AzTrials
AzTrials

Health Self-managementNCT06914739

Application of Health Empowerment Theory to Enhance Health Empowerment Levels and Self-Health Management Ability Among Older Migrants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing The Health Empowerment Theory (HET) program and routine community care in people with Health Self-management, run by TianLe Xiang at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-based health self-management program in empowering older migrants to manage their health. This study used a single-blind, randomized controlled trial design. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Health Self-management
What is being tested?
The Health Empowerment Theory (HET) program and routine community care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
12 Mar 2021to 12 Feb 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • (1) age 60 years or older; (2) residing in thelocal area for a minimum of six months; (3) agreement to participate in the study and willingness tosign the informed consent form; and (4) possessing a clear sense of autonomy and the ability tounderstand and engage with the content of the study intervention activities.

Who cannot join

  • (1) absencefrom two consecutive lectures or group activities without prior notification and (2) voluntary withdrawal from the study at the participant's request.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Huzhou University

    Huzhou, Zhejiang, 313000

Other trials in China

About this study

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-based health self-management program in empowering older migrants to manage their health. This study used a single-blind, randomized controlled trial design. A comparison was conducted between the experimental and control groups in terms of pre-test and post-test levels of health empowerment and health self-management abilities.

Being tested
The Health Empowerment Theory (HET) program, routine community care

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The Health Empowerment Theory (HET) programBehavioural

    The intervention group received the HET-based intervention program for 12 weeks. From the first week to the fourth week, community nurses interacted with the participants face-to-face to analyze and establish their problems and needs in health management (usual community health services utilization, such as medicine purchases and vaccinations) and helped clarify the importance of health management and their strengths (such as existing health knowledge). From the fifth to twelfth weeks, participants attended health knowledge lectures led by community nurses, covering topics such as: a) healthy lifestyle, primarily diet, exercise, and disease prevention and management for older adults; and b) community health services, which included recent or long-term community health services (such as health examinations for older adults and family doctor contracts). WeChat groups and offline gatherings at community health centers (with groups of eight to ten peers) were organized to interact and comm

  • routine community careBehavioural

    The control group received routine community care, including notifications of community- related activities and lectures through WeChat group chats or telephone calls, and had questions answered by researchers and community nurses.

Study groups in NCT06914739
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
The intervention groupExperimentalThe intervention group received the HET-based intervention program for 12 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: The Health Empowerment Theory (HET) program
routine community careActive comparatorThe control group received routine community care for 12 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: routine community care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. health empowerment level

    The Older Health Empowerment Evaluation Scale comprises six subdimensions: liability beliefs, knowledge and skills, external support, participation in health management, acceptance of change, and empowerment of others.35 The scale consists of 38 items. A Likert 5-point scoring method was employed, with a total score ranging from 38 to 190. A high score indicates a high level of health empowerment among older adults. The total Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.959, with the Cronbach's α coefficient of each dimension ranging from 0.827 to 0.890. This scale was used to replace the chronic disease older health empowerment scale, mainly to better assess health empowerment in older adults and reflect subtle but significant differences in empowerment levels between the older groups.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. self-health management ability

    The Adult Health Self-Management Skill Rating Scale is a widely used instrument for evaluating individual self-health management ability.36 The formal scale consists of three subscales with 38 items: the Health Self-Management Cognition subscale (14 items), Self-Management Environment subscale (10 items), and Health Self-Management Behavior subscale (14 items). A Likert 5-point scoring method was employed, whereby a high score indicates a high level of health self-management ability. A score of 36 to 76 indicates a low level of ability, 77 to 152 denotes a medium level, and 153 to 190 indicates a high level of ability. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.993, and the content validity was 0.895.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2025
  2. Study start12 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion8 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion12 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
66 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06914739
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022011
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
31 Mar 2025
Last updated
6 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing The Health Empowerment Theory (HET) program and routine community care in people with Health Self-management, run by TianLe Xiang at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

health empowerment level (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in