AzTrials
AzTrials

Tobacco Product Beliefs and UseNCT06927700

Effects of FDA Authorized Smokeless Tobacco Claims Among US Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

A study testing Modified Risk Claim Type - None, Product Brand - General Snus and Product Brand - Copenhagen in people with Tobacco Product Beliefs and Use, run by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will be an online survey experiment conducted with adults who smoke cigarettes (ages 21+) to examine their reactions to modified risk advertising claims authorized by the Food \& Drug Administration (FDA) for two smokeless tobacco brands (General Snus and Copenhagen), which describe the lower risks of these… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tobacco Product Beliefs and Use
What is being tested?
Modified Risk Claim Type - None, Product Brand - General Snus and Product Brand - Copenhagen
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,257 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
24 Apr 2025to 4 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults (age 21 and over) who are current established cigarettes smokers (i.e., smoked 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and now smoke every day or somedays), based in the US, members of Ipsos' KnowledgePanel, and have chosen to complete their research panel surveys in English

Who cannot join

  • Panel participants who do not meet the criteria outlined above will be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Rutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study will be an online survey experiment conducted with adults who smoke cigarettes (ages 21+) to examine their reactions to modified risk advertising claims authorized by the Food \& Drug Administration (FDA) for two smokeless tobacco brands (General Snus and Copenhagen), which describe the lower risks of these products compared to cigarette smoking. The study will compare effects of ads with different two different claim types (i.e. claims about reduced lung cancer risk and claims about reduced risks for multiple disease) versus ads with no reduced-risk claims, and examine effects on message and product perceptions, and interest in using the smokeless tobacco products. This study will also examine how smokers' reactions/interest may vary based on the product brand, and asses prior awareness/exposure to the authorized claims.

Being tested
Modified Risk Claim Type - None, Product Brand - General Snus, Product Brand - Copenhagen, Modified Risk Claim Type - Multiple Diseases, Modified Risk Claim Type - Lung Cancer
Keywords
smokeless tobacco, tobacco advertising, modified risk claims, snus, moist snuff
Medical subject headings
Tobacco Use

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Modified Risk Claim Type - NoneBehavioural

    Participants will view smokeless tobacco ads with no modified risk claim (control)

  • Product Brand - General SnusBehavioural

    Participants will views ads for the smokeless tobacco brand General Snus

  • Product Brand - CopenhagenBehavioural

    Participants will views ads for the smokeless tobacco brand Copenhagen

  • Modified Risk Claim Type - Multiple DiseasesBehavioural

    Participants will view smokeless tobacco ads with a claim about lower risks for multiple diseases

  • Modified Risk Claim Type - Lung CancerBehavioural

    Participants will either view smokeless tobacco ads with a modified risk claim about lower risks for lung cancer only

Study groups in NCT06927700
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1 (General Snus-Control Ads)OtherParticipants in this group will view 4 ads for the brand General Snus that do not include a modified risk claim.
Receives: Behavioral: Modified Risk Claim Type - None; Behavioral: Product Brand - General Snus
Group 2 (General Snus-Multiple Disease Ads)ExperimentalParticipants in this group will view 4 ads for the brand General Snus that include a modified risk claim about the lower risk of multiple diseases.
Receives: Behavioral: Product Brand - General Snus; Behavioral: Modified Risk Claim Type - Multiple Diseases
Group 3 (General Snus- Lung Ads)ExperimentalParticipants in this group will view 4 ads for the brand General Snus that include a modified risk claim about the lower risk of lung cancer only.
Receives: Behavioral: Product Brand - General Snus; Behavioral: Modified Risk Claim Type - Lung Cancer
Group 4 (Copenhagen-Control Ads)ExperimentalParticipants in this group will view 4 ads for the brand Copenhagen that do not include a modified risk claim.
Receives: Behavioral: Modified Risk Claim Type - None; Behavioral: Product Brand - Copenhagen
Group 5 (Copenhagen-Multiple Disease Ads)ExperimentalParticipants in this group will view 4 ads for the brand Copenhagen that include a modified risk claim about the lower risk of multiple diseases.
Receives: Behavioral: Product Brand - Copenhagen; Behavioral: Modified Risk Claim Type - Multiple Diseases
Group 6 (Copenhagen- Lung Ads)ExperimentalParticipants in this group will view 4 ads for the brand Copenhagen that include a modified risk claim about the lower risk of lung cancer only.
Receives: Behavioral: Product Brand - Copenhagen; Behavioral: Modified Risk Claim Type - Lung Cancer

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. General Relative Harm Perception

    Single item measure asking participants how harmful they think daily use of the viewed smokeless tobacco product would be to their health compared to daily cigarette smoking, (1=a lot less harmful, 2=somewhat less harmful, 3=about the same, 4=somewhat more harmful, 5=a lot more harmful). Higher scores mean thinking the viewed smokeless tobacco product is more harmful than cigarettes.

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

  2. Perceptions of Perceived Relative Risks of Diseases

    Assessment of perceived risks of getting various smoking related diseases from using the viewed smokeless tobacco product versus from smoking cigarettes. Responses to 6 parallel questions (each asking about a different disease) were averaged together in this composite item. The question stated: "If you used only [General Snus/Copenhagen - inserted based on brand condition] or only cigarettes every day, which product would make it more likely that you would get": 1) lung cancer; 2) heart disease; 3) mouth cancer; 4) stroke; 5) chronic bronchitis; 6) emphysema. Response options to each were on a 5 point scale from (1=much more likely with General Snus/Copenhagen to 5=much more likely with cigarettes). Results presented here are based on the averages responses to the six items. Higher scores mean thinking risks are greater from smoking cigarettes than from using the viewed smokeless tobacco product.

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

  3. Absolute Harm Perception

    Single item measure asking participants how likely or unlikely they think the viewed smokeless tobacco product would be to cause serious health problems during their lifetime, if they used it every day (from 1=not at all likely to 5=extremely likely). Higher scores mean greater likelihood of thinking the product is harmful to health.

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

  4. Product Use Intentions

    Assessment of intentions to use the viewed smokeless tobacco products based on averaging responses to three parallel questions: "Thinking about the ads you saw for [General Snus or Copenhagen] products, how interested, in the next 6 months, would you be in: 1) Using or trying these products? 2) Using these products as a way to quit or cut down on your cigarette smoking? 3) Completely switching from cigarettes to these products? Response options to each were on a 5 point scale from (1=not at all interested to 5=extremely interested). Results presented here are based on the averaged responses to these three items. Higher scores mean greater interest in using the products.

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Risk Message Recall

    Participants are asked to recall (yes/no) if the ads they viewed include any statement saying that using the product can lower risks of certain diseases.

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

  2. Ad Persuasiveness

    A composite measure based on the average of 6 advertisement perceptions, asking participants to rate whether they agreed or disagreed that they ads they viewed: 1) included important information; 2) were understandable; 3) included believable information; 4) included credible information; 5) included information new to me; 6) make me want to learn more about those products. Response options were on a 6 point agreement scale from 1=strongly disagree to 6=strongly agree. Higher scores mean greater agreement that the ads were effective and persuasive.

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

  3. Claim Believability & Credibility

    A composite measure based on the average of 2 claim perception items, asking participants to rate whether they agreed or disagreed that the modified-risk claim in the ads they viewed was : 1) believable 2) credible. Participants responded to this while seeing the claim again on the survey screen. Response options were on a 7 point agreement scale from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree. Higher scores mean greater agreement that the claims were believable and credible.

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

  4. Overall Perceived Claim Persuasiveness

    A composite measure based on the average of 7 claim perception items, asking participants to rate whether they agreed or disagreed that the modified-risk claim in the ads they viewed was : 1) believable; 2) credible; 3) important; 4) new to me; 5) makes me think using this product could be less harmful to my health than smoking; 6) makes me more interested in trying this product; 7) would make me think seriously about completely switching to this product. Participants responded to this while seeing the claim again on the survey screen. Response options were on a 7 point agreement scale from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree. Higher scores mean greater agreement that participants thought the claim was persuasive/effective.

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

  5. Switching Comprehension

    An item assessing participants' understanding of the need to completely switch to the smokeless tobacco product viewed in order to reduce risks. It said:

    Please answer the next question based on your understanding of the ads you viewed earlier. Based on the ads, [General Snus OR Copenhagen, inserted based on condition] can reduce a smoker's health risks if you: (Select all that apply)

    1. Use only [General Snus/Copenhagen] and not smoke any cigarettes anymore
    2. Use [General Snus/Copenhagen] and smoke fewer cigarettes than before
    3. Use both products ([General Snus/Copenhagen] and cigarettes) about equally
    4. None of the above
    5. I don't know/not sure

    Measured: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2025
  2. Study start24 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion4 May 2025
  4. Study completion4 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
1,257 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06927700
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro2024000097
Other IDs
R21CA289541
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
7 Apr 2025
Last updated
4 Mar 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The study ad stimuli, survey instrument, codebook, and de-identified dataset will be deposited to a data repository - we anticipate this will be the National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program (NAHDAP), currently managed by ICPSR at the University of Michigan.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Modified Risk Claim Type - None, Product Brand - General Snus and Product Brand - Copenhagen in people with Tobacco Product Beliefs and Use, run by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

General Relative Harm Perception (time frame: Assessed in survey measures completed immediately after viewing the study stimuli). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in