Pregnancy RelatedNCT06913582
The Effectiveness of Distance Yoga Learning in Improving Ma-ternal Pandemic-related Depression and Stress During Pregnancy
A study testing Yoga in people with Pregnancy Related, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The goal of this quasi-experimental study design is to explore the effects of distance yoga learning in improving depression and pregnancy stress in pregnant women during the pandemic disease. The main questions which aim to answer are: 1. hypothesis1 - Distance yoga learning can decrease depression during pregnancy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 43 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy Related
- What is being tested?
- Yoga
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 2022to 21 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 43 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- First-time mothers between 20 and 26 weeks of pregnancy.
- normal fetus with a singleton.
- no history of smoking, drinking, or drug abuse.
- no bleeding during pregnancy.
- no related high-risk complications during pregnancy (such as high blood pressure, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, heart dis-ease, etc.).
- no early abortion symptoms.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Able to move normally.
- Able to listen, speak, read and write Chinese.
- Able to participate in the research and cooperate in completing the questionnaire.
Who cannot join
- Multiparous women.
- First-time mothers with pregnancy >26 weeks.
- Multiple births.
- Symptoms of bleeding or early miscarriage.
- Related high-risk pregnancy complications.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board
The goal of this quasi-experimental study design is to explore the effects of distance yoga learning in improving depression and pregnancy stress in pregnant women during the pandemic disease. The main questions which aim to answer are:
- hypothesis1 - Distance yoga learning can decrease depression during pregnancy.
- hypothesis2 -Distance yoga learning can decrease pregnancy stress. The experimental group received a 12-week pregnancy yoga program, including one weekly 60-minute distance yoga class and followed by 2 times of DVD yoga exercise at home while the control group received only routine nursing care.
Read the detailed description
This is a quasi-experimental study design for primiparous women in the obstetrics and gynecology department of a regional hospital as the research subjects. This study received ethical approval from the hospital and all participants provided written informed consent. After the researcher took convenience samples and explained the research purpose in the prenatal parent classroom, they were assigned to the experimental group and the control group according to the wishes of the cases. Pregnant women in the experimental group received routine prenatal care guidance and yoga exercises three times a week, while the control group only received routine pre-natal guidance and the differences between the two groups were compared.
The sample size was estimated using G-power 3.1.9.2 software. The sample size was estimated to be 52 participants. Assuming the attrition rate was 20%, there were 32 people in the experimental group and the control group making a total of 64 participants.
During the study, one participant in the experimental group had premature delivery due to early water rupture, and the other one was hospitalized for tocolysis due to frequent uterine contractions and therefore withdrew from the experiment, resulting in a loss of 2 samples. For control group, one participant was admitted to the hospital for tocolysis due to prepartum hemorrhage and was withdrew from the study. Therefore, a total of 61 participants completed the study .
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Related
- Being tested
- Yoga
- Keywords
- distance yoga, pandemic, depression and stress, pregnancy
- Medical subject headings
- Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
YogaBehavioural
A 12-week pregnancy yoga program was delivered to experimental group (n=30) including one weekly 60-minute remote online yoga class and followed by 2 times of DVD yoga exercise.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experiment | Experimental | A 12-week pregnancy yoga program was delivered to experimental group (n=30) including one weekly 60-minute remote online yoga class and followed by 2 times of DVD yoga exercise. Receives: Behavioral: Yoga |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
demographic data and exercise history of two groups
Basic characteristics: Basic personal information included age, height, religious beliefs, marital status, education, daily activities, past medical history, etc. Obstetric variable information included weeks of pregnancy, pre-pregnancy weight, weight gained during pregnancy, and exercise before and during pregnancy, etc.
Measured: 12 months
The change of depression status of two groups
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS): The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is used to measure prenatal and postpartum depressed mood. There are 10 questions in total, each question is scored on a 4-point scale. According to the order of each option, the first, second and fourth items are scored from 0 to 3 points, the other items are scored from 3 to 0 points, and the total score is from 0 to 30 points. The levels of scale were as follows: 0-9 points: low risk, usually no further psychological intervention is needed; 10-12 points: medium risk, further evaluation and observation are recom-mended; 13 points and above: high risk, comprehensive psychological evaluation and possible intervention measures should be carried out. The higher the score of pregnant women, the more severe the prenatal depression is.
Measured: 12 months
Stress during pregnancy of two groups
Pregnancy Stress Rating Scale (PSRS): The "Pregnancy Stress Scale" developed by Chen, Huang, and Ka in 1991 and revised it into a new version of the "Pregnancy Stress Scale" by Chen was used in this study. The scale has five factors; it mainly measures the psychological stress experienced by women during pregnancy. There are 36 questions in total with the Likert five-point scoring method totaling score of 180 points. The higher the score, the greater the stress during pregnancy. The new version of the "Pregnancy Stress Scale" has good internal consistency (α=.92) and 2-week test-retest reliability (α=.82).
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Apr 2025
- Study start22 Jun 2022
- Primary completion21 Jun 2023
- Study completion21 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pregnancy RelatedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chang Gung Memorial HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- quasi-experimental design with experimental and control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wen-Ping Lee, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06913582
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Kate65.0220
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nazzari S, Pili MP, Gunay Y, Provenzi L. Pandemic babies: A systematic review of the association between maternal pandemic-related stress during pregnancy and infant development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Jul;162:105723. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105723. Epub 2024 May 16.
PubMed 38762129Lokken EM, Huebner EM, Taylor GG, Hendrickson S, Vanderhoeven J, Kachikis A, Coler B, Walker CL, Sheng JS, Al-Haddad BJS, McCartney SA, Kretzer NM, Resnick R, Barnhart N, Schulte V, Bergam B, Ma KK, Albright C, Larios V, Kelley L, Larios V, Emhoff S, Rah J, Retzlaff K, Thomas C, Paek BW, Hsu RJ, Erickson A, Chang A, Mitchell T, Hwang JK, Erickson S, Delaney S, Archabald K, Kline CR, LaCourse SM, Adams Waldorf KM; Washington State COVID-19 in Pregnancy Collaborative. Disease severity, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal deaths among pregnant patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):77.e1-77.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1221. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
PubMed 33515516Zambrano LD, Ellington S, Strid P, Galang RR, Oduyebo T, Tong VT, Woodworth KR, Nahabedian JF 3rd, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Gilboa SM, Meaney-Delman D; CDC COVID-19 Response Pregnancy and Infant Linked Outcomes Team. Update: Characteristics of Symptomatic Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status - United States, January 22-October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 6;69(44):1641-1647. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6944e3.
PubMed 33151921Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, Du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
PubMed 32109013Marchand G, Patil AS, Masoud AT, Ware K, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Calteux N, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Coriell C, Cook C, Ruuska A, Nourelden AZ, Sainz K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 maternal and neonatal clinical features and pregnancy outcomes up to June 3, 2021. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Feb;2(1):100049. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100049. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
PubMed 35005663Berthelot N, Lemieux R, Garon-Bissonnette J, Drouin-Maziade C, Martel E, Maziade M. Uptrend in distress and psychiatric symptomatology in pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul;99(7):848-855. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13925. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
PubMed 32449178Davenport MH, Meyer S, Meah VL, Strynadka MC, Khurana R. Moms Are Not OK: COVID-19 and Maternal Mental Health. Front Glob Womens Health. 2020 Jun 19;1:1. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.00001. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 34816146Lee CF, Hwang FM, Lin HM, Chi LK, Chien LY. The Physical Activity Patterns of Pregnant Taiwanese Women. J Nurs Res. 2016 Dec;24(4):291-299. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000158.
PubMed 27846101van Mulken MR, McAllister M, Lowe JB. The stigmatisation of pregnancy: societal influences on pregnant women's physical activity Behaviour. Cult Health Sex. 2016 Aug;18(8):921-35. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2016.1148199. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
PubMed 26967357Walasik I, Kwiatkowska K, Kosinska Kaczynska K, Szymusik I. Physical Activity Patterns among 9000 Pregnant Women in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 9;17(5):1771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051771.
PubMed 32182850Gawrysiak MJ, Leong SH, Grassetti SN, Wai M, Shorey RC, Baime MJ. Dimensions of distress tolerance and the moderating effects on mindfulness-based stress reduction. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2016 Sep;29(5):552-60. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2015.1085513. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
PubMed 26293679Goyal M, Singh S, Sibinga EM, Gould NF, Rowland-Seymour A, Sharma R, Berger Z, Sleicher D, Maron DD, Shihab HM, Ranasinghe PD, Linn S, Saha S, Bass EB, Haythornthwaite JA. Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):357-68. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13018.
PubMed 24395196Mottola MF, Davenport MH, Ruchat SM, Davies GA, Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Jaramillo Garcia A, Barrowman N, Adamo KB, Duggan M, Barakat R, Chilibeck P, Fleming K, Forte M, Korolnek J, Nagpal T, Slater LG, Stirling D, Zehr L. 2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;52(21):1339-1346. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100056.
PubMed 30337460Farrell T, Reagu S, Mohan S, Elmidany R, Qaddoura F, Ahmed EE, Corbett G, Lindow S, Abuyaqoub SM, Alabdulla MA. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the perinatal mental health of women. J Perinat Med. 2020 Nov 26;48(9):971-976. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0415.
PubMed 32975206Arzamani N, Soraya S, Hadi F, Nooraeen S, Saeidi M. The COVID-19 pandemic and mental health in pregnant women: A review article. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 20;13:949239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.949239. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36203829
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06913582
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Kate65.0220
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Related
- Keywords
- distance yoga, pandemic, depression and stress, pregnancy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this quasi-experimental study design is to explore the effects of distance yoga learning in improving depression and pregnancy stress in pregnant women during the pandemic disease. The main questions which aim to answer are:
- hypothesis1 - Distance yoga learning can decrease depression during pregnancy.
- hypothesis2 -Distance yoga learning can decrease pregnancy stress. The experimental group received a 12-week pregnancy yoga program, including one weekly 60-minute distance yoga class and followed by 2 times of DVD yoga exercise at home while the control group received only routine nursing care.
Detailed description
This is a quasi-experimental study design for primiparous women in the obstetrics and gynecology department of a regional hospital as the research subjects. This study received ethical approval from the hospital and all participants provided written informed consent. After the researcher took convenience samples and explained the research purpose in the prenatal parent classroom, they were assigned to the experimental group and the control group according to the wishes of the cases. Pregnant women in the experimental group received routine prenatal care guidance and yoga exercises three times a week, while the control group only received routine pre-natal guidance and the differences between the two groups were compared.
The sample size was estimated using G-power 3.1.9.2 software. The sample size was estimated to be 52 participants. Assuming the attrition rate was 20%, there were 32 people in the experimental group and the control group making a total of 64 participants.
During the study, one participant in the experimental group had premature delivery due to early water rupture, and the other one was hospitalized for tocolysis due to frequent uterine contractions and therefore withdrew from the experiment, resulting in a loss of 2 samples. For control group, one participant was admitted to the hospital for tocolysis due to prepartum hemorrhage and was withdrew from the study. Therefore, a total of 61 participants completed the study .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- quasi-experimental design with experimental and control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experiment | Experimental | Behavioral: YogaA 12-week pregnancy yoga program was delivered to experimental group (n=30) including one weekly 60-minute remote online yoga class and followed by 2 times of DVD yoga exercise. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 43 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- First-time mothers between 20 and 26 weeks of pregnancy.
- normal fetus with a singleton.
- no history of smoking, drinking, or drug abuse.
- no bleeding during pregnancy.
- no related high-risk complications during pregnancy (such as high blood pressure, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, heart dis-ease, etc.).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Multiparous women.
- First-time mothers with pregnancy >26 weeks.
- Multiple births.
- Symptoms of bleeding or early miscarriage.
- Related high-risk pregnancy complications.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| YogaA 12-week pregnancy yoga program was delivered to experimental group (n=30) including one weekly 60-minute remote online yoga class and followed by 2 times of DVD yoga exercise. | Behavioural | experiment |
Primary outcome
demographic data and exercise history of two groups
Time frame: 12 months
Basic characteristics: Basic personal information included age, height, religious beliefs, marital status, education, daily activities, past medical history, etc. Obstetric variable information included weeks of pregnancy, pre-pregnancy weight, weight gained during pregnancy, and exercise before and during pregnancy, etc.
The change of depression status of two groups
Time frame: 12 months
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS): The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is used to measure prenatal and postpartum depressed mood. There are 10 questions in total, each question is scored on a 4-point scale. According to the order of each option, the first, second and fourth items are scored from 0 to 3 points, the other items are scored from 3 to 0 points, and the total score is from 0 to 30 points. The levels of scale were as follows: 0-9 points: low risk, usually no further psychological intervention is needed; 10-12 points: medium risk, further evaluation and observation are recom-mended; 13 points and above: high risk, comprehensive psychological evaluation and possible intervention measures should be carried out. The higher the score of pregnant women, the more severe the prenatal depression is.
Stress during pregnancy of two groups
Time frame: 12 months
Pregnancy Stress Rating Scale (PSRS): The "Pregnancy Stress Scale" developed by Chen, Huang, and Ka in 1991 and revised it into a new version of the "Pregnancy Stress Scale" by Chen was used in this study. The scale has five factors; it mainly measures the psychological stress experienced by women during pregnancy. There are 36 questions in total with the Likert five-point scoring method totaling score of 180 points. The higher the score, the greater the stress during pregnancy. The new version of the "Pregnancy Stress Scale" has good internal consistency (α=.92) and 2-week test-retest reliability (α=.82).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 38762129Nazzari S, Pili MP, Gunay Y, Provenzi L. Pandemic babies: A systematic review of the association between maternal pandemic-related stress during pregnancy and infant development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Jul;162:105723. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105723. Epub 2024 May 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 33515516Lokken EM, Huebner EM, Taylor GG, Hendrickson S, Vanderhoeven J, Kachikis A, Coler B, Walker CL, Sheng JS, Al-Haddad BJS, McCartney SA, Kretzer NM, Resnick R, Barnhart N, Schulte V, Bergam B, Ma KK, Albright C, Larios V, Kelley L, Larios V, Emhoff S, Rah J, Retzlaff K, Thomas C, Paek BW, Hsu RJ, Erickson A, Chang A, Mitchell T, Hwang JK, Erickson S, Delaney S, Archabald K, Kline CR, LaCourse SM, Adams Waldorf KM; Washington State COVID-19 in Pregnancy Collaborative. Disease severity, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal deaths among pregnant patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):77.e1-77.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1221. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 33151921Zambrano LD, Ellington S, Strid P, Galang RR, Oduyebo T, Tong VT, Woodworth KR, Nahabedian JF 3rd, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Gilboa SM, Meaney-Delman D; CDC COVID-19 Response Pregnancy and Infant Linked Outcomes Team. Update: Characteristics of Symptomatic Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status - United States, January 22-October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 6;69(44):1641-1647. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6944e3.
- Results publication: PubMed 32109013Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, Du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 35005663Marchand G, Patil AS, Masoud AT, Ware K, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Calteux N, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Coriell C, Cook C, Ruuska A, Nourelden AZ, Sainz K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 maternal and neonatal clinical features and pregnancy outcomes up to June 3, 2021. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Feb;2(1):100049. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100049. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 32449178Berthelot N, Lemieux R, Garon-Bissonnette J, Drouin-Maziade C, Martel E, Maziade M. Uptrend in distress and psychiatric symptomatology in pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul;99(7):848-855. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13925. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 34816146Davenport MH, Meyer S, Meah VL, Strynadka MC, Khurana R. Moms Are Not OK: COVID-19 and Maternal Mental Health. Front Glob Womens Health. 2020 Jun 19;1:1. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.00001. eCollection 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 27846101Lee CF, Hwang FM, Lin HM, Chi LK, Chien LY. The Physical Activity Patterns of Pregnant Taiwanese Women. J Nurs Res. 2016 Dec;24(4):291-299. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000158.
- Results publication: PubMed 26967357van Mulken MR, McAllister M, Lowe JB. The stigmatisation of pregnancy: societal influences on pregnant women's physical activity Behaviour. Cult Health Sex. 2016 Aug;18(8):921-35. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2016.1148199. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 32182850Walasik I, Kwiatkowska K, Kosinska Kaczynska K, Szymusik I. Physical Activity Patterns among 9000 Pregnant Women in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 9;17(5):1771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051771.
- Results publication: PubMed 26293679Gawrysiak MJ, Leong SH, Grassetti SN, Wai M, Shorey RC, Baime MJ. Dimensions of distress tolerance and the moderating effects on mindfulness-based stress reduction. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2016 Sep;29(5):552-60. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2015.1085513. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 24395196Goyal M, Singh S, Sibinga EM, Gould NF, Rowland-Seymour A, Sharma R, Berger Z, Sleicher D, Maron DD, Shihab HM, Ranasinghe PD, Linn S, Saha S, Bass EB, Haythornthwaite JA. Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):357-68. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13018.
- WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard 2020Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pregnancy Related
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Obesity-Related Indices and Albuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Albuminuria
RecruitingObservational study
Growing Little PEAPODS Study
Premature Birth, Premature Infant
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Methamphetamine Use Disorder During Pregnancy
Methamphetamine Use Disorder, Pregnancy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Yoga in people with Pregnancy Related, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
demographic data and exercise history of two groups (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06913582, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2025.