AzTrials
AzTrials

Stomach NeoplasmGaC-TOPNCT06923449

Gastric Cancer' Textbook Oncological Outcome and Tumor Board Performance

An observational study of Stomach Neoplasm, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational, no-profit, spontaneous, retrospective, monocentric study is to compare surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients affected by gastric cancer before and after the institution of the Tumor Board, a multidisciplinary weekly case discussion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stomach Neoplasm
What is being tested?
Multidisciplinary Tumor Board
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
16 May 2024to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All subsequent patients aged 18 years or older, surgical candidates with curative intent, with a pathology-confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, treated at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS of Rome from 2018 to date.

Who may be able to join

  • pathology-confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma
  • age 18 years or older
  • surgical candidates with curative intent

Who cannot join

  • Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)
  • previous EMR or ESD (salvage surgery)
  • histologies other than adenocarcinoma (no squamous cell carcinomas, GISTs, sarcomas, lymphomas, etc)
  • unsufficient staging (unclear clinical stage at diagnosis)
  • emergency presentation (obstrucetd, significantly bleeding, perforated gastric cancer)
  • synchronous tumors affecting survival
  • pregnant patients
  • age <18years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Laura Antolino, MD, PhD contact

+393470409876

laura.antolino@gmail.com

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

    Rome, IT, 00168

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Gastric Cancer' Textbook Oncological Outcome and Tumor Board Performance - The Experience of a High-volume Italian University Hospital

The goal of this observational, no-profit, spontaneous, retrospective, monocentric study is to compare surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients affected by gastric cancer before and after the institution of the Tumor Board, a multidisciplinary weekly case discussion. The main question it aims to answer is whether the Textbook Outcome (TO) and Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO) of patients with non-early, non-metastatic gastric cancer undergoing surgical treatment with curative intent have improved before (from January 2018 to November 2019) and after (from December 2019 onwards) the establishment of the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli (FPG).

Read the detailed description

Background. Textbook Outcome (TO) is a composite parameter for quality in surgical oncology proposed by the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group, directly related to survival [1]. A Polish group proposed an integration to the TO, adding the item perioperative chemotherapy administration compliance (POC), for a comprehensive assessment of multimodal treatment in gastric cancer (GaC) patients' management, named Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO) [2]. This has been subsequently validated in the European GASTRODATA database [3], showing a correlation with lower 90-day mortality rates. The latter study acknowledges a TO of 68.5%, higher than previous experiences reported from the Western world, while reporting a TOO of only 22.8%, pointing out the need to improve multimodal treatment of GC patients.

To evaluate any influence of systematic Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) on patient outcomes, we aim to assess TO, TOO, Time from first diagnosis To first Therapy (TTT), the appropriateness of Patient to Treatment Allocation (PTA), and MTB hospital Adherence (TBA) as indicators of Tumor Board Performance (TBP) before and after its institution. At Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, the MTB for GaC was established in November 2019. We will collect data from 2018 to date in order to minimize bias due to different perioperative regimens.

Hypothesis. We hypothesize a global improvement in GaC patients' TO and TOO following the institution of the MTB.

Objectives. The study's primary objective is to evaluate the Textbook Outcome (TO) and Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO) of patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgical treatment with curative intent before (from January 2018 to November 2019) and after (from December 2019 onwards) the establishment of the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli (FPG) (primary endpoint: percentage of patients achieving TO and TOO out of the total number of patients who underwent surgery with curative intent for gastric cancer at FPG before and after the MTB institution). Secondary objectives include assessing Tumor Board Performance (TBP) by measuring: - Time from diagnosis To Treatment, the interval between diagnosis and beginning of the first oncological treatment (TTT; endpoint: delay in days/weeks from diagnosis to treatment before and after MTB institution), - Patient to Treatment Allocation (PTA; endpoint: percentage of upfront surgery candidates who do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy before and after MTB institution) and - Tumor Board Adherence (TBA; endpoint: percentage of patients operated on at FPG who were previously discussed at the MTB out of the total number of patients who underwent surgery with curative intent for gastric cancer at FPG).

Methods. We will review clinical, pathological, surgical and oncological data of patients affected by Gastric Cancer candidated for surgical intervention -either upfront, either post neoadjuvant treatment, either in conversion surgery- with curative intent for primary and secondary outcomes.

Expected results. This study aims to demonstrate an improvement in Gastric Cancer patients' outcomes, such as Textbook Outcome (TO) and Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO), following the establishment of the MTB. Additionally, we anticipate enhanced Tumor Board Performance over time, thanks to the improvements of Time from Diagnosis to Treatment (TTT), Tumor Board Adherence (TBA), and Patient to Treatment Allocation (PTA), attributable to a learning effect.

Being tested
Multidisciplinary Tumor Board
Keywords
Gastric Cancer, Multidisciplinary Tumor Board, Textbook Outcome, Textbook Oncological Outcome
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Multidisciplinary Tumor BoardOther

    Institution of Multidisciplinary Tumor Board for Gastric Cancer at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli in november 2019

Study groups in NCT06923449
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pre-TBAll subsequent patients aged 18 years or older, surgical candidates with curative intent, with a pathology-confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, treated at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS of Rome from jan 2018 to november 2019
Post-TBAll subsequent patients aged 18 years or older, surgical candidates with curative intent, with a pathology-confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, treated at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS of Rome from december 2019 onwards
Receives: Other: Multidisciplinary Tumor Board

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Textbook Outcome (TO)

    fulfillment of 10 items consisting in (1) radical resection according to the surgeons' assessment at the end of the operation, (2) no intraoperative complications, (3) negative resection margins (R0), (4) at least 15 lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved and examined, (5) no severe postoperative complications, (6) no reinterventions, (7) no readmission to intensive care unit (ICU), (8) no prolonged hospital stay (21 days), (9) no postoperative mortality, and (10) no hospital readmission

    Measured: january 2018 - february 2024

  2. Textbook Oncologic Outcome (TOO)

    TOO is defined by the addition of PeriOperative Chemotherapy (POC) or Adjuvant chemoTherapy (AT) administration to the 10 TO items resulting in 11 items

    Measured: january 2018 - february 2024

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Time To first Treatment (TTT)

    TTT is defined as the interval from diagnosis to first treatment (first chemotherapy administration or radical surgery), the diagnosis will be traced to the date of final pathology of endoscopic biopsies; TTT will be subdivided in Staging Time (ST), time from first histology to completion of staging, and Waiting list Time (WT), time from last staging exam to first treatment

    Measured: january 2018 - february 2024

  2. Patient to Treatment Allocation (PTA)

    PTA appropriateness, indicated by the percentage of newly diagnosed patients undergoing upfront surgery who are not offered adjuvant therapy. This may be due to either early staging or because the patient is deemed unfit for systemic treatment. PTA will be calculated in patients aged 80y or younger, given that older patients less frequently receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Measured: january 2018 - february 2024

  3. Tumor Board Adherence (TBA)

    TBA expressed as the percentage of patients who undergo surgery for Gastric Cancer at FPG after being discussed at the MTB over the totality of patients surgically treated for GaC at FPG

    Measured: january 2018 - february 2024

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2025
  2. Study start16 May 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
250 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06923449
Sponsor's protocol ID
ID 6671 Prot.n.0010178/24
Acronym
GaC-TOP
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
4 Apr 2025
Last updated
11 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Busweiler LA, Schouwenburg MG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Kolfschoten NE, de Jong PC, Rozema T, Wijnhoven BP, van Hillegersberg R, Wouters MW, van Sandick JW; Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group. Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):742-750. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10486. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

    PubMed 28240357
  • Sedlak K, Rawicz-Pruszynski K, Mlak R, Geca K, Skorzewska M, Pelc Z, Malecka-Massalska T, Polkowski WP. Union is strength: Textbook outcome with perioperative chemotherapy compliance decreases the risk of death in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;48(2):356-361. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

    PubMed 34404560
  • Sedlak K, Rawicz-Pruszynski K, Mlak R, Van Sandick J, Gisbertz S, Pera M, Dal Cero M, Baiocchi GL, Celotti A, Morgagni P, Vittimberga G, Hoelscher A, Moenig S, Kolodziejczyk P, Richter P, Gockel I, Piessen G, Da Costa PM, Davies A, Baker C, Allum W, Romario UF, De Pascale S, Rosati R, Reim D, Santos LL, D'ugo D, Wijnhoven B, Degiuli M, De Manzoni G, Kielan W, Frejlich E, Schneider P, Polkowski WP. Textbook Oncological Outcome in European GASTRODATA. Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):823-831. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006054. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

    PubMed 37555342
  • Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, Corcoran N, Tran B, Bowden P, Crowe J, Costello AJ. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 24.

    PubMed 26643552
  • Hanna TP, King WD, Thibodeau S, Jalink M, Paulin GA, Harvey-Jones E, O'Sullivan DE, Booth CM, Sullivan R, Aggarwal A. Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020 Nov 4;371:m4087. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4087.

    PubMed 33148535
  • Kim TH, Suh YS, Huh YJ, Son YG, Park JH, Yang JY, Kong SH, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Slankamenac K, Clavien PA, Yang HK. The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a more sensitive complication index than the conventional Clavien-Dindo classification in radical gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan;21(1):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0728-3. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

    PubMed 28597328
  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.

    PubMed 3558716
  • Pak LM, Yang T, Wang J. The safety and efficacy of gastrectomy for gastric cancer among octogenarians: a western population-based study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(4):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

    PubMed 30366851

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stomach Neoplasm, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Laura Antolino, MD, PhD (+393470409876, laura.antolino@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Textbook Outcome (TO) (time frame: january 2018 - february 2024). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06923449, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in