AzTrials
AzTrials

Maxillary Sinus Squamous Cell CarcinomaNCT06865313

Functional Evaluation After Maxillectomy and Scapular Free Flap Reconstruction

An observational study of Maxillary Sinus Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of the study is to analyse the functional and aesthetic outcomes after removal of the maxillar bone and reconstruction with part of the scapular bone for people having maxillary tumor Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Maxillary Sinus Squamous Cell Carcinoma
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Mar 2023to 30 Jun 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: all patients with malignant or benign maxillary sinus tumors managed by total maxillectomy and free scapula tip flap reconstruction between January 2015 and July 2023 in the Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) department of Croix Rousse Hospital in Lyon, France.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with maxillary sinus tumor
  • Treated by maxillectomy with free scapula tip flap reconstruction
  • 18 years of age or older

Who cannot join

  • Reconstruction failure
  • Carcinomatous recurrence and/or further progression impacting quality of life
  • Death

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Croix Rousse Hospital

    Lyon, 69004

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Total or Subtotal Maxillectomy with Scapular Free Flap Reconstruction: Airway Management, Aesthetic and Functional Results

The goal of the study is to analyse the functional and aesthetic outcomes after removal of the maxillar bone and reconstruction with part of the scapular bone for people having maxillary tumor

Keywords
Maxillectomy, Reconstruction, Scapula, Tracheotomy, Functional, Aesthetic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06865313
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients studiedpatients with malignant or benign maxillary sinus tumors managed by total maxillectomy and free scapular flap reconstruction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. time to resumption of oral feeding

    time to resumption of oral feeding after the surgery, measuring in days

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 15 days

  2. duration of hospitalization in a continuing care unit

    hospitalization in a continuing care unit after the surgery, measuring in days

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 15 days

  3. Tracheotomy

    need to do a tracheotomy during or after the surgery, qualitative outcome (yes or no)

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 15 days

  4. Hospitalisation time

    Duration of the whole hospitalisation in the ENT unit, measuring in days

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 15 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Swallowing assessment with the Functional Oral Intake Scale

    Swallowing was assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Scores ranged from one (no oral intake) to seven (normal diet with no change in texture), with a high score indicating good swallowing function.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 years

  2. Aesthetic evaluation

    A subjective patient assessment of the aesthetic result was carried out using the appearance subcategory of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL v4). There are five possible responses, each scored at 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100. A score of 0 represents the worst possible aesthetic result, and a score of 100 the best possible result.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 years

  3. Quality of Life assessment using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (version 3.0) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head & Neck 43 questionnaires.

    The QLQ-C30 is a general quality-of-life questionnaire specific to oncological pathology and intended for all cancer patients regardless of location.

    It comprises a central questionnaire for assessing 5 functions (physical, cognitive, social, limitations in daily activities and psychological), 9 symptoms and overall health. To this questionnaire can be added modules specific to a cancer site, such as the EORTC QLQ-H\&N43 for head and neck cancers.

    Responses to both questionnaires are then transformed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health scale, a high score represents a good level of functioning, while a high score on the symptom scales indicates a high level of symptoms and/or problems.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 years

  4. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire

    Functional assessment of the upper limb was performed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of both upper limbs. The score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate an inability to perform tasks, great difficulty in doing them, or significant symptoms.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06865313
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-05-022-CS
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
18 Feb 2025
Last updated
7 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Maxillary Sinus Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

time to resumption of oral feeding (time frame: through study completion, an average of 15 days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in