AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal Cancer; Gut Microbiota DysbiosisNCT06875648

Intestinal Flora Differences Between Colorectal Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals

An observational study of Colorectal Cancer; Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis, run by Hansung University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This observational case-control study aims to compare the composition of intestinal microbiota between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and healthy individuals. Fecal samples from 36 CRC patients and 25 healthy controls were analyzed for bacterial abundance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Not applicable (observational study)
How many people
61 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 1 Mar 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Retrospective case-control study of 36 CRC patients (stages I-III, diagnosed 2022-2023) and 25 healthy controls from Central Hospital, Zhanjiang, China. CRC group: pre-treatment fecal samples, TNM staging. Control group: age/gender-matched, no GI diseases, normal colonoscopy/fecal tests. Exclusions: antibiotic/probiotic use (past 3 months), inflammatory bowel disease, incomplete records.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults (≥18 years) with histopathologically confirmed colorectal cancer (CRC group)
  • Archived fecal sample available from time of CRC diagnosis (prior to treatment)
  • Complete clinical records including TNM staging (I-III) for CRC patients
  • Age- and gender-matched adults without CRC history (control group)
  • Archived fecal sample available from routine health check-ups (control group)

Who cannot join

  • Recent antibiotic or probiotic use (within 3 months)
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Incomplete medical records
  • For controls: history of colorectal cancer, polyps, or chronic gastrointestinal diseases
  • For controls: abnormal colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test within the past year

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Central Hospital of Guangdong Provincial Nongken

    Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524002

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Intestinal Flora Differences Between Colorectal Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals: A Case-Control Study

This observational case-control study aims to compare the composition of intestinal microbiota between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and healthy individuals. Fecal samples from 36 CRC patients and 25 healthy controls were analyzed for bacterial abundance. Results indicate significant differences in beneficial, neutral, and harmful bacterial populations between groups, with CRC patients showing reduced beneficial flora (e.g., Lactobacillus) and increased harmful/neutral flora (e.g., Staphylococcus). Further stratification by cancer stage (I-III) revealed progressive dysbiosis with disease progression.

Read the detailed description

This observational case-control study investigates the compositional differences in intestinal microbiota between individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) and healthy controls. The study enrolled 36 CRC patients confirmed by histopathology and 25 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers without gastrointestinal diseases or antibiotic/probiotic use within the preceding three months. Fecal samples were collected from CRC patients at the time of diagnosis and from healthy participants during routine health screenings. Utilizing 16S rRNA sequencing or quantitative PCR, the relative abundance of specific bacterial taxa (e.g., Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Staphylococcus) was quantified to assess dysbiosis patterns. Additionally, the analysis stratified CRC patients by clinical stage (I-III) to explore progressive shifts in microbial communities with disease advancement. The findings aim to elucidate the role of gut microbiota in CRC pathogenesis and provide insights into potential microbiome-based diagnostic or therapeutic strategies.

Being tested
Not applicable (observational study)
Keywords
Colorectal Neoplasms (MeSH), Gastrointestinal Microbiome (MeSH), Dysbiosis (MeSH), Microbial Biomarkers
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Dysbiosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Not applicable (observational study)Other

    Retrospective analysis of gut microbiota in CRC patients vs. healthy controls. No interventions were administered; data were collected from archived samples and medical records.

Study groups in NCT06875648
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CRC PatientsParticipants: 36 individuals with histopathologically confirmed colorectal cancer. Data Source: Archived fecal samples and medical records from patients diagnosed between January 2022 and October 2023. Inclusion Criteria: Adults (≥18 years). Newly diagnosed CRC without prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Availability of fecal samples collected at diagnosis. Exclusion Criteria: Antibiotic/probiotic use within 3 months before sample collection. Concurrent gastrointestinal infections or inflammatory bowel disease. Subgroups: Stratified by clinical stage (I, II, III) based on TNM classification from medical records.
Receives: Other: Not applicable (observational study)
Healthy ControlsParticipants: 25 age- and gender-matched individuals without gastrointestinal diseases or cancer history. Data Source: Archived fecal samples and health screening records from routine check-ups during the same period. Inclusion Criteria: Adults (≥18 years). No history of colorectal polyps, cancer, or chronic gastrointestinal disorders. Normal colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test results. Exclusion Criteria: Antibiotic/probiotic use within 3 months before sample collection. Recent acute gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., diarrhea, constipation).
Receives: Other: Not applicable (observational study)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of Mean Relative Abundance of Intestinal Bacterial Genera between CRC Patients and Healthy Controls

    The primary metric is the mean relative abundance of specific intestinal bacterial genera (e.g., Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Staphylococcus). Quantitative comparison will be performed between CRC patients and healthy controls using data obtained from fecal samples via 16S rRNA sequencing or qPCR. This is a retrospective analysis of samples collected between January 2021 and March 2025.

    Measured: Retrospective analysis of fecal samples collected between January 2021 and March 2025

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06875648
Sponsor's protocol ID
GDMEC-2024-028
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
10 Mar 2025
Last updated
18 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to restrictions imposed by the hospital ethics committee and Chinese data privacy laws.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Cancer; Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis, run by Hansung University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of Mean Relative Abundance of Intestinal Bacterial Genera between CRC Patients and Healthy Controls (time frame: Retrospective analysis of fecal samples collected between January 2021 and March 2025). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in