House Dust Mite AllergyPhase 3NCT06920771
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Study to Assess the Efficacy of PURETHAL Mites Mixture 50,000 AUeq/mL Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Asthma Induced by House Dust Mite (HDM)
A Phase 3 study testing PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/ml in people with House Dust Mite Allergy and House Dust Mite Rhinitis, run by HAL Allergy at 68 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
Rationale: Allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) is a global health problem, affecting 10-25% of the population. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only disease-modifying therapeutic option for subjects with house dust mites (HDM)-induced allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- House Dust Mite Allergy, House Dust Mite Rhinitis
- What is being tested?
- PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/ml
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 691 participants
- Where
- 68 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2024to 30 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Prior to screening, subjects need to have signed the current approved Informed Consent Form (ICF).
- Male or female subjects age 18-65 years at the time of informed consent.
- Clinical history consistent with moderate-severe HDM allergic rhinitis (with or without asthma) according to the ARIA classification (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) (Bousquet et al., 2008), for at least one year prior to the first dosing.
- Subjects should be able and willing to complete daily e-Diaries for a period of 4 weeks during the screening period, 1 week after maintenance visit 7, and for a period of 8 weeks at the end of treatment under the same living conditions.
- Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1) \> 70% at Screening.
- If a subject is asthmatic, asthma must be clinically controlled for at least three months before the screening using inhaled steroids and / or Long Acting Beta Agonists (corresponding to GINA treatment steps 1 -3) and inhaled steroid use should be on a stable, not higher dose than of ≤400 µg budesonide per day or dose-equivalent (≤500 µg beclometasone dipropionate; ≤160 µg ciclesonide;
Show all 20Show fewer
- ≤250 µg fluticasone propionate; ≤200 µg mometasone furoate). Patients with asthma should use their standard asthma medication throughout the whole study period to ensure their asthma remains controlled.
- Positive SPT to D. pter and/or D. far (mean wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm, negative control should be \< 2 mm, histamine positive control should be ≥ 3 mm), assessed at Screening.
- Subjects with a positive NPT for D. pter extract at Screening (Lebel score ≥6 at 10,000 AU/mL, test should be postponed, if baseline score is ≥ 3 or if negative control score is \> 3).
- Allergen specific serum IgE level for D. pter and/or D. far of \> 0.7 U/mL, assessed at Screening.
- Subjects need to have an average daily TNSS of at least 8 out of 12 points at baseline, determined according to the daily e-Diary entries during 2 weeks of baseline assessment. Subjects should have a minimum e-Diary entry compliance of 70% for which the average is calculated.
- Negative serum pregnancy test at screening for women of childbearing potential.
- Females of childbearing potential must be using highly effective and acceptable methods of birth control (as per the CTFG recommendations) to prevent pregnancy and agree to continue to practice an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of participation in the trial. Contraceptive measures considered adequate are:
- combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal)
- progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable)
- intrauterine device (IUD)
- intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
- bilateral tubal occlusion
- vasectomised partner
- sexual abstinence Waivers to the inclusion criteria will NOT be allowed.
Who cannot join
- A clinically relevant history of symptomatic seasonal ARC and/or a positive SPT (mean wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) caused by an allergen (including animal hair and dander), to which the subject is regularly exposed and/or exposure is overlapping with the e-Diary completion periods at Screening and at the end of treatment.
- Nasal surgery and/or severe nasal or severe oral disease within 6 months prior to Screening.
- Patients not adhering to the e-Diary procedure and/or procedure for Rescue Medication use during e-Diary phase.
- Severe asthma (GINA 2022 treatment steps 4 - 5).
- Uncontrolled asthma, as defined by any of the following:
- Asthma Control Test (ACT) ≤19,
Show all 19Show fewer
- FEV1 ≤70% of predicted value,
- Emergency room visit for asthma attack/exacerbation within 6 months prior to screening,
- At least 1 hospitalization due to asthma within the last year,
- History of intubation/mechanical ventilation due to asthma,
- More than 2 courses of oral steroids used for treatment of asthma within the last 6 months prior to Screening,
- Daily use of inhaled corticosteroids \>400mcg budesonide or equivalent.
- History of anaphylaxis with cardio-respiratory symptoms (food allergy, drugs or an idiopathic reaction).
- Previous treatment with AIT with HDM allergen or a cross-reacting allergen for more than 1 month at the maintenance level within the last 5 years. Initiation of HDM SCIT is acceptable, if treatment has been discontinued before reaching maintenance dose.
- AIT (subcutaneous, sublingual or oral) with other allergens than HDM within the last 3 months prior to screening or planned during the trial period.
- Participation in a clinical trial within the last 3 months prior to screening (e.g.
- new investigational drug or biological) or during the trial. 10. Any vaccination (including COVID-19) less than 1 week prior to screening, during screening and the up-dosing phase and the TCRS scoring periods. 11. Any immunosuppressive treatment or anti-IgE therapy within the last 6 months prior to the first dosing of the trial drug and during the trial 12. Any treatment with β-adrenergic blockers unless prescribed as per treatment standards to the subject if the medical benefit will prevail the risks upon investigators discretion. 13. Hypersensitivity to any of the other components of the investigational product. 14. Severe immune disorders (including autoimmune diseases) and/or diseases requiring immunosuppressive medication. 15. Active COVID-19 infection at the time of screening or 2 weeks before. 16. Active malignancies or any malignant disease in the last 5 years. 17. A chronic or acute disease that in the opinion of the investigator might place the subject at an additional risk, including but not limited to the following: cardiovascular insufficiency, any severe or unstable lung diseases, endocrine disorders, clinically significant renal or hepatic diseases, haematological disorders, severe atopic dermatitis, other relevant skin diseases (affecting SPT testing areas). 18. Diseases with a contraindication for the use of adrenaline/epinephrine (e.g.
- hyperthyroidism, glaucoma). 19. Use of prohibited medication and/or not able to discontinue medications that are prohibited during the specified trial periods. 20. Moderate to severe nasal obstructive disease such as polyps, septum deviation. 21. Clinically significant chronic sinusitis or ocular infection. 22. Female subjects of childbearing potential who are pregnant or lactating. 23. Alcohol, drug, or medication abuse within the past year and during the trial.
- 24. Any (expected) lack of cooperation or compliance upon the discretion of the investigator. 25. Severe psychiatric, psychological, or neurological disorders. 26. Employees of the Sponsor, CRO, clinical study site and/or who are 1st grade relatives, or partners of the investigator. 27. Known commitment to an institution by virtue of an order issued either by the judicial or the administrative authorities 28. Expected changes in average HDM exposure during the trial (e.g. new avoidance measures, relocation and holidays or trips lasting more than 10 days during the efficacy assessment period)
Trial locations and contacts
68 sites in 5 countries.
68 sites in 5 countries
Poland34 sites
NZOZ Homeo Medicus Poradnia Alergologiczna
Bialystok
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Gabinet Pediatryczno-Alergologiczny Anna Płoszczuk
Bialystok
Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska AlerMedica
Bialystok
Centrum Medyczne KERmed
Bydgoszcz
Pratia - Ośrodek Badań Klinicznych
Częstochowa
Clinica Vitae Spółka z o. o.
Gdansk
Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Elżbieta Matusz
Gryfice
Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita
Katowice
Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska dr n.med. Joanna Orlicz-Widawska
Katowice
PZU Zdrowie Centra Medyczne Kielce
Kielce
Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Jan Zdanowski Specjalista Alergolog
Koszalin
Centrum Nowoczesnych Terapii "Dobry Lekarz" Sp. z o.o.
Krakow
Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o - FutureMeds Kraków
Krakow
Małopolskie Centrum Alergologii sp z o.o.
Krakow
Clinmedica Research sp. z o.o.
Lodz
CM Szpital Św. Rodziny
Lodz
IP Clinic Sp. z o. o.
Lodz
Medical University of Lodz
Lodz
Centrum Diagnostyczno-Terapeutyczne Medicus Sp. z o.o.
Lubin
ALERGOTEST s.c. Specjalistyczne Centrum Medyczne
Lublin
Centrum Alergoologii Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Alergologiczna
Lublin
Pro Life Medica Sp. z o.o.
Lublin
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie
Lublin
Centrum Alergologii
Poznan
NZOZ Alergo-Med
Poznan
Poradnie Specjalistyczne Alergologia Plus - Justyna Rakowicz
Poznan
NSZOZ Puls Med
Skarżysko-Kamienna
Alergo-Med Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Lekarska Sp. z o. o.
Tarnów
Gabinet Lekarski Bożena Kubicka-Kozik
Tomaszów Mazowiecki
Centrum Alergologii Irmed Irena Wojciechowska
Warsaw
ETG Warszawa
Warsaw
POLIMEDICA CENTRUM BADAŃ, PROFILAKTYKI I LECZENIA Sp. z o.o. - POLIMEDICA PTG
Warsaw
All-Med - Specjalistyczna Opieka Medyczna - Medyczny Instytut Badawczy
Wroclaw
NZOZ Centrum Usług Medycznych "PROXIMUM" Sp. z o. o.
Wroclaw
Germany19 sites
Emovis GmbH
Berlin
Praxis Dr. Ginko
Bonn
Praxis Dr. Elke Decot
Dreieich
HNO-Praxis Dr. Udo Schäfer
Dresden
HNO Praxis Dr. Uta Thieme
Duisburg
Medizentrum Essen-Borbeck
Essen
Pneumologisches Forschungsinstitut Hohegeest GbR
Geesthacht
HNO-Facharztpraxis Alte Post
Göttingen
HNO Research GmbH
Itzehoe
Hospital Schleswig-Holstein. Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie.
Kiel, 24105
BAG Prof. G. Hoheisel/Dr. A. Bonitz Praxis für Pneumologie und Allergologie - Studienzentrum
Leipzig
Praxis Dr. Bohn
Mittweida
Ballenberger, Freytag, Wenisch -Institut für klinische Forschung GmbH
Neu-Isenburg
Studienzentrum MOL BAG Dres. E.Hippke & S. Runge
Neuenhagen
KliFOs - Klinische Forschung Osnabrück
Osnabrück
Studienzentrum Dr.Schlenska
Peine
Studienzentrum Dr.Laßmann
Saalfeld
Allergo GmbH - Prüfzentrum Schorndorf
Schorndorf
Klinikum Stuttgart - Krankenhaus Bad Cannstatt
Stuttgart
Lithuania7 sites
CD8 clinic
Kaunas
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno klinikos
Kaunas
Inovatyvios alergologijos centras
Vilnius
JSC Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Diseases
Vilnius
JSC Family Doctor
Vilnius
JSC Inlita
Vilnius
JSC Verkiu clinic
Vilnius
Bulgaria6 sites
UMBAL Kaspela
Plovdiv
Medical Center Prolet EOOD
Rousse
Medical Center Smolyan
Smolyan
DCC Convex
Sofia
Diagnostic-Consulativ Senter Ascendent
Sofia
University Hospital Alexandrovska
Sofia
Latvia2 sites
LOR Clinic
Riga
The Center of Investigation in Treatment of Allergyc Diseases
Riga
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Study to Assess the Efficacy of PURETHAL Mites Mixture 50,000 AUeq/mL Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Asthma Induced by House Dust Mite
Rationale: Allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) is a global health problem, affecting 10-25% of the population. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only disease-modifying therapeutic option for subjects with house dust mites (HDM)-induced allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis. This Phase 3 clinical study aims to demonstrate the effecacy of PURETHAL Mites (PM) Mixture subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) compared to a placebo over one year of treatment in patients with moderate to severe HDM- induced allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC), while also prioritizing the safety of the treatment. PM Mixture is a suspension of chemically modified extract from the house dust mites Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (D. pter) and Dermatophagoides farinae (D. far), adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide. Modified extracts (allergoids) are associated with reduced allergenicity but with preserved immunogenicity. Based on the previous studies the dose of 0.5 mL of PM Mixture solution with concentration 50,000 AUeq/mL (allergen units in millilitre) was selected for this Phase 3 clinical study.
Objectives: The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of PM Mixture 50,000 AUeq/mL (0.5 mL) SCIT based on an average Total Combined Rhinitis Score (TCRS), which will be compared between PM Mixture and placebo groups. The TCRS consists of rhinitis symptom score and medication score measured daily over the last 8 weeks of the 1 year treatment.
Read more
Other secondary efficacy parameters will be compared between treatment groups to show efficacy: rhinitis symptom and medication scores separately as well as a combined symptom and medication score for nasal symptoms only (CSMS(n)); Total Combined Conductivities Score; nasal provocation test; immunological blood markers such as immunoglobulins E, G and G4; and Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (standardised) (RQLQ(S)).
Trial design: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled multi-centre clinical trial where subjects are participating for about 14 months.
Trial population: Patients (18-65 years of age) suffering from moderate to severe ARC induced by HDM with or without controlled asthma can be included in the study. The main criteria to evaluate the HDM allergy will be done by the following parameters: allergic medical history to HDM minimum 1 year; positive skin prick test and nasal provocation test HDM D. pter and/or D. far; certain level of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E to D. pter or D. far, and most importantly they should have sufficient rhinitis symptom score measured during 2 weeks at screening. Additionally patients should have sufficient lung functions confirmed by the spirometry, they may have asthma which should be controlled. Patients with a chronic or acute disease that might place the subject at an additional risk will not be included. Certain medications which can interfere with the study treatment or increase the health risks should be washed-out and can not be taken during the study.
Approximately 920 HDM-allergic subjects will be screened in order after the screening period to enroll 552 subjects.
- Conditions
- House Dust Mite Allergy, House Dust Mite Rhinitis
- Being tested
- PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/ml, Biological/Vaccine: Placebo
- Keywords
- PM0059, House dust mite, House dust mite allergy, House dust mite rhinitis, allergy, rhinitis, total nasal symptom score, TNSS, subcutaneous, Purethal
- Medical subject headings
- Dust Mite Allergy, Hypersensitivity, Rhinitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/mlBiological
Biological/Vaccine: Placebo
Increasing volumes of placebo, will be administered by subcutaneous injection (starting with 0.05 ml) at weekly intervals till the maintenance dose (0.5 ml) is reached. Subsequently, maintenance dosages, corresponding to 0.5 ml of placebo, are given at 4-weekly intervals
Biological/Vaccine: PlaceboBiological
Increasing dosages, corresponding to increasing volumes of drug solution (starting with 0.05 ml), will be administered by subcutaneous injection at weekly intervals till the maintenance dose (0.5 ml) is reached. Subsequently, maintenance dosages, corresponding to 0.5 ml of drug solution, are given at 4-weekly intervals.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo Comparator: placebo | Placebo comparator | Increasing volumes of placebo, will be administered by subcutaneous injection (starting with 0.05 ml) at weekly intervals till the maintenance dose (0.5 ml) is reached. Subsequently, maintenance dosages, corresponding to 0.5 ml of placebo, are given at 4-weekly intervals. Receives: Biological: PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/ml; Biological: Biological/Vaccine: Placebo |
| Experimental: PURETHAL Mites, 50,000 AU/ml | Active comparator | Increasing dosages, corresponding to increasing volumes of drug solution (starting with 0.05 ml), will be administered by subcutaneous injection at weekly intervals till the maintenance dose (0.5 ml) is reached. Subsequently, maintenance dosages, corresponding to 0.5 ml of drug solution, are given at 4-weekly intervals. Receives: Biological: PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/ml; Biological: Biological/Vaccine: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary objective
To assess clinical efficacy of PM Mixture 50,000 AUeq/mL (0.5 mL) SCIT in subjects suffering from moderate to severe HDM-induced ARC, measured by difference in the average Total Combined Rhinitis Score (TCRS) during the last 8 weeks of one (± 1 month) year treatment, between PM treatment and placebo.
Each symptom will be individually graded and then summed to a maximum of 24 points.
Measured: Last 8 weeks (before end of study) of the intervention.
Secondary outcomes (1)
To assess the effect of PM treatment by comparing the average daily Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) between PM and placebo during the last 8 weeks of one (± 1 month) year treatment of subjects with HDM-allergic ARC.
To assess the effect of PM treatment by comparing the average daily Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) between PM and placebo during the last 8 weeks of one (± 1 month) year treatment of subjects with HDM-allergic ARC.
Measured: The last 8 weeks of one (± 1 month) year treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2025
- Study start9 Sep 2024
- Primary completion30 Mar 2026
- Study completion30 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for House Dust Mite AllergyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 691 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- HAL Allergy
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Ergomed, ClinCompetence Cologne GmbH
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hans Hoogeveen, Study director, Head of Clinical Development
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06920771
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PM/0059
- Other IDs
- 2023-504942-75-01, 2023
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Study to Assess the Efficacy of PURETHAL Mites Mixture 50,000 AUeq/mL Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Asthma Induced by House Dust Mite
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06920771
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PM/0059
- Conditions
- House Dust Mite Allergy, House Dust Mite Rhinitis
- Keywords
- PM0059, House dust mite, House dust mite allergy, House dust mite rhinitis, allergy, rhinitis, total nasal symptom score, TNSS
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 691 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- HAL AllergyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Ergomed, ClinCompetence Cologne GmbH
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: Allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) is a global health problem, affecting 10-25% of the population. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only disease-modifying therapeutic option for subjects with house dust mites (HDM)-induced allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis. This Phase 3 clinical study aims to demonstrate the effecacy of PURETHAL Mites (PM) Mixture subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) compared to a placebo over one year of treatment in patients with moderate to severe HDM- induced allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC), while also prioritizing the safety of the treatment. PM Mixture is a suspension of chemically modified extract from the house dust mites Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (D. pter) and Dermatophagoides farinae (D. far), adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide. Modified extracts (allergoids) are associated with reduced allergenicity but with preserved immunogenicity. Based on the previous studies the dose of 0.5 mL of PM Mixture solution with concentration 50,000 AUeq/mL (allergen units in millilitre) was selected for this Phase 3 clinical study.
Objectives: The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of PM Mixture 50,000 AUeq/mL (0.5 mL) SCIT based on an average Total Combined Rhinitis Score (TCRS), which will be compared between PM Mixture and placebo groups. The TCRS consists of rhinitis symptom score and medication score measured daily over the last 8 weeks of the 1 year treatment.
Other secondary efficacy parameters will be compared between treatment groups to show efficacy: rhinitis symptom and medication scores separately as well as a combined symptom and medication score for nasal symptoms only (CSMS(n)); Total Combined Conductivities Score; nasal provocation test; immunological blood markers such as immunoglobulins E, G and G4; and Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (standardised) (RQLQ(S)).
Trial design: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled multi-centre clinical trial where subjects are participating for about 14 months.
Trial population: Patients (18-65 years of age) suffering from moderate to severe ARC induced by HDM with or without controlled asthma can be included in the study. The main criteria to evaluate the HDM allergy will be done by the following parameters: allergic medical history to HDM minimum 1 year; positive skin prick test and nasal provocation test HDM D. pter and/or D. far; certain level of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E to D. pter or D. far, and most importantly they should have sufficient rhinitis symptom score measured during 2 weeks at screening. Additionally patients should have sufficient lung functions confirmed by the spirometry, they may have asthma which should be controlled. Patients with a chronic or acute disease that might place the subject at an additional risk will not be included. Certain medications which can interfere with the study treatment or increase the health risks should be washed-out and can not be taken during the study.
Approximately 920 HDM-allergic subjects will be screened in order after the screening period to enroll 552 subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo Comparator: placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/ml, Biological: Biological/Vaccine: PlaceboIncreasing volumes of placebo, will be administered by subcutaneous injection (starting with 0.05 ml) at weekly intervals till the maintenance dose (0.5 ml) is reached. Subsequently, maintenance dosages, corresponding to 0.5 ml of placebo, are given at 4-weekly intervals. |
| Experimental: PURETHAL Mites, 50,000 AU/ml | Active comparator | Biological: PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/ml, Biological: Biological/Vaccine: PlaceboIncreasing dosages, corresponding to increasing volumes of drug solution (starting with 0.05 ml), will be administered by subcutaneous injection at weekly intervals till the maintenance dose (0.5 ml) is reached. Subsequently, maintenance dosages, corresponding to 0.5 ml of drug solution, are given at 4-weekly intervals. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Prior to screening, subjects need to have signed the current approved Informed Consent Form (ICF).
- Male or female subjects age 18-65 years at the time of informed consent.
- Clinical history consistent with moderate-severe HDM allergic rhinitis (with or without asthma) according to the ARIA classification (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) (Bousquet et al., 2008), for at least one year prior to the first dosing.
- Subjects should be able and willing to complete daily e-Diaries for a period of 4 weeks during the screening period, 1 week after maintenance visit 7, and for a period of 8 weeks at the end of treatment under the same living conditions.
- Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1) \> 70% at Screening.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- A clinically relevant history of symptomatic seasonal ARC and/or a positive SPT (mean wheal diameter ≥ 3 mm) caused by an allergen (including animal hair and dander), to which the subject is regularly exposed and/or exposure is overlapping with the e-Diary completion periods at Screening and at the end of treatment.
- Nasal surgery and/or severe nasal or severe oral disease within 6 months prior to Screening.
- Patients not adhering to the e-Diary procedure and/or procedure for Rescue Medication use during e-Diary phase.
- Severe asthma (GINA 2022 treatment steps 4 - 5).
- Uncontrolled asthma, as defined by any of the following:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/mlBiological/Vaccine: Placebo Increasing volumes of placebo, will be administered by subcutaneous injection (starting with 0.05 ml) at weekly intervals till the maintenance dose (0.5 ml) is reached. Subsequently, maintenance dosages, corresponding to 0.5 ml of placebo, are given at 4-weekly intervals | Biological | Experimental: PURETHAL Mites, 50,000 AU/ml, Placebo Comparator: placebo |
| Biological/Vaccine: PlaceboIncreasing dosages, corresponding to increasing volumes of drug solution (starting with 0.05 ml), will be administered by subcutaneous injection at weekly intervals till the maintenance dose (0.5 ml) is reached. Subsequently, maintenance dosages, corresponding to 0.5 ml of drug solution, are given at 4-weekly intervals. | Biological | Experimental: PURETHAL Mites, 50,000 AU/ml, Placebo Comparator: placebo |
Primary outcome
Primary objective
Time frame: Last 8 weeks (before end of study) of the intervention.
To assess clinical efficacy of PM Mixture 50,000 AUeq/mL (0.5 mL) SCIT in subjects suffering from moderate to severe HDM-induced ARC, measured by difference in the average Total Combined Rhinitis Score (TCRS) during the last 8 weeks of one (± 1 month) year treatment, between PM treatment and placebo. Each symptom will be individually graded and then summed to a maximum of 24 points.
1 secondary outcome
To assess the effect of PM treatment by comparing the average daily Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) between PM and placebo during the last 8 weeks of one (± 1 month) year treatment of subjects with HDM-allergic ARC.
Time frame: The last 8 weeks of one (± 1 month) year treatment.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for House Dust Mite Allergy
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of B Regulatory Cells by Flow Cytometry
Pollen Allergy, Venom Allergy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dupilumab Effects Against Aeroallergen Challenge
Asthma, Allergic
RecruitingObservational study
The Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy Guided by Component-Resolved Diagnosis for Dust Mite Allergens in Chinese Pediatric Patients With Rhinitis and/or Asthma
Allergic Rhinitis Due to House Dust Mite
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of SLIT in Patients With Rhinitis/RC With/Without Mild-moderate Asthma, Due to Dpt and/or Df
Rhinitis, Rhinoconjunctivitis
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of PURESSENTIEL Allergy Protection Nasal Spray (SNPA®) in House Dust Mite Allergic Rhinitis- ACARAY Study
Allergic Disorder of Respiratory System
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hans Hoogeveen study director
Head of Clinical Development
68 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing PURETHAL Mites 50,000 AUeq/ml in people with House Dust Mite Allergy and House Dust Mite Rhinitis, run by HAL Allergy at 68 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 68 sites in Poland, Germany, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Latvia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary objective (time frame: Last 8 weeks (before end of study) of the intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2026.