AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast Cancer, MetastaticAVATARIINCT06882499

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) With Maintenance of Systemic Therapy Versus Physicians' Choice of Systemic Therapy for Oligoprogressive ER-positive, Her-2 Negative Breast Cancer II

A study testing Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Physician's choice of systemic treatment in people with Breast Cancer, Metastatic and Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) as a method to delay a change in systemic therapy in patients with oligoprogressive ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Physician's choice of systemic treatment
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
74 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Nov 2026to 1 Nov 2032
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients will be eligible for inclusion in this trial if all the following criteria apply:
  • Patient has signed the AVATAR-II Patient Information and Consent Form (PICF)
  • Male or female, ≥ 18 years of age at the time signing consent
  • Patients with histologically proven ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer receiving an ET in combination with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. Biopsy of metastatic disease if technically feasible but not mandatory
  • Patients must have evidence of extracranial metastatic disease, with no evidence of uncontrolled intracranial metastases. (Controlled intracranial metastases are defined as stable disease on repeat CT imaging performed at least one month apart.)
  • Patients must have evidence of radiological response to ET and CDK 4/6 inhibitor for a minimum of six months prior to randomisation.
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Note: Patient must have ongoing stability/response in at least one lesion at the time of randomisation.
  • Evidence of new or existing OPD, as determined by the Investigator and defined according to RECIST1.1, via CT on a per-lesion basis (between 1-5 metastases, including the primary) as follows:
  • At least a 20% increase in the diameter of a lesion, taking as reference the smallest diameter on a previous CT scan with an absolute increase of at least 5mm
  • Appearance of a new lesion(s) Note: A new lesion can be identified using various imaging modalities, such as PET-CT or WBBS, as long as the lesion is visible on serial CT scans.
  • For patients with liver or lung metastases, maximum of 3 oligoprogressive lesions in single organ
  • All OPD must be amenable to SABR, as per the radiotherapy guidelines in section 11.1 and Appendix 4 and 5 of Protocol v2.3 dated 20Feb2026
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
  • Clinician and patient are willing to continue current line of therapy if randomised to Arm A
  • Patient is able to complete QoL questionnaires, and other assessments required as part of the study

Who cannot join

  • Patients will not be eligible for inclusion in this trial if any of the following criteria apply:
  • Is pregnant or lactating at the time of randomisation
  • Evidence of more than one clone of metastatic disease e.g., a patient with both ER-positive and triple negative clones of disease and ER-negative and/or HER2-positive disease would be excluded from the study
  • Evidence of leptomeningeal disease
  • Evidence of malignant cord compression
  • Evidence of lesion within femoral bone requiring surgical fixation
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Patients with risk of bone fracture are not candidate for SABR (Appendix 4 and 5 of Protocol v2.3 dated 20Feb2026)
  • Previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Note: chemotherapy for primary breast cancer is allowed
  • Contraindications to radiotherapy
  • Any condition deeming the patient unsuitable to comply with the study
  • Substantial overlap with previously treated area. Reirradiation is permitted with the condition that the combined plan adheres to the specific dose constraints outlined in this protocol. It is advised to use biological effective dose (BED) calculations to correlate previous doses with the tolerance doses documented in the protocol
  • Evidence of progression in more than 5 lesions
  • Prior SABR delivered for oligoprogressive disease with the intent of delaying a change in systemic therapy.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

A/Prof Steven David contact

+61 3 9928 9801

steven.david@petermac.org

A/Prof Michelle White contact

+61 3 9928 8111

michelle@mcc.net.au

About this study

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) as a method to delay a change in systemic therapy in patients with oligoprogressive ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The main question it aims to answer is to assess whether the addition of SABR to continuation of first line endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitor (Arm A) to patients with oligoprogressive ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer could have longer time to treatment failure (TTF) in comparison to physician choice of systemic treatment (Arm B) in patients who had progressed first line.

The treatment strategy in Arm A is to maintain patients on current endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitor, controlling localised progressing sites of disease with SABR. Treatment strategy in Arm B is to maintain disease control with physician's choice of systemic therapy alone.

Read the detailed description

AVATAR II is a phase II multicentre open label, randomised trial. Following informed consent, eligible patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer receiving an ET (either AI or selective estrogen receptor degrader in combination with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor with newly diagnosed OPD amenable to SABR will be randomised to either:

Arm A: SABR to all known sites of OPD with continuation of first line therapy ET and CDK 4/6 inhibitor Arm B: Physician's choice of systemic treatment

Patients must have evidence of radiological response to ET and CDK 4/6 inhibitor for a minimum of six months prior to randomisation.

All patients will be followed up for 3 years after the last patient has been randomised.

Being tested
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy, Physician's choice of systemic treatment
Keywords
ER-positive, HER2-negative, selective estrogen receptor degrader, endocrine therapy, aromatase inhibitor, CDK 4/6 inhibitor, SABR, oligoprogression, oligometastases, oligometastatic, sbrt
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stereotactic Ablative RadiotherapyRadiation

    Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

  • Physician's choice of systemic treatmentOther

    Physician's choice of systemic therapy does not mandate a change in systemic therapy, however, SABR is not permitted for management in this arm

Study groups in NCT06882499
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SABR to all known sites of oligoprogressive disease with continuation of first line therapyExperimentalSABR to all known sites of oligoprogressive disease with continuation of first line therapy ET + CDK4/6i
Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
Physician's choice of systemic treatmentActive comparatorPhysician's choice of systemic treatment does not mandate a change in systemic therapy, however, SABR is not permitted for management in this arm
Receives: Other: Physician's choice of systemic treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Outcome Measure

    The primary endpoint of this study is to measure the time to treatment failure between Arm A and Arm B.

    Treatment failure is defined as time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause.

    Progression, will be determined by the Investigator, using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1. (RECIST1.1; Appendix 2) (33) as a guide.

    The treatment strategy in Arm A is to maintain patients on current ET and CDK 4/6 inhibitor, controlling localised progressing sites of disease with SABR. Treatment strategy in Arm B is to maintain disease control with physician's choice systemic therapy alone.

    Measured: Time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause assessed until withdrawal of consent, death, or 3 years after the last patient has been randomised, whichever is earlier.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Secondary Objective 1

    To compare PFS; PFS is assessed from randomisation to the date of the first evidence of progression or death by any cause. Progression will be assessed by the treating clinician as part of standard-of-care practice, using RECIST 1.1 as a guide or based on clinical progression.

    Measured: Time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause assessed until withdrawal of consent, death, or 3 years after the last patient has been randomised, whichever is earlier.

  2. Secondary Objective 2

    To compare progression-free survival 2 (PFS-2); PFS-2 is assessed from randomisation to the date of progression on next line of systemic anti-cancer treatment or death by any cause.

    Measured: Time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause assessed until withdrawal of consent, death, or 3 years after the last patient has been randomised, whichever is earlier.

  3. Secondary Objective 3

    To compare PFS of next line of treatment (2nd PFS); 2nd PFS is assessed from failure of treatment strategy to progression on next line of systemic anti-cancer treatment or date of death by any cause.

    Measured: Time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause assessed until withdrawal of consent, death, or 3 years after the last patient has been randomised, whichever is earlier.

  4. Secondary Objective 4

    To compare OS; OS is assessed from randomisation to the date of death by any cause.

    Measured: Time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause assessed until withdrawal of consent, death, or 3 years after the last patient has been randomised, whichever is earlier.

  5. Secondary Objective 5

    To compare treatment related adverse events (TRAEs); TRAEs are adverse events assessed using the Common Terminology for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0) considered possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment (systemic therapy or SABR)

    Measured: Time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause assessed until withdrawal of consent, death, or 3 years after the last patient has been randomised, whichever is earlier.

  6. Secondary Objective 6

    To compare the QoL using the FACT-B total score: Area under the curve (AUC) of the FACT-B Total score from baseline to 48 weeks

    Measured: Time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause assessed until withdrawal of consent, death, or 3 years after the last patient has been randomised, whichever is earlier.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2032 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2032 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
74 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06882499
Sponsor's protocol ID
PMC105165 (24/143)
Acronym
AVATARII
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
8 Dec 2024
Last updated
18 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Not contractually obliged but it may be considered

Publications

  • Alomran R, White M, Bruce M, Bressel M, Roache S, Karroum L, Hanna GG, Siva S, Goel S, David S. Stereotactic radiotherapy for oligoprogressive ER-positive breast cancer (AVATAR). BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 23;21(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08042-w.

    PubMed 33757458
  • David SP, Siva S, Bressel M, Tan J, Hanna GG, Alomran RK, et al. Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) for Oligoprogressive ER-Positive Breast Cancer (AVATAR): A Phase II Prospective Multicenter Trial. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2023;117(4):e6-e.

  • Kelly P, Ma Z, Baidas S, Moroose R, Shah N, Dagan R, Mamounas E, Rineer J. Patterns of Progression in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: An Argument for Local Therapy. Int J Breast Cancer. 2017;2017:1367159. doi: 10.1155/2017/1367159. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

    PubMed 29147583
  • Patel PH, Palma D, McDonald F, Tree AC. The Dandelion Dilemma Revisited for Oligoprogression: Treat the Whole Lawn or Weed Selectively? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Dec;31(12):824-833. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

    PubMed 31182289
  • Cheung P. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligoprogressive cancer. Br J Radiol. 2016 Oct;89(1066):20160251. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160251. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

    PubMed 27556349
  • Chan OSH, Lee VHF, Mok TSK, Mo F, Chang ATY, Yeung RMW. The Role of Radiotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-positive Patients with Oligoprogression: A Matched-cohort Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Sep;29(9):568-575. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.04.035. Epub 2017 May 9.

    PubMed 28499791
  • Weickhardt AJ, Scheier B, Burke JM, Gan G, Lu X, Bunn PA Jr, Aisner DL, Gaspar LE, Kavanagh BD, Doebele RC, Camidge DR. Local ablative therapy of oligoprogressive disease prolongs disease control by tyrosine kinase inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Dec;7(12):1807-1814. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182745948.

    PubMed 23154552
  • Xu Q, Liu H, Meng S, Jiang T, Li X, Liang S, Ren S, Zhou C. First-line continual EGFR-TKI plus local ablative therapy demonstrated survival benefit in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with oligoprogressive disease. J Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;10(2):522-529. doi: 10.7150/jca.26494. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30719148
  • Qiu B, Liang Y, Li Q, Liu G, Wang F, Chen Z, Liu M, Zhao M, Liu H. Local Therapy for Oligoprogressive Disease in Patients With Advanced Stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;18(6):e369-e373. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

    PubMed 28465010
  • Iyengar P, Kavanagh BD, Wardak Z, Smith I, Ahn C, Gerber DE, Dowell J, Hughes R, Abdulrahman R, Camidge DR, Gaspar LE, Doebele RC, Bunn PA, Choy H, Timmerman R. Phase II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with erlotinib for patients with limited but progressive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3824-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7412. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

    PubMed 25349291
  • Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Petrakova K, Blackwell KL, Winer EP, Janni W, Verma S, Conte P, Arteaga CL, Cameron DA, Mondal S, Su F, Miller M, Elmeliegy M, Germa C, O'Shaughnessy J. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1541-1547. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy155.

    PubMed 29718092
  • Tripathy D, Im SA, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Hurvitz SA, Chow L, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Villanueva Vazquez R, Jung KH, Babu KG, Wheatley-Price P, De Laurentiis M, Im YH, Kuemmel S, El-Saghir N, Liu MC, Carlson G, Hughes G, Diaz-Padilla I, Germa C, Hirawat S, Lu YS. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):904-915. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4. Epub 2018 May 24.

    PubMed 29804902
  • Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, Sohn J, Paluch-Shimon S, Huober J, Park IH, Tredan O, Chen SC, Manso L, Freedman OC, Garnica Jaliffe G, Forrester T, Frenzel M, Barriga S, Smith IC, Bourayou N, Di Leo A. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3638-3646. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

    PubMed 28968163
  • Johnston S, Martin M, Di Leo A, Im SA, Awada A, Forrester T, Frenzel M, Hardebeck MC, Cox J, Barriga S, Toi M, Iwata H, Goetz MP. MONARCH 3 final PFS: a randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019 Jan 17;5:5. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0097-z. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30675515
  • Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Ro J, Bondarenko I, Im SA, Masuda N, Colleoni M, DeMichele A, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Loibl S, Andre F, Puyana Theall K, Huang X, Giorgetti C, Huang Bartlett C, Cristofanilli M. Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-1936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810527. Epub 2018 Oct 20.

    PubMed 30345905

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Physician's choice of systemic treatment in people with Breast Cancer, Metastatic and Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact A/Prof Steven David (+61 3 9928 9801, steven.david@petermac.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary Outcome Measure (time frame: Time from randomisation to progression of disease resulting in a failure of treatment strategy or death by any cause assessed until withdrawal of consent, death, or 3 years after the last patient has been randomised, whichever is earlier.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06882499, which also lists 33 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in