Malnutrition, ChildNCT06866626
Impact of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend and Nutrition Education on Turkana Children's Health Outcomes
A study testing Theory-Based Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and WASH Practices Among Turkana Caregivers and Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend in people with Malnutrition, Child, run by Texas Tech University at 1 site in Kenya.
Trial summary
The goal of this study was to test the effect of an intervention that Integrated supplemental feeding program for children aged 6-59 months with a caregiver intensive nutrition education intervention on the health outcomes of Turkan children aged 6-59 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 59 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Malnutrition, Child
- What is being tested?
- Theory-Based Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and WASH Practices Among Turkana Caregivers and Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 602 participants
- Where
- 1 siteKenya
- Study dates
- 12 Jun 2023to 15 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 59 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children between 6-59 months
- no known allergy reactions to rice, lentils, carrots and onions
- being a permanent resident of nayada and sopel villages
- willingness to participate in the study
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend Combined with a Theory Based Nutrition Education Intervention on Turkana Children's Health Outcomes
The goal of this study was to test the effect of an intervention that Integrated supplemental feeding program for children aged 6-59 months with a caregiver intensive nutrition education intervention on the health outcomes of Turkan children aged 6-59 months.
The purpose of this study was fivefold: (i) to assess child nutrition status, food security status, child feeding practices, water, hygiene and sanitation (WASH) practices, and the associated factors in Turkana County, Kenya. (ii) To assess the nutrition knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intentions towards recommended child feeding practices among Turkana caregivers of children aged 6-59 months. (iii) To assess the effect of a theory-based nutrition education intervention on nutrition knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intentions towards recommended child feeding practices among Turkana caregivers of children aged 6-59 months, (iv) to evaluate the effect of a theory-based nutrition education intervention on child feeding practices and WASH practices among Turkana caregivers of children aged 6-59 months, (v) and to assess the effect of consuming Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend combined with nutrition education intervention on the nutritional status of Turkana children aged 6 -59 months.
In this quasi-experimental study, children in the intervention group received a daily meal of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend (6 days/week) for eight weeks and their caregivers' received sessions of nutrition education on infant and young child feeding practices and WASH practices. The participants in the control group were only given one bag of supplemental food on the days of data collection to compensate for their time
- Conditions
- Malnutrition, Child
- Being tested
- Theory-Based Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and WASH Practices Among Turkana Caregivers, Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend
- Keywords
- Complementary feeding, WASH practices, Child undernutrition, nutrition education, Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend, Supplemental feeding
- Medical subject headings
- Child Nutrition Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Theory-Based Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and WASH Practices Among Turkana CaregiversBehavioural
This nutrition education intervention was designed following the DESIGN procedure, informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, and employed health literacy principles. The nutrition education sessions were held Monday through Saturday for a total of 8 weeks in a community building. This nutrition education intervention had 4 modules, module one covered the recommended breastfeeding practices, including early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and continued breastfeeding. The second module was on the young child feeding practices, with a focus on the quality and quantity of the child's meal. The third module entailed WASH practices such as disinfection of drinking water, harms of open defecation, and other personal and household hygiene practices. The fourth module served as a comprehensive review of all previous modules.
Harvest Lentil Vegetable BlendDietary supplement
Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend is a dehydrated supplemental food produced from natural ingredients namely, rice, carrots, lentils and onions. This product was prepared by mixing it with water and boiling the mixture for approximately 25-35 minutes to a mid-consistency. In this study we implemented a blanket supplementary feeding program where all the recruited children in the intervention group received a meal of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend. The feeding program was on-site, and participating children aged 6-12 months received three-quarters of a cup of the supplemental food, (~ 52 kcal/d). Children aged 13-23 months received 1 cup of the supplemental food (∼69 kcal/d), whereas children aged 24-59 months received 2 cups of the supplemental food (∼138 kcal/d). The feeding was implemented for 6 days a week (Monday through Saturday) for a total of eight weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | This arm consisted of 171 children aged 6-59 months and 145 children's caregivers. Children received a daily meal of a supplemental food (Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend) six days a week for a total of eight weeks. Additionally, their caregivers received a theory-based nutrition education intervention on complementary feeding practices and water, hygiene and sanitation (WASH) practices for eight weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Theory-Based Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and WASH Practices Among Turkana Caregivers; Dietary Supplement: Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend |
| Control group | No intervention | This group consistent of 147 children aged 6-59 months and 139 children's caregivers. Children in the control group were given one bag of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend on the days of data collection while their caregivers received no nutrition education intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Weight
Child's weight measurements were taken using an electronic weighing scale (ROTLIN) and recorded to the nearest 0.01kg. To measure the weight of children less than 24 months, we first weighed their caregivers alone and then weighed caregivers with the child. To gain the true weight of the child we subtracted the combined weight of the child and their caregiver from the caregiver's recorded weight. Children older than 24 months were weighed alone.
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Height
Child's height was measured using Shorr Board® measuring board. For children below 24 months, their lying length was measured. For children older than 24 months, their standing height was taken . Height measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.1cm.
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Height-for-age z-scores (HAZ)
height-for-age (HAZ) were computed using the WHO Anthro Survey Analyzer software.
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ)
Weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ) were computed using the WHO Anthro Survey Analyzer software.
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Weight-for-height z scores (WHZ)
Weight-for-height z-scores (WHZ) were computed using the WHO Anthro Survey Analyzer software.
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
% of children affected by stunting
Children were classified as stunted if their HAZ were below -2 SD the WHO Child Growth Standards
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
% of children affected by underweight
Children were classified as underweight if their WAZ were below -2 SD the WHO Child Growth Standards
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
% of children affected by wasting
Children were classified as wasted if their WHZ were below -2 SD the WHO Child Growth Standards
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
% of children co-currently affected by wasting and stunting
Children were classified as co-currently stunted and wasted if their HAZ and WHZ wew below -2 SD the WHO Child Growth Standards
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Meal Frequency
The meal frequency was calculated by summing all the feedings a child consumed throughout the day, including solid, semi-solid or soft foods, as well as milk feeds for non-breastfed children. The proportion of children meeting the minimum meal frequency (MMF) was computed among children aged 6-23 months. Per the WHO and UNICEF guidelines, the recommended age-appropriate meal frequency varies both by child's age and breastfeeding status. The recommended MMF is two feedings for breastfed children aged 6-8 months, three feedings for breastfed children 9-23 months, and four feedings for non-breastfed children 6-23 months .
Measured: Baseline, midline ( 4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline( 8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Dietary Diversity
To assess children's dietary diversity, caregivers were asked if their children consumed food from the following eight foods groups: (i) breastmilk, (ii) grains, roots, and tubbers (iii) pulses, nuts, and seeds, (iv) dairy products, (v) flesh foods, (vi) eggs, (vii) vitamin-A-rich fruits and vegetables, and (viii) other fruits and vegetables . A food group was assigned a score of one if a child consumed at least one food item from that group; otherwise, it was scored as zero. To calculate the dietary diversity scores, all the food groups consumed were added up. The maximum possible score was eight food groups for children aged 6-23 months and seven food groups for children 24-59 months (excluding breastmilk). A child was considered to have met the minimum dietary diversity if they consumed at least five food groups for ages 6-23 months and at least four food groups for ages 24-59 months .
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Consumption of animal sources foods (ASFs)
The proportion of children consuming ASFs was calculated by dividing the number of children who consumed at least one food item from dairy products, flesh foods and eggs food groups by the total number of children in the sample.
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Acceptable diet score
The proportion of children meeting the minimum acceptable diet was calculated among children aged 6-23 months. This is a composite measure of both the dietary diversity and meal frequency . Breastfed children were said to receive minimum acceptable diet if they met both minimum dietary diversity (MDD) and the age-appropriate meal frequency (MMF) . For non-breastfed children they had to meet the MDD, the age-appropriate MMF, and receive at least two milk feeds.
Measured: Baseline, midline ( 4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline( 8 weeks after baseline assessments)
WASH Practices
The household WASH practices were assessed using a questionnaire adapted from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. The assessed WASH practices were: source of drinking water, preparation of drinking water, hand washing at the critical time, proper handwashing technique, sanitation facility and open defecation.
Measured: Baseline, midline ( 4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline( 8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers' Knowledge on Infant and Child Complementary Feeding Practices
A total of 12 items were used to assess caregivers' knowledge on proper IYCF practices. These items have been adapted from the FAO guidelines for assessing nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices, and were validated by experts in the Community and International Nutrition Research (CINR) Lab. Each correct question was given a score of one, or else a score of zero was given. All the correct scores were summated to provide an aggregate knowledge score for each participant, with the maximum possible score of 12 points. Knowledge scores were further categorized as low (< 6 points), fair (6 - 8 points), and Adequate (> 8 points).
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers' attitudes towards child feeding practices
A total of 13 questions were used to assess caregivers' attitudes towards child feeding practices (e.g.: "Solid foods should be introduced to children at 6 months"). Possible responses to the attitudes' questions were "disagree", "not sure", and "agree". The summated attitude scores were calculated for each caregiver, where responses for each question were scored as follows: "disagree" was assigned a score of one, "not sure" a score of two, and "agree" a score of three. The total maximum possible score was 39 points, with a higher score indicating positive attitudes towards child feeding practices . The attitudes scores were further divided into two categories, attitudes towards breastfeeding practices (possible maximum score was 6 points) and attitudes towards complementary practices (possible maximum score was 33 points).
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers perceived social support (subjective norms)
Caregivers perceived social support on the practice of proper child feeding practices were assessed using five questions (e.g.: "People who are important to me think that I should start giving my child semisolid or solid foods after he/she turns 2 weeks"). The responses to the subjective norms' questions were on a three-point Likert scale of "disagree", "not sure", and "agree". The aggregate subjective norms score was calculated for each caregiver, where those who responded "disagree" were assigned a score of one, "not sure" assigned a score of two, and "agree" assigned a score of three for positively worded questions and the reverse for the negatively worded questions. The possible maximum subjective norms score was 15 points, and the minimum score was five points. Higher score indicated greater perceived social support for adhering to the recommended child feeding practices.
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers perceived behavioral control
Five items were used to assess caregivers perceived behavioral control (e.g.: "I feel confident feeding my child when he/she is sick"). Caregivers answered on three points- Likert scale of "not confident", "ok/so-so", and "confident". The composite perceived behavioral control score was calculated for each caregiver, with those who responded "not confident" assigned a score of one, "ok/so-so" a score of two, and "confident" a score of three. The possible maximum subjective norms score was 15 points and the minimum score was five points, with higher values indicating high perceived behavioral control
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers' intentions to practice recommended child feeding practices
A total of five questions were used to assess caregivers' intentions to practice recommended child feeding practices (e.g.: "I intend to feed my child different types of food"). Possible responses to the attitudes' questions were "disagree", "neither agree nor disagree", and "agree". The summative intentions score was calculated for each caregiver, with those who responded "disagree" assigned a score of one, "neither agree nor disagree" a score of two, and "agree" a score of three. The possible maximum subjective norms score was 15 points, with higher values indicating high motivation to comply to the recommended child feeding practices
Measured: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2025
- Study start12 Jun 2023
- Primary completion15 Aug 2023
- Study completion15 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Malnutrition, ChildStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 602 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Tech University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Breedlove Foods Inc
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mary Murimi, Texas Tech University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06866626
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB2023-381
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend Combined with a Theory Based Nutrition Education Intervention on Turkana Children's Health Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06866626
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB2023-381
- Conditions
- Malnutrition, Child
- Keywords
- Complementary feeding, WASH practices, Child undernutrition, nutrition education, Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend, Supplemental feeding
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 602 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Tech UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Breedlove Foods Inc
- Study start
- 12 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study was to test the effect of an intervention that Integrated supplemental feeding program for children aged 6-59 months with a caregiver intensive nutrition education intervention on the health outcomes of Turkan children aged 6-59 months.
The purpose of this study was fivefold: (i) to assess child nutrition status, food security status, child feeding practices, water, hygiene and sanitation (WASH) practices, and the associated factors in Turkana County, Kenya. (ii) To assess the nutrition knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intentions towards recommended child feeding practices among Turkana caregivers of children aged 6-59 months. (iii) To assess the effect of a theory-based nutrition education intervention on nutrition knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intentions towards recommended child feeding practices among Turkana caregivers of children aged 6-59 months, (iv) to evaluate the effect of a theory-based nutrition education intervention on child feeding practices and WASH practices among Turkana caregivers of children aged 6-59 months, (v) and to assess the effect of consuming Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend combined with nutrition education intervention on the nutritional status of Turkana children aged 6 -59 months.
In this quasi-experimental study, children in the intervention group received a daily meal of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend (6 days/week) for eight weeks and their caregivers' received sessions of nutrition education on infant and young child feeding practices and WASH practices. The participants in the control group were only given one bag of supplemental food on the days of data collection to compensate for their time
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Theory-Based Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and WASH Practices Among Turkana Caregivers, Dietary Supplement: Harvest Lentil Vegetable BlendThis arm consisted of 171 children aged 6-59 months and 145 children's caregivers. Children received a daily meal of a supplemental food (Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend) six days a week for a total of eight weeks. Additionally, their caregivers received a theory-based nutrition education intervention on complementary feeding practices and water, hygiene and sanitation (WASH) practices for eight weeks. |
| Control group | No intervention | –This group consistent of 147 children aged 6-59 months and 139 children's caregivers. Children in the control group were given one bag of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend on the days of data collection while their caregivers received no nutrition education intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Children between 6-59 months
- no known allergy reactions to rice, lentils, carrots and onions
- being a permanent resident of nayada and sopel villages
- willingness to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Theory-Based Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and WASH Practices Among Turkana CaregiversThis nutrition education intervention was designed following the DESIGN procedure, informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, and employed health literacy principles. The nutrition education sessions were held Monday through Saturday for a total of 8 weeks in a community building. This nutrition education intervention had 4 modules, module one covered the recommended breastfeeding practices, including early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and continued breastfeeding. The second module was on the young child feeding practices, with a focus on the quality and quantity of the child's meal. The third module entailed WASH practices such as disinfection of drinking water, harms of open defecation, and other personal and household hygiene practices. The fourth module served as a comprehensive review of all previous modules. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| Harvest Lentil Vegetable BlendHarvest Lentil Vegetable Blend is a dehydrated supplemental food produced from natural ingredients namely, rice, carrots, lentils and onions. This product was prepared by mixing it with water and boiling the mixture for approximately 25-35 minutes to a mid-consistency. In this study we implemented a blanket supplementary feeding program where all the recruited children in the intervention group received a meal of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend. The feeding program was on-site, and participating children aged 6-12 months received three-quarters of a cup of the supplemental food, (~ 52 kcal/d). Children aged 13-23 months received 1 cup of the supplemental food (∼69 kcal/d), whereas children aged 24-59 months received 2 cups of the supplemental food (∼138 kcal/d). The feeding was implemented for 6 days a week (Monday through Saturday) for a total of eight weeks. | Dietary supplement | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Weight
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Child's weight measurements were taken using an electronic weighing scale (ROTLIN) and recorded to the nearest 0.01kg. To measure the weight of children less than 24 months, we first weighed their caregivers alone and then weighed caregivers with the child. To gain the true weight of the child we subtracted the combined weight of the child and their caregiver from the caregiver's recorded weight. Children older than 24 months were weighed alone.
18 secondary outcomes
Height
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Height-for-age z-scores (HAZ)
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ)
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Weight-for-height z scores (WHZ)
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
% of children affected by stunting
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
% of children affected by underweight
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
% of children affected by wasting
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
% of children co-currently affected by wasting and stunting
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Meal Frequency
Time frame: Baseline, midline ( 4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline( 8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Dietary Diversity
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Consumption of animal sources foods (ASFs)
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Acceptable diet score
Time frame: Baseline, midline ( 4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline( 8 weeks after baseline assessments)
WASH Practices
Time frame: Baseline, midline ( 4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline( 8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers' Knowledge on Infant and Child Complementary Feeding Practices
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers' attitudes towards child feeding practices
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers perceived social support (subjective norms)
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers perceived behavioral control
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Caregivers' intentions to practice recommended child feeding practices
Time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Malnutrition, Child
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Maternal Probiotic Intervention to Improve Gut Health-Trial II-Pakistan
Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), Stunting
Recruiting
Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Vitamin D Deficiency
Active, not recruiting
Milk Fat Globule Membrane-Enhanced RUTF for Children With Severe Acute Malnutrition
Severe Acute Malnutrition, Cognitive Impairment
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Comparative Efficacy of Antibiotics for Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth in Bangladeshi Children
Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth
Recruiting
Effectiveness of an Alternative Protocol in the Management of Acute Malnutrition
Acute Malnutrition With no Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Theory-Based Nutrition Education Intervention to Improve Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and WASH Practices Among Turkana Caregivers and Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend in people with Malnutrition, Child, run by Texas Tech University at 1 site in Kenya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Weight (time frame: Baseline, midline (4 weeks after baseline assessments) and Endline (8 weeks after baseline assessments)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2025.