monane M, Verghese PB, Braunstein JB, Blennow K, Janelidze S, Stomrud E, Salvado G, Hansson O. Blood Biomarkers to Detect Alzheimer Disease in Primary Care and Secondary Care. JAMA. 2024 Oct 15;332(15):1245-1257. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.13855.
- Background: PubMed 38866966Schindler SE, Galasko D, Pereira AC, Rabinovici GD, Salloway S, Suarez-Calvet M, Khachaturian AS, Mielke MM, Udeh-Momoh C, Weiss J, Batrla R, Bozeat S, Dwyer JR, Holzapfel D, Jones DR, Murray JF, Partrick KA, Scholler E, Vradenburg G, Young D, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Aubrecht J, Braunstein JB, Hendrix J, Hu YH, Mattke S, Monane M, Reilly D, Somers E, Teunissen CE, Shobin E, Vanderstichele H, Weiner MW, Wilson D, Hansson O. Acceptable performance of blood biomarker tests of amyloid pathology - recommendations from the Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Jul;20(7):426-439. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-00977-5. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Alzheimers Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vice President, Neurology study director
C2N Diagnostics
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PrecivityAD2 - Early Testing and PrecivityAD2 - Delayed Testing in people with Alzheimers Disease, run by C2N Diagnostics.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to achieve >=90% Diagnostic Confidence for AD or Non-AD (time frame: From enrollment until diagnosis, with primary assessment at Visit 2 (Day 90) and Visit 3 (Day 180).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06856681, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2025.