Positive Parenting SkillsNCT06865183
Investigating a Brief Virtual Seminar Series for Parents of Children Ages 2-12
A study testing Positive Parenting Seminar Series in people with Positive Parenting Skills, run by Texas Tech University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a brief positive parenting seminar series delivered virtually helps teach parents additional tools and strategies to support healthy child development, encourage good behavior, and manage misbehavior, while improving parenting practices and child outcomes for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Positive Parenting Skills
- What is being tested?
- Positive Parenting Seminar Series
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 123 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 Feb 2024to 14 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Parent must reside in the State of Texas
- Parent had to have at least one child ages 2-12 years
- Child had to live with parent at least one night every 2 weeks
Who cannot join
- Parent did not have sufficient English proficiency to understand seminar content and complete study-related surveys
- Parent did not have access to the internet and/or could not attend seminars using the Zoom platform
- Child was currently participating in mental health services
- Child began taking psychiatric medication within 1 month of the study
- Parent was currently participating in mental health services
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Further Evaluation of Selected Child Triple P as a Universal Intervention Delivered Through Telehealth
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a brief positive parenting seminar series delivered virtually helps teach parents additional tools and strategies to support healthy child development, encourage good behavior, and manage misbehavior, while improving parenting practices and child outcomes for parents of children ages 2-12.
The main questions it aims to answer are whether parents are satisfied with the intervention and find the strategies helpful and acceptable, whether the intervention leads to changes in parenting behaviors (e.g., positive parenting) and child outcomes (e.g., emotional and behavioral problems), and how removing the active discussion from the seminars impacts parents' ability to improve their parenting skills and their child's outcomes.
Read more
Researchers will compare three groups: parents receiving the seminars with a group discussion, parents receiving the seminars without a group discussion, and parents on a waitlist. This will help determine if group discussions lead to greater improvements in parenting practices and child outcomes.
Participants attended three online parenting seminars via telehealth (if assigned to a seminar group). They completed surveys before, during, and after the seminars to share their experiences and provide feedback. Participants in the waitlist group completed surveys at the beginning and end of the study, and will participate in the seminars after the study period.
Read the detailed description
Despite the effectiveness of parenting interventions in promoting adaptive child-rearing behaviors and preventing youth internalizing and externalizing problems, our current model for mental health treatment that involves a highly trained mental health professional providing services in a one-on-one format at a clinic, private office, or health-care facility is not sustainable. As such, there is an urgent need to identify ways to increase the accessibility and scalability of mental health services to reduce the well-documented gap between children and families who need mental health services and those who are able to access them. Therefore, the goal of the current randomized controlled trial is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a brief (i.e., 3 session) seminar series for parents with children between the ages of 2 and 12, which was offered via telehealth to increase accessibility. Additionally, this project will evaluate whether the ability for parents to ask questions and discuss skill implementation with a mental health provider is necessary for treatment effectiveness, given that programs that do not require a provider for implementation have the potential for greater scalability.
After completing the baseline survey, eligible parents were randomly assigned to condition using block randomization. For parents assigned to the intervention-as-usual condition (i.e., 90-minute condition), seminars were delivered live by two masters-level therapists who were fully accredited in Selected Child Triple P. The seminars consisted of 60-minutes of seminar content (i.e., discussion of various parenting strategies), followed by a 30-minute question-and-answer period. Participation was encouraged by co-leaders throughout the seminars and the question-and-answer period.
For parents assigned to the intervention without an active discussion component (i.e., 60-minute condition), seminar content was pre-recorded by the same two co-leaders who led the seminars live to ensure standardization of the material and to create an environment focused on receiving information rather than active participation. During these meetings, participants were not allowed to unmute and were only able to message the hosts of the meeting (i.e., the leader).
The same seminar content was covered in both intervention conditions. The seminars included the Power of Positive Parenting, Raising Confident, Competent Children, and Raising Resilient Children.
Approximately 2-months and 4-months after attending the final seminar, parents were contacted to complete a 30-minute follow-up survey for which they were compensated. The dates that parents attended each seminar were recorded and parents were contacted approximately 2-months and 4-months after their last attended seminar (or their last opportunity to attend a seminar if they did not attend all three seminars). Parents in the waitlist control condition were contacted approximately 2-months and 4-months after the last seminar was offered to those assigned to the intervention conditions in their enrollment cohort.
- Conditions
- Positive Parenting Skills
- Being tested
- Positive Parenting Seminar Series
- Keywords
- Selected Child Triple P, Parenting Intervention, Telehealth, Positive Parenting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Positive Parenting Seminar SeriesBehavioural
Also called Selected Child Triple P
Selected Child Triple P Positive Parenting Seminar Series Delivered Through Telehealth
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention-as-usual | Experimental | 90-minute positive parenting seminars with active discussion component Receives: Behavioral: Positive Parenting Seminar Series |
| Intervention without an active discussion component | Experimental | 60-minute positive parenting seminars without an active discussion component Receives: Behavioral: Positive Parenting Seminar Series |
| Waitlist Control | No intervention | Assessment-only waitlist control condition |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Parent Satisfaction
Parents assigned to an intervention condition completed a modified 8-item version of the Parent Satisfaction Survey after each seminar. Response options ranged from 1 (Poor, No definitely not, or Not at all) to 7 (Excellent, Yes, definitely, or Very much).
Measured: Weekly, through intervention completion, average of 3 weeks.
Acceptability
Parents assigned to an intervention condition completed a modified 9-item version of the Treatment Acceptability Rating Form. Response options ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 7 (Very much).
Measured: Weekly, through intervention completion, average of 3 weeks.
Positive Parenting
All parents completed the 16-item positive parenting composite measure of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale, which was comprised of proactive parenting (6-items), positive reinforcement (4-items), warmth (3-items), and supportiveness (3-items) sub-scales. Response options ranged from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always) reflecting the frequency with which parents engaged in different parenting behaviors.
Measured: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Negative Parenting
All parents completed the 18-item negative parenting composite measure of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale, which was comprised of hostility (7-items), physical control (4-items), and lax control (7-items) sub-scales. Response options ranged from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always) reflecting the frequency with which parents engaged in different parenting behaviors.
Measured: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Parental Psychological Control
All parents completed the 8-item Parent Psychological Control Measure, that is based off the Psychological Control Scale - Youth Self-Report. Response options ranged from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always) reflecting the frequency with which parents engaged in different parenting behaviors.
Measured: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Parental Knowledge of Effective Parenting Strategies
All parents completed the 16-item Brief Version of the Knowledge of Parenting Strategies Scale. Parents selected one response that would reflect the most effective action for a parent to take in a situation described in the question.
Measured: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Parental Hope
All parents completed the 5-item Hope for Parenting Scale. Response options ranged from 1 (Definitely False) to 8 (Definitely True) indicating how much they agree or disagree with each item.
Measured: Baseline, weekly, through intervention completion (average of 3 weeks), 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Parental Self-Efficacy
All parents completed the 5-item Brief Parental Self-Efficacy Scale. Response options ranged from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree), indicating how much they agreed with each statement.
Measured: Baseline, weekly, through intervention completion (average of 3 weeks), 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Global Satisfaction
Parents assigned to an intervention condition also completed the 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Response options ranged from 1 (None of my needs have been met, Quite dissatisfied) to 4 (Almost all of my needs have been met, Very satisfied).
Measured: 2-months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Child Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties
All parents completed the 25-item Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. This measure consists of emotional problems (5-items), conduct problems (5-items), hyperactivity (5-items), peer problems (5-items), and prosocial behavior (5-items) sub-scales. Each sub-scale will be examined as an outcome, along with the total difficulties scale, which is a composite of all five sub-scales and reflects overall emotional and behavioral difficulties. Response options ranged from 0 (Not true) to 2 (Certainly True) and reflects how often children experience various difficulties.
Measured: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Child Emotion Dysregulation
All parents completed the 24-item Emotion Dysregulation Inventory. Response options ranged from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very severe) reflecting the severity of various emotions and behaviors displayed by children.
Measured: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Child Emotion Regulation
All parents completed the 8-item emotion regulation sub-scale of the Emotion Regulation Checklist. Response options ranged from 0 (Never) to 3 (Almost always) reflecting the frequency with which children displayed various emotions and behaviors.
Measured: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2025
- Study start23 Feb 2024
- Primary completion14 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Positive Parenting SkillsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Three study conditions compared: intervention-as-usual, intervention without an active discussion component, and waitlist control
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 123 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Tech University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John Cooley, University of Florida
- Investigators
- John L. Cooley, Ph.D., Principal investigator, University of Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06865183
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-1035c
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Sumargi A, Sofronoff K, Morawska A. A Randomized-Controlled Trial of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Seminar Series with Indonesian Parents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015 Oct;46(5):749-61. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0517-8.
PubMed 25335876Sanders, M., Prior, J., & Ralph, A. (2009). An evaluation of a brief universal seminar series on positive parenting: A feasibility study. Journal of Children's Services, 4(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/17466660200900002
Foskolos, K., Gardner, F., & Montgomery, P. (2023). Brief parenting seminars for preventing child behavioral and emotional difficulties: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32(10), 3063-3075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02653-6
Ricker BT, Cooley JL, Dennis VE, Streicher BE, Mitchell TB, Cummings C, Singer J. Evaluating A Brief Telehealth Positive Parenting Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Prev Sci. 2026 Mar;27(3):390-405. doi: 10.1007/s11121-026-01894-3. Epub 2026 Mar 21.
PubMed 41863587
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Further Evaluation of Selected Child Triple P as a Universal Intervention Delivered Through Telehealth
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06865183
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023-1035c
- Conditions
- Positive Parenting Skills
- Keywords
- Selected Child Triple P, Parenting Intervention, Telehealth, Positive Parenting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 123 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Tech UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a brief positive parenting seminar series delivered virtually helps teach parents additional tools and strategies to support healthy child development, encourage good behavior, and manage misbehavior, while improving parenting practices and child outcomes for parents of children ages 2-12.
The main questions it aims to answer are whether parents are satisfied with the intervention and find the strategies helpful and acceptable, whether the intervention leads to changes in parenting behaviors (e.g., positive parenting) and child outcomes (e.g., emotional and behavioral problems), and how removing the active discussion from the seminars impacts parents' ability to improve their parenting skills and their child's outcomes.
Researchers will compare three groups: parents receiving the seminars with a group discussion, parents receiving the seminars without a group discussion, and parents on a waitlist. This will help determine if group discussions lead to greater improvements in parenting practices and child outcomes.
Participants attended three online parenting seminars via telehealth (if assigned to a seminar group). They completed surveys before, during, and after the seminars to share their experiences and provide feedback. Participants in the waitlist group completed surveys at the beginning and end of the study, and will participate in the seminars after the study period.
Detailed description
Despite the effectiveness of parenting interventions in promoting adaptive child-rearing behaviors and preventing youth internalizing and externalizing problems, our current model for mental health treatment that involves a highly trained mental health professional providing services in a one-on-one format at a clinic, private office, or health-care facility is not sustainable. As such, there is an urgent need to identify ways to increase the accessibility and scalability of mental health services to reduce the well-documented gap between children and families who need mental health services and those who are able to access them. Therefore, the goal of the current randomized controlled trial is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a brief (i.e., 3 session) seminar series for parents with children between the ages of 2 and 12, which was offered via telehealth to increase accessibility. Additionally, this project will evaluate whether the ability for parents to ask questions and discuss skill implementation with a mental health provider is necessary for treatment effectiveness, given that programs that do not require a provider for implementation have the potential for greater scalability.
After completing the baseline survey, eligible parents were randomly assigned to condition using block randomization. For parents assigned to the intervention-as-usual condition (i.e., 90-minute condition), seminars were delivered live by two masters-level therapists who were fully accredited in Selected Child Triple P. The seminars consisted of 60-minutes of seminar content (i.e., discussion of various parenting strategies), followed by a 30-minute question-and-answer period. Participation was encouraged by co-leaders throughout the seminars and the question-and-answer period.
For parents assigned to the intervention without an active discussion component (i.e., 60-minute condition), seminar content was pre-recorded by the same two co-leaders who led the seminars live to ensure standardization of the material and to create an environment focused on receiving information rather than active participation. During these meetings, participants were not allowed to unmute and were only able to message the hosts of the meeting (i.e., the leader).
The same seminar content was covered in both intervention conditions. The seminars included the Power of Positive Parenting, Raising Confident, Competent Children, and Raising Resilient Children.
Approximately 2-months and 4-months after attending the final seminar, parents were contacted to complete a 30-minute follow-up survey for which they were compensated. The dates that parents attended each seminar were recorded and parents were contacted approximately 2-months and 4-months after their last attended seminar (or their last opportunity to attend a seminar if they did not attend all three seminars). Parents in the waitlist control condition were contacted approximately 2-months and 4-months after the last seminar was offered to those assigned to the intervention conditions in their enrollment cohort.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Three study conditions compared: intervention-as-usual, intervention without an active discussion component, and waitlist control
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention-as-usual | Experimental | Behavioral: Positive Parenting Seminar Series90-minute positive parenting seminars with active discussion component |
| Intervention without an active discussion component | Experimental | Behavioral: Positive Parenting Seminar Series60-minute positive parenting seminars without an active discussion component |
| Waitlist Control | No intervention | –Assessment-only waitlist control condition |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Parent must reside in the State of Texas
- Parent had to have at least one child ages 2-12 years
- Child had to live with parent at least one night every 2 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Parent did not have sufficient English proficiency to understand seminar content and complete study-related surveys
- Parent did not have access to the internet and/or could not attend seminars using the Zoom platform
- Child was currently participating in mental health services
- Child began taking psychiatric medication within 1 month of the study
- Parent was currently participating in mental health services
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Parenting Seminar SeriesAlso: Selected Child Triple PSelected Child Triple P Positive Parenting Seminar Series Delivered Through Telehealth | Behavioural | Intervention without an active discussion component, Intervention-as-usual |
Primary outcome
Parent Satisfaction
Time frame: Weekly, through intervention completion, average of 3 weeks.
Parents assigned to an intervention condition completed a modified 8-item version of the Parent Satisfaction Survey after each seminar. Response options ranged from 1 (Poor, No definitely not, or Not at all) to 7 (Excellent, Yes, definitely, or Very much).
Acceptability
Time frame: Weekly, through intervention completion, average of 3 weeks.
Parents assigned to an intervention condition completed a modified 9-item version of the Treatment Acceptability Rating Form. Response options ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 7 (Very much).
Positive Parenting
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
All parents completed the 16-item positive parenting composite measure of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale, which was comprised of proactive parenting (6-items), positive reinforcement (4-items), warmth (3-items), and supportiveness (3-items) sub-scales. Response options ranged from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always) reflecting the frequency with which parents engaged in different parenting behaviors.
Negative Parenting
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
All parents completed the 18-item negative parenting composite measure of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale, which was comprised of hostility (7-items), physical control (4-items), and lax control (7-items) sub-scales. Response options ranged from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always) reflecting the frequency with which parents engaged in different parenting behaviors.
Parental Psychological Control
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
All parents completed the 8-item Parent Psychological Control Measure, that is based off the Psychological Control Scale - Youth Self-Report. Response options ranged from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always) reflecting the frequency with which parents engaged in different parenting behaviors.
Parental Knowledge of Effective Parenting Strategies
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
All parents completed the 16-item Brief Version of the Knowledge of Parenting Strategies Scale. Parents selected one response that would reflect the most effective action for a parent to take in a situation described in the question.
Parental Hope
Time frame: Baseline, weekly, through intervention completion (average of 3 weeks), 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
All parents completed the 5-item Hope for Parenting Scale. Response options ranged from 1 (Definitely False) to 8 (Definitely True) indicating how much they agree or disagree with each item.
Parental Self-Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline, weekly, through intervention completion (average of 3 weeks), 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
All parents completed the 5-item Brief Parental Self-Efficacy Scale. Response options ranged from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree), indicating how much they agreed with each statement.
Global Satisfaction
Time frame: 2-months
Parents assigned to an intervention condition also completed the 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Response options ranged from 1 (None of my needs have been met, Quite dissatisfied) to 4 (Almost all of my needs have been met, Very satisfied).
3 secondary outcomes
Child Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Child Emotion Dysregulation
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Child Emotion Regulation
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, and 4-month follow-up assessments.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 25335876Sumargi A, Sofronoff K, Morawska A. A Randomized-Controlled Trial of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Seminar Series with Indonesian Parents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015 Oct;46(5):749-61. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0517-8.
- BackgroundSanders, M., Prior, J., & Ralph, A. (2009). An evaluation of a brief universal seminar series on positive parenting: A feasibility study. Journal of Children's Services, 4(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/17466660200900002
- BackgroundFoskolos, K., Gardner, F., & Montgomery, P. (2023). Brief parenting seminars for preventing child behavioral and emotional difficulties: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32(10), 3063-3075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02653-6
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41863587Ricker BT, Cooley JL, Dennis VE, Streicher BE, Mitchell TB, Cummings C, Singer J. Evaluating A Brief Telehealth Positive Parenting Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Prev Sci. 2026 Mar;27(3):390-405. doi: 10.1007/s11121-026-01894-3. Epub 2026 Mar 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Positive Parenting Skills
Active, not recruiting
Investigating a Brief Virtual Seminar Series for Parents of Teens Ages 13-17
Positive Parenting Skills
Not yet recruiting
Increasing Kindergarten Social-Emotional Skills for Positive Long-Term Mental Health
Parenting Behavior, Social Emotional Competence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John L. Cooley, Ph.D. principal investigator
University of Florida
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Positive Parenting Seminar Series in people with Positive Parenting Skills, run by Texas Tech University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Parent Satisfaction (time frame: Weekly, through intervention completion, average of 3 weeks.). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06865183, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2026.