Comparative Study of Low-Energy 1064nm Laser and DPL in Rosacea Treatment

Rosacea is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disorder primarily affecting the face, characterized by episodic or persistent redness, visible blood vessels (vasodilation), and, in more severe cases, the development of pimples or pustules. The condition often begins with frequent flushing, particularly in response to triggers such as heat, stress, or certain foods. Over time, it may lead to more persistent erythema, particularly in the central areas of the face, which can have a significant cosmetic impact on patients. In the most advanced stages of rosacea, the skin may develop thickened areas, particularly around the nose, a condition known as rhinophyma. Rosacea can be classified into four subtypes based on its clinical presentation: erythematotelangiectatic, which is marked by redness and visible blood vessels; papulopustular, which resembles acne with the formation of pimples and pustules; rhinophyma, which involves skin thickening, particularly around the nose; and ocular rosacea, which affects the eyes and can lead to dryness, irritation, and in severe cases, vision impairment.

While the exact cause of rosacea is not fully understood, it is widely believed to involve a combination of genetic factors, environmental triggers, and abnormalities in the immune and neurovascular systems. Many studies suggest that rosacea patients may have heightened sensitivity to various external and internal stimuli, such as UV light, spicy foods, and temperature extremes. Additionally, there is evidence indicating that rosacea may be associated with dysregulation of the blood vessels in the face, resulting in frequent flushing and persistent redness. Other potential contributing factors include the overgrowth of the skin bacterium *Demodex* and inflammatory responses to certain microbes.

Given that rosacea is a lifelong condition that typically follows a relapsing-remitting course, managing the disease can be challenging. While there is no cure, treatments are available to control symptoms and minimize flare-ups. These treatments range from topical medications to laser therapies and lifestyle modifications. Patients are often advised to avoid known triggers, such as hot drinks, spicy foods, and environmental factors that might cause excessive flushing. Medical management usually includes topical or oral antibiotics, such as metronidazole or tetracycline, which can help reduce inflammation and control the appearance of pimples. However, because rosacea tends to be chronic, its management often requires long-term treatment, which can include laser therapy.

Laser treatment is one of the most effective options for addressing the vascular component of rosacea, such as visible blood vessels and facial redness. Lasers that specifically target oxyhemoglobin in blood vessels, such as pulsed dye laser (PDL), intense pulsed light (IPL), and long-pulse Nd:YAG lasers, have been shown to be effective at reducing erythema and telangiectasia. Alexandrite laser, traditionally used for the treatment of pigmented lesions and hair removal, has also gained attention for its potential in treating deeper vascular lesions in rosacea. This is due to its ability to penetrate deeper into the dermis and its selective absorption by deoxygenated hemoglobin, making it an attractive option for treating larger or deeper vascular lesions that may not respond well to other laser treatments. However, research on the efficacy of Alexandrite lasers specifically for rosacea treatment is still limited. The most significant randomized clinical trial available, conducted by Kim et al., found that dual-wavelength Alexandrite/Nd:YAG laser treatment was comparable to pulsed dye laser in its effectiveness for managing rosacea.

Another promising treatment option for rosacea is the 1064nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, which operates using a large spot and low-energy mode. This laser offers a unique photothermal effect that is particularly effective for treating the vascular components of rosacea. The laser can enhance the activity of endogenous porphyrins, which helps to inhibit the activity of *Propionibacterium acnes*, a bacterium associated with rosacea and acne. The 1064nm wavelength of the Nd:YAG laser is especially effective for targeting the dilated blood vessels that are a hallmark of rosacea. By selectively absorbing oxyhemoglobin, the laser can destroy blood vessels and inhibit their formation, leading to a reduction in redness and inflammation. Additionally, the laser's photothermal effect stimulates collagen regeneration, which helps to repair the skin's barrier, promote the rearrangement of collagen fibers, and reduce the formation of acne-induced scars. This makes it a comprehensive treatment not only for the vascular symptoms of rosacea but also for addressing some of the long-term cosmetic issues, such as scarring.

In addition to these established laser therapies, the use of DPL (dual pulsed light), a narrow-band intense pulsed light device, has also shown promise in treating rosacea. DPL combines the advantages of both PDL and IPL by delivering a more concentrated energy output in the range of 500-600 nm. This wavelength range includes key absorption peaks for oxyhemoglobin, specifically 542 nm and 577 nm, allowing for higher vascular selectivity and greater energy precision. As a result, DPL is particularly effective at targeting superficial vascular lesions and is a useful option for patients with more delicate or sensitive skin types. Its ability to precisely target blood vessels makes it an efficient treatment for rosacea with a minimal risk of side effects.

In this study, the researchers designed a randomized, face-to-face comparison trial to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of two different treatment modalities for rosacea: the large-spot low-energy 1064nm Nd:YAG laser and the DPL device. The trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of these treatments in reducing the symptoms of rosacea, such as facial redness, visible blood vessels, and inflammation, as well as their impact on overall skin texture and appearance. By comparing these two approaches directly, the researchers sought to determine if one treatment offered superior results in terms of patient outcomes, safety, and long-term efficacy.