AzTrials
AzTrials

Tooth DiseasesNCT06895915

Accuracy of Immediate Implant Placement Using Robotic System Versus Dynamic Navigation System in Anterior Maxillae: A Random Controlled Clinical Trial

A study testing dynamic navigation surgery and robotic surgery in people with Tooth Diseases, run by Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prosthetic-driven immediate implant placement for optimal aesthetic restoration has been increasing in demand during the last decades but requires higher accuracy. Dynamic navigation has been reported better implant positioning in immediate implant placement compared to free hand procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tooth Diseases
What is being tested?
dynamic navigation surgery and robotic surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jun 2026to 1 Sep 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • a. ≥18 years old and in good health; b. One or more maxillary incisors that cannot be retained due to non-periodontitis; c. The buccal bone plate is intact; d. No acute infection; e. The extraction socket have at least 3-5 mm apical bone.

Who cannot join

  • a. General contraindications of oral implant surgery (such as immunodeficiency, long-term use of corticosteroids); b. Treatments or diseases that may affect bone tissue metabolism (for example, taking bisphosphonates or receiving local radiotherapy); c. Periodontitis history or uncontrolled periodontitis. Bleeding of probing (BOP) positive site ≥ 10%, or probing depth (PD) ≥ 4mm; d. Heavy smokers or previous heavy smoking history (quit smoking time <5 years or> 20 cigarettes per day); e. Refuse to participate in this trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Yijie Zhang, Master contact

13524325673

izhangyijie@163.com

China1 site
  • Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Department of oral implantology

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011

    Yijie Zhang, +8613524325673, izhangyijie@163.com

Other trials in China

About this study

Prosthetic-driven immediate implant placement for optimal aesthetic restoration has been increasing in demand during the last decades but requires higher accuracy. Dynamic navigation has been reported better implant positioning in immediate implant placement compared to free hand procedure. On the basis of dynamic navigation, robotic system uses the robotic arm to replace the manual process of implant bed preparation and implant placement, therefore improving the accuracy of implant placement theoretically. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the positional implant accuracy, the surgical time, and patient satisfaction between dynamic navigation and robotic assisted immediate implant placement in maxillae. Subjects will be randomized to either group based on the allocation. The accuracy of placement will be assessed evaluating the difference between the planned and the actual position using a follow-up CBCT scan taken at the end of the surgery. Subjects will be followed up for one year to assess both patient reported and professional outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Prosthetic-driven immediate implant placement for optimal aesthetic restoration has been increasing in demand during the last decades but requires higher accuracy. Dynamic navigation has been reported better implant positioning in immediate implant placement compared to free hand procedure. However, dynamic navigation faces the following deficiencies in immediate implant placement. Firstly, it has a steep learning curve. Secondly, the rigid palatal bone wall of the socket will force the direction of drill deviating buccally. On the basis of dynamic navigation, robotic system uses the robotic arm to replace the manual process of implant bed preparation and implant placement, therefore improving the accuracy of implant placement theoretically. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the positional implant accuracy, the surgical time, and patient satisfaction between dynamic navigation and robotic assisted immediate implant placement in maxillae. Subjects will be randomized to either treatment modalities based on the plan. The accuracy of placement will be assessed evaluating the difference between the planned and the actual position using a follow-up scan taken at the end of the surgery. Subjects will be followed up for one year to assess the professional outcomes.

Conditions
Tooth Diseases
Being tested
dynamic navigation surgery, robotic surgery
Keywords
immediate implant placement, dynamic navigation, robotic surgery
Medical subject headings
Tooth Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • dynamic navigation surgeryProcedure or surgery

    immediate implant placement assisted by dynamic navigation

  • robotic surgeryProcedure or surgery

    immediate implant placement assisted by robotic surgery

Study groups in NCT06895915
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Robotic SurgeryExperimentalImmediate implant placement assisted by robotic surgery
Receives: Procedure: dynamic navigation surgery
Dynamic navigationSham comparatorImmediate implant placement assisted by dynamic navigation
Receives: Procedure: robotic surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Implant positional accuracy

    Implant accuracy will be measured as discrepancy between the digital plan and the actual position of the implant. (Global deviation at platform and apex, Angular deviation)

    Measured: immediately after surgery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Surgery time

    Time needed for surgery procedure will be recorded from anaesthesia to connection of cover screw/healing abutment.

    Measured: intraoperative

  2. Pain perception

    Patient pain perception during surgery will be recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS with range from 0 to 10 with 10 being the highest possible pain experience).

    Measured: Immediately after surgery

  3. Pain perception

    Patient pain perception after surgery will be recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS with range from 0 to 10 with 10 being the highest possible pain experience).

    Measured: 7 days after surgery

  4. Surgeon preference

    Assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 100 mm, with 0=least desirable option and 100 = most desirable option.

    Measured: Immediately after surgery

  5. Soft tissue changes

    Assessed by midfacial recession, mesial and distal papillary recession.

    Measured: immediately after crown delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06895915
Sponsor's protocol ID
SH9H-2024-T306-2
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
20 Mar 2025
Last updated
22 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification, will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author following publication.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing dynamic navigation surgery and robotic surgery in people with Tooth Diseases, run by Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yijie Zhang, Master (13524325673, izhangyijie@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Implant positional accuracy (time frame: immediately after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in