AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic StrokeRICAMIS2NCT06931535

Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Posterior Ischemic Stroke

A study testing remote ischemic conditioning in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A substantial body of basic and clinical research has demonstrated the protective effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in ischemic stroke. While these clinical studies support the safety of RIC, the neuroprotective benefits of RIC in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients lack robust evidence due to small… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ischemic Stroke
What is being tested?
remote ischemic conditioning
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,600 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
13 Apr 2025to 30 Jun 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years;
  • Time from onset to treatment: ≤48 hours;
  • Posterior circulation ischemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI, including patients who have received intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy;
  • NIHSS score at randomization: 6-16, with an item 1a (level of consciousness) score of 0-1;
  • First-ever stroke or prior stroke without significant residual disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1);
  • Signed informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage;
  • Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg despite antihypertensive therapy);
  • Subclavian artery stenosis ≥ 50% or subclavian steal syndrome;
  • Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm;
  • Severe abnormalities in coagulation;
  • Any contraindication for remote ischemic adaptation: the upper limb has serious soft tissue injury, fracture or vascular injury, distal upper limb perivascular lesions, etc.;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Participating in other clinical trials within 3 months;
  • Comorbidity with any serious diseases and life expectancy is less than half a year;
  • Patients not suitable for this clinical studies considered by researcher;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command

    Shenyang, 110016

    Hui-Sheng Chen, Ph.D., +86 13352452086, chszh@aliyun.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Posterior Ischemic Stroke (RICAMIS2): a Prospective, Random, Open Label, Blinded End Point, Multi-center Study

A substantial body of basic and clinical research has demonstrated the protective effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in ischemic stroke. While these clinical studies support the safety of RIC, the neuroprotective benefits of RIC in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients lack robust evidence due to small sample sizes, heterogeneous RIC protocols, and variability in the severity of neurological deficits among study populations. Our recent multicenter randomized clinical trial, the RICAMIS study, investigated the efficacy of RIC in patients with acute moderate ischemic stroke. The results showed that RIC administered within 48 hours of onset significantly improved 90-day neurological outcomes in patients with moderate stroke severity. It is well established that anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and posterior circulation stroke (PCS) differ in multiple aspects, including anatomical structure, collateral circulation, blood supply, clinical manifestations, prognosis, ischemic tolerance time, and treatment response. For instance, compared to the anterior circulation, the posterior circulation has poorer collateral circulation, a higher proportion of stroke etiologies attributed to atherosclerosis, and longer ischemic tolerance time. Consequently, intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy may offer a more extended therapeutic time window for PCS patients. A prespecified subgroup analysis of the RICAMIS study revealed that patients with PCS derived greater benefit from RIC than those with ACS. However, this finding requires further validation through prospective studies, as prior research has never specifically examined the efficacy of RIC in PCS patients.

Based on the above discussion, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of RIC in patients with acute moderate PCS.

Conditions
Ischemic Stroke
Being tested
remote ischemic conditioning
Keywords
posterior circulation stroke, remote ischemic conditioning
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • remote ischemic conditioningDevice

    The cuff of the remote ischemic conditioning device was placed on both upper arms (at the same position as blood pressure measurement) and inflated to 200 mmHg. The treatment protocol consisted of 5 cycles of 5-minute inflation followed by 5-minute deflation, performed twice daily. The treatment duration was 8-12 consecutive days.

Study groups in NCT06931535
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
controlNo interventionstandard stroke care
RIC groupExperimentalremote ischemic conditioning, twice a day, for 10 days.
Receives: Device: remote ischemic conditioning

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. proportion of excellent outcome

    Excellent outcome is defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1. mRS ranges from 0-6, higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Measured: 90±7 days

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. proportion of favorable outcome

    Favorable outcome is defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. mRS ranges from 0-6, higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Measured: 90±7 days

  2. Distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    mRS scores range from 0 to 6. mRS ranges from 0-6, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: 90±7 days

  3. change in National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS)

    NIHSS scores range 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater stroke severity

    Measured: 24±6 hours

  4. change in National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS)

    NIHSS scores range 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater stroke severity

    Measured: 10±2 days

  5. The incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP)

    SAP is defined according to the recommendation from the pneumonia in stroke consensus group (Stroke. 2015; 46:2335-40.)

    Measured: 10±2 days or during hospitalization, whichever is earlier.

  6. occurrence rate of the composite events of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular events

    Measured: 90±7 days

  7. death due to all causes

    Measured: 90±7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Apr 2025
  2. Study start13 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06931535
Sponsor's protocol ID
Y (2024) 345
Acronym
RICAMIS2
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
6 Apr 2025
Last updated
17 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Liu QY, Li X, Dai YJ, Zhou ZH, Chen HS. Remote ischaemic conditioning for acute moderate posterior ischaemic stroke (RICAMIS2): rationale and design. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2026 Sep 30:svn-2025-004552. doi: 10.1136/svn-2025-004552. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42816113

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing remote ischemic conditioning in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

proportion of excellent outcome (time frame: 90±7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06931535, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
RICAMIS2 Clinical Trial NCT06931535 | AzTrials