Accuracy of Sonographic Vs MRI Fetal Weight EstimationNCT06898892
Comparison of Sonographic and MRI Weight Estimation in Fetuses with Suspected Macrosomia
A study testing Fetal MRI in people with Accuracy of Sonographic Vs MRI Fetal Weight Estimation, run by Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of sonographic vs. magnetic resonance fetal weight estimation in suspected fetal macrosomia in term pregnancy. Pregnant patient at term with suspected macrosomia will participate and undergo both sonographic and magnetic resonance fetal weight estimations and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Accuracy of Sonographic Vs MRI Fetal Weight Estimation
- What is being tested?
- Fetal MRI
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 13 Feb 2025to 13 Feb 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- singleton pregnancy at term, suspected fetal macrosomia,
Who cannot join
- fetal anomaly multiple pregnancy PROM
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation Between Sonographic Vs. Magnetic Resonance Assessment
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of sonographic vs. magnetic resonance fetal weight estimation in suspected fetal macrosomia in term pregnancy.
Pregnant patient at term with suspected macrosomia will participate and undergo both sonographic and magnetic resonance fetal weight estimations and the actual birthweight will be recorded and compared with the fetal weight estimations
Read the detailed description
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of sonographic vs. magnetic resonance fetal weight estimation in suspected fetal macrosomia in term pregnancy.
Pregnant patient at term with suspected macrosomia will participate and undergo both sonographic and magnetic resonance fetal weight estimations and the actual birthweight will be recorded and compared with the fetal weight estimations inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancies at term, suspected fetal macrosomia (>4000 gr in non GDM and >3800 gr. in GDM cases exclusion criteria-fetal anomaly, PPROM, multiple gestation The radiologist and the sonographer will be blinded to the fetal weight estimation and to the other estimation done
- Being tested
- Fetal MRI
- Keywords
- fetal weight estimation, accuracy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fetal MRIDiagnostic test
all participant will undergo MRI fetal weight estimation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| suspected macrosomia | Experimental | suspected macrosomia at term who will undergo sonographic and MRI fetal weight estimation Receives: Diagnostic Test: Fetal MRI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
MRI fetal weight estimation accuracy
gram
Measured: from enollment to Performing the MRI at 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2025
- Study start13 Feb 2025
- Primary completion13 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion13 Feb 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Accuracy of Sonographic Vs MRI Fetal Weight EstimationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Maya Wolf, Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
- Investigators
- Amal shahin, Principal investigator, Galilee Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06898892
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0249-24-NHR
- Other IDs
- Galilee medical center
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A. Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;165(4 Pt 1):831-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90424-p.
PubMed 1951539Kadji C, Cannie MM, Kang X, Carlin A, Benjou Etchoua S, Resta S, Dutemeyer V, Abi-Khalil F, Mazzone E, Bevilacqua E, Jani JC. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2):238.e1-238.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
PubMed 34358479Malin GL, Bugg GJ, Takwoingi Y, Thornton JG, Jones NW. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):77-88. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13517. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PubMed 26224221