AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Floor DisorderDiRehFloorNCT06914791

Differential Rehabilitative Treatment for Pelvic Floor in Sportswoman

A study testing Kegel arm and De Gasquet arm in people with Pelvic Floor Disorder, run by Alessandro Micarelli at 1 site in Italy.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study at least 24 sportswoman (18-50 years old) will be recruited a randomized in two groups which will be differently treated for the following 8 weeks. one group will be treated with Kegel approach and the other one with De Gasquet apporach. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pelvic Floor Disorder
What is being tested?
Kegel arm and De Gasquet arm
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Apr 2025to 15 Aug 2025
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • practicing sports by at least one year

Who cannot join

  • no systemic disorders
  • no drugs assumption
  • no children

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Italy1 site
  • UNITER Onlus Foundation

    Fara in Sabina, 02032

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Differential Rehabilitative Treatment for Pelvic Floor in Sportswoman: an Interventional Pilto Study Comparing Kegel and De Gasquet Approach

In this study at least 24 sportswoman (18-50 years old) will be recruited a randomized in two groups which will be differently treated for the following 8 weeks. one group will be treated with Kegel approach and the other one with De Gasquet apporach. before and after the treatment they will fill in a battery of falidated questionnaire in order to evaluate the improvement at pelvic floor level, quality of life and psychological distress.

Read the detailed description

In this study at least 24 sportswoman (18-50 years old) with pelvic floow symptos (18-50 years old) will be recruited a randomized in two groups which will be differently treated for the following 8 weeks. They should havo no children, other relevant systemic disorders and assume no drugs. They should practice sports by at least one year.

one group will be treated with Kegel approach and the other one with De Gasquet apporach. before and after the treatment they will fill in a battery of falidated questionnaire in order to evaluate the improvement at pelvic floor level, quality of life and psychological distress. In partiqular they fill in:

  • Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)
  • Incontinence Severity Index (ISI)
  • Quality of life questionnaire (SF-36)
  • King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ)
  • Intestinal related symptoms questionnaire (ICIQ-B)
  • Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Being tested
Kegel arm, De Gasquet arm
Keywords
pelvic floor rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Pelvic Floor Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Kegel armProcedure or surgery

    in this group participants will be followed up for 8 weeks with kegel exercises

  • De Gasquet armProcedure or surgery

    in this group participants will be followed up for 8 weeks with de gasquet exercises

Study groups in NCT06914791
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
kegel armActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Kegel arm
De Gasquet armExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: De Gasquet arm

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)

    Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory evalueates the pelvic floor distress with values ranging from 0 to 300 indicating respectively better and worse score

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Incontinence Severity Index (ISI)

    the Incontinence Severity Index evaluates the incontinence with values ranging from 0 to 12 indicating respectively better and worse score

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Quality of life questionnaire (SF-36)

    the Quality of life questionnaire evaluates the quality of life with values ranging from 0 % to 100 % indicating respectively better and worse limitations

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ)

    the King's Health Questionnaire evaluates the urinary tract consequences on daily life with values ranging from 0 to 100 indicating respectively better and worse limitations

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. Intestinal related symptoms questionnaire (ICIQ-B)

    the Intestinal related symptoms questionnaire evaluates the intestinal consequences on daily quality of life with values ranging from 0 to 26 indicating respectively better and worse scores

    Measured: 8 weeks

  5. Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)

    Depression Anxiety Stress Scale evaluates anxiety, depression and stress with values ranging from 0 to 14 indicating respectively better and worse scores for depression, 0 to 10 indicating respectively better and worse scores for anxiety and 0 to 17 indicating respectively better and worse scores for stress

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2025
  2. Study start1 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Aug 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Aug 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06914791
Sponsor's protocol ID
PelvicRehab1
Acronym
DiRehFloor
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
22 Mar 2025
Last updated
6 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: it is not possible for the law of our contry

Publications

  • Campbell KG, Batt ME, Drummond A. Prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction in recreational athletes: a cross-sectional survey. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2429-2437. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05548-8. Epub 2023 May 10.

    PubMed 37162534
  • Brandt F, Solomayer EF, Sklavounos P. Correlation between the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) and the quality of life dimensions of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) in German-speaking urinary incontinent women. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Feb;51(2):102288. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102288. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

    PubMed 34902634
  • Bø K. Exercise and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Female Elite Athletes. Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science: The Female Athlete. 2015

  • Blazek D, Stastny P, Maszczyk A, Krawczyk M, Matykiewicz P, Petr M. Systematic review of intra-abdominal and intrathoracic pressures initiated by the Valsalva manoeuvre during high-intensity resistance exercises. Biol Sport. 2019 Dec;36(4):373-386. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2019.88759. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

    PubMed 31938009
  • Barba M, Cola A, Melocchi T, Braga A, Castronovo F, Manodoro S, Pennacchio M, Munno GM, Ruffolo AF, Degliuomini RS, Salvatore S, Torella M, Frigerio M. Italian validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2459-2465. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05572-8. Epub 2023 May 17.

    PubMed 37195425
  • Alves JO, Luz STD, Brandao S, Da Luz CM, Jorge RN, Da Roza T. Urinary Incontinence in Physically Active Young Women: Prevalence and Related Factors. Int J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;38(12):937-941. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115736. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

    PubMed 28950397
  • Almeida MB, Barra AA, Saltiel F, Silva-Filho AL, Fonseca AM, Figueiredo EM. Urinary incontinence and other pelvic floor dysfunctions in female athletes in Brazil: A cross-sectional study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Sep;26(9):1109-16. doi: 10.1111/sms.12546. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

    PubMed 26369504
  • Abd El-Aty E.M., Hassan M.E.-G. Effect of Kegel Exercise Training Program On Improving Quality Of Life Among Women With Urinary Incontinence. Egypt. J. Health Care. 2021

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in