HIVNCT06928961
A Patient Portal and PROMs to Improve Health Problem Detection and Retention in HIV Care: The DRHIVe Study
A study testing Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material in people with HIV and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO), run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Too often, people living with HIV (PLHIV) face challenges, including additional health and psychosocial problems, that complicate self-care, like medication-taking and medical appointment attendance. Healthcare providers are not always aware when patients face these difficulties. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV, Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO), Screening
- What is being tested?
- Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Dec 2025to Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed living with HIV
- Adult (at least 18 years old)
- Literate in English or French
- Patient at the study site
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment or medical instability that prevents participation
- Insufficient mastery of French or English to participate (e.g., complete PROMs, study questionnaires)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
David Lessard, PhD contact
Canada1 site
Chronic Viral Illness Service, Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre - Glen Site
Montreal, Quebec
Bertrand P Lebouché, MD, PhD, 514-843-2090, bertrand.lebouche@mcgill.ca
About this study
Official title: Implementation of a Patient Portal and Tailored Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Health Problem Detection and Retention in HIV Care: The DRHIVe Study
Too often, people living with HIV (PLHIV) face challenges, including additional health and psychosocial problems, that complicate self-care, like medication-taking and medical appointment attendance. Healthcare providers are not always aware when patients face these difficulties. A 'patient portal' is an online application that can give patients access to their medical records, appointment reminders, and questionnaires to inform providers about their health and wellbeing. Patient portals in HIV care can help providers detect patient problems and improve care. At the McGill University Health Centre's (MUHC) HIV care service, a survey showed great interest in a patient portal among both PLHIV and healthcare providers. Yet, little is known on how best to integrate a portal in HIV care settings and ensure it is accessible to patients. This project will be conducted at the MUHC's HIV care service in Montreal, Quebec which has over 2,000 patients. Participating patients will log on to a patient portal through a smartphone application and have a calendar of their HIV care appointments, health questionnaires to complete (previously chosen by people with HIV and healthcare providers), reminders for both and access to educational material. HIV physicians will be able to see their patients' questionnaire results to discuss them during clinic appointments. The project's objectives are to better understand what is needed to successfully integrate a portal in similar HIV practices with diverse patients and learn how acceptable and usable it is for HIV patients and doctors. The project will also examine how patient portal use impacts satisfaction, attendance, and physician detection of specific health problems. Furthemore, it will consider how patient sex, age, and ethnicity influence the results. People with HIV, providers, and staff at the study site will be involved in decision-making about this project. Over its 5-year duration, knowledge will be gained and shared on how to expand portal use efficiently and equitably in similar HIV care centers.
Read the detailed description
Background HIV care involves challenges; people living with HIV (PLHIV) face greater risks of several comorbidities and psychosocial difficulties, which often impede medication adherence, appointment attendance, and other aspects of HIV self-management. For providers, detection of many of these issues (e.g., symptoms, depression, substance use) largely relies on patients reporting them and they may go untreated. Evidence shows that patient portals and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can help improve HIV management. How best to implement and ensure equitable access to these tools is less clear.
Aims This project will deploy a patient portal with a standard set of PROMs previously chosen through HIV stakeholder consultations led by the research team (PLHIV, healthcare professionals…). The study site, the Chronic Viral Illness Service (CVIS) of the McGill University Health Centre, serves over 2,000 PLHIV and is the largest university hospital-based HIV center in Montreal, Quebec. The study trial will assess an implementation strategy and patient and physician perceptions of the intervention (Aim 1) and evaluate the effectiveness of available portal functions (patient lab results, appointment calendar, PROMs, reminders, educational material) in improving health service and patient outcomes (Aim 2). HIV stakeholders will be engaged throughout this 5-year project, with representation of underserved HIV communities.
Methods A single-site, multi-method, 24-month unblinded trial will be led, with a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design and progressive intervention roll-out to all participants. Nine HIV physicians will participate with 360 of their patients, setting targets for sex, age, and race/ethnicity (factors tied to differential portal use). Patients will be trained to use the portal. Appointment and PROMs-completion reminders will be automated. Patients receiving the intervention will fill out PROMs prior to meeting their HIV physician at 6-month intervals. Physicians will be trained to consult the data via an online dashboard.
For Aim 1, study questionnaires (every 6 months), will assess patient and physician satisfaction with the intervention and perceived acceptability and usability. Portal metadata, trial data (e.g., recruitment rate) and qualitative data (e.g., semi-structured interviews, coordinator fieldnotes, meeting minutes) will be analyzed, in part, to determine fidelity and feasibility. For Aim 2, outcomes will be measured every six months. Patient outcomes include satisfaction with care and medical appointment attendance which will be based on questionnaire data and study site data, respectively. Service outcomes include physician detection of health-related problems screened for with the PROMs and patient-centered care which will be obtained from physician consultation notes and questionnaire data, respectively. Data will be analyzed, in part, with an implementation framework (NASSS) and attend to equity. The engagement approach used includes an executive committee with patient-partners and physician-champions, and a patient advisory committee. The multidisciplinary research team includes experts in all relevant areas, including implementation science.
Expected outcomes This project will build knowledge on how to implement portals and PROMs efficiently and inclusively in similar HIV centers while potentially benefiting thousands of PLHIV at the CVIS.
- Conditions
- HIV, Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO), Screening, Patient Portals
- Being tested
- Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material
- Keywords
- HIV, Implementation, mHealth, Patient-reported outcome measures, PROMs, Screening, Patient portal, Mixed methods, Stakeholder engagement, Quebec, Canada, HIV care
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational materialOther
Patients in the intervention will be trained to register on and use the patient portal. The following portal features will be used and studied in this project: the appointment calendar, PROMs administration, reminders (e.g., for appointments), educational materials, and access to personal lab results. Educational materials in the portal will include information on what to expect during HIV clinic visits, how to interpret HIV lab reports, and instructional videos on using the portal. Prior to visiting their HIV physician, patients will have continuous access to several portal features (calendar, education, and lab results, if applicable), and receive reminders (within 48 hours) of their clinic appointment and to complete the PROMs. Physicians will acquire their patients' PROM scores via the patient portal and receive training on how to do so. Patients and physicians are expected to review the PROM results and consider them during each clinic visit.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | In this arm, the control period will be 6 months followed by 18 months of intervention. Receives: Other: Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | In this arm, the control period will be 12 months followed by 12 months of intervention. Receives: Other: Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | In this arm, the control period will be 18 months, followed by 6 months of intervention. Receives: Other: Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of the intervention
Acceptability of the intervention is the primary implementation outcome. It will be measured with the Acceptability E-Scale. The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 6 and 30, respectively, where higher scores mean greater acceptability.
Measured: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Satisfaction with care
Satisfaction with care will be the primary effectiveness outcome measure. It will be assessed with the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) measure. The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 0 and 28, respectively, where higher scores mean greater levels of patient satisfaction.
Measured: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Secondary outcomes (10)
Technology usability -Ease of use
Technology usability is a secondary outcome for assessing the implementation. It will be measured in terms of Perceived ease of use (1 item, Single Ease Question). The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 1 and 7, respectively, where higher scores mean greater ease of use.
Measured: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Technology usability -Perceived usefulness
Technology usability is a secondary outcome for assessing the implementation. It will be measured in terms of Perceived usefulness. The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 1 and 7, respectively, where higher scores mean greater perceived usefulness.
Measured: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Technology usability -Attitude
Technology usability is a secondary outcome for assessing the implementation. It will be measured in terms of Attitude (likelihood to recommend the intervention). The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 1 and 5, respectively, where higher scores mean a greater likelihood to recommend. Scores will be used to calulate the percentage of participants who are likely to recommend the intervention.
Measured: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Feasibility of the intervention -Consent rate
Feasibility will be assessed to evaluate the implementation. It will be measured in terms of the Consent rate (the percentage of participants who consented amongst those who were eligible and approached).
Measured: At baseline
Feasibility of the intervention -Retention rate
Feasibility will be assessed to evaluate the implementation. It will be measured in terms of the participant Retention rate (the percentage of participants who enrolled in the study and completed the trial).
Measured: From baseline to 24 months
Fidelity of the intervention -PROM completion by patients
Fidelity will be assessed to evaluate the implementation. It will be measured in terms of the percentage of visits patients completed the PROMs on time.
Measured: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Fidelity of the intervention -PROM data reviewed by providers
Fidelity will be assessed to evaluate the implementation. It will be measured in terms of the percentage of visits providers reviewed their patients' PROM results on time.
Measured: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Patient management -Provider detection of PROM-related problems
Patient management is a secondary effectiveness outcome. It will be measured based on the detection (or not) of each health or psychosocial problem targeted by the administered PROMs, as recorded in the physician clinical notes of participating patients.
Measured: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Patient-centered care
Patient-centered care is a secondary effectiveness outcome. It will be measured with the Health care process subscale (8 items) of the Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (PCCC-R).The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 1 and 4, respectively, where higher scores mean a less patient-centered health care process.
Measured: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Self-management -Appointment attendance
Self-management is a secondary effectiveness outcome. It will be measured in terms of the number of patients attending appointments per the study schedule, based on study site administrative data.
Measured: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2025
- Study startDec 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- This is a single-site, unblinded, 24-month pragmatic trial using a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness design. The intervention will be progressively rolled out at 6-month intervals, until all participants (9 physicians and 360 patients) receive it. For rollout, 9 clusters formed of 1 physician and 40 of their patients will be randomly assigned to a rollout schedule. From 0-6 months, all participants with be in the control condition. At months 6, 12, and 18, 3 distinct clusters will begin the intervention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Programme National de Mentorat sur le VIH et les Hépatites (PNMVH), Portail VIH/sida du Québec, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Unité de Soutien SSA Québec
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Bertrand Lebouche, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Investigators
- Bertrand P Lebouché, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06928961
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 186089_1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan is yet in place. However, we do not exclude the possibility of eventually making the protocol, ICFs, datasets, data collection tools, etc. publicly available.
Publications
Engler K, Lessard D, Lacombe K, Palich R, Lebouche B. Development of a core patient-reported outcome set for use in HIV care at the individual patient level in Montreal: protocol for a two-phased multimethod project. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e088822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088822.
PubMed 39819929
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementation of a Patient Portal and Tailored Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Health Problem Detection and Retention in HIV Care: The DRHIVe Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06928961
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 186089_1
- Conditions
- HIV, Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO), Screening, Patient Portals
- Keywords
- HIV, Implementation, mHealth, Patient-reported outcome measures, PROMs, Screening, Patient portal, Mixed methods
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Programme National de Mentorat sur le VIH et les Hépatites (PNMVH), Portail VIH/sida du Québec, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Unité de Soutien SSA Québec
- Study start
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Too often, people living with HIV (PLHIV) face challenges, including additional health and psychosocial problems, that complicate self-care, like medication-taking and medical appointment attendance. Healthcare providers are not always aware when patients face these difficulties. A 'patient portal' is an online application that can give patients access to their medical records, appointment reminders, and questionnaires to inform providers about their health and wellbeing. Patient portals in HIV care can help providers detect patient problems and improve care. At the McGill University Health Centre's (MUHC) HIV care service, a survey showed great interest in a patient portal among both PLHIV and healthcare providers. Yet, little is known on how best to integrate a portal in HIV care settings and ensure it is accessible to patients. This project will be conducted at the MUHC's HIV care service in Montreal, Quebec which has over 2,000 patients. Participating patients will log on to a patient portal through a smartphone application and have a calendar of their HIV care appointments, health questionnaires to complete (previously chosen by people with HIV and healthcare providers), reminders for both and access to educational material. HIV physicians will be able to see their patients' questionnaire results to discuss them during clinic appointments. The project's objectives are to better understand what is needed to successfully integrate a portal in similar HIV practices with diverse patients and learn how acceptable and usable it is for HIV patients and doctors. The project will also examine how patient portal use impacts satisfaction, attendance, and physician detection of specific health problems. Furthemore, it will consider how patient sex, age, and ethnicity influence the results. People with HIV, providers, and staff at the study site will be involved in decision-making about this project. Over its 5-year duration, knowledge will be gained and shared on how to expand portal use efficiently and equitably in similar HIV care centers.
Detailed description
Background HIV care involves challenges; people living with HIV (PLHIV) face greater risks of several comorbidities and psychosocial difficulties, which often impede medication adherence, appointment attendance, and other aspects of HIV self-management. For providers, detection of many of these issues (e.g., symptoms, depression, substance use) largely relies on patients reporting them and they may go untreated. Evidence shows that patient portals and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can help improve HIV management. How best to implement and ensure equitable access to these tools is less clear.
Aims This project will deploy a patient portal with a standard set of PROMs previously chosen through HIV stakeholder consultations led by the research team (PLHIV, healthcare professionals…). The study site, the Chronic Viral Illness Service (CVIS) of the McGill University Health Centre, serves over 2,000 PLHIV and is the largest university hospital-based HIV center in Montreal, Quebec. The study trial will assess an implementation strategy and patient and physician perceptions of the intervention (Aim 1) and evaluate the effectiveness of available portal functions (patient lab results, appointment calendar, PROMs, reminders, educational material) in improving health service and patient outcomes (Aim 2). HIV stakeholders will be engaged throughout this 5-year project, with representation of underserved HIV communities.
Methods A single-site, multi-method, 24-month unblinded trial will be led, with a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design and progressive intervention roll-out to all participants. Nine HIV physicians will participate with 360 of their patients, setting targets for sex, age, and race/ethnicity (factors tied to differential portal use). Patients will be trained to use the portal. Appointment and PROMs-completion reminders will be automated. Patients receiving the intervention will fill out PROMs prior to meeting their HIV physician at 6-month intervals. Physicians will be trained to consult the data via an online dashboard.
For Aim 1, study questionnaires (every 6 months), will assess patient and physician satisfaction with the intervention and perceived acceptability and usability. Portal metadata, trial data (e.g., recruitment rate) and qualitative data (e.g., semi-structured interviews, coordinator fieldnotes, meeting minutes) will be analyzed, in part, to determine fidelity and feasibility. For Aim 2, outcomes will be measured every six months. Patient outcomes include satisfaction with care and medical appointment attendance which will be based on questionnaire data and study site data, respectively. Service outcomes include physician detection of health-related problems screened for with the PROMs and patient-centered care which will be obtained from physician consultation notes and questionnaire data, respectively. Data will be analyzed, in part, with an implementation framework (NASSS) and attend to equity. The engagement approach used includes an executive committee with patient-partners and physician-champions, and a patient advisory committee. The multidisciplinary research team includes experts in all relevant areas, including implementation science.
Expected outcomes This project will build knowledge on how to implement portals and PROMs efficiently and inclusively in similar HIV centers while potentially benefiting thousands of PLHIV at the CVIS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a single-site, unblinded, 24-month pragmatic trial using a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness design. The intervention will be progressively rolled out at 6-month intervals, until all participants (9 physicians and 360 patients) receive it. For rollout, 9 clusters formed of 1 physician and 40 of their patients will be randomly assigned to a rollout schedule. From 0-6 months, all participants with be in the control condition. At months 6, 12, and 18, 3 distinct clusters will begin the intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Other: Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational materialIn this arm, the control period will be 6 months followed by 18 months of intervention. |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Other: Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational materialIn this arm, the control period will be 12 months followed by 12 months of intervention. |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Other: Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational materialIn this arm, the control period will be 18 months, followed by 6 months of intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Confirmed living with HIV
- Adult (at least 18 years old)
- Literate in English or French
- Patient at the study site
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Cognitive impairment or medical instability that prevents participation
- Insufficient mastery of French or English to participate (e.g., complete PROMs, study questionnaires)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational materialPatients in the intervention will be trained to register on and use the patient portal. The following portal features will be used and studied in this project: the appointment calendar, PROMs administration, reminders (e.g., for appointments), educational materials, and access to personal lab results. Educational materials in the portal will include information on what to expect during HIV clinic visits, how to interpret HIV lab reports, and instructional videos on using the portal. Prior to visiting their HIV physician, patients will have continuous access to several portal features (calendar, education, and lab results, if applicable), and receive reminders (within 48 hours) of their clinic appointment and to complete the PROMs. Physicians will acquire their patients' PROM scores via the patient portal and receive training on how to do so. Patients and physicians are expected to review the PROM results and consider them during each clinic visit. | Other | Arm 1, Arm 2, Arm 3 |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of the intervention
Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Acceptability of the intervention is the primary implementation outcome. It will be measured with the Acceptability E-Scale. The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 6 and 30, respectively, where higher scores mean greater acceptability.
Satisfaction with care
Time frame: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Satisfaction with care will be the primary effectiveness outcome measure. It will be assessed with the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) measure. The minimum and maximum scores on this measure are 0 and 28, respectively, where higher scores mean greater levels of patient satisfaction.
10 secondary outcomes
Technology usability -Ease of use
Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Technology usability -Perceived usefulness
Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Technology usability -Attitude
Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Feasibility of the intervention -Consent rate
Time frame: At baseline
Feasibility of the intervention -Retention rate
Time frame: From baseline to 24 months
Fidelity of the intervention -PROM completion by patients
Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Fidelity of the intervention -PROM data reviewed by providers
Time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Patient management -Provider detection of PROM-related problems
Time frame: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Patient-centered care
Time frame: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Self-management -Appointment attendance
Time frame: At baseline, then at months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2025.
- Background: PubMed 39819929Engler K, Lessard D, Lacombe K, Palich R, Lebouche B. Development of a core patient-reported outcome set for use in HIV care at the individual patient level in Montreal: protocol for a two-phased multimethod project. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e088822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088822.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan is yet in place. However, we do not exclude the possibility of eventually making the protocol, ICFs, datasets, data collection tools, etc. publicly available.
Related trials for HIV
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
David Lessard, PhD contact
Bertrand P Lebouché, MD, PhD principal investigator
Department of Family Medicine, McGill University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Patient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material in people with HIV and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO), run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kim Engler, PhD (514 934-1934 ext. 32126, kimcengler@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of the intervention (time frame: During the intervention at months 6, 12, 18, and 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06928961, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2025.