AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT06888258

Compare Analgesia Between MTP Block And ESPB in MRM

A study testing Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block and Ultrasound guided Mid-point to Pleura block in people with Breast Cancer, run by National Cancer Institute, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy between ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block Vs midpoint transverse process to Pleura block in modified radical mastectomy surgeries Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block and Ultrasound guided Mid-point to Pleura block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Oct 2024to 1 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA I-II.
  • Undergoing modified radical mastectomy surgery.
  • Body mass index (BMI) from 18.5 to 30 kg/m2

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal.
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Bleeding disorders; platelets count <50,000 , prothrombin concentration < 60% or any coagulopathy disorder.
  • Use of any anti-coagulants.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • ASA III-IV.
  • Neurological disorders.
  • Patient with psychiatric disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

mahmoud Saad Mahmoud Mohamed Mohamed, Msc contact

+201094555375

doc.mahmoudsaad@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • National cancer institute, Cairo University

    Cairo, 11796

    Zainab Korany, +20 10 21419716, irb@nci.cu.edu.eg

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Mid-point Transverse Process to Pleura Block And Erector Spinae Plane Block For Perioperative Analgesia In Modified Radical Mastectomy In Breast Cancer Patients

This study is conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy between ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block Vs midpoint transverse process to Pleura block in modified radical mastectomy surgeries

Read the detailed description

Patients participants will be randomized into 3 groups:

Group M (mid-point transverse process to pleura block MTP) N=3o Patients will receive Ultrasound guided mid-point transverse process to pleura block preoperative with injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%.

Group M: The block will be performed preoperatively with full aseptic precautions. The ultrasound probe will be placed on the back in a vertical orientation on the lateral side of the posterior median line to identify the transverse processes of the 4th and 5th thoracic vertebrae and pleura.

A skin wheal using 3ml of 1% lidocaine will be made 2 to 3 cm superior to the superior aspect of the transducer. Using the in plane needling technique in the space between the transverse processes of the 4th and 5th thoracic vertebrae, the puncture needle needle tip will be placed at the mid-point between the transverse process and pleura, with no blood, gas, or cerebrospinal fluid observed on aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered. The local anesthetic spread will be noted in the area midway between the transverse process and pleura is an indication of a successful puncture.

Group E (Erector Spinae Plane Block ESB) N=3o Patients will receive Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with injection of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%.

Group E: The block will be performed preoperatively with full aseptic precautions. The ultrasound probe will be placed on the back in a vertical orientation on the lateral side of the posterior median line to identify the transverse process of the 5th thoracic vertebra and erector spine muscle.

A skin wheal using 3ml of 1% lidocaine will be made 2 to 3 cm superior to the superior aspect of the transducer. The puncture will be performed using the intra-plane needling technique after local anaesthesia infiltration. A 20-gauge Tuohy needle connected to a syringe containing the anesthetic mixture or saline will be advanced. When the puncture needle touch the transverse process, with no blood, gas, or cerebrospinal fluid observed on aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered between the erector spine muscle and transverse process.

Local anesthetic diffusion between the transverse process and erector spinae muscle is an indication of a successful puncture.

Group C (control group) N=30 Patients will not receive any block. Induction will be performed by using a regimen of IV by fentanyl 1 μg/kg, Additional bolus doses of fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg will be given if the mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate rises above 20% of baseline levels.

Randomization will be done by statistician and each group of the patient will revealed only when the included patient is transferred to preanesthetic room.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block, Ultrasound guided Mid-point to Pleura block
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane blockProcedure or surgery

    Group E: The block will be performed preoperatively with full aseptic precautions. The ultrasound probe will be placed on the back in a vertical orientation on the lateral side of the posterior median line to identify the transverse process of the 5th thoracic vertebra and erector spine muscle.

    A skin wheal using 3ml of 1% lidocaine will be made 2 to 3 cm superior to the superior aspect of the transducer. The puncture will be performed using the intra-plane needling technique after local anaesthesia infiltration. A 20-gauge Tuohy needle connected to a syringe containing the anesthetic mixture or saline will be advanced. When the puncture needle touch the transverse process, with no blood, gas, or cerebrospinal fluid observed on aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered between the erector spine muscle and transverse process.

    Local anesthetic diffusion between the transverse process and erector spinae muscle is an indication of a successful puncture.

  • Ultrasound guided Mid-point to Pleura blockProcedure or surgery

    Group M: The block will be performed preoperatively with full aseptic precautions. The ultrasound probe will be placed on the back in a vertical orientation on the lateral side of the posterior median line to identify the transverse processes of the 4th and 5th thoracic vertebrae and pleura.

    A skin wheal using 3ml of 1% lidocaine will be made 2 to 3 cm superior to the superior aspect of the transducer. Using the in plane needling technique in the space between the transverse processes of the 4th and 5th thoracic vertebrae, the puncture needle needle tip will be placed at the mid-point between the transverse process and pleura, with no blood, gas, or cerebrospinal fluid observed on aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered. The local anesthetic spread will be noted in the area midway between the transverse process and pleura is an indication of a successful puncture.

Study groups in NCT06888258
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Erector Spinae Plane block armActive comparatorGroup E: The block will be performed preoperatively with full aseptic precautions. The ultrasound probe will be placed on the back in a vertical orientation on the lateral side of the posterior median line to identify the transverse process of the 5th thoracic vertebra and erector spine muscle. A skin wheal using 3ml of 1% lidocaine will be made 2 to 3 cm superior to the superior aspect of the transducer. The puncture will be performed using the intra-plane needling technique after local anaesthesia infiltration. A 20-gauge Tuohy needle connected to a syringe containing the anesthetic mixture or saline will be advanced. When the puncture needle touch the transverse process, with no blood, gas, or cerebrospinal fluid observed on aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered between the erector spine muscle and transverse process. Local anesthetic diffusion between the transverse process and erector spinae muscle is an indication of a successful puncture.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block
Mid-point Transverse Process to Pleura block armActive comparatorGroup M: The block will be performed preoperatively with full aseptic precautions. The ultrasound probe will be placed on the back in a vertical orientation on the lateral side of the posterior median line to identify the transverse processes of the 4th and 5th thoracic vertebrae and pleura. A skin wheal using 3ml of 1% lidocaine will be made 2 to 3 cm superior to the superior aspect of the transducer. Using the in plane needling technique in the space between the transverse processes of the 4th and 5th thoracic vertebrae, the puncture needle needle tip will be placed at the mid-point between the transverse process and pleura, with no blood, gas, or cerebrospinal fluid observed on aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered. The local anesthetic spread will be noted in the area midway between the transverse process and pleura is an indication of a successful puncture.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound guided Mid-point to Pleura block
Control armNo interventionPatients in this arm will not receive block but they will receive Intravenous morphine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. post-operative opioid (morphine) consumption in the 1st 24 hours

    Total post operative morphine dosage in mg required

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Time to first rescue analgesia, starting after extubation. In minutes

    When was the first rescue analgesia given

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Total dose of fentanyl required intraoperative (including induction dose) in microgram

    Total fentanyl dose given intraoperative

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Numerical pain rating score at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min., 3,6,12 and 24 h after surgery. Score from 0 to 10 where 10 is the worst pain

    Pain score post operative

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Change in heart rate (rate per minute) intraoperatively at 30 minutes interval in comparison to baseline reading.

    Change in vital data intraoperative

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. Change mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) intraoperatively at 30 minutes interval in comparison to baseline reading.

    Change in vital data intraoperative

    Measured: 24 hours

  6. Heart rate (per minute) at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours postoperatively

    Post operative vital data

    Measured: 24 hours

  7. Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours postoperatively

    Post operative vital data

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06888258
Sponsor's protocol ID
AP2407-201-014
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
23 Feb 2025
Last updated
26 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block and Ultrasound guided Mid-point to Pleura block in people with Breast Cancer, run by National Cancer Institute, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact mahmoud Saad Mahmoud Mohamed Mohamed, Msc (+201094555375, doc.mahmoudsaad@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

post-operative opioid (morphine) consumption in the 1st 24 hours (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in