AzTrials
AzTrials

CognitionPACVANNCT06900452

The Effect of Pistachio-Rich Breakfast Meals on Cognitive Function in Healthy Older Adults

A study testing 0.5 serving of pistachios, 1 serving of pistachios and 2 servings of pistachios in people with Cognition, run by University of Reading at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to investigate the effect of a breakfast meal containing varying serving sizes (doses) of pistachio nuts on cognitive function throughout the course of the day in healthy ageing adults aged 65-80. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cognition
What is being tested?
0.5 serving of pistachios, 1 serving of pistachios and 2 servings of pistachios
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
6 Mar 2025to Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 65 - 80 years old
  • Fruit \& veg intake less than or equal to 4 servings per day
  • Not regularly consuming more than 3 servings of fish per week
  • Adequate English language and visual \& auditory acuity to perform the cognitive tasks
  • Normal BMI for age
  • Normal MMSE performance between 26-30

Who cannot join

  • Being diagnosed with psychological or psychiatric disorders
  • ADHD or dyslexia
  • Any food allergy or intolerance
  • Use of medications and dietary supplements that may impact study results
  • Antibiotic use within the last 3 months
  • Adherence to vegan or vegetarian diets, or other specific diets that may impact study outcomes
  • Being diagnosed with cardiometabolic disease (including type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease), or suffer from untreated hypertension or thrombosis related disorders
  • Taking blood thinners

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Claire Williams, PhD contact

0118 378 7540

claire.williams@reading.ac.uk

Lynne Bell, PhD contact

0118 378 8313

l.bell@reading.ac.uk

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Nutrition, Cognition & Health Lab, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading

    Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6ES

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Cognitive, Vascular, Neural and Biochemical Effects of Acute Pistachio Intervention in Older Adults

This study aims to investigate the effect of a breakfast meal containing varying serving sizes (doses) of pistachio nuts on cognitive function throughout the course of the day in healthy ageing adults aged 65-80.

Read the detailed description

This crossover RCT investigates the acute postprandial effect (over a 6-hour period) of a breakfast meal containing varying serving sizes (doses) of pistachio nuts on the cognitive behaviour in healthy adults aged 65-80 years old. The study will also assess markers of inflammation and brain health by taking blood samples, and explore brain function (EEG) and blood flow (FMD) to understand how pistachio nuts may positively influence cognitive health. The study will involve a screening visit and four testing visits, with a week interval between each. On the evening prior to each test visit, participants are asked not to consume any food or drinks expect water, including tea/coffee and alcohol, after 8.30pm, and on the morning of test visits to only consume one slice of buttered white toast and a glass of water prior to attending the visit. During the four testing visits, cognitive and mood battery tests will be taken at baseline and then at 2-, 4- and 6-hour intervals following the consumption of the intervention meal. Blood draws are taken at the end of the day. For the subset of participants taking part in FMD, this will be measured at baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours prior to cognitive testing. For those taking part in EEG, this data will be collected at 6 hours.

Conditions
Cognition
Being tested
0.5 serving of pistachios, 1 serving of pistachios, 2 servings of pistachios, Placebo
Keywords
Cognition, Pistachios, Vascular, Neural, Inflammation, Mood
Medical subject headings
Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 0.5 serving of pistachiosDietary supplement

    The equivalent of 0.5 servings (15g) of shelled, roasted pistachio nuts, crushed and mixed into a muesli-based breakfast meal for consumption.

    Ingredients: 15g pistachio, 35g muesli base, 150g full fat natural yoghurt, 15g unsalted butter (melted), 10g unflavoured whey powder

  • 1 serving of pistachiosDietary supplement

    The equivalent of 1 serving (30g) of shelled, roasted pistachio nuts, crushed and mixed into a muesli-based breakfast meal for consumption.

    Ingredients: 30g pistachio, 35g muesli base, 150g full fat natural yoghurt, 10g unsalted butter (melted), 5g unflavoured whey powder

  • 2 servings of pistachiosDietary supplement

    The equivalent of 2 servings (60g) of shelled, roasted pistachio nuts, crushed and mixed into a muesli-based breakfast meal for consumption.

    Ingredients: 60g pistachios, 25g muesli base, 150g low fat natural yoghurt

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    Macronutrient-matched placebo breakfast meal. Ingredients: 40g muesli base, 150g full fat natural yoghurt, 25g unsalted butter (melted), 15g unflavoured whey powder

Study groups in NCT06900452
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorMacronutrient-matched placebo breakfast meal
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo
0.5 servings of pistachioExperimental0.5 servings of pistachio (15g) administered in breakfast meal
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 0.5 serving of pistachios
1 serving of pistachioExperimental1 serving of pistachio (30g) administered in breakfast meal
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 1 serving of pistachios
2 servings of pistachioExperimental2 servings of pistachio (60g) administered in breakfast meal
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 2 servings of pistachios

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list. After 5 presentations, a new list (list B) is presented and recalled, and finally participants are asked (without hearing list A again) to recall as many words as they can from list A. After a 30 minute period, participants are asked to think back to the task and recall as many words as possible from list A only, providing a measure of delayed recall.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list. After 5 presentations, a new list (list B) is presented and recalled, and finally participants are asked (without hearing list A again) to recall as many words as they can from list A. After a 30 minute period, participants are asked to think back to the task and recall as many words as possible from list A only, providing a measure of delayed recall.

    Measured: 2 hours

  3. Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list. After 5 presentations, a new list (list B) is presented and recalled, and finally participants are asked (without hearing list A again) to recall as many words as they can from list A. After a 30 minute period, participants are asked to think back to the task and recall as many words as possible from list A only, providing a measure of delayed recall.

    Measured: 4 hours

  4. Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list. After 5 presentations, a new list (list B) is presented and recalled, and finally participants are asked (without hearing list A again) to recall as many words as they can from list A. After a 30 minute period, participants are asked to think back to the task and recall as many words as possible from list A only, providing a measure of delayed recall.

    Measured: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes (36)
  1. Rate of learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 sequential words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list. Scores are recorded as a percentage of accuracy, and the rate of learning is determined through change in accuracy across the 5 recalls.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Rate of learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 sequential words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list. Scores are recorded as a percentage of accuracy, and the rate of learning is determined through change in accuracy across the 5 recalls.

    Measured: 2 hours

  3. Rate of learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 sequential words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list. Scores are recorded as a percentage of accuracy, and the rate of learning is determined through change in accuracy across the 5 recalls.

    Measured: 4 hours

  4. Rate of learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 sequential words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list. Scores are recorded as a percentage of accuracy, and the rate of learning is determined through change in accuracy across the 5 recalls.

    Measured: 6 hours

  5. Word recognition (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    Following the delayed word recall, words from list A, list B and novel words are displayed sequentially on the screen and participants are asked to indicate which words were from list A only.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Word recognition (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    Following the delayed word recall, words from list A, list B and novel words are displayed sequentially on the screen and participants are asked to indicate which words were from list A only.

    Measured: 2 hours

  7. Word recognition (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    Following the delayed word recall, words from list A, list B and novel words are displayed sequentially on the screen and participants are asked to indicate which words were from list A only.

    Measured: 4 hours

  8. Word recognition (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)

    Following the delayed word recall, words from list A, list B and novel words are displayed sequentially on the screen and participants are asked to indicate which words were from list A only.

    Measured: 6 hours

  9. Modified Attention Network Task (MANT)

    This task examines execution function, attention and inhibition. Participants respond to a centrally presented target arrow pointing to the left or the right by pressing the corresponding key on the keyboard. The target arrow is flanked by arrows that point in the same (congruent) or opposite (incongruent) direction. Previous studies have found that participants show larger latencies and more errors on incongruent trials when compared with congruent trials due to the conflicting interference of the incongruently facing arrows. Response latencies to congruent trials reflect processing speed, while errors on incongruent trials indicate susceptibility to interference. In this study participants will be presented with two blocks of the MANT - one normal block, and one block with the addition of serial 3s. In the serial 3s block, participants will be asked to count backwards in 3s out loud while continuing to perform the MANT, increasing the level of cognitive demand.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Modified Attention Network Task (MANT)

    This task examines execution function, attention and inhibition. Participants respond to a centrally presented target arrow pointing to the left or the right by pressing the corresponding key on the keyboard. The target arrow is flanked by arrows that point in the same (congruent) or opposite (incongruent) direction. Previous studies have found that participants show larger latencies and more errors on incongruent trials when compared with congruent trials due to the conflicting interference of the incongruently facing arrows. Response latencies to congruent trials reflect processing speed, while errors on incongruent trials indicate susceptibility to interference. In this study participants will be presented with two blocks of the MANT - one normal block, and one block with the addition of serial 3s. In the serial 3s block, participants will be asked to count backwards in 3s out loud while continuing to perform the MANT, increasing the level of cognitive demand.

    Measured: 2 hours

  11. Modified Attention Network Task (MANT)

    This task examines execution function, attention and inhibition. Participants respond to a centrally presented target arrow pointing to the left or the right by pressing the corresponding key on the keyboard. The target arrow is flanked by arrows that point in the same (congruent) or opposite (incongruent) direction. Previous studies have found that participants show larger latencies and more errors on incongruent trials when compared with congruent trials due to the conflicting interference of the incongruently facing arrows. Response latencies to congruent trials reflect processing speed, while errors on incongruent trials indicate susceptibility to interference. In this study participants will be presented with two blocks of the MANT - one normal block, and one block with the addition of serial 3s. In the serial 3s block, participants will be asked to count backwards in 3s out loud while continuing to perform the MANT, increasing the level of cognitive demand.

    Measured: 4 hours

  12. Modified Attention Network Task (MANT)

    This task examines execution function, attention and inhibition. Participants respond to a centrally presented target arrow pointing to the left or the right by pressing the corresponding key on the keyboard. The target arrow is flanked by arrows that point in the same (congruent) or opposite (incongruent) direction. Previous studies have found that participants show larger latencies and more errors on incongruent trials when compared with congruent trials due to the conflicting interference of the incongruently facing arrows. Response latencies to congruent trials reflect processing speed, while errors on incongruent trials indicate susceptibility to interference. In this study participants will be presented with two blocks of the MANT - one normal block, and one block with the addition of serial 3s. In the serial 3s block, participants will be asked to count backwards in 3s out loud while continuing to perform the MANT, increasing the level of cognitive demand.

    Measured: 6 hours

  13. Task Switching Task

    This task requires executive function and sustained attention, and provides a measure of cognitive flexibility. Participants view a circle with 8 equally spaced radii, 2 of which form a bold bisecting line. Numbers are chosen randomly from a set of 1-4 \& 6-9 and displayed sequentially in a clockwise direction. A response of higher or lower than 5 is made for trials below the bold line, and even or odd for numbers above the line. Outcome measures include overall accuracy and reaction time (RT) on correct trials, as well as accuracy and RT on trials where there is a 'switch cost' from stimuli moving from below to above the bold line and vice versa.

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Task Switching Task

    This task requires executive function and sustained attention, and provides a measure of cognitive flexibility. Participants view a circle with 8 equally spaced radii, 2 of which form a bold bisecting line. Numbers are chosen randomly from a set of 1-4 \& 6-9 and displayed sequentially in a clockwise direction. A response of higher or lower than 5 is made for trials below the bold line, and even or odd for numbers above the line. Outcome measures include overall accuracy and reaction time (RT) on correct trials, as well as accuracy and RT on trials where there is a 'switch cost' from stimuli moving from below to above the bold line and vice versa.

    Measured: 2 hours

  15. Task Switching Task

    This task requires executive function and sustained attention, and provides a measure of cognitive flexibility. Participants view a circle with 8 equally spaced radii, 2 of which form a bold bisecting line. Numbers are chosen randomly from a set of 1-4 \& 6-9 and displayed sequentially in a clockwise direction. A response of higher or lower than 5 is made for trials below the bold line, and even or odd for numbers above the line. Outcome measures include overall accuracy and reaction time (RT) on correct trials, as well as accuracy and RT on trials where there is a 'switch cost' from stimuli moving from below to above the bold line and vice versa.

    Measured: 4 hours

  16. Task Switching Task

    This task requires executive function and sustained attention, and provides a measure of cognitive flexibility. Participants view a circle with 8 equally spaced radii, 2 of which form a bold bisecting line. Numbers are chosen randomly from a set of 1-4 \& 6-9 and displayed sequentially in a clockwise direction. A response of higher or lower than 5 is made for trials below the bold line, and even or odd for numbers above the line. Outcome measures include overall accuracy and reaction time (RT) on correct trials, as well as accuracy and RT on trials where there is a 'switch cost' from stimuli moving from below to above the bold line and vice versa.

    Measured: 6 hours

  17. Corsi Block Tapping Task

    A standardised assessment of visuospatial working memory. The task comprises nine identical squares fixed in a random arrangement on a screen. Participants observe sequences of between two and nine blocks, which they then reproduce as accurately as possible by clicking with the mouse. Outcomes include number of correct sequences identified as a percentage of accuracy, and number of correct blocks identified (not necessarily in the correct sequence). Four versions of each sequence length are presented during the task. A novel sequence will be presented on each occasion, the order of which will be counterbalanced across participants.

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Corsi Block Tapping Task

    A standardised assessment of visuospatial working memory. The task comprises nine identical squares fixed in a random arrangement on a screen. Participants observe sequences of between two and nine blocks, which they then reproduce as accurately as possible by clicking with the mouse. Outcomes include number of correct sequences identified as a percentage of accuracy, and number of correct blocks identified (not necessarily in the correct sequence). Four versions of each sequence length are presented during the task. A novel sequence will be presented on each occasion, the order of which will be counterbalanced across participants.

    Measured: 2 hours

  19. Corsi Block Tapping Task

    A standardised assessment of visuospatial working memory. The task comprises nine identical squares fixed in a random arrangement on a screen. Participants observe sequences of between two and nine blocks, which they then reproduce as accurately as possible by clicking with the mouse. Outcomes include number of correct sequences identified as a percentage of accuracy, and number of correct blocks identified (not necessarily in the correct sequence). Four versions of each sequence length are presented during the task. A novel sequence will be presented on each occasion, the order of which will be counterbalanced across participants.

    Measured: 4 hours

  20. Corsi Block Tapping Task

    A standardised assessment of visuospatial working memory. The task comprises nine identical squares fixed in a random arrangement on a screen. Participants observe sequences of between two and nine blocks, which they then reproduce as accurately as possible by clicking with the mouse. Outcomes include number of correct sequences identified as a percentage of accuracy, and number of correct blocks identified (not necessarily in the correct sequence). Four versions of each sequence length are presented during the task. A novel sequence will be presented on each occasion, the order of which will be counterbalanced across participants.

    Measured: 6 hours

  21. N-back task

    The N-Back task is a measure of working memory where participants are instructed to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously. In this simplified 0-back version, participants respond when the target matches a fixed target specified at the beginning of the task (similar to a Go/No-Go task). Data will be analysed for both accuracy and reaction time on correct trials. For a subset of participants, this task will be conducted while recording EEG (6 hours only) in order to monitor change in brain activity in response to target trials. The N-Back was selected as it has been shown in previous work to elicit a strong P300 signal (see EEG as additional outcome).

    Measured: Baseline

  22. N-back task

    The N-Back task is a measure of working memory where participants are instructed to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously. In this simplified 0-back version, participants respond when the target matches a fixed target specified at the beginning of the task (similar to a Go/No-Go task). Data will be analysed for both accuracy and reaction time on correct trials. For a subset of participants, this task will be conducted while recording EEG (6 hours only) in order to monitor change in brain activity in response to target trials. The N-Back was selected as it has been shown in previous work to elicit a strong P300 signal (see EEG as additional outcome).

    Measured: 2 hours

  23. N-back task

    The N-Back task is a measure of working memory where participants are instructed to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously. In this simplified 0-back version, participants respond when the target matches a fixed target specified at the beginning of the task (similar to a Go/No-Go task). Data will be analysed for both accuracy and reaction time on correct trials. For a subset of participants, this task will be conducted while recording EEG (6 hours only) in order to monitor change in brain activity in response to target trials. The N-Back was selected as it has been shown in previous work to elicit a strong P300 signal (see EEG as additional outcome).

    Measured: 4 hours

  24. N-back task

    The N-Back task is a measure of working memory where participants are instructed to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously. In this simplified 0-back version, participants respond when the target matches a fixed target specified at the beginning of the task (similar to a Go/No-Go task). Data will be analysed for both accuracy and reaction time on correct trials. For a subset of participants, this task will be conducted while recording EEG (6 hours only) in order to monitor change in brain activity in response to target trials. The N-Back was selected as it has been shown in previous work to elicit a strong P300 signal (see EEG as additional outcome).

    Measured: 6 hours

  25. EEG (ERPs & PSD)

    Event related potential (ERP) measure of P300 \& N200 latency and amplitude will be assessed using EEG (electroencephalography) in a subset of participants during resting state (eyes open and closed) and during the N-Back task. Additionally, power for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Theta bands during performance of the N-Back task will be assessed in these participants.

    EEG data will be collected using Brain Products software and 16-channel active electrodes.

    Measured: 6 hours

  26. Blood markers

    Blood samples will be collected 6 hours post-intervention to measure to following serum markers: BDNF, irisin, IGF-1 and cytokines (IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α). Samples will be analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

    Measured: 6 hours

  27. Flow mediated dilation (FMD)

    A subset of participants will complete FMD assessment prior to each cognitive task battery (baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours). FMD is a non-invasive ultrasound technique that measures how the brachial artery dilates in response to increased blood flow following occlusion. Participants are required to lie down for 15 minutes before scanning commences. The procedure then takes 9 minutes: the brachial artery is first scanned for 1 minute, a blood pressure cuff is then inflated on the forearm for 5 minutes, before being released and the artery scanned for a further 3 minutes. This data will be analysed using Cardiovascular Suit. During FMD, laser doppler flowometry (LDF) will also be measured using the index finger of the right arm and analysed for % PORH (post occlusive reactive hyperaemia), measured in flux units .

    Measured: Baseline

  28. Flow mediated dilation (FMD)

    A subset of participants will complete FMD assessment prior to each cognitive task battery (baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours). FMD is a non-invasive ultrasound technique that measures how the brachial artery dilates in response to increased blood flow following occlusion. Participants are required to lie down for 15 minutes before scanning commences. The procedure then takes 9 minutes: the brachial artery is first scanned for 1 minute, a blood pressure cuff is then inflated on the forearm for 5 minutes, before being released and the artery scanned for a further 3 minutes. This data will be analysed using Cardiovascular Suit. During FMD, laser doppler flowometry (LDF) will also be measured using the index finger of the right arm and analysed for % PORH (post occlusive reactive hyperaemia), measured in flux units .

    Measured: 2 hours

  29. Flow mediated dilation (FMD)

    A subset of participants will complete FMD assessment prior to each cognitive task battery (baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours). FMD is a non-invasive ultrasound technique that measures how the brachial artery dilates in response to increased blood flow following occlusion. Participants are required to lie down for 15 minutes before scanning commences. The procedure then takes 9 minutes: the brachial artery is first scanned for 1 minute, a blood pressure cuff is then inflated on the forearm for 5 minutes, before being released and the artery scanned for a further 3 minutes. This data will be analysed using Cardiovascular Suit. During FMD, laser doppler flowometry (LDF) will also be measured using the index finger of the right arm and analysed for % PORH (post occlusive reactive hyperaemia), measured in flux units .

    Measured: 4 hours

  30. Flow mediated dilation (FMD)

    A subset of participants will complete FMD assessment prior to each cognitive task battery (baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours). FMD is a non-invasive ultrasound technique that measures how the brachial artery dilates in response to increased blood flow following occlusion. Participants are required to lie down for 15 minutes before scanning commences. The procedure then takes 9 minutes: the brachial artery is first scanned for 1 minute, a blood pressure cuff is then inflated on the forearm for 5 minutes, before being released and the artery scanned for a further 3 minutes. This data will be analysed using Cardiovascular Suit. During FMD, laser doppler flowometry (LDF) will also be measured using the index finger of the right arm and analysed for % PORH (post occlusive reactive hyperaemia), measured in flux units .

    Measured: 6 hours

  31. Raven's Progressive Matrices

    The Raven's is a non-verbal intelligence test designed to assess abstract reasoning and fluid intelligence which provides a single score (the sum of correct answers). Ravens will be included in the present study at baseline as a measure of IQ, which may later be utilised as a covariate when analysing the cognitive data.

    Measured: Baseline

  32. Epic-Norfolk Food Frequency Questionnaire

    The FFQ is a validated tool for gauging the average habitual dietary intake of micro and macronutrients of an individual in the UK. Data will be processed using the FETA software.

    Measured: Baseline

  33. Blood pressure

    Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic and diastolic blood pressure mmHg.

    Measured: Baseline

  34. Blood pressure

    Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic and diastolic blood pressure mmHg.

    Measured: 2 hours

  35. Blood pressure

    Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic and diastolic blood pressure mmHg.

    Measured: 4 hours

  36. Blood pressure

    Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic and diastolic blood pressure mmHg.

    Measured: 6 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Mar 2025
  2. Study start6 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completionNov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
52 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06900452
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-236-CW
Acronym
PACVAN
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
21 Mar 2025
Last updated
7 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All relevant study outcomes described in the Ethics Review Application Form, including demographics, anthropometrics, cognitive performance, blood tests FMD and EEG data, will be preserved and made available via a data repository, such as the University of Reading data repository, in anonymised form, so that they can be consulted and re-used by others.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 0.5 serving of pistachios, 1 serving of pistachios and 2 servings of pistachios in people with Cognition, run by University of Reading at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Claire Williams, PhD (0118 378 7540, claire.williams@reading.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in