Macular HolesGiantMH-SONCT06915948
Postoperative Same Day Closure of Giant Macular Hole With Silicone Oil
An observational study of Macular Holes and Vitrectomy, run by Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
Patients with stage 3 and 4 macular holes of size \>700 microns who underwent pars plana vitrectomy, Internal limiting Membrane peeling and silicone oil tamponade were followed at day 1 , 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal and anatomical closure of macular hole assessed at all intervals Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Macular Holes, Vitrectomy
- What is being tested?
- Macular Hole Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 1 May 2021to 30 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: -Patients (South Indians) who attended Retina OPD in Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital, Palakkad, Kerala was selected to participate in the study
Who may be able to join
- Patients with idiopathic chronic giant macular hole more than 700 micron size confirmed by indirect biomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography.
- Patients who give a valid informed consent
- Patients who underwent surgery
Who cannot join
- High myopic patients ( >10 D)
- Patients with history of ocular trauma
- Patients with history of any macular surgery
- Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with macular hole
- Patients having vision loss due to other ocular comorbidities- glaucoma , macular pathology or vitreous hemorrhage.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Postoperative Anatomical Closure of Idiopathic Chronic Giant Macular Hole on the Same Day Determined by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography for Macular Hole Surgery With Silicone Oil Tamponade
Patients with stage 3 and 4 macular holes of size \>700 microns who underwent pars plana vitrectomy, Internal limiting Membrane peeling and silicone oil tamponade were followed at day 1 , 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal and anatomical closure of macular hole assessed at all intervals
Read the detailed description
Patients who attended Retina OPD in Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital, Palakkad were selected to participate in the study
Basic demographic profile which includes name, age, gender , address was noted .
Structured questionnaire was used to collect information about the presence of any systemic risk factors like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, any prior retinal surgery and high myopia .
Preoperatively , all subjects will be tested for BCVA , intraocular pressure measurement, slit lamp bio-microscopy of anterior segment and indirect non contact bio-microscopy of the fundus with 20D lens will be documented .
Using spectral domain optical coherence tomography diagnosis of macular hole was confirmed and hole form factor and diameter hole index calculated based on the findings in optical coherence tomography.
Patients with stage 3 and 4 macular holes of size \>700 u who underwent pars plana vitrectomy, ILM peeling and silicone oil tamponade were shortlisted.
Patients follow up was done on day 1, 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal .
For each follow up , BCVA with silicon oil and intraocular pressure was measured and indirect noncontact bio-microscopy examination of the macula was examined. Assessment of macula was done using OCT on day 1, 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal .
In all patients the anatomical closure of macular hole was assessed on day 1, 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal .
Statistical methods
- The information recorded on the data collection forms were uploaded in an excel sheet and data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20.
- To obtain the characteristic of categorical variables, frequency and percentage were applied.
- To obtain the characteristic of numerical variables, mean and standard deviation were used.
- Chi square test/ Fisher's exact test was used to find association between HFF, DHI, gender with hole closure type of closure.
- Students t test and Man Whitney U test were performed to compare the average values of numerical parameters such as age, BCVA with hole closure, type of closure, HFF, DHI.
- Paired t test was used to compare the pre-Op and Final BCVA. P-value \<0.05 was consideredto denote statistical significance.
- ANOVA was used wherever we had to compare numerical data/means between 3 groups of type of hole closure- open vs type I vs type II closure.
- Conditions
- Macular Holes, Vitrectomy
- Being tested
- Macular Hole Surgery
- Keywords
- Macular Hole, Giant Large Macular Hole, Silicone Oil, SD-OCT
- Medical subject headings
- Retinal Perforations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Macular Hole SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Pars Plana Vitrectomy with ILM peeling with silicone oil tamponade
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of eyes with Immediate Anatomical Closure of Macular hole
Percentage (%) of eyes with Immediate Anatomical Closure of Macular hole on same day
Measured: Day 1
Percentage of eyes having Type I Closure of Macular hole
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Type I Closure of Macular hole at Day 0
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Type I Closure of Macular hole at 2 weeks
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Type I Closure of Macular hole 1 month post Silicone oil removal in eyes undergoing Silicone oil removal
Measured: Day 1; 2 weeks after surgery ; 1 month post silicone oil removal
Percentage of eyes having Type II Closure of Macular hole
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Type II Closure of Macular hole at Day 0
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Type II Closure of Macular hole at 2 weeks
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Type II Closure of Macular hole 1 month post Silicone oil removal in eyes undergoing Silicone oil removal
Measured: At Day 1, 2 weeks after surgery and 1 month post Silicone oil removal
Percentage of eyes having Open Macular hole
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Open Macular hole at Day 0
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Open Macular hole at 2 weeks
- Percentage (%) of eyes having Open Macular hole 1 month post Silicone oil removal in eyes undergoing Silicone oil removal
Measured: At Day 1, 2 weeks after surgery and 1 month post Silicone oil removal
Adverse events
Any adverse events
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percentage of eyes with Anatomical Closure of Macular hole
- Percentage (%) of eyes with Anatomical Closure of Macular hole at 2 week follow up
- Percentage (%) of eyes with Anatomical Closure of Macular hole at 1 month post silicone oil removal
Measured: 2 weeks post surgery , 1 month Post Silicone oil removal
Role of Hole Forming Factor (HFF) in predicting Hole Closure
- Number of eyes with HFF <0.5 achieving hole closure
- Number of eyes with HFF >0.5 achieving hole closure
Measured: at day 1, 2 weeks post surgery
Role of Diameter Hole Index (DHI) in predicting Hole Closure
- Number of eyes with DHI <0.5 achieving hole closure
- Number of eyes with DHI >0.5 achieving hole closure
Measured: at day 1, 2 weeks post surgery
Mean Diameter Hole Index
- Mean Preoperative Diameter Hole Index(DHI) in eyes with Type I closure of macular hole
- Mean Preoperative Diameter Hole Index(DHI) in eyes with Type II closure of macular hole
- Mean Preoperative Diameter Hole Index(DHI) in eyes with Open macular hole
Measured: 2 weeks post surgery
Mean Hole Forming Factor
- Mean Preoperative Hole Forming Factor(HFF) in eyes with Type I closure of macular hole
- Mean Preoperative Hole Forming Factor(HFF) in eyes with Type II closure of macular hole
- Mean Preoperative Hole Forming Factor(HFF) in eyes with Open macular hole
Measured: 2 weeks post surgery
Visual Outcomes
Visual Acuity In LogMAR (logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) units Pre-operatively (baseline) and after 1 month of silicone oil removal excluding eyes that needed resurgery
Measured: Pre-operative (baseline) and 1 month post Silicone oil removal
Resurgeries
No. of eyes that underwent resurgery for open macular hole No. of eyes that underwent resurgery for reason other than open macular hole
Measured: 6 months
Reopened Holes
Number of hole reopen cases , even under silicone oil
Measured: 6 months
Adverse events
Any adverse events in 3 months follow up .
Measured: 3 months
Face down positioning
To find out relevance for maintaining face down positioning
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2025
- Study start1 May 2021
- Primary completion30 Apr 2023
- Study completion30 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Macular HolesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Saurav Mahajan, Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital
- Investigators
- Rajkumar Maheshwari, MS, Principal investigator, Ahalia Foundation Eye HospitalAmrutha S, DNB, Principal investigator, Ahalia Foundation Eye HospitalSaurav Mahajan, MS, Principal investigator, Ahalia Foundation Eye HospitalSajeev C Jacob, MS, Study chair, Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06915948
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202103.
- Other IDs
- U1111-1312-4425
- Acronym
- GiantMH-SO
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Postoperative Anatomical Closure of Idiopathic Chronic Giant Macular Hole on the Same Day Determined by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography for Macular Hole Surgery With Silicone Oil Tamponade
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06915948
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GiantMH-SO / 202103.
- Conditions
- Macular Holes, Vitrectomy
- Keywords
- Macular Hole, Giant Large Macular Hole, Silicone Oil, SD-OCT
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ahalia Foundation Eye HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with stage 3 and 4 macular holes of size \>700 microns who underwent pars plana vitrectomy, Internal limiting Membrane peeling and silicone oil tamponade were followed at day 1 , 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal and anatomical closure of macular hole assessed at all intervals
Detailed description
Patients who attended Retina OPD in Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital, Palakkad were selected to participate in the study
Basic demographic profile which includes name, age, gender , address was noted .
Structured questionnaire was used to collect information about the presence of any systemic risk factors like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, any prior retinal surgery and high myopia .
Preoperatively , all subjects will be tested for BCVA , intraocular pressure measurement, slit lamp bio-microscopy of anterior segment and indirect non contact bio-microscopy of the fundus with 20D lens will be documented .
Using spectral domain optical coherence tomography diagnosis of macular hole was confirmed and hole form factor and diameter hole index calculated based on the findings in optical coherence tomography.
Patients with stage 3 and 4 macular holes of size \>700 u who underwent pars plana vitrectomy, ILM peeling and silicone oil tamponade were shortlisted.
Patients follow up was done on day 1, 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal .
For each follow up , BCVA with silicon oil and intraocular pressure was measured and indirect noncontact bio-microscopy examination of the macula was examined. Assessment of macula was done using OCT on day 1, 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal .
In all patients the anatomical closure of macular hole was assessed on day 1, 2 weeks and 1 month post silicone oil removal .
Statistical methods
- The information recorded on the data collection forms were uploaded in an excel sheet and data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20.
- To obtain the characteristic of categorical variables, frequency and percentage were applied.
- To obtain the characteristic of numerical variables, mean and standard deviation were used.
- Chi square test/ Fisher's exact test was used to find association between HFF, DHI, gender with hole closure type of closure.
- Students t test and Man Whitney U test were performed to compare the average values of numerical parameters such as age, BCVA with hole closure, type of closure, HFF, DHI.
- Paired t test was used to compare the pre-Op and Final BCVA. P-value \<0.05 was consideredto denote statistical significance.
- ANOVA was used wherever we had to compare numerical data/means between 3 groups of type of hole closure- open vs type I vs type II closure.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- -Patients (South Indians) who attended Retina OPD in Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital, Palakkad, Kerala was selected to participate in the study
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with idiopathic chronic giant macular hole more than 700 micron size confirmed by indirect biomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography.
- Patients who give a valid informed consent
- Patients who underwent surgery
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- High myopic patients ( >10 D)
- Patients with history of ocular trauma
- Patients with history of any macular surgery
- Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with macular hole
- Patients having vision loss due to other ocular comorbidities- glaucoma , macular pathology or vitreous hemorrhage.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Macular Hole SurgeryPars Plana Vitrectomy with ILM peeling with silicone oil tamponade | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Percentage of eyes with Immediate Anatomical Closure of Macular hole
Time frame: Day 1
Percentage (%) of eyes with Immediate Anatomical Closure of Macular hole on same day
Percentage of eyes having Type I Closure of Macular hole
Time frame: Day 1; 2 weeks after surgery ; 1 month post silicone oil removal
* Percentage (%) of eyes having Type I Closure of Macular hole at Day 0 * Percentage (%) of eyes having Type I Closure of Macular hole at 2 weeks * Percentage (%) of eyes having Type I Closure of Macular hole 1 month post Silicone oil removal in eyes undergoing Silicone oil removal
Percentage of eyes having Type II Closure of Macular hole
Time frame: At Day 1, 2 weeks after surgery and 1 month post Silicone oil removal
* Percentage (%) of eyes having Type II Closure of Macular hole at Day 0 * Percentage (%) of eyes having Type II Closure of Macular hole at 2 weeks * Percentage (%) of eyes having Type II Closure of Macular hole 1 month post Silicone oil removal in eyes undergoing Silicone oil removal
Percentage of eyes having Open Macular hole
Time frame: At Day 1, 2 weeks after surgery and 1 month post Silicone oil removal
* Percentage (%) of eyes having Open Macular hole at Day 0 * Percentage (%) of eyes having Open Macular hole at 2 weeks * Percentage (%) of eyes having Open Macular hole 1 month post Silicone oil removal in eyes undergoing Silicone oil removal
Adverse events
Time frame: Day 1
Any adverse events
10 secondary outcomes
Percentage of eyes with Anatomical Closure of Macular hole
Time frame: 2 weeks post surgery , 1 month Post Silicone oil removal
Role of Hole Forming Factor (HFF) in predicting Hole Closure
Time frame: at day 1, 2 weeks post surgery
Role of Diameter Hole Index (DHI) in predicting Hole Closure
Time frame: at day 1, 2 weeks post surgery
Mean Diameter Hole Index
Time frame: 2 weeks post surgery
Mean Hole Forming Factor
Time frame: 2 weeks post surgery
Visual Outcomes
Time frame: Pre-operative (baseline) and 1 month post Silicone oil removal
Resurgeries
Time frame: 6 months
Reopened Holes
Time frame: 6 months
Adverse events
Time frame: 3 months
Face down positioning
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Macular Holes
RecruitingObservational study
Surgical Procedure Efficiency Evaluation stuDy
Cataract, Vitreous Hemorrhage
RecruitingObservational study
Intraoperative OCT Guidance of Intraocular Surgery II
Macular Holes, Epiretinal Membrane
Recruiting
Autologous Tenon's Capsule Graft for Refractory Macular Holes
Macular Hole Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Outcomes of Macular Hole Surgery With Inverted Flap With vs Without Post op Posturing With SF6 in Macular Hole More Than 400 Micrometres
Macular Hole
Recruiting
Comparative Study of Decellularized Human Amniotic Membrane Hydrogel and Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap in Idiopathic Large Macular Holes
Macular Holes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rajkumar Maheshwari, MS principal investigator
Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital
Amrutha S, DNB principal investigator
Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital
Saurav Mahajan, MS principal investigator
Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Macular Holes and Vitrectomy, run by Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of eyes with Immediate Anatomical Closure of Macular hole (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2025.