Hip Replacement, TotalBERTHANCT06908564
Balance Rehabilitation Based on Serious Games
A study testing Experimental: Interactive balance rehabilitation based on serious games. and Active Comparator: conventional balance rehabilitation without the use of technological devices. in people with Hip Replacement, Total, run by IRCCS San Raffaele Roma at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The effects of new technologies, particularly exergames, on the rehabilitation process of patients with hip arthroplasty have not yet been verified. For this reason, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness, in terms of balance recovery, of a balance rehabilitation program based on serious games in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hip Replacement, Total
- What is being tested?
- Experimental: Interactive balance rehabilitation based on serious games. and Active Comparator: conventional balance rehabilitation without the use of technological devices.
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 23 Jun 2023to 14 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age over 18 years;
- First elective hip arthroplasty;
- Cognitive ability to understand and perform the exercises outlined in the protocol;
- Ability to sign the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Unable to adhere to the exercise program due to poor compliance;
- Previous contralateral hip arthroplasty;
- Surgical wound complications;
- Severe cognitive, linguistic, or visual impairments (inability to understand and follow the study procedures);
- Conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, may interfere with the study or contraindicate participation for safety reasons;
- Diagnosis of epilepsy;
- Presence of implanted cardiac pacemakers;
- Lack of signed informed consent for the study.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
Rome, Italy, 00163
Casa di Cura San Raffaele Sulmona
Sulmona, Italy, 67039
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of BalancE RehabiliTation Based on Serious Games in People With Hip Arthroplasty: a Pilot Non-Randomized Multicenter Study
The effects of new technologies, particularly exergames, on the rehabilitation process of patients with hip arthroplasty have not yet been verified. For this reason, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness, in terms of balance recovery, of a balance rehabilitation program based on serious games in individuals with hip arthroplasty compared to conventional treatment.
Read the detailed description
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic surgeries worldwide, primarily aimed at reducing pain, improving function, and enhancing quality of life. Over the past decade, the rate of THA has increased by 30%, and it is projected to double by 2035. Rehabilitation after THA includes pain management, wound care, self-care, motor therapy, early mobilization, and complication prevention [iv, v, vi]. Active patient involvement in the rehabilitation process is increasingly recognized as essential for improving post-THA autonomy .
Exergames can enhance patient engagement and attention during treatment, potentially leading to better rehabilitation outcomes. The application of game design approaches in rehabilitation has gained popularity, offering more engaging treatments that boost patient motivation and understanding. Serious games, which are not primarily intended for entertainment, focus on specific therapeutic goals. In motor rehabilitation, exergames allow patients to perform physical exercises through video game interaction, often integrating sensors and biosensors that provide biofeedback and enable therapists to monitor progress and personalize treatment.
Despite their growing popularity, there is limited literature on the effectiveness and safety of exergames in orthopedic rehabilitation. A systematic review by Wang et al. found a moderate reduction in pain with technology-assisted rehabilitation (via tele-rehabilitation) in patients with hip and knee arthroplasty, but no significant effects on functional mobility. Research specifically on THA patients is scarce and of low quality. Byra et al. reported similar findings, indicating a lack of comprehensive evidence on the effectiveness of technological rehabilitation in THA patients, although preliminary results in pain management, posture training, and proprioception are promising.
The effects of new technologies, particularly exergames, on the rehabilitation of patients with hip arthroplasty remain unverified. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a balance rehabilitation program based on serious games in individuals with hip arthroplasty compared to conventional treatment.
- Conditions
- Hip Replacement, Total
- Being tested
- Experimental: Interactive balance rehabilitation based on serious games., Active Comparator: conventional balance rehabilitation without the use of technological devices.
- Keywords
- Hip Arthroplasty Replacement, Lower Limb, Balance, Rehabilitation, Robotic-Assisted Therapy, Range Of Motion, Pain, Activity of Daily Living, Hip Replacement Total
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental: Interactive balance rehabilitation based on serious games.Device
The intervention of the Experimental Group consists of 30 minutes (16 sessions, 4 days/week, for 4 weeks) of balance rehabilitation exercises using non-immersive virtual reality through the OAK device (Khymeia Group, Italy). The system includes exercises that require the patient to reach visual targets by shifting their Center of Pressure (COP). The exercises are categorized based on the direction of COP displacement and can be performed with increasing difficulty, as determined by the physiotherapist during the rehabilitation process.
Active Comparator: conventional balance rehabilitation without the use of technological devices.Other
Intervention of the Control Group (CG) consists of 30 minutes (4 days/week, for 4 weeks) of conventional balance rehabilitation treatments without the use of technological devices. The motor exercises will focus on the rehabilitation of balance, the trunk, and the lower limbs and will be carried out with a physiotherapist who will tailor the treatment according to the patient's characteristics and needs. Primary attention will be given to recovering trunk control and seated posture. This phase will focus on restoring and maintaining muscle trophism in the anterior and posterior kinetic chains of the thigh and lower leg, as well as the hip's range of motion, through isometric exercises and gentle joint mobilizations while adhering to anti-dislocation guidelines.
The process will continue with the reacquisition of the upright stance, emphasizing proprioceptive, coordination, and balance abilities. Once the upright position is stabilized, gait re-education will be introduced.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group (EG) | Experimental | The Experimental Group (EG) perform 30 minutes (16 sessions, 4 days/week, for 4 weeks) of balance rehabilitation exercises using non-immersive virtual reality with the OAK device (Khymeia Group, Italy). Receives: Device: Experimental: Interactive balance rehabilitation based on serious games. |
| Active comparator (CG) | Active comparator | Partecipants assigned to Control Group (CG) follow 30 minutes (4 days/week, for 4 weeks) of conventional rehabilitative treatments for balance without the use of technological devices. Receives: Other: Active Comparator: conventional balance rehabilitation without the use of technological devices. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time up and go test assess fall risk and measure the progress of balance, sit to stand and walking.
Simple screening test that is a sensitive and specific measure of probability for falls among older adults.
This test is intended to population affected by Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer's, Hip fracture, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Total Hip Replacement, Stroke and Huntington Disease. Materials needed consist in one chair with armrest, stopwatch and tape for mark 3 meters. Patients wear their regular footwear and can use a walking aid, if needed.
The patient starts in a seated position and stands up upon therapist's command: walks 3 meters, turns around, walks back to the chair and sits down.
The time stops when the patient is seated. Be sure to document the assistive device used. The score is calculated in seconds and high scores indicate an elevate risk of falling.
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Secondary outcomes (8)
Cognitive Time Up and Go Test (TUG-C)
Time up and go test assess fall risk and measure the progress of balance, sit to stand and walking. Simple screening test that is a sensitive and specific measure of probability for falls among older adults. Materials needed consist in one chair with armrest, stopwatch and tape for mark 3 meters. Patients wear their regular footwear and can use a walking aid, if needed. The patient starts in a seated position and stands up upon therapist's command: walks 3 meters, turns around, walks back to the chair and sits down meanwhile he counting backwards in threes from a random start point. The time stops when the patient is seated. Be sure to document the assistive device used. The score is calculated in seconds and high scores indicate an elevate risk of fallTUG
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Passive Range of Motion (p-ROM)
Passive ROM refers to the movement of a joint through its range of motion by an external force. It's calculated using goniometer. Goniometer measures with a sensitivity of 1 degree. Elevated degrees of p-rom means high joint mobility.
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Ten Meter Walking Test (10MWT)
The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking or gait speed in meters per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function. Equipment required consists of a walkway of 10m with additional 2m at both ends, marked with tape, for acceleration \& deceleration (14 m total). The 14-metre walkway is marked 0-, 2-, 12-, and 14-metre points. In addition is required 2 chairs and stopwatch (or timer). The total time taken to ambulate 10 meters is recorded in this way: timing starts when the toes pass the 2-meter mark and stops when the toes pass the 12-meter mark. The total time is recorded in m/s. Low total time in 10MWT means that gait speed is elevate.
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR).
The hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) is a questionnaire intended to be used to assess patient's opinions about their hip and associated problems and to evaluate their symptoms and functional limitations during a therapeutic process. HOOS JR is developed based on the original 40-question questionnaire HOOS. HOOS JR has 6 items and it is shorter than original HOOS.
The HOOS is meant to be used over short and long-term intervals to assess changes over time or the effect of treatment. Factors that should be considered when using the HOOS include age, sex, weight, geographic location, other chronic diseases, history of an inactive hip problem, contralateral hip disease, and active knee, ankle, or foot problems. Each question allows for a score ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 corresponds to the absence of symptoms and 4 corresponds to the most severe symptom.
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Medical Research Council Scale (MRC)
The Medical Research Council Scale (also known as Oxford Scale) is a numerical rating scale used to quantify the power or strength produced by the contraction of a muscle. The main muscle groups investigated are:
Ankle Dorsiflexion, Ankle Plantiflexion, Knee Extension, Knee Flexion, Hip Flexion and Hip Extension. Muscle Grading Scores consists in:
0-No detectable muscle contraction (visible or palpation);
- Detectable contraction (visible or palpation), but no movement achieved;
- Limb movement achieved, but unable to move against gravity;
- Limb movement against resistance of gravity;
- Limb movement against gravity and external resistance;
- Normal strength.
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Modified Barthel Index (mBI)
The Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living is an ordinal scale which measures a person's ability to complete activities of daily living (ADL). The Barthel Index measures the degree of assistance required by an individual on ten mobility and self-care ADL items. The ten items are scored with a number of points, and then a final score is calculated by summing the points awarded to each functional skill. This allows the examiner to measure a patient's functional disability by quantifying their performance. Scores can be assigned either via direct assessment / observation or from reliable interviews with the patient, family, or staff. Research also suggests that the examiner's "common sense" and clinical experience can be used to assign scores. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in completing the measured ADLs. Higher scores also indicate the patient is more likely to return home, with varying degrees of assistance, following hospital discharge.
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales.It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms. From the patient's perspective, this spectrum appears continuous; their pain does not take discrete jumps, as a categorization of none, mild, moderate and severe would suggest. It was to capture this idea of an underlying continuum that the VAS was devised. The pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity between patients with similar conditions.
The VAS allows you to assign a value to pain from 1 to 10, where 1 corresponds to no pain and 10 corresponds to the maximum pain perceived by the patient in his life.
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment) and day 120 (T2 - 3 months after treatment).
Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC).
Activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale is a structured questionnaire that measures an individual's confidence during ambulatory activities without falling or experiencing a sense of unsteadiness. It consists of 16 questions gauging the individual's confidence while doing activities. The ABC scale is reported to be an accurate measure to identify individuals with a fall risk in populations of stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's, vestibular disorders, in elderly, and in other neurological conditions that can affect balance. Its a 16-item questionnaire where patients' rate their confidence while doing activities with a scoring from 0-100 (0 is no confidence and 100 is full confidence).
Measured: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment) and day 120 (T2 - 3 Months after treatment).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2025
- Study start23 Jun 2023
- Primary completion14 Oct 2026
- Study completion14 Oct 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hip Replacement, TotalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministero della Salute, Italy
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Prof. Marco Franceschini, MD, Study chair, IRCCS San Raffaele RomaProf. Marco Franceschini, MD, Principal investigator, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06908564
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RP 23/08
- Acronym
- BERTHA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) related to primary and secondary outcome measures will be shared, including assessment results and relevant demographic data, in compliance with ethical and legal requirements.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of BalancE RehabiliTation Based on Serious Games in People With Hip Arthroplasty: a Pilot Non-Randomized Multicenter Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06908564
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BERTHA / RP 23/08
- Conditions
- Hip Replacement, Total
- Keywords
- Hip Arthroplasty Replacement, Lower Limb, Balance, Rehabilitation, Robotic-Assisted Therapy, Range Of Motion, Pain, Activity of Daily Living
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Raffaele RomaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministero della Salute, Italy
- Study start
- 23 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Oct 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The effects of new technologies, particularly exergames, on the rehabilitation process of patients with hip arthroplasty have not yet been verified. For this reason, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness, in terms of balance recovery, of a balance rehabilitation program based on serious games in individuals with hip arthroplasty compared to conventional treatment.
Detailed description
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic surgeries worldwide, primarily aimed at reducing pain, improving function, and enhancing quality of life. Over the past decade, the rate of THA has increased by 30%, and it is projected to double by 2035. Rehabilitation after THA includes pain management, wound care, self-care, motor therapy, early mobilization, and complication prevention [iv, v, vi]. Active patient involvement in the rehabilitation process is increasingly recognized as essential for improving post-THA autonomy .
Exergames can enhance patient engagement and attention during treatment, potentially leading to better rehabilitation outcomes. The application of game design approaches in rehabilitation has gained popularity, offering more engaging treatments that boost patient motivation and understanding. Serious games, which are not primarily intended for entertainment, focus on specific therapeutic goals. In motor rehabilitation, exergames allow patients to perform physical exercises through video game interaction, often integrating sensors and biosensors that provide biofeedback and enable therapists to monitor progress and personalize treatment.
Despite their growing popularity, there is limited literature on the effectiveness and safety of exergames in orthopedic rehabilitation. A systematic review by Wang et al. found a moderate reduction in pain with technology-assisted rehabilitation (via tele-rehabilitation) in patients with hip and knee arthroplasty, but no significant effects on functional mobility. Research specifically on THA patients is scarce and of low quality. Byra et al. reported similar findings, indicating a lack of comprehensive evidence on the effectiveness of technological rehabilitation in THA patients, although preliminary results in pain management, posture training, and proprioception are promising.
The effects of new technologies, particularly exergames, on the rehabilitation of patients with hip arthroplasty remain unverified. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a balance rehabilitation program based on serious games in individuals with hip arthroplasty compared to conventional treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group (EG) | Experimental | Device: Experimental: Interactive balance rehabilitation based on serious games.The Experimental Group (EG) perform 30 minutes (16 sessions, 4 days/week, for 4 weeks) of balance rehabilitation exercises using non-immersive virtual reality with the OAK device (Khymeia Group, Italy). |
| Active comparator (CG) | Active comparator | Other: Active Comparator: conventional balance rehabilitation without the use of technological devices.Partecipants assigned to Control Group (CG) follow 30 minutes (4 days/week, for 4 weeks) of conventional rehabilitative treatments for balance without the use of technological devices. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age over 18 years;
- First elective hip arthroplasty;
- Cognitive ability to understand and perform the exercises outlined in the protocol;
- Ability to sign the informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Unable to adhere to the exercise program due to poor compliance;
- Previous contralateral hip arthroplasty;
- Surgical wound complications;
- Severe cognitive, linguistic, or visual impairments (inability to understand and follow the study procedures);
- Conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, may interfere with the study or contraindicate participation for safety reasons;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Interactive balance rehabilitation based on serious games.The intervention of the Experimental Group consists of 30 minutes (16 sessions, 4 days/week, for 4 weeks) of balance rehabilitation exercises using non-immersive virtual reality through the OAK device (Khymeia Group, Italy). The system includes exercises that require the patient to reach visual targets by shifting their Center of Pressure (COP). The exercises are categorized based on the direction of COP displacement and can be performed with increasing difficulty, as determined by the physiotherapist during the rehabilitation process. | Device | Experimental Group (EG) |
| Active Comparator: conventional balance rehabilitation without the use of technological devices.Intervention of the Control Group (CG) consists of 30 minutes (4 days/week, for 4 weeks) of conventional balance rehabilitation treatments without the use of technological devices. The motor exercises will focus on the rehabilitation of balance, the trunk, and the lower limbs and will be carried out with a physiotherapist who will tailor the treatment according to the patient's characteristics and needs. Primary attention will be given to recovering trunk control and seated posture. This phase will focus on restoring and maintaining muscle trophism in the anterior and posterior kinetic chains of the thigh and lower leg, as well as the hip's range of motion, through isometric exercises and gentle joint mobilizations while adhering to anti-dislocation guidelines. The process will continue with the reacquisition of the upright stance, emphasizing proprioceptive, coordination, and balance abilities. Once the upright position is stabilized, gait re-education will be introduced. | Other | Active comparator (CG) |
Primary outcome
Time Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Time up and go test assess fall risk and measure the progress of balance, sit to stand and walking. Simple screening test that is a sensitive and specific measure of probability for falls among older adults. This test is intended to population affected by Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer's, Hip fracture, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Total Hip Replacement, Stroke and Huntington Disease. Materials needed consist in one chair with armrest, stopwatch and tape for mark 3 meters. Patients wear their regular footwear and can use a walking aid, if needed. The patient starts in a seated position and stands up upon therapist's command: walks 3 meters, turns around, walks back to the chair and sits down. The time stops when the patient is seated. Be sure to document the assistive device used. The score is calculated in seconds and high scores indicate an elevate risk of falling.
8 secondary outcomes
Cognitive Time Up and Go Test (TUG-C)
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Passive Range of Motion (p-ROM)
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Ten Meter Walking Test (10MWT)
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR).
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Medical Research Council Scale (MRC)
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Modified Barthel Index (mBI)
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment) and day 120 (T2 - 3 months after treatment).
Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC).
Time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment) and day 120 (T2 - 3 Months after treatment).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) related to primary and secondary outcome measures will be shared, including assessment results and relevant demographic data, in compliance with ethical and legal requirements.
Related trials for Hip Replacement, Total
Not yet recruiting
Early Mobilization and Postoperative Complications in Hip Arthroplast
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Patient Education
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Bone Fixation of Mpact Double Mobility Cup
Total Hip Replacement
Recruiting
Binaural Beats for Postoperative Pain and Anxiety Reduction
TKA, THA
Recruiting
QLESP Block Versus PENG+LFCN Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty
Pain Management, Arthroplasty Total Hip Replacement
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Minimizing Blood Loss After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Blood Loss After a Total Hip Replacement
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Prof. Marco Franceschini, MD study chair
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
Prof. Marco Franceschini, MD principal investigator
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental: Interactive balance rehabilitation based on serious games. and Active Comparator: conventional balance rehabilitation without the use of technological devices. in people with Hip Replacement, Total, run by IRCCS San Raffaele Roma at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time Up and Go Test (TUG) (time frame: Day 0 (T0 - baseline), day 30 (T1 - After treatment).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.