Breast CancerEDGENCT06911528
Application of EndoScell Intraoperative Cellular Probing Technology for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
A study testing EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technology in people with Breast Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node, run by Fudan University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is a common surgical treatment for breast cancer and a primary method for assessing the pathological status of axillary lymph nodes. Precise intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes during surgery assists in timely evaluation of axillary lymph node pathology and helps in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node, Frozen Section
- What is being tested?
- EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technology
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 709 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years and older (inclusive)
- Female
- Preoperative pathology confirmed invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ
- Scheduled for sentinel lymph node biopsy
- Capable of and willing to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with a confirmed allergy to methylene blue or sodium citrate tracers
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients unwilling to participate in the clinical study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032
Jiajian Chen, +86 21 64175590, elwin1020@163.com
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Application of EndoScell Intraoperative Cellular Probing Technology in Breast Conserving Therapy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is a common surgical treatment for breast cancer and a primary method for assessing the pathological status of axillary lymph nodes. Precise intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes during surgery assists in timely evaluation of axillary lymph node pathology and helps in formulating further treatment strategies.
Touch imprint cytology (TIC) is one of the most commonly used intraoperative detection techniques. The new intraoperative cellular detection technology, EndoScell Scanner (ES), uses an improved real-time miniaturized fluorescence microscopy system for image acquisition. The ultra-high-resolution images obtained can reach the cellular level. In previous studies, the accuracy and sensitivity of this technology for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes were comparable to imprint cytology, but it is much more rapid. The detection technology uses fluorescein sodium and methylene blue as fluorescent dyes, which is non-invasive and also non-consumptive of tissue samples.
Read more
This study involves patients scheduled for sentinel lymph node biopsy and aims to evaluate the clinical application value of the EndoScell Scanner (ES) for intraoperative assessment of the pathological status of sentinel lymph nodes through a prospective self-controlled study. To avoid the potential impact of methylene blue on the ES detection technology, we will use mitoxantrone as a new dye for sentinel lymph node tracing in this study.
The primary study objective is to compare the accuracy of the ES detection technology in assessing sentinel lymph node status, using paraffin pathology examination as the gold standard. The primary endpoint is the accuracy of the ES technology. Secondary endpoints include the image quality score of the ES detection, the learning curve of the surgeons, and the time required for detection.
Read the detailed description
In recent years, the incidence of breast cancer in China has risen rapidly. Over the past two decades, the annual average incidence rate has increased from 15 per 100,000 to about 30 per 100,000. In first-tier cities like Shanghai, the incidence rate even exceeds 60 per 100,000, making breast cancer the leading malignant tumor threatening women's health. Compared to Western countries, the onset age of breast cancer in Chinese women is relatively younger, with over 54% of cases occurring before menopause. Surgery remains the mainstay of comprehensive treatment for breast cancer. Nearly half of the patients require mastectomy due to the extent or location of the tumor, resulting in significant disfigurement and long-term psychological trauma. In recent years, the demand for postoperative breast appearance among breast cancer patients in China has been increasing, leading to a rise in the proportion of conventional breast-conserving surgery, breast-conserving surgery, and various types of breast reconstruction surgeries.
Breast-conserving surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy can improve the postoperative breast appearance and quality of life while achieving tumor safety equal to or even better than that of total mastectomy. Breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery, which combine the principles of conventional breast conservation with plastic surgery techniques, further enhance the feasibility and safety of breast-conserving surgery.
The development of breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery has created a more urgent need to ensure negative margins intraoperatively. Despite expanding surgical indications due to the application of oncoplastic techniques, the positive margin rate of breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery is not significantly different from that of conventional breast-conserving surgery, ranging from 5% to 15%. Although re-excision after a positive margin does not affect local recurrence risk, it significantly diminishes postoperative cosmetic outcomes. More importantly, the design of oncoplastic surgery incisions becomes a challenge if mastectomy is needed based on margin status. Currently, the most accurate method for margin assessment is postoperative margin staining followed by radial sectioning and paraffin pathology examination. To enable timely intraoperative margin assessment, various methods have been proposed, including intraoperative frozen section analysis, specimen X-ray photography, and micro-computed tomography. However, these methods require ex vivo specimen evaluation and have limited sensitivity. Small sample studies have used micro-PET/CT technology for specimen imaging, but its high cost prevents widespread clinical validation and application.
The EndoScell Scaner (ES) is a novel intraoperative cell detection technology that uses a modified real-time miniaturized fluorescence microscope system for image acquisition, achieving ultra-high resolution at the cellular level. Previous studies have shown that its accuracy and sensitivity in intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection are comparable to those of cytological imprinting but with greater speed. This technology employs sodium fluorescein and methylene blue as fluorescent dyes, is non-invasive, and does not consume tissue samples.
This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of the EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cell probing technology for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing conventional breast-conserving surgery and breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy. The primary objective is to compare the accuracy of ES technology in assessing margin status and sentinel lymph node status using paraffin pathology as the gold standard. The primary endpoints are the accuracy of ES technology, positive margin rate, and reoperation rate; the secondary endpoints are ES detection image quality score, learning curve of surgeons, and detection time.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node, Frozen Section, Cytology
- Being tested
- EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technology
- Keywords
- Breast carcinoma, sentinel lymph node, tracer, touch imprint cytology, epifluorescence widefield microscope system
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technologyProcedure or surgery
In this project, we utilize the miniature wide-angle focusing microscope for intraoperative cell-level observation and detection, a technology in which our hospital has conducted extensive research and accumulated rich experience.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative Assessment | Experimental | After screening and enrollment, the EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technology will be used for intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel lymph node. Concurrently, imprint cytology will be performed for evaluation. During the study period, intraoperative decisions will primarily reference the results of the imprint cytology technique. Receives: Procedure: EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technology |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The accuracy of ES technology
the accuracy of the ES technology (including accuracy, sensitivity and specificity)
Measured: After the final pathological results are obtained, it is usually about 2 weeks after surgery
The reoperation rate
The proportion of reoperations due to a positive margin
Measured: 3 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (3)
The quality score of ES imaging
The image quality of ES was scored by the pathologist
Measured: After the final pathological results are obtained, it is usually about 2 weeks after surgery
The learning curve of the surgeons
Evaluate the number of cases required for the surgeon to achieve 95% or more accuracy
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The time required for the intraoperative evaluation
The time required for intraoperative detection using ES technology
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2025
- Study start30 Jan 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fudan UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 709 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fudan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jiong Wu, Fudan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06911528
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EDGE
- Other IDs
- HYXH2024012
- Acronym
- EDGE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 4 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Application of EndoScell Intraoperative Cellular Probing Technology in Breast Conserving Therapy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06911528
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EDGE / EDGE
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node, Frozen Section, Cytology
- Keywords
- Breast carcinoma, sentinel lymph node, tracer, touch imprint cytology, epifluorescence widefield microscope system
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 709 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fudan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is a common surgical treatment for breast cancer and a primary method for assessing the pathological status of axillary lymph nodes. Precise intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes during surgery assists in timely evaluation of axillary lymph node pathology and helps in formulating further treatment strategies.
Touch imprint cytology (TIC) is one of the most commonly used intraoperative detection techniques. The new intraoperative cellular detection technology, EndoScell Scanner (ES), uses an improved real-time miniaturized fluorescence microscopy system for image acquisition. The ultra-high-resolution images obtained can reach the cellular level. In previous studies, the accuracy and sensitivity of this technology for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes were comparable to imprint cytology, but it is much more rapid. The detection technology uses fluorescein sodium and methylene blue as fluorescent dyes, which is non-invasive and also non-consumptive of tissue samples.
This study involves patients scheduled for sentinel lymph node biopsy and aims to evaluate the clinical application value of the EndoScell Scanner (ES) for intraoperative assessment of the pathological status of sentinel lymph nodes through a prospective self-controlled study. To avoid the potential impact of methylene blue on the ES detection technology, we will use mitoxantrone as a new dye for sentinel lymph node tracing in this study.
The primary study objective is to compare the accuracy of the ES detection technology in assessing sentinel lymph node status, using paraffin pathology examination as the gold standard. The primary endpoint is the accuracy of the ES technology. Secondary endpoints include the image quality score of the ES detection, the learning curve of the surgeons, and the time required for detection.
Detailed description
In recent years, the incidence of breast cancer in China has risen rapidly. Over the past two decades, the annual average incidence rate has increased from 15 per 100,000 to about 30 per 100,000. In first-tier cities like Shanghai, the incidence rate even exceeds 60 per 100,000, making breast cancer the leading malignant tumor threatening women's health. Compared to Western countries, the onset age of breast cancer in Chinese women is relatively younger, with over 54% of cases occurring before menopause. Surgery remains the mainstay of comprehensive treatment for breast cancer. Nearly half of the patients require mastectomy due to the extent or location of the tumor, resulting in significant disfigurement and long-term psychological trauma. In recent years, the demand for postoperative breast appearance among breast cancer patients in China has been increasing, leading to a rise in the proportion of conventional breast-conserving surgery, breast-conserving surgery, and various types of breast reconstruction surgeries.
Breast-conserving surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy can improve the postoperative breast appearance and quality of life while achieving tumor safety equal to or even better than that of total mastectomy. Breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery, which combine the principles of conventional breast conservation with plastic surgery techniques, further enhance the feasibility and safety of breast-conserving surgery.
The development of breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery has created a more urgent need to ensure negative margins intraoperatively. Despite expanding surgical indications due to the application of oncoplastic techniques, the positive margin rate of breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery is not significantly different from that of conventional breast-conserving surgery, ranging from 5% to 15%. Although re-excision after a positive margin does not affect local recurrence risk, it significantly diminishes postoperative cosmetic outcomes. More importantly, the design of oncoplastic surgery incisions becomes a challenge if mastectomy is needed based on margin status. Currently, the most accurate method for margin assessment is postoperative margin staining followed by radial sectioning and paraffin pathology examination. To enable timely intraoperative margin assessment, various methods have been proposed, including intraoperative frozen section analysis, specimen X-ray photography, and micro-computed tomography. However, these methods require ex vivo specimen evaluation and have limited sensitivity. Small sample studies have used micro-PET/CT technology for specimen imaging, but its high cost prevents widespread clinical validation and application.
The EndoScell Scaner (ES) is a novel intraoperative cell detection technology that uses a modified real-time miniaturized fluorescence microscope system for image acquisition, achieving ultra-high resolution at the cellular level. Previous studies have shown that its accuracy and sensitivity in intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection are comparable to those of cytological imprinting but with greater speed. This technology employs sodium fluorescein and methylene blue as fluorescent dyes, is non-invasive, and does not consume tissue samples.
This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of the EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cell probing technology for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing conventional breast-conserving surgery and breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy. The primary objective is to compare the accuracy of ES technology in assessing margin status and sentinel lymph node status using paraffin pathology as the gold standard. The primary endpoints are the accuracy of ES technology, positive margin rate, and reoperation rate; the secondary endpoints are ES detection image quality score, learning curve of surgeons, and detection time.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative Assessment | Experimental | Procedure: EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technologyAfter screening and enrollment, the EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technology will be used for intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel lymph node. Concurrently, imprint cytology will be performed for evaluation. During the study period, intraoperative decisions will primarily reference the results of the imprint cytology technique. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18 years and older (inclusive)
- Female
- Preoperative pathology confirmed invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ
- Scheduled for sentinel lymph node biopsy
- Capable of and willing to provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with a confirmed allergy to methylene blue or sodium citrate tracers
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients unwilling to participate in the clinical study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technologyIn this project, we utilize the miniature wide-angle focusing microscope for intraoperative cell-level observation and detection, a technology in which our hospital has conducted extensive research and accumulated rich experience. | Procedure or surgery | Intraoperative Assessment |
Primary outcome
The accuracy of ES technology
Time frame: After the final pathological results are obtained, it is usually about 2 weeks after surgery
the accuracy of the ES technology (including accuracy, sensitivity and specificity)
The reoperation rate
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
The proportion of reoperations due to a positive margin
3 secondary outcomes
The quality score of ES imaging
Time frame: After the final pathological results are obtained, it is usually about 2 weeks after surgery
The learning curve of the surgeons
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The time required for the intraoperative evaluation
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Apr 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EndoScell Scaner (ES) novel intraoperative cellular probing technology in people with Breast Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node, run by Fudan University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jiajian Chen, Doctor (+8618017317219, elwin1020@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The accuracy of ES technology (time frame: After the final pathological results are obtained, it is usually about 2 weeks after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2025.