Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)NCT06867861
Effect of Fiber Supplementation on the Need for Medication With Gestational Diabetes
A study testing Fiber in people with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), run by Eastern Virginia Medical School at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The hypotheses to be tested are 1) Fiber supplementation will decrease the need for medication in patients with gestational diabetes, and 2) Fiber supplementation will decrease adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in these patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
- What is being tested?
- Fiber
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Feb 2025to 26 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Singleton gestation
- Known or new diagnosis of gestational diabetes without reason for medication
- Age >=18 to <=50
Who cannot join
- - Non-English as primary language.
- Known or suspected fetal anomaly or aneuploidy.
- Known lower bowel disorder
- Known phenylketonuria
- Prisoners.
- Management of diabetes outside of Eastern Virginia Medical School Maternal Fetal Medicine.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at ODU
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Morgan Scaglione, MD, 757-446-7900, scaglima@odu.edu
Kristin Ayers, MPH, 757-446-7900, ayerskl@odu.edu
About this study
Official title: Effect of Fiber Supplementation on the Need for Medication With Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The hypotheses to be tested are 1) Fiber supplementation will decrease the need for medication in patients with gestational diabetes, and 2) Fiber supplementation will decrease adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in these patients. In this study, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to limit bias in evaluating these hypotheses.
Read the detailed description
The study team proposes a randomized controlled trial of women with singleton pregnancies who present with a new diagnosis of diet-controlled gestational diabetes (previously referred to as GDMA1). The participants will be randomized to the intervention group (fiber supplementation) or control group (no fiber supplementation) in 1:1 fashion. The participant will be randomized by a number-generating computer software after recruitment at the new gestational diabetes education class.
- Conditions
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
- Being tested
- Fiber
- Keywords
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Fiber, GDM
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes, Gestational
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FiberDietary supplement
Psyllium fiber supplement capsules, 2g soluble fiber per capsule. They will be instructed to take 4 capsules twice daily for a total of 16g supplemental soluble fiber per day. This will be continued throughout pregnancy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber | Experimental | Participants will psyllium fiber supplement capsules, 2g soluble fiber per capsule. They will be instructed to take 4 capsules twice daily for a total of 16g supplemental soluble fiber per day. This will be continued throughout pregnancy. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Fiber |
| No Fiber | No intervention | Participants will receive no fiber supplementation capsules. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants with Need for GDM Medication
The primary outcome is the need for medication (either insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents) for management of gestational diabetes (progression from GDMA1 to GDMA2). We chose this primary outcome because the need for medication is associated with the need for significantly more antenatal interventions due to increased adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Hgb A1c at delivery
Measurement of Hgb A1c
Measured: At delivery
Rate of Fetal Demise
Rate of fetal demise
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of documented occurrence (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction
Number of participants diagnosed with fetal growth restriction
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants Diagnosed with Preeclampsia
Number of participants diagnosed with preeclampsia
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants with Placental Abruption
Number of participants with placental abruption
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Mode of Delivery
Rates of cesarean and vaginal deliveries
Measured: At delivery
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Rates of each indication for cesarean delivery
Measured: At delivery
Rate of Shoulder Dystocia
Rate of shoulder dystocia
Measured: At delivery
Quantitative Blood Loss
Blood loss in mL
Measured: At delivery
Rate of Postpartum Hemorrhage
Rates of patients with quantitative blood loss > 1000mL
Measured: At delivery
Rates of Infection
Rates of infection
Measured: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Birth Weight
Birth weight
Measured: At delivery
Apgar Score
Apgar scores at delivery on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores meaning a better outcome
Measured: At delivery
Rates of Neonatal Infections
Rates of neonatal infections
Measured: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Rate of Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Rate of respiratory distress syndrome
Measured: At delivery
Rate of Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Rate of necrotizing enterocolitis
Measured: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Rate of NICU Admission
Rate of admission to NICU
Measured: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Days in NICU
Days spent in NICU
Measured: Delivery until discharge of the neonate (assessed up to 180 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2025
- Study start24 Feb 2025
- Primary completion24 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion26 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Virginia Medical School
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jerri Waller, Eastern Virginia Medical School
- Investigators
- Jerri Waller, MD, Principal investigator, Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06867861
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24-08-FB-0214
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):e49-e64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501.
PubMed 29370047Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1139-48.
Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, Muise M, Vandermeer B, Donovan L. Benefits and harms of treating gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16;159(2):123-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00661.
PubMed 23712381Karter AJ, Subramanian U, Saha C, Crosson JC, Parker MM, Swain BE, Moffet HH, Marrero DG. Barriers to insulin initiation: the translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):733-5. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1184. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
PubMed 20086256Chandalia M, Garg A, Lutjohann D, von Bergmann K, Grundy SM, Brinkley LJ. Beneficial effects of high dietary fiber intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1392-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421903.
PubMed 10805824Anderson JW, Allgood LD, Turner J, Oeltgen PR, Daggy BP. Effects of psyllium on glucose and serum lipid responses in men with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Oct;70(4):466-73. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/70.4.466.
PubMed 10500014Sun J, Wang J, Ma W, Miao M, Sun G. Effects of Additional Dietary Fiber Supplements on Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies. Nutrients. 2022 Nov 2;14(21):4626. doi: 10.3390/nu14214626.
PubMed 36364883Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS; Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2477-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042973. Epub 2005 Jun 12.
PubMed 15951574
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Fiber Supplementation on the Need for Medication With Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06867861
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 24-08-FB-0214
- Conditions
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
- Keywords
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Fiber, GDM
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Virginia Medical SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 26 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The hypotheses to be tested are 1) Fiber supplementation will decrease the need for medication in patients with gestational diabetes, and 2) Fiber supplementation will decrease adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in these patients. In this study, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to limit bias in evaluating these hypotheses.
Detailed description
The study team proposes a randomized controlled trial of women with singleton pregnancies who present with a new diagnosis of diet-controlled gestational diabetes (previously referred to as GDMA1). The participants will be randomized to the intervention group (fiber supplementation) or control group (no fiber supplementation) in 1:1 fashion. The participant will be randomized by a number-generating computer software after recruitment at the new gestational diabetes education class.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: FiberParticipants will psyllium fiber supplement capsules, 2g soluble fiber per capsule. They will be instructed to take 4 capsules twice daily for a total of 16g supplemental soluble fiber per day. This will be continued throughout pregnancy. |
| No Fiber | No intervention | –Participants will receive no fiber supplementation capsules. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Singleton gestation
- Known or new diagnosis of gestational diabetes without reason for medication
- Age >=18 to <=50
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- - Non-English as primary language.
- Known or suspected fetal anomaly or aneuploidy.
- Known lower bowel disorder
- Known phenylketonuria
- Prisoners.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FiberPsyllium fiber supplement capsules, 2g soluble fiber per capsule. They will be instructed to take 4 capsules twice daily for a total of 16g supplemental soluble fiber per day. This will be continued throughout pregnancy. | Dietary supplement | Fiber |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants with Need for GDM Medication
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
The primary outcome is the need for medication (either insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents) for management of gestational diabetes (progression from GDMA1 to GDMA2). We chose this primary outcome because the need for medication is associated with the need for significantly more antenatal interventions due to increased adverse pregnancy outcomes.
18 secondary outcomes
Hgb A1c at delivery
Time frame: At delivery
Rate of Fetal Demise
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of documented occurrence (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants Diagnosed with Preeclampsia
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Number of Participants with Placental Abruption
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)
Mode of Delivery
Time frame: At delivery
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: At delivery
Rate of Shoulder Dystocia
Time frame: At delivery
Quantitative Blood Loss
Time frame: At delivery
Rate of Postpartum Hemorrhage
Time frame: At delivery
Rates of Infection
Time frame: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Birth Weight
Time frame: At delivery
Apgar Score
Time frame: At delivery
Rates of Neonatal Infections
Time frame: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Rate of Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Time frame: At delivery
Rate of Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Time frame: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Rate of NICU Admission
Time frame: Delivery until discharge (assessed up to 5 days)
Days in NICU
Time frame: Delivery until discharge of the neonate (assessed up to 180 days)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29370047ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):e49-e64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501.
- BackgroundLandon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1139-48.
- Background: PubMed 23712381Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, Muise M, Vandermeer B, Donovan L. Benefits and harms of treating gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16;159(2):123-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00661.
- Background: PubMed 20086256Karter AJ, Subramanian U, Saha C, Crosson JC, Parker MM, Swain BE, Moffet HH, Marrero DG. Barriers to insulin initiation: the translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):733-5. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1184. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
- Background: PubMed 10805824Chandalia M, Garg A, Lutjohann D, von Bergmann K, Grundy SM, Brinkley LJ. Beneficial effects of high dietary fiber intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1392-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421903.
- Background: PubMed 10500014Anderson JW, Allgood LD, Turner J, Oeltgen PR, Daggy BP. Effects of psyllium on glucose and serum lipid responses in men with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Oct;70(4):466-73. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/70.4.466.
- Background: PubMed 36364883Sun J, Wang J, Ma W, Miao M, Sun G. Effects of Additional Dietary Fiber Supplements on Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies. Nutrients. 2022 Nov 2;14(21):4626. doi: 10.3390/nu14214626.
- Background: PubMed 15951574Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS; Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2477-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042973. Epub 2005 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), Obstetric Anesthesia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness Study of a Lifestyle Intervention Versus Metformin in Mothers With Recent Gestational Diabetes
Weight Loss, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy
Not yet recruiting
STRONG: SMART Trial
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Not yet recruiting
A Study to Lower Blood Pressure One Year After Childbirth in Women Who Had Preeclampsia
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, Cardiovascular Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at ODU
Norfolk, United States
Jerri Waller, MD principal investigator
Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fiber in people with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), run by Eastern Virginia Medical School at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants with Need for GDM Medication (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 7 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06867861, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2025.