Pontic Site AugmentationNCT06926452
Clinical and Volumetric Changes Following Single Pontic Site Development Using Multilayered Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Connective Tissue Grafting in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
A study testing Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. and Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrin in people with Pontic Site Augmentation and Connective Tissue Graft, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
In clinical practice most patients' first concern is esthetics, soft tissue grafting is becoming routine in clinical practice to make up for the deficiency in supra-crestal tissue dimension that typically follows tooth loss. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pontic Site Augmentation, Connective Tissue Graft
- What is being tested?
- Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. and Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrin
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2025to Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults from the age of 18 - 40 years
- Patients with missing maxillary teeth/tooth in the area from 2nd premolar to 2nd premolar with ridge defect according to Seibert classification (Class I, II and III).
- Intact gingival tissue with at least 2mm keratinized tissue.
- Periodontally healthy patients.
- Patients accepts to provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Smokers.
- Pregnant females.
- Handicapped and mentally challenged patients.
- Systemic disease compromising wound healing.
- Active soft tissue infection
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Joseph Osama Kostandy, Bachelor Degree of dentsitry contact
About this study
In clinical practice most patients' first concern is esthetics, soft tissue grafting is becoming routine in clinical practice to make up for the deficiency in supra-crestal tissue dimension that typically follows tooth loss. The edentulous site experiences major qualitative and quantitative changes because of a number of sequential events that occur after tooth extraction. Ridge dimensional alterations of the underlying bone and the soft tissue architecture overlaying it are the consequence of the socket healing process. To maintain the remaining teeth, aesthetic jaw support and optimal food chewing, lost teeth must be replaced. The teeth adjacent to and opposing a missing tooth will eventually tip, shift, and migrate, disrupting normal function. One integral part of the new strategy for treating periodontal diseases is thought to be surgical periodontal operations. Soft tissue grafting has become more frequently utilized to improve the aesthetics of teeth and dental implant sites by treating mucogingival abnormalities, restoring an appropriate width of keratinized tissue, and enhancing tissue thickness. SCTG has its own limitations, such as lack of graft availability, need for a second surgical site, proximity to palatine neurovascular complex and unaesthetic tissue contour at the recipient site. Due to these limitations, investigations on more regenerative nature techniques have been explored such as PRF, Using PRF instead of SCTG has the added value of decreasing discomfort and postoperative pain after the surgical procedure due to having additional donor site, To the best of our knowledge testing multi-layer PRF against SCTG in pontic site augmentation was never done before.
Read the detailed description
In clinical practice most patients' first concern is esthetics, soft tissue grafting is becoming routine in clinical practice to make up for the deficiency in supra-crestal tissue dimension that typically follows tooth loss. The edentulous site experiences major qualitative and quantitative changes because of a number of sequential events that occur after tooth extraction. Ridge dimensional alterations of the underlying bone and the soft tissue architecture overlaying it are the consequence of the socket healing process. To maintain the remaining teeth, aesthetic jaw support and optimal food chewing, lost teeth must be replaced. The teeth adjacent to and opposing a missing tooth will eventually tip, shift, and migrate, disrupting normal function. One integral part of the new strategy for treating periodontal diseases is thought to be surgical periodontal operations. Soft tissue grafting has become more frequently utilized to improve the aesthetics of teeth and dental implant sites by treating mucogingival abnormalities, restoring an appropriate width of keratinized tissue, and enhancing tissue thickness. SCTG has its own limitations, such as lack of graft availability, need for a second surgical site, proximity to palatine neurovascular complex and unaesthetic tissue contour at the recipient site. Due to these limitations, investigations on more regenerative nature techniques have been explored such as PRF, Using PRF instead of SCTG has the added value of decreasing discomfort and postoperative pain after the surgical procedure due to having additional donor site, To the best of our knowledge testing multi-layer PRF against SCTG in pontic site augmentation was never done before.
Following tooth extraction, alveolar bone loss and structural and compositional changes of the covering soft tissues, as well as morphological alterations, can be expected. The numerous alterations in the alveolar process may lead to difficulties at the time of implant placement when a prosthetically driven implant position is desired, SCTG has its own limitations, such as lack of graft availability, need for a second surgical site, proximity to palatine neurovascular complex and unaesthetic tissue contour at the recipient site. The use of the SCTG in periodontal surgery is considered the golden pattern to the gingival recession treatment due to its characteristics of quick keratinization and adherence. However, the application of the technique is limited by the thickness of the giver tissue, anatomical factors, technical difficulty, and the need of an additional giver site. Due to these limitations, investigations on more regenerative nature techniques have been explored such as PRF. Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) is an autologous biomaterial obtained from a patient's blood, rich in platelets, growth factors, and fibrin, which has regenerative and healing properties. Multi-layer PRF (ML-PRF) involves stacking several PRF membranes to increase their volumetric effect and improve tissue healing in areas requiring soft tissue augmentation.
- Conditions
- Pontic Site Augmentation, Connective Tissue Graft
- Being tested
- Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft., Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrin
- Keywords
- Pontic site augmentation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft.Procedure or surgery
Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft.
Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrinProcedure or surgery
Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. |
| Test | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Keratinized tissue thickness
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2025
- Study startMay 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pontic Site AugmentationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled clinical trial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Joseph Osama Joseph Kostandy, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06926452
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRF vs CTG
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Volumetric Changes Following Single Pontic Site Development Using Multilayered Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Connective Tissue Grafting in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06926452
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRF vs CTG
- Conditions
- Pontic Site Augmentation, Connective Tissue Graft
- Keywords
- Pontic site augmentation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In clinical practice most patients' first concern is esthetics, soft tissue grafting is becoming routine in clinical practice to make up for the deficiency in supra-crestal tissue dimension that typically follows tooth loss. The edentulous site experiences major qualitative and quantitative changes because of a number of sequential events that occur after tooth extraction. Ridge dimensional alterations of the underlying bone and the soft tissue architecture overlaying it are the consequence of the socket healing process. To maintain the remaining teeth, aesthetic jaw support and optimal food chewing, lost teeth must be replaced. The teeth adjacent to and opposing a missing tooth will eventually tip, shift, and migrate, disrupting normal function. One integral part of the new strategy for treating periodontal diseases is thought to be surgical periodontal operations. Soft tissue grafting has become more frequently utilized to improve the aesthetics of teeth and dental implant sites by treating mucogingival abnormalities, restoring an appropriate width of keratinized tissue, and enhancing tissue thickness. SCTG has its own limitations, such as lack of graft availability, need for a second surgical site, proximity to palatine neurovascular complex and unaesthetic tissue contour at the recipient site. Due to these limitations, investigations on more regenerative nature techniques have been explored such as PRF, Using PRF instead of SCTG has the added value of decreasing discomfort and postoperative pain after the surgical procedure due to having additional donor site, To the best of our knowledge testing multi-layer PRF against SCTG in pontic site augmentation was never done before.
Detailed description
In clinical practice most patients' first concern is esthetics, soft tissue grafting is becoming routine in clinical practice to make up for the deficiency in supra-crestal tissue dimension that typically follows tooth loss. The edentulous site experiences major qualitative and quantitative changes because of a number of sequential events that occur after tooth extraction. Ridge dimensional alterations of the underlying bone and the soft tissue architecture overlaying it are the consequence of the socket healing process. To maintain the remaining teeth, aesthetic jaw support and optimal food chewing, lost teeth must be replaced. The teeth adjacent to and opposing a missing tooth will eventually tip, shift, and migrate, disrupting normal function. One integral part of the new strategy for treating periodontal diseases is thought to be surgical periodontal operations. Soft tissue grafting has become more frequently utilized to improve the aesthetics of teeth and dental implant sites by treating mucogingival abnormalities, restoring an appropriate width of keratinized tissue, and enhancing tissue thickness. SCTG has its own limitations, such as lack of graft availability, need for a second surgical site, proximity to palatine neurovascular complex and unaesthetic tissue contour at the recipient site. Due to these limitations, investigations on more regenerative nature techniques have been explored such as PRF, Using PRF instead of SCTG has the added value of decreasing discomfort and postoperative pain after the surgical procedure due to having additional donor site, To the best of our knowledge testing multi-layer PRF against SCTG in pontic site augmentation was never done before.
Following tooth extraction, alveolar bone loss and structural and compositional changes of the covering soft tissues, as well as morphological alterations, can be expected. The numerous alterations in the alveolar process may lead to difficulties at the time of implant placement when a prosthetically driven implant position is desired, SCTG has its own limitations, such as lack of graft availability, need for a second surgical site, proximity to palatine neurovascular complex and unaesthetic tissue contour at the recipient site. The use of the SCTG in periodontal surgery is considered the golden pattern to the gingival recession treatment due to its characteristics of quick keratinization and adherence. However, the application of the technique is limited by the thickness of the giver tissue, anatomical factors, technical difficulty, and the need of an additional giver site. Due to these limitations, investigations on more regenerative nature techniques have been explored such as PRF. Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) is an autologous biomaterial obtained from a patient's blood, rich in platelets, growth factors, and fibrin, which has regenerative and healing properties. Multi-layer PRF (ML-PRF) involves stacking several PRF membranes to increase their volumetric effect and improve tissue healing in areas requiring soft tissue augmentation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Active comparator | Procedure: Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. |
| Test | Experimental | Procedure: Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adults from the age of 18 - 40 years
- Patients with missing maxillary teeth/tooth in the area from 2nd premolar to 2nd premolar with ridge defect according to Seibert classification (Class I, II and III).
- Intact gingival tissue with at least 2mm keratinized tissue.
- Periodontally healthy patients.
- Patients accepts to provide informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Smokers.
- Pregnant females.
- Handicapped and mentally challenged patients.
- Systemic disease compromising wound healing.
- Active soft tissue infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft.Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. | Procedure or surgery | Control |
| Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrinPontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrin | Procedure or surgery | Test |
Primary outcome
Keratinized tissue thickness
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Pontic Site Augmentation
Recruiting
Pontic Site Development With or Without Fixed Partial Denture
Mucogingival Defects, Pontic Site Development
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Joseph Osama Kostandy, Bachelor Degree of dentsitry contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pontic site augmentation with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. and Pontic site augmenation using multi-layered platelet rich fibrin in people with Pontic Site Augmentation and Connective Tissue Graft, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Joseph Osama Kostandy, Bachelor Degree of dentsitry (+2001226718007 ext. 022, joseph.osama@dentistry.cu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Keratinized tissue thickness (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2025.