AzTrials
AzTrials

Dietary BehaviorTTSNCT06877468

Toddler Tastes Study

A study testing Associative conditioning and Modeling in people with Dietary Behavior, run by State University of New York at Buffalo at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of two food preference learning approaches for toddlers that could serve as alternatives to mere repeated exposure to new or previously disliked foods. The target population is toddlers who score higher on food fussiness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 months and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dietary Behavior
What is being tested?
Associative conditioning and Modeling
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
82 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Mar 2025to 29 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 months and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Child is 18-36 months old
  • Parent/guardian is 18 years of age or older
  • Parent/guardian participating is the primary caregiver of the child
  • Child is not diagnosed with a physical or mental health condition (e.g., allergies to study foods, ARFID or autism diagnosis) that would impact safe or feasible participation
  • Participants are English speakers
  • Child is high on food fussiness, defined as a 2.5 or above on the food fussiness scale of the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire for toddlers

Who cannot join

  • The child is outside the age range of 18-36 months at enrollment, as verified by birth date
  • Child is diagnosed with a physical or mental health condition that precludes safe or feasible participation
  • The parent/guardian is less than 18 years old
  • The parent/guardian participating is not the primary caregiver of the child
  • Participants are not English speakers
  • Child is low on food fussiness, defined as below a 2.5 on the food fussiness scale of the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire for toddlers

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Child Health and Behavior Lab at the University at Buffalo

    Buffalo, New York, 14214

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Developing Tailored Clinical Resources for Promoting Children's Healthy Food Preferences

The goal of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of two food preference learning approaches for toddlers that could serve as alternatives to mere repeated exposure to new or previously disliked foods. The target population is toddlers who score higher on food fussiness.

The study is a two-group randomized controlled trial. Families will be randomized to 1 of 2 study groups: associative conditioning, or the child tasting vegetables alongside a palatable dip, or modeling, in which the child and parent taste vegetables together. Both groups will attend two laboratory visits, one before and one after a 4-week exposure period, and will be asked to complete 8 vegetable tastings in accordance with their assigned condition across the 4 intervention weeks.

Read more

Key questions to be addressed are:

  • summarizing the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention strategies
  • assessing whether children's liking and intake of the target food increase from baseline to post-intervention
Read the detailed description

Repeated exposure is a food preference learning strategy with a large evidence base, but there is a deficit in the literature regarding its effectiveness for children higher in food fussiness. The goal of this research is to identify strategies for young children who might need alternatives to repeated exposure to help them learn to accept vegetables. The approaches that will be evaluated are modeling and associative conditioning, and it is hypothesized that in both groups, children will show greater liking and intake of their target food post-intervention compared to baseline. Group differences in this potential increase, as well as feasibility and acceptance of the intervention strategies among the target population will be explored and summarized.

The study will be interventional. Families, stratified by child age and sex, will be randomized to 1 of 2 study groups: associative conditioning or modeling. Both groups will attend two laboratory visits, one baseline and one post-intervention assessment, and between these will complete 8 target vegetable taste exposures across 4 intervention weeks.

During screening, parents will be asked questions that will inform selection of their child's target vegetable (and dip if applicable). Using 3 vegetables from the literature, parents will report on whether they have served each of those vegetables, whether their child tasted it, and whether they would like their child to eat that vegetable. One of these vegetables will be chosen as the target vegetable to be tasted by the child during the study. The goal is to assign a vegetable that the child could use help learning to like/eat, that the parent would also like to serve at home. During screening, parents will also be asked to rate their child's liking of specific dips, which will inform which dip is provided to those that are assigned to the associative conditioning group (i.e. a dip they are likely to enjoy will like). Vegetables, and dips if applicable, will be provided.

After screening, a ~1 hour baseline laboratory visit will be scheduled. During the visit, written informed consent (parent) and verbal assent (child) will be completed. The child will be able to play with toys in the waiting room with the research staff and parent prior to the assent procedures to allow the child to acclimate to the environment and staff. Children will then be told that it is time to taste foods, and that they will come to a different room, with study staff and their parent, if they would like to do this activity. Vegetables will then be served to children (without any accompaniments/dip or modeling), and children's liking and intake will be measured via parent perceptions of liking and weighed plate waste, respectively. The child will be asked to try a bite of the vegetable. Then one-half cup of the study vegetable will be provided to the child, and they will be told they can eat as much or as little of the vegetable as they like. Parents will be asked to rate how much they think their child liked the vegetable, and the vegetable will be pre and post weighed to indicate consumption. At this visit, parents will also complete a survey that includes questions about demographics. At the end of the session, families will be randomized (i.e., associative conditioning or modeling groups) and provided with the intervention materials needed to complete the at-home exposures, including the target vegetable, instructions, and dips if applicable. Study staff will provide and explain the activity materials to families. Parents will be given opportunities to ask any questions, and staff will be trained to provide guidance and help problem solve implementation barriers as needed.

During the 4-week intervention period, parents will complete 2 exposures per week (8 total). During exposures, children in the associative conditioning group will be served a target vegetable with a liked dip. In the modeling group, a target vegetable will be served to both parent and child, with specific instructions provided to the parent on how to taste and react to the vegetable. Text reminders will be sent prior to each week to remind parents about the exposures. Parents will also complete brief, <5 minute online surveys at the end of each week. Surveys will assess whether the tastings were implemented as assigned, whether the child tasted/ate the vegetable, and parent perceptions of the child's liking of the vegetable.

Following the 4-week intervention period, families will attend a post-intervention assessment in the lab (~1 hr). Children's liking and intake of the target will be assessed as at baseline. The target vegetable will be served without dip or modeling, as at baseline, and parents will complete an audio-recorded, structured interview regarding their thoughts on the program they received during the study, strategies they use to feed their child, and views on potential clinical tools that could be used by pediatricians to communicate with families about increasing acceptance of healthy foods. Study staff will play with the child with toys in the waiting area while the parent completes the interview.

Approximately 40 parent-child dyads will be enrolled, with approximately half of the sample randomly assigned to the associative conditioning group and half to the modeling group, stratifying on child sex and age. Feasibility and acceptability will be summarized using descriptive statistics (survey data) and thematic analysis (interview data). Outcomes include the percentage of assigned tastings that were implemented as intended and whether this varies by group or individual or family characteristics. Parent feedback including barriers and facilitators to implementing programs will be summarized, as well as refinements that may improve the programs. Paired samples t-tests will test whether children's liking and intake of the target food increase from baseline to post-test (or an analogous non-parametric test if appropriate) overall; potential group differences in these changes will also be tested.

Being tested
Associative conditioning, Modeling
Keywords
food preferences, toddlers, associative conditioning, modeling, food fussiness, vegetable acceptance, dietary intake
Medical subject headings
Food Preferences, Food Fussiness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Associative conditioningBehavioural

    Child is offered a vegetable to taste with a palatable dip, over 8 occasions. Vegetable is served at home by parent/caregiver following standard script.

  • ModelingBehavioural

    Child is offered a vegetable to taste while their parent/caregiver also tastes it and models enjoying it, over 8 occasions. Vegetable is served at home with parent/caregiver following standard scripting.

Study groups in NCT06877468
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Associative conditioning (Veggie and Dip tastings): ChildExperimentalChild is offered a vegetable to taste with a palatable dip, over 8 occasions. Tastings occur at home with the parent serving the vegetable and following standard scripting.
Receives: Behavioral: Associative conditioning
Modeling (Parent and Me tastings): ChildExperimentalChild is offered a vegetable to taste while their parent/caregiver also tastes it and models enjoying it, over 8 occasions. Tastings occur at home with the parent serving and tasting the vegetable following standard scripting.
Receives: Behavioral: Modeling
Associative conditioning (Veggie and Dip tastings): ParentExperimentalParents of children in the associative conditioning group
Receives: Behavioral: Associative conditioning
Modeling (Parent and Me tastings): ParentExperimentalParents of children in the modeling group
Receives: Behavioral: Modeling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Target Food Tastings Implemented

    As an indicator of feasibility, parents/guardians (here forward parents) will report on whether target food tastings were implemented as assigned. A proportion of assigned tastings that were implemented will be calculated (number of completed tastings divided by 8).

    Measured: Intervention (Weeks 1-4 after baseline assessment)

  2. Acceptability of the Food Preference Interventions

    Themes from parent interviews will be summarized to inform how acceptable the study sample found each intervention.

    Measured: Intervention (Weeks 1-4 after baseline assessment)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in Vegetable Liking

    Changes in parent-reported child liking of the assigned study vegetable from baseline to post-intervention will be calculated. Liking is measured using a visual analog scale along which parents report how much they think the child enjoyed the served food on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 is disliked extremely and 9 is liked extremely.

    Measured: Baseline, post-intervention (Week 5)

  2. Change in Vegetable Intake

    Changes in intake of the study vegetable will be calculated from baseline to post-intervention using weighed plate waste (weight of vegetable at post-intervention minus weight at baseline).

    Measured: Baseline, post-intervention (Week 5)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Mar 2025
  2. Study start19 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion29 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion29 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
82 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06877468
Sponsor's protocol ID
00008595
Acronym
TTS
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
4 Mar 2025
Last updated
2 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Deidentified data will be shared upon reasonable request after planned analyses are completed by the study team.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Associative conditioning and Modeling in people with Dietary Behavior, run by State University of New York at Buffalo at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Sep 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Target Food Tastings Implemented (time frame: Intervention (Weeks 1-4 after baseline assessment)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in