AzTrials
AzTrials

UltrasoundNCT06884852

Ultrasound-guided Multilevel Erectorspinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Prevention of Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome for Breast Cancer Patients

A study testing Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and Thoracic epidural block in people with Ultrasound and Multilevel Erector Spinae Plane Block, run by National Cancer Institute, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of multilevel erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs thoracic epidural in modified radical mastectomy (MRM) regarding duration of analgesia, postoperative opioid consumption, effect on intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative numerical pain rating… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
What is being tested?
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and Thoracic epidural block
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
20 Mar 2025to 1 Mar 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female patients age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 Years.
  • Type of surgery; Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM)
  • Physical status ASA II, III.
  • Body mass index (BMI): > 20 kg/m2 and < 35 kg/m2.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal.
  • Allergy or a contraindication to the drug used in the study, e.g. local anesthetics, opioids.
  • History of psychological disorders.
  • History of chronic pain.
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia e.g. sepsis, peripheral neuropathies and coagulopathy.
  • Advanced chronic renal disease, which is defined as a chronic kidney disease (CKD) in which there is a severe reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR < 30 ml/min) and includes stages 4 and 5 of the CKD classification.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Decompensated cirrhosis, which is defined as an acute deterioration in liver function in a patient with cirrhosis and is characterized by jaundice, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, or variceal hemorrhage.
  • Severe heart disease which is defined as NYHA class iii (moderate symptoms with less than normal activity, marked limitation of function status) or NYHA class IV (severe symptoms with features of heart failure with minimal activity or at rest and severe limitation of functional status)
  • Severe lung disease which includes oxygen saturation of blood less than 92%, RR more than 20, FEV1/FVC ratio less than 60%.
  • Pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ahmed El Abdelaal, Master contact

00201097900275

drahmedsayeh9915@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • National Cancer Institute

    Cairo, 11796

    Ahmed El Abdelaal, Master, 00201097900275, drahmedsayeh9915@gmail.com

    Ghada G Elsayed, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of multilevel erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs thoracic epidural in modified radical mastectomy (MRM) regarding duration of analgesia, postoperative opioid consumption, effect on intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative numerical pain rating scale and quality of life for the next 6 months.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among females. Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) is the principal surgical treatment for breast cancer. The standard mode of anesthesia is general anesthesia, in addition to regional blocks for effective postoperative pain control.

Pain is usually managed by narcotics, which have many side effects, including prolonged sedation, increasing incidence of pain recurrence, respiratory depression, nausea \& vomiting and paralytic ileus. All requiring close monitoring and in some occasions Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks are the gold standard techniques. However, both techniques may lead to some serious complications including spinal cord injury, pneumothorax, incompatibility with pre-existing anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy and hemodynamic instability.

Recently, multiple regional techniques have been used for postoperative thoracic pain control, including that caused by modified radical mastectomy. Interfascial plane blocks are currently the hot topic in management of postoperative pain. One of these blocks is erector spinae plane block (ESPB). It is an interfacial Para spinal plane block that is simple, safe, effective and associated with fewer complications in comparison to the gold standard techniques.

Being tested
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), Thoracic epidural block
Medical subject headings
Somatoform Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)Drug

    Also called Bupivacaine 0.25%

    Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) using multilevel injections of bupivacaine 0.25%.

    We will inject 15ml at the level of T2 and 15ml at the level of T5.

  • Thoracic epidural blockDrug

    Also called Bupivacaine 0.25%

    Thoracic epidural block at level of T5 -T6 using 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% as a bolus followed by 5 ml bupivacaine 0.25% every 1-2 hours depending on the duration of surgery and the response of the patient.

Study groups in NCT06884852
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)ExperimentalErector spinae plane block (ESPB) using multilevel injections of bupivacaine 0.25%. We injected 15ml at the level of T2 and 15ml at the level of T5.
Receives: Drug: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)
Thoracic epidural blockExperimentalThoracic epidural block at level of T5 -T6 using 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% as a bolus followed by 5 ml bupivacaine 0.25% every 1-2 hours depending on the duration of surgery and the response of the patient.
Receives: Drug: Thoracic epidural block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The average duration of analgesia

    The average duration of analgesia will be recorded from the end of surgery till the first dose of morphine administrated.

    Measured: 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. The total amount of morphine

    Patient will be discharged to the ward then rescue analgesia will be given in the form of IV morphine 3 mg boluses if the patient reported Numeric Pain Rating Scale ≥ 4. The total amount of morphine given in 24 hours will be recorded for the two groups.

    Measured: 24 hours postoperatively

  2. Incidence of postmastectomy pain syndrome

    Incidence of postmastectomy pain syndrome at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively will be recorded.

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

  3. The total amount of fentanyl

    Fentanyl 1 μg/kg will be given if the mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate rises above 20% of the baseline levels.

    Measured: Intraoperatively

  4. Heart rate (HR)

    Heart rate will be noted at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postoperatively

    Measured: 24 hours Postoperatively

  5. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)

    Mean arterial blood pressure will be noted at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postoperatively

    Measured: 24 hours Postoperatively

  6. Degree of pain

    Each patient will be instructed about postoperative pain assessment with the numeric rating scale (NRS) score. NRS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable"). NRS will be recorded (at rest and during movement) at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postoperatively.

    Measured: 24 hours Postoperatively

  7. Incidence of Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

    Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be rated on a four-point verbal scale; (none =no nausea, mild = nausea but no vomiting, moderate= vomiting one attack, severe =vomiting > one attack). 0.1 mg/kg of IV ondansetron will be given to patients with moderate or severe postoperative nausea and vomiting.Nausea and vomiting Scores using a four-point verbal scale; on arrival to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), scoring at 0, 4, 8,12,16,20 and 24 hours postoperatively.

    Measured: 24 hours Postoperatively

  8. Complications related to the block

    Complications related to the block such as local anesthetics, systemic toxicity, and vascular injury will be recorded

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

  9. Morphine-related complications

    Patient will be discharged to the ward then rescue analgesia will be given in the form of IV morphine 3 mg boluses if the patient reported Numeric Pain Rating Scale ≥ 4. The total amount of morphine given in 24 hours will be recorded for the two groups. Morphine-related complications such as respiratory depression, urine retention, or pruritis will be recorded.

    Measured: 24 hours Postoperatively

  10. Patient's satisfaction

    Patient's satisfaction: the patient will be classified in this group as satisfied or not.

    Measured: 24 hours Postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2025
  2. Study start20 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
44 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06884852
Sponsor's protocol ID
AP2405-201-046-193
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
13 Mar 2025
Last updated
21 May 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and Thoracic epidural block in people with Ultrasound and Multilevel Erector Spinae Plane Block, run by National Cancer Institute, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmed El Abdelaal, Master (00201097900275, drahmedsayeh9915@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The average duration of analgesia (time frame: 24 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in