SeptoplastyNCT06900621
Effects of Methods on Dry Mouth After Septoplasty Surgery
A study testing ice water and room temperature water in people with Septoplasty and Dry Mouth, run by Ege University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
It was planned to investigate the effects of two different methods on early dry mouth after septoplasty surgery. The data of this study, which is planned to be conducted experimentally, is planned to be collected at Gönen State Hospital between 2025-2026. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Septoplasty, Dry Mouth
- What is being tested?
- ice water and room temperature water
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 25 Mar 2025to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 89 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 89
- Able to communicate in Turkish
- No obstacle to communication
- Agreeing to participate in the study
- Conscious and oriented as a result of the evaluation made with SPMT at 30 minutes after the surgery, with a clear airway, no nausea or vomiting
- Using silicone nasal tampons
Who cannot join
- Patients with a preoperative oral mucous membrane integrity assessment Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) result of over 16
- Those taking medication that affects dry mouth
- Those with a chronic disease that affects dry mouth
- Those undergoing a second simultaneous surgical procedure
- Those who develop complications during surgery and/or during recovery from anesthesia
- Patients who smoke will not be included in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Gönen State Hospital
Balıkesir, Gönen, 10900
dürdane palabıyık yılmaz, nurse, +905309597629, durdanepalabiyikyilmaz@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Effects of Two Different Methods on Early Period Dry Mouth After Septoplasty Surgery
It was planned to investigate the effects of two different methods on early dry mouth after septoplasty surgery. The data of this study, which is planned to be conducted experimentally, is planned to be collected at Gönen State Hospital between 2025-2026. Patients who are scheduled to undergo septoplasty surgery and present with septum deviation constitute the universe of the study. The research sample (n: 63) was determined using the Power analysis G*Power v3.1.9.7 program by taking the sample study as reference. However, considering the data losses (dropouts) in similar studies, when the missing data rate was taken as 20% , the sample size was determined as 81 patients. Patients who were informed about the study and volunteered to participate in the study (n: 81) and met the inclusion criteria of the study will constitute the sample group. 3 groups were determined in the study as intervention groups (group 1 and group 2) and control group (group 3). Patients who meet the preoperative criteria will be randomized into one of three groups after surgery. Data will be collected using the Patient Identification Form, General Patient Follow-up Form, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Assessment Scale (NOSE), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoring expressed by the patient to measure mouth dryness and satisfaction, "Safety Protocol for Thirst Management in the Immediate Postoperative Period" (SPTM), Oral Mucous Membrane Integrity Assessment and Follow-up Form - Oral Assessment Guide (OAG). 3 groups will be created in the study. 5 ml of ice water will be applied to one group that will receive intervention, the other group will be given water at normal room temperature, and the control group will receive standard clinical care and will not be treated. As a result of the evaluation made with SPTM in the first 30 minutes after the surgery, the dry mouth of all patients included in the study (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) who meet the conditions will be evaluated before the application, starting from the first 30 minutes after the surgery and at 60 - 90 - 120 - 150 - 180 minutes. In the study, all patients (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) will be evaluated for dry mouth before the application. The data obtained as a result of the study will be analyzed with a statistical package program. In the evaluation of the data in the study, descriptive statistics and parametric or non-parametric tests will be applied depending on whether the data show a normal distribution. In comparisons, p<0.05 value will be considered statistically significant.
Read the detailed description
Nasal septum deviation (NSD) is one of the most common upper respiratory tract diseases causing airway obstruction, with some authors reporting a prevalence of up to 70-80% in the general population. In NSD, breathing through the mouth instead of the nose may cause complaints of dry mouth and sore throat. In addition to NSD, diseases and medications that cause dry mouth include the presence of an endotracheal tube in intensive care patients, the presence of an orogastric or nasogastric tube, frequent oral aspiration, therapeutic dehydration (e.g. cardiogenic shock or ARDS), not taking fluids or nutrients by mouth, fever, diarrhea, burns, continuous oxygen therapy, dysphagia, fear, and anxiety. Klavuz et al. (2022) found that gender did not have much of an effect on dry mouth and the prevalence of dry mouth could be seen at different rates as a result of their study conducted between the ages of 16-90. In addition, it was observed that smoking reduced the salivary flow rate; however, it was not the primary factor causing hyposalivation. Although septoplasty is the most commonly performed surgery in NSD, the severity, side and type of nasal obstruction should be taken into consideration when making the surgical decision. Özkiriş and Mutlu (2010) stated that NSD was determined in 39% of 20,596 patients and only 2,113 of the patients had complaints of nasal obstruction and surgery was applied to approximately 55% of them. The terms dry mouth and thirst, which are often used interchangeably, are the most common symptoms of terminal dehydration, along with nausea, vomiting and fatigue. The patient's feeling of dry mouth is defined as a distressing discomfort. Preoperative fasting, medication use during anesthesia-surgery, mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube, application of devices such as airway, blood loss during surgery, etc. may present situations that encourage and increase the appearance of thirst, and may also cause deterioration of oral health, salivary flow rate and content in patients. Moon et al. (2015) compared cold water and cold saline gauze in their study and concluded that wet gauze can be applied with cold normal saline to reduce thirst and salivary acidity and improve the condition of the oral cavity in patients after surgery. Thirst and dry mouth increase as decreased salivary flow decreases the pH of saliva. The risk of dry mouth is defined as sensitivity to discomfort or damage in the oral mucosa due to decreased quantity or quality of saliva, while mouth breathing is among the risk factors for the diagnosis of oral mucous membrane deterioration. In the literature, it is stated that sipping a small amount of water is the most common and practical method in the treatment of dry mouth; in addition, mouthwashes, moisturizing products and artificial saliva products are effective in improving the quality of life and maintaining and protecting oral health. Many different methods have been used for the intervention of postoperative dry mouth before and after surgery. Garcia (2019) reported that in the preoperative application of mentholated chewing gum, dry mouth increased from 64.7 to 72.5 in the control group and decreased from 64.7 to 3.9 in the intervention group. In a similar study, dry mouth also decreased. In bariatric surgery patients in the PACU with videolaparoscopy, the use of a mentholated pack was not more effective than a non-mentholated precaution pack in terms of reducing thirst intensity, improving lip hydration, dryness and oral cavity taste for one hour, and the mentholated strategy was proven to be effective after a single application. In a similar study, it was found that a mentholated care pack only improved the tongue and saliva in postoperative patients undergoing abdominal surgery. In the study of Oztas and Oztas (2022), no significant difference was found between the three groups in terms of age, gender, ASA, preoperative thirst and dry mouth, and preoperative oral health status. A significant difference was found between the groups after 8, 20, 24, 36, and 40 hours in terms of thirst and dry mouth severity scores. The intervention group receiving cold water spray showed statistically significant differences when compared with the control groups receiving cold saline and 1-2 ml room temperature water, but no significant difference was found between the oral health status and pH scores after 4, 8, 20, 24, 36, and 40 hours. It shows that cold water spray is more effective on the thirst and dry mouth scores of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery compared to cold normal saline spray and water applied using a syringe, but it is not an effective factor on oral health status and saliva pH values. Hur et al. (2009) examined the effects of gargling with cold water, applying wet gauze and moisturizing after nasal surgery; a significant decrease in mouth dryness was found in the intervention group at 2-4 hours, and a significant decrease in mouth dryness was found in the control group at 4 hours. As a result, gargling with cold water was found to be an effective nursing intervention to reduce postoperative thirst and dry mouth, and gargling with cold water was found to be effective in reducing thirst in relation to the duration. Gu et al. (2022) compared wiping with cold water gauze and not wiping with cold water gauze in patients undergoing nasal surgery, and concluded that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of thirst and oral status after the intervention, but thirst and oral status improved significantly. However, no study has been found that evaluates the effects of ice water and room temperature water interventions on dry mouth after septoplasty surgery. The subject of this thesis is to examine the effects of interventions on dry mouth in patients after septoplasty. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of two different methods on early period dry mouth after septoplasty surgery.
- Conditions
- Septoplasty, Dry Mouth
- Being tested
- ice water, room temperature water
- Keywords
- dry mouth, nursing, early period, septoplasty, water at room temperature, ice water
- Medical subject headings
- Xerostomia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ice waterOther
Patients who apply SPTM are given a semifowler position with the head of the bed at least 45°, if there is no contraindication. The water temperature (5-9 °C) will be measured with a calibrated digital thermometer. After VAS scoring, patients are sprayed with 5 ml of ice water placed in spray cans every 30 minutes until all the water is used up in the mouth, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks, depending on the group. A total of 5 rounds are made with 5 ml of water in one round (0.2 ml is sprayed on the tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks) and each round is planned to be completed in 1 minute and last at most 5 minutes. This application is applied to the intervention groups 5 times in total (30th min- 60th min- 90th min- 120th min- 150th min). The first oral intake of the patients is routinely started at the 180th minute.
room temperature waterOther
Patients who apply SPTM are given a semifowler position with the head of the bed at least 45°, if there is no contraindication. The water temperature (15-24 °C) will be measured with a calibrated digital thermometer. After VAS scoring, patients are sprayed with 5 ml of room temperature water placed in spray cans every 30 minutes until all the water is used up in the mouth, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks, depending on the group. A total of 5 rounds are made with 5 ml of water in one round (0.2 ml is sprayed on the tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks) and each round is planned to be completed in 1 minute and last at most 5 minutes. This application is applied to the intervention groups 5 times in total (30th min- 60th min- 90th min- 120th min- 150th min). The first oral intake of the patients is routinely started at the 180th minute.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ice Water (Group 1) | Active comparator | Patients who come to the surgical clinic after the surgery will be given a VAS score for dry mouth at the 30th minute. Immediately afterwards, 5 ml of ice water (5-9 °C) placed in spray cans every 30 minutes will be sprayed into the mouth, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks until all the water is used up. This application will be applied to the intervention groups a total of 5 times (30th min-60th min-90th min-120th min-150th min). VAS scoring will be done for dry mouth before each application. The first oral intake of the patients is routinely started at the 180th minute. After the applications are completed, VAS scoring will be requested for the satisfaction evaluation of the patients in the intervention group. Receives: Other: ice water |
| Room Temperature Water (Group 2) | Active comparator | Patients who come to the surgical clinic after the surgery will be given a VAS score for dry mouth assessment at the 30th minute. Immediately afterwards, 5 ml of room temperature water (15-24 °C) placed in spray cans every 30 minutes will be sprayed into the mouth, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks until all the water is used up. This application will be applied to the intervention groups a total of 5 times (30th min-60th min-90th min-120th min-150th min). VAS scoring will be done for dry mouth before each application. The first oral intake of the patients is routinely started at the 180th minute. After the applications are completed, VAS scoring will be requested for the satisfaction assessment of the patients in the intervention group. Receives: Other: room temperature water |
| Control (Group 3) | No intervention | The routine application in the clinic (oral intake restriction for 3 hours after surgery) will be applied to the control group. No application will be made, dry mouth will be evaluated at the specified times. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
dry mouth
Pre-Operative: Patients will be checked in terms of inclusion and exclusion criteria in the clinic and if they are suitable, they will be asked to participate in the study. The oral assessment guide (OAG) will be applied at this stage of the study. Patients who score 16 points or less in the OAG assessment (by the researcher using a light source and abeslang) will be included in the study. Before surgery, patients will be asked to fill out the Patient Identification Form. Then, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Assessment Scale and the VAS scoring, expressed by the patient to measure dry mouth, will be performed and recorded in the general patient follow-up form. Post-operatively: starting from the first 30 minutes after the operation, and at 60-90-120-150-180 minutes, all patients included in the study (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) will be evaluated for dry mouth before the application. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be used to determine dry mouth.
Measured: The evaluation of dry mouth with VAS will be done once before the surgery and 6 times after the surgery and will take a total of 3-5 minutes.
Secondary outcomes (1)
patient satisfaction
In the literature, VAS has been used to evaluate postoperative dry mouth (Oztas and Oztas 2022; Serato et al. 2019). VAS has also been used in the assessment of satisfaction (Oztas and Oztas 2022; Lee et al. 2020; Elmashad and Gouda, 2018).
Measured: Patient satisfaction evaluation with VAS will be done after the application is completed only for Group 1 and Group 2 after the operation. It will take a maximum of 1 minute.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2025
- Study start25 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion28 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SeptoplastyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ege UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study was planned as an experimental, randomized controlled, single-blind study.Patients who meet the postoperative criteria will be randomized to one of three groups. Randomization was performed as a 3-way block randomization (Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2022). In the study, 3-way block randomization was applied using a blind technique. 3 participants in each block were assigned to different groups in a randomized order. The group codes determined in accordance with the randomization list were used to assign participants to the experimental conditions. This randomization method was preferred in order to provide balance between the participant groups and to minimize the potential effects of external factors.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ege University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, dürdane palabıyık yılmaz, Ege University
- Investigators
- Eda Dolgun, Ass. Prof., Study director, Ege University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06900621
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EGE-SBE-DPY-01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Two Different Methods on Early Period Dry Mouth After Septoplasty Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06900621
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EGE-SBE-DPY-01
- Conditions
- Septoplasty, Dry Mouth
- Keywords
- dry mouth, nursing, early period, septoplasty, water at room temperature, ice water
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ege UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It was planned to investigate the effects of two different methods on early dry mouth after septoplasty surgery. The data of this study, which is planned to be conducted experimentally, is planned to be collected at Gönen State Hospital between 2025-2026. Patients who are scheduled to undergo septoplasty surgery and present with septum deviation constitute the universe of the study. The research sample (n: 63) was determined using the Power analysis G*Power v3.1.9.7 program by taking the sample study as reference. However, considering the data losses (dropouts) in similar studies, when the missing data rate was taken as 20% , the sample size was determined as 81 patients. Patients who were informed about the study and volunteered to participate in the study (n: 81) and met the inclusion criteria of the study will constitute the sample group. 3 groups were determined in the study as intervention groups (group 1 and group 2) and control group (group 3). Patients who meet the preoperative criteria will be randomized into one of three groups after surgery. Data will be collected using the Patient Identification Form, General Patient Follow-up Form, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Assessment Scale (NOSE), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoring expressed by the patient to measure mouth dryness and satisfaction, "Safety Protocol for Thirst Management in the Immediate Postoperative Period" (SPTM), Oral Mucous Membrane Integrity Assessment and Follow-up Form - Oral Assessment Guide (OAG). 3 groups will be created in the study. 5 ml of ice water will be applied to one group that will receive intervention, the other group will be given water at normal room temperature, and the control group will receive standard clinical care and will not be treated. As a result of the evaluation made with SPTM in the first 30 minutes after the surgery, the dry mouth of all patients included in the study (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) who meet the conditions will be evaluated before the application, starting from the first 30 minutes after the surgery and at 60 - 90 - 120 - 150 - 180 minutes. In the study, all patients (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) will be evaluated for dry mouth before the application. The data obtained as a result of the study will be analyzed with a statistical package program. In the evaluation of the data in the study, descriptive statistics and parametric or non-parametric tests will be applied depending on whether the data show a normal distribution. In comparisons, p<0.05 value will be considered statistically significant.
Detailed description
Nasal septum deviation (NSD) is one of the most common upper respiratory tract diseases causing airway obstruction, with some authors reporting a prevalence of up to 70-80% in the general population. In NSD, breathing through the mouth instead of the nose may cause complaints of dry mouth and sore throat. In addition to NSD, diseases and medications that cause dry mouth include the presence of an endotracheal tube in intensive care patients, the presence of an orogastric or nasogastric tube, frequent oral aspiration, therapeutic dehydration (e.g. cardiogenic shock or ARDS), not taking fluids or nutrients by mouth, fever, diarrhea, burns, continuous oxygen therapy, dysphagia, fear, and anxiety. Klavuz et al. (2022) found that gender did not have much of an effect on dry mouth and the prevalence of dry mouth could be seen at different rates as a result of their study conducted between the ages of 16-90. In addition, it was observed that smoking reduced the salivary flow rate; however, it was not the primary factor causing hyposalivation. Although septoplasty is the most commonly performed surgery in NSD, the severity, side and type of nasal obstruction should be taken into consideration when making the surgical decision. Özkiriş and Mutlu (2010) stated that NSD was determined in 39% of 20,596 patients and only 2,113 of the patients had complaints of nasal obstruction and surgery was applied to approximately 55% of them. The terms dry mouth and thirst, which are often used interchangeably, are the most common symptoms of terminal dehydration, along with nausea, vomiting and fatigue. The patient's feeling of dry mouth is defined as a distressing discomfort. Preoperative fasting, medication use during anesthesia-surgery, mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube, application of devices such as airway, blood loss during surgery, etc. may present situations that encourage and increase the appearance of thirst, and may also cause deterioration of oral health, salivary flow rate and content in patients. Moon et al. (2015) compared cold water and cold saline gauze in their study and concluded that wet gauze can be applied with cold normal saline to reduce thirst and salivary acidity and improve the condition of the oral cavity in patients after surgery. Thirst and dry mouth increase as decreased salivary flow decreases the pH of saliva. The risk of dry mouth is defined as sensitivity to discomfort or damage in the oral mucosa due to decreased quantity or quality of saliva, while mouth breathing is among the risk factors for the diagnosis of oral mucous membrane deterioration. In the literature, it is stated that sipping a small amount of water is the most common and practical method in the treatment of dry mouth; in addition, mouthwashes, moisturizing products and artificial saliva products are effective in improving the quality of life and maintaining and protecting oral health. Many different methods have been used for the intervention of postoperative dry mouth before and after surgery. Garcia (2019) reported that in the preoperative application of mentholated chewing gum, dry mouth increased from 64.7 to 72.5 in the control group and decreased from 64.7 to 3.9 in the intervention group. In a similar study, dry mouth also decreased. In bariatric surgery patients in the PACU with videolaparoscopy, the use of a mentholated pack was not more effective than a non-mentholated precaution pack in terms of reducing thirst intensity, improving lip hydration, dryness and oral cavity taste for one hour, and the mentholated strategy was proven to be effective after a single application. In a similar study, it was found that a mentholated care pack only improved the tongue and saliva in postoperative patients undergoing abdominal surgery. In the study of Oztas and Oztas (2022), no significant difference was found between the three groups in terms of age, gender, ASA, preoperative thirst and dry mouth, and preoperative oral health status. A significant difference was found between the groups after 8, 20, 24, 36, and 40 hours in terms of thirst and dry mouth severity scores. The intervention group receiving cold water spray showed statistically significant differences when compared with the control groups receiving cold saline and 1-2 ml room temperature water, but no significant difference was found between the oral health status and pH scores after 4, 8, 20, 24, 36, and 40 hours. It shows that cold water spray is more effective on the thirst and dry mouth scores of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery compared to cold normal saline spray and water applied using a syringe, but it is not an effective factor on oral health status and saliva pH values. Hur et al. (2009) examined the effects of gargling with cold water, applying wet gauze and moisturizing after nasal surgery; a significant decrease in mouth dryness was found in the intervention group at 2-4 hours, and a significant decrease in mouth dryness was found in the control group at 4 hours. As a result, gargling with cold water was found to be an effective nursing intervention to reduce postoperative thirst and dry mouth, and gargling with cold water was found to be effective in reducing thirst in relation to the duration. Gu et al. (2022) compared wiping with cold water gauze and not wiping with cold water gauze in patients undergoing nasal surgery, and concluded that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of thirst and oral status after the intervention, but thirst and oral status improved significantly. However, no study has been found that evaluates the effects of ice water and room temperature water interventions on dry mouth after septoplasty surgery. The subject of this thesis is to examine the effects of interventions on dry mouth in patients after septoplasty. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of two different methods on early period dry mouth after septoplasty surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This study was planned as an experimental, randomized controlled, single-blind study.Patients who meet the postoperative criteria will be randomized to one of three groups. Randomization was performed as a 3-way block randomization (Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2022). In the study, 3-way block randomization was applied using a blind technique. 3 participants in each block were assigned to different groups in a randomized order. The group codes determined in accordance with the randomization list were used to assign participants to the experimental conditions. This randomization method was preferred in order to provide balance between the participant groups and to minimize the potential effects of external factors.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ice Water (Group 1) | Active comparator | Other: ice waterPatients who come to the surgical clinic after the surgery will be given a VAS score for dry mouth at the 30th minute. Immediately afterwards, 5 ml of ice water (5-9 °C) placed in spray cans every 30 minutes will be sprayed into the mouth, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks until all the water is used up. This application will be applied to the intervention groups a total of 5 times (30th min-60th min-90th min-120th min-150th min). VAS scoring will be done for dry mouth before each application. The first oral intake of the patients is routinely started at the 180th minute. After the applications are completed, VAS scoring will be requested for the satisfaction evaluation of the patients in the intervention group. |
| Room Temperature Water (Group 2) | Active comparator | Other: room temperature waterPatients who come to the surgical clinic after the surgery will be given a VAS score for dry mouth assessment at the 30th minute. Immediately afterwards, 5 ml of room temperature water (15-24 °C) placed in spray cans every 30 minutes will be sprayed into the mouth, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks until all the water is used up. This application will be applied to the intervention groups a total of 5 times (30th min-60th min-90th min-120th min-150th min). VAS scoring will be done for dry mouth before each application. The first oral intake of the patients is routinely started at the 180th minute. After the applications are completed, VAS scoring will be requested for the satisfaction assessment of the patients in the intervention group. |
| Control (Group 3) | No intervention | –The routine application in the clinic (oral intake restriction for 3 hours after surgery) will be applied to the control group. No application will be made, dry mouth will be evaluated at the specified times. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 89 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age between 18 and 89
- Able to communicate in Turkish
- No obstacle to communication
- Agreeing to participate in the study
- Conscious and oriented as a result of the evaluation made with SPMT at 30 minutes after the surgery, with a clear airway, no nausea or vomiting
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with a preoperative oral mucous membrane integrity assessment Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) result of over 16
- Those taking medication that affects dry mouth
- Those with a chronic disease that affects dry mouth
- Those undergoing a second simultaneous surgical procedure
- Those who develop complications during surgery and/or during recovery from anesthesia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ice waterPatients who apply SPTM are given a semifowler position with the head of the bed at least 45°, if there is no contraindication. The water temperature (5-9 °C) will be measured with a calibrated digital thermometer. After VAS scoring, patients are sprayed with 5 ml of ice water placed in spray cans every 30 minutes until all the water is used up in the mouth, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks, depending on the group. A total of 5 rounds are made with 5 ml of water in one round (0.2 ml is sprayed on the tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks) and each round is planned to be completed in 1 minute and last at most 5 minutes. This application is applied to the intervention groups 5 times in total (30th min- 60th min- 90th min- 120th min- 150th min). The first oral intake of the patients is routinely started at the 180th minute. | Other | Ice Water (Group 1) |
| room temperature waterPatients who apply SPTM are given a semifowler position with the head of the bed at least 45°, if there is no contraindication. The water temperature (15-24 °C) will be measured with a calibrated digital thermometer. After VAS scoring, patients are sprayed with 5 ml of room temperature water placed in spray cans every 30 minutes until all the water is used up in the mouth, tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks, depending on the group. A total of 5 rounds are made with 5 ml of water in one round (0.2 ml is sprayed on the tongue, palate, floor of the mouth, inside the right and left cheeks) and each round is planned to be completed in 1 minute and last at most 5 minutes. This application is applied to the intervention groups 5 times in total (30th min- 60th min- 90th min- 120th min- 150th min). The first oral intake of the patients is routinely started at the 180th minute. | Other | Room Temperature Water (Group 2) |
Primary outcome
dry mouth
Time frame: The evaluation of dry mouth with VAS will be done once before the surgery and 6 times after the surgery and will take a total of 3-5 minutes.
Pre-Operative: Patients will be checked in terms of inclusion and exclusion criteria in the clinic and if they are suitable, they will be asked to participate in the study. The oral assessment guide (OAG) will be applied at this stage of the study. Patients who score 16 points or less in the OAG assessment (by the researcher using a light source and abeslang) will be included in the study. Before surgery, patients will be asked to fill out the Patient Identification Form. Then, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Assessment Scale and the VAS scoring, expressed by the patient to measure dry mouth, will be performed and recorded in the general patient follow-up form. Post-operatively: starting from the first 30 minutes after the operation, and at 60-90-120-150-180 minutes, all patients included in the study (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) will be evaluated for dry mouth before the application. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be used to determine dry mouth.
1 secondary outcome
patient satisfaction
Time frame: Patient satisfaction evaluation with VAS will be done after the application is completed only for Group 1 and Group 2 after the operation. It will take a maximum of 1 minute.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Septoplasty
Recruiting
Pharyngeal Mucosal Conditioning to Prevent Postoperative Sore Throat in Septoplasty Patients With Severe Nasal Obstruction
Postoperative Sore Throat, Nasal Obstruction
Recruiting
Impact of Septoplasty on Headache
Impact of Septoplasty on Headache
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Analgesia Nociception Index Monitoring in Trigeminal Cardiac Reflex During Nasal Septoplasty
ENT Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Cold Dissection vs Electrocautry on TCR in Septoplasty
Septoplasty Surgeries
Recruiting
Comparative Study - Transseptal Suture Technique Verses Anterior Nasal Packing After Septoplasty
Deviated Nasal Septum, Postoperative Nasal Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Eda Dolgun, Ass. Prof. study director
Ege University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ice water and room temperature water in people with Septoplasty and Dry Mouth, run by Ege University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dürdane Palabıyık Yılmaz, PhD Student (+905309597629, durdanepalabiyikyilmaz@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
dry mouth (time frame: The evaluation of dry mouth with VAS will be done once before the surgery and 6 times after the surgery and will take a total of 3-5 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025.