Stable Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureNCT06872801
Home High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Noninvasive Ventilation for Stable Chronic Respiratory Failure
A study testing High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation in people with Stable Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, run by Wonju Severance Christian Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of home high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with stable chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stable Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
- What is being tested?
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Mar 2025to Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult aged 40 years or older
- Diagnosed with COPD
- Arterial blood gas test, pCO2 > 45 mmHg at stable status
- A person who can read or write in Korean
- Written informed consent to participate in this study
Who cannot join
- A person who disagrees with the content of a informed consent
- Those who have difficulty wearing NIV or HFNC
- Cognitive impairment or apsychiatric disorder
- Hypoxic or hypercapnic exacerbation within the previous four weeks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, Gangwondo, 26426
Hyo Jin Kim, 82-33-741-0927, chestcrc0927@gmail.com
Sang-Ha Kim
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Effects of Home High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Stable Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of home high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with stable chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does HFNC or NIV reduce blood carbon dioxide levels more effectively?
- How well do patients tolerate and adhere to each therapy?
- Are there differences in oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and quality of life between the two treatments?
Read more
Participants Will:
- Use either HFNC (myAirvo2®) or NIV (Trilogy Evo®) every night for at least 4 hours over a 6-week period.
- Visit the hospital for checkups and arterial blood gas tests at the end of each 6-week period.
- Switch to the alternate device after six weeks as part of the crossover study design.
- Have their device usage recorded and analyzed.
Read the detailed description
[Objectives and Background] Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the standard treatment for respiratory failure caused by acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Numerous recent studies have demonstrated its efficacy, showing improvements in arterial blood gas results, reduced intubation rates, shorter hospital stays, and lower mortality rates.
Some studies suggest that NIV may also be beneficial for patients with stable chronic hypercapnic COPD. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed that applying NIV in these patients reduces one-year mortality, acute exacerbations, and hospital admission rates, while improving hypercapnia, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, dyspnea, six-minute walk test results, and quality of life. However, some patients have difficulty adapting to NIV, limiting their benefits from the therapy.
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has been developed to deliver heated and humidified air through slightly enlarged nasal prongs. HFNC effectively reduces dead space by rapidly clearing expiratory gas from the upper airway and ensures the delivery of high-flow gas without dilution with ambient air. Studies have shown that HFNC reduces intubation rates and mortality in patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. Compared to NIV, HFNC is not inferior in terms of re-intubation rates. Moreover, HFNC has demonstrated rapid reductions in CO2 levels in hypercapnic patients. Preliminary studies have confirmed its effectiveness in long-term use for patients with stable chronic hypoxemic or hypercapnic respiratory failure, with the most effective flow rates ranging from 30-50 L/min.
This clinical trial aims to compare the effects of NIV and HFNC (myAirvo2®) in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD. Participants will use each device for six weeks in a crossover design, and the primary outcome will be a comparison of arterial CO2 reduction.
[Inclusion Criteria, Exclusion Criteria, Target Sample Size, and Rationale]
- Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 40 years or older
- Diagnosed with COPD
- Resting arterial blood gas analysis showing pCO2 > 45 mmHg
- Ability to read and write Korean
- Voluntarily provided written informed consent For elderly patients (≥80 years), if cognitive function or judgment is impaired, informed consent may also be obtained from a legal representative. During the study period, participants will receive device training and explanations in a quiet setting to ensure understanding.
- Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to consent
- Difficulty using NIV or HFNC
- Cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the study
- Acute exacerbation of hypoxemia or hypercapnia within the past four weeks
- Target Sample Size: 38 Participants
- Rationale for Sample Size: A previous study confirmed a significant reduction in arterial CO2 levels of 4 mmHg with HFNC compared to standard treatment in stable hypercapnic COPD patients. This study is designed as a non-inferiority crossover trial, with a non-inferiority margin of -4 mmHg, a standard deviation of 6.0 mmHg, a two-sided significance level of 5%, and a power of 80%. Based on these parameters, 34 participants are needed. Allowing for a 10% dropout rate, the final target sample size is set at 38 participants.
[Study Duration] From Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval to 18 months thereafter.
[Study Parameters]
- Demographics: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, smoking status (current/ex/non), smoking pack-years
- Arterial blood gas analysis (3 times: baseline, crossover, end of study): pH, PaCO2, PaO2, HCO3-, SPO2
- PtCO2 (transcutaneous CO2)
- Pulmonary function test (within the last year): FEV1 (L), % predicted FEV1, FVC (L), % predicted FVC, FEV1/FVC (%)
- Dyspnea scale: mMRC score
- Home oxygen therapy status and flow rate
- Current treatment medications: inhaled bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids
- Average daily usage time
[Study Methods] Participants will be randomly assigned to NIV (Trilogy Evo®) or HFNC (myAirvo2®) in a 1:1 ratio for six weeks, then crossover to the alternate device for another six weeks. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (V1), after the first device (V2), and after crossover completion (V3).
- Being tested
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula, Noninvasive Ventilation
- Keywords
- Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Noninvasive Ventilation, High-Flow Nasal Cannula, Randomized Controlled Trial, Crossover Design
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High-Flow Nasal CannulaDevice
To compare the effects of NIV (Trilogy Evo®) and HFNC (myAirvo2®) in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD.
Noninvasive VentilationDevice
to compare the effects of NIV (Trilogy Evo®) and HFNC (myAirvo2®) in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HFNC-NIV | Experimental | Participants first use HFNC for six weeks, then switch to NIV for six weeks Receives: Device: High-Flow Nasal Cannula; Device: Noninvasive Ventilation |
| NIV-HFNC | Experimental | Participants first use NIV for six weeks, then switch to HFNC for six weeks Receives: Device: High-Flow Nasal Cannula; Device: Noninvasive Ventilation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PaCO2
Arterial blood gas analysis will be performed three times to assess the improvement of hypercapnia, the primary outcome, by measuring pH, PaCO₂, PaO₂, HCO₃-, and SpO₂.
Measured: The first measurement will be conducted at baseline, on the day the first device is applied. The second measurement will be taken at week 6 from baseline, after the device has been used for six weeks. The final measurement will be performed at week 12 fr
Secondary outcomes (2)
TCO2
Transcutaneous CO₂ (SenTec V-Sign, SenTec AG, Switzerland) will be measured three times as a surrogate marker for hypercapnia.
Measured: The first measurement will be conducted at baseline, on the day the first device is applied. The second measurement will be taken at week 6 from baseline, after the device has been applied for six weeks. The final measurement will be performed at week 12
Compliance
During the six-week application period of each device, the actual average daily usage time and the percentage of days with at least four hours of usage (number of days with ≥4 hours of use/ total number of applied days) ×100 will be assessed.
Measured: The first assessment will be conducted at week 6 from baseline, after the first device has been applied for six weeks. The second assessment will be performed at week 12 from baseline, after the second device has been applied for six weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Mar 2025
- Study startMar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Stable Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sang-Ha Kim, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06872801
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WonjuSCH-SHK001-V1.0
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Effects of Home High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Stable Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06872801
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WonjuSCH-SHK001-V1.0
- Keywords
- Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Noninvasive Ventilation, High-Flow Nasal Cannula, Randomized Controlled Trial, Crossover Design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Wonju Severance Christian HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of home high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with stable chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does HFNC or NIV reduce blood carbon dioxide levels more effectively?
- How well do patients tolerate and adhere to each therapy?
- Are there differences in oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and quality of life between the two treatments?
Participants Will:
- Use either HFNC (myAirvo2®) or NIV (Trilogy Evo®) every night for at least 4 hours over a 6-week period.
- Visit the hospital for checkups and arterial blood gas tests at the end of each 6-week period.
- Switch to the alternate device after six weeks as part of the crossover study design.
- Have their device usage recorded and analyzed.
Detailed description
[Objectives and Background] Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the standard treatment for respiratory failure caused by acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Numerous recent studies have demonstrated its efficacy, showing improvements in arterial blood gas results, reduced intubation rates, shorter hospital stays, and lower mortality rates.
Some studies suggest that NIV may also be beneficial for patients with stable chronic hypercapnic COPD. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed that applying NIV in these patients reduces one-year mortality, acute exacerbations, and hospital admission rates, while improving hypercapnia, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, dyspnea, six-minute walk test results, and quality of life. However, some patients have difficulty adapting to NIV, limiting their benefits from the therapy.
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has been developed to deliver heated and humidified air through slightly enlarged nasal prongs. HFNC effectively reduces dead space by rapidly clearing expiratory gas from the upper airway and ensures the delivery of high-flow gas without dilution with ambient air. Studies have shown that HFNC reduces intubation rates and mortality in patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. Compared to NIV, HFNC is not inferior in terms of re-intubation rates. Moreover, HFNC has demonstrated rapid reductions in CO2 levels in hypercapnic patients. Preliminary studies have confirmed its effectiveness in long-term use for patients with stable chronic hypoxemic or hypercapnic respiratory failure, with the most effective flow rates ranging from 30-50 L/min.
This clinical trial aims to compare the effects of NIV and HFNC (myAirvo2®) in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD. Participants will use each device for six weeks in a crossover design, and the primary outcome will be a comparison of arterial CO2 reduction.
[Inclusion Criteria, Exclusion Criteria, Target Sample Size, and Rationale]
- Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 40 years or older
- Diagnosed with COPD
- Resting arterial blood gas analysis showing pCO2 > 45 mmHg
- Ability to read and write Korean
- Voluntarily provided written informed consent For elderly patients (≥80 years), if cognitive function or judgment is impaired, informed consent may also be obtained from a legal representative. During the study period, participants will receive device training and explanations in a quiet setting to ensure understanding.
- Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to consent
- Difficulty using NIV or HFNC
- Cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the study
- Acute exacerbation of hypoxemia or hypercapnia within the past four weeks
- Target Sample Size: 38 Participants
- Rationale for Sample Size: A previous study confirmed a significant reduction in arterial CO2 levels of 4 mmHg with HFNC compared to standard treatment in stable hypercapnic COPD patients. This study is designed as a non-inferiority crossover trial, with a non-inferiority margin of -4 mmHg, a standard deviation of 6.0 mmHg, a two-sided significance level of 5%, and a power of 80%. Based on these parameters, 34 participants are needed. Allowing for a 10% dropout rate, the final target sample size is set at 38 participants.
[Study Duration] From Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval to 18 months thereafter.
[Study Parameters]
- Demographics: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, smoking status (current/ex/non), smoking pack-years
- Arterial blood gas analysis (3 times: baseline, crossover, end of study): pH, PaCO2, PaO2, HCO3-, SPO2
- PtCO2 (transcutaneous CO2)
- Pulmonary function test (within the last year): FEV1 (L), % predicted FEV1, FVC (L), % predicted FVC, FEV1/FVC (%)
- Dyspnea scale: mMRC score
- Home oxygen therapy status and flow rate
- Current treatment medications: inhaled bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids
- Average daily usage time
[Study Methods] Participants will be randomly assigned to NIV (Trilogy Evo®) or HFNC (myAirvo2®) in a 1:1 ratio for six weeks, then crossover to the alternate device for another six weeks. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (V1), after the first device (V2), and after crossover completion (V3).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HFNC-NIV | Experimental | Device: High-Flow Nasal Cannula, Device: Noninvasive VentilationParticipants first use HFNC for six weeks, then switch to NIV for six weeks |
| NIV-HFNC | Experimental | Device: High-Flow Nasal Cannula, Device: Noninvasive VentilationParticipants first use NIV for six weeks, then switch to HFNC for six weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult aged 40 years or older
- Diagnosed with COPD
- Arterial blood gas test, pCO2 > 45 mmHg at stable status
- A person who can read or write in Korean
- Written informed consent to participate in this study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A person who disagrees with the content of a informed consent
- Those who have difficulty wearing NIV or HFNC
- Cognitive impairment or apsychiatric disorder
- Hypoxic or hypercapnic exacerbation within the previous four weeks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High-Flow Nasal CannulaTo compare the effects of NIV (Trilogy Evo®) and HFNC (myAirvo2®) in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD. | Device | HFNC-NIV, NIV-HFNC |
| Noninvasive Ventilationto compare the effects of NIV (Trilogy Evo®) and HFNC (myAirvo2®) in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD | Device | HFNC-NIV, NIV-HFNC |
Primary outcome
PaCO2
Time frame: The first measurement will be conducted at baseline, on the day the first device is applied. The second measurement will be taken at week 6 from baseline, after the device has been used for six weeks. The final measurement will be performed at week 12 fr
Arterial blood gas analysis will be performed three times to assess the improvement of hypercapnia, the primary outcome, by measuring pH, PaCO₂, PaO₂, HCO₃-, and SpO₂.
2 secondary outcomes
TCO2
Time frame: The first measurement will be conducted at baseline, on the day the first device is applied. The second measurement will be taken at week 6 from baseline, after the device has been applied for six weeks. The final measurement will be performed at week 12
Compliance
Time frame: The first assessment will be conducted at week 6 from baseline, after the first device has been applied for six weeks. The second assessment will be performed at week 12 from baseline, after the second device has been applied for six weeks.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation in people with Stable Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, run by Wonju Severance Christian Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sang-Ha Kim (82-33-741-0926, sanghakim@yonsei.ac.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PaCO2 (time frame: The first measurement will be conducted at baseline, on the day the first device is applied. The second measurement will be taken at week 6 from baseline, after the device has been used for six weeks. The final measurement will be performed at week 12 fr). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2025.