AsthmaNCT06935084
ASTHMAXcel Voice Study
A study testing ASTHMAXcel Voice platform in people with Asthma, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the adapted and refined ASTHMAXcel Voice platform to usual care (UC). It is hypothesized by the investigator team that ASTHMAXcel Voice will be associated with improved clinical and process outcomes, asthma quality of life (QOL)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- ASTHMAXcel Voice platform
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Sep 2025to Sep 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- English speaking
- Persistent asthma (diagnosed by a healthcare provider) on a daily controller medication
- Able to provide informed consent
- Smartphone access (iOS or Android) with data plan
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Severe psychiatric or cognitive problems that would prohibit completion of protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Sunit Jariwala, MD, 609-937-1023, sjariwal@montefiore.org
Juliana D Rodriguez, MD, 718-862-1722, juliana.rodríguez@einsteinmed.edu
About this study
Official title: Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial for A Novel Patient-Facing Mobile Platform to Collect and Implement Patient-Reported Outcomes and Voice Biomarkers in Underserved Adult Patients With Asthma
The objective of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the adapted and refined ASTHMAXcel Voice platform to usual care (UC). It is hypothesized by the investigator team that ASTHMAXcel Voice will be associated with improved clinical and process outcomes, asthma quality of life (QOL), medication adherence, and self-efficacy as compared to UC.
Read the detailed description
Poor outcomes for minority patients with asthma have been linked to poverty and other social determinants of health (SDOH), environmental exposures, and poor self-management. In a previous Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded study, the researchers developed and pilot tested ASTHMAXcel PRO, a mobile app that promotes self-management of asthma (NCT03847142). The app was optimized for outpatient settings and promoted asthma self-management through the collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), animated videos, goal setting, personalized algorithms, and push notifications. The use of the app led to significant decreases in the need for steroids, visits for asthma to the emergency department, and hospitalizations for asthma.
In this current research, ASTHMAXcel Voice, an app developed and refined during enhancement of ASTHMAXcel PRO, will make use of voice biomarkers to detect worsening symptoms. This technology uses machine learning to assess respiratory dysfunction, including asthma, based on a 6-second voice sample. From the sample, a Respiratory Symptoms Risk Score (RSRS) is calculated that correlates with the speaker's risk of respiratory impairment. The updated platform will calculate the patient's RSRS; facilitate shared decision making, screen for SDoH, and referrals; improve the ability of patients to self-manage; and allow for remote care coordination.
This program draws upon the Common Sense Model (CSM) of Self-Regulation which describes a cognitive processing system that includes situational stimuli (asthma symptoms), objective representation of the health threat (illness representations) with its treatment decision (controller medication use), and appraisal of outcomes (asthma control) for the success/failure of those treatment decisions. The model contains a feedback loop with illness representations changing over time as patients gain experience with asthma management. Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) may also affect the representation of the health threat, treatment decisions, and appraisal of outcomes. As an example, a patient with depression, a poor social support network, insecure housing, and financial stress may view asthma as an acute disease that is uncontrollable, which in turn leads to negative beliefs about medications and low self-efficacy towards asthma management. ASTHMAXcel Voice strives to shift illness representations away from the belief that asthma only exists when there are active symptoms and change behavior towards daily controller medication use over the long term to prevent asthma symptoms. Realtime feedback based on voice samples that yield a RSRS (voice biomarker) will help the patient to accurately detect perceived threats and manage asthma exacerbations during earlier stages. ASTHMAXcel Voice is also based on the SEM that addresses causes of poor asthma control across four interconnected domains: community, medical system, interpersonal, and individual level factors. ASTHMAXcel Voice is a multilevel approach to address these barriers with intervention components that are directly applied at each level.
There is growing recognition that mobile health interventions can be applied across all these levels to facilitate health behavior change through the use of push notifications and interactive educational content. ASTHMAXcel Voice works on the individual and interpersonal levels by providing targeted asthma education and push notifications to assist with medication adherence and asthma management. Worse outcomes assessed by PROs (asthma control) and voice biomarkers may heighten the perceived threat level of asthma and prompt Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) to seek out the educational content more frequently to improve asthma control. On the organizational (medical system) level, ASTHMAXcel Voice will facilitate shared decision-making and ongoing communication between the patient, Community Health Worker (CHW) or Social Worker (SW), and Health Care Provider (HCP). For example, a monthly visual dashboard display will increase HCP awareness of deteriorating trends assessed from PROs and voice biomarkers. On the community level, the CHW or SW will provide patients with SDoH relevant community resources (e.g., pest remediation services, smoking cessation programs, support groups, food pantries) to address SDoH concerns reported in the mobile platform. Finally, to inform more effective design and implementation of ASTHMAXcel Voice, the study team will use the Unified Theory of Acceptance and use of Technology (UTAUT) health IT framework in determining a user's technology acceptance and adoption behavior.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- ASTHMAXcel Voice platform
- Keywords
- Mobile Health Application, Asthma Management, Asthma Control
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ASTHMAXcel Voice platformOther
ASTHMAXcel Voice is a mobile health application with a multi-level approach to address barriers with intervention components and facilitate health behavior change through the use of push notifications and interactive educational content.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ASTHMAXcel | Experimental | Participants in this arm will be provided with the adapted and refined ASTHMAXcel Voice platform. Receives: Other: ASTHMAXcel Voice platform |
| Usual Care (UC) | No intervention | Participants in this arm will receive standard care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Asthma Control
Change in asthma control will be assessed and measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT). The ACT is a 5-item questionnaire administered to assess asthma control. Participants will score each item on the ACT based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (poor control) to 5 (excellent control) yielding an overall possible scoring range of 5-25, such that higher overall scores are associated with increased levels of asthma control. Change in ACT scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to compare ACT scores between baseline and 2 months and baseline and 6 months within each arm.
Measured: Change from Baseline to 6 months after randomization
Secondary outcomes (14)
Change in Asthma Control
Change in asthma control will be assessed and measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT). The ACT is a 5-item questionnaire administered to assess asthma control. Participants will score each item on the ACT based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (poor control) to 5 (excellent control) yielding an overall possible scoring range of 5-25, such that higher overall scores are associated with increased levels of asthma control. Change in ACT scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to compare ACT scores between baseline and 2 months and baseline and 6 months within each arm.
Measured: Change from Baseline to 2 months after randomization
Change in User Acceptance of ASTHMAXcel Voice Application
Change in user acceptance of the application will be assessed using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and User of Technology (UTAUT) Questionnaire. The UTAUT considers 4 constructs: performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitating conditions (FC), as most influential in determining technology acceptance and adoption behavior. Each of the 4 constructs consists of 4 statements which are evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree), with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of technology acceptance and use, reflecting stronger perceptions of PE, EE, SI, and FC. Scores for all items are summed and then the total score is divided by 16 to calculate a mean or average score. Scores will be summarized by using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to assess changes in user acceptance between baseline and 2 months and baseline and 6 months within the arm.
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, and 6 months after randomization
Change in User Satisfaction of Interaction with the ASTHMAXcel Voice application
Change in User satisfaction of Interaction with the application will be assessed using Version 7 of the Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS). The QUIS is a measurement tool designed to assess a computer user's subjective satisfaction with specific aspects of the human-computer interface. QUIS measures specific interface factors such as screen visibility, terminology and system information, learning factors, system capabilities, usability and user interface, and system clutter, across 32 questions. Each QUIS question is measured on an ascending scale ranging from 0-9, wherein higher scores are associated with more favorable user impression of aspects of the interface. Scores for all items are summed and divided by the number of items answered to calculate a mean or average score. Scores will be summarized by using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to assess changes between baseline and 2 months and baseline and 6 months within the arm.
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, and 6 months after randomization
ASTHMAXcel Voice application Usage
ASTHMAXcel Voice application usage will be evaluated using analytics within the "Admin Panel" of the application. Specifically, the number of logins to ASTHMAXcel Voice will be determined and considered as a proxy for usage. Usage will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Change in Overall User Satisfaction
Overall User Satisfaction will be assessed using the 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 is a brief global measure of client satisfaction which contains four response choices (1-4), where "1" indicates the lowest degree of satisfaction and "4," the highest. Scores are summed across each item once. Responses to items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total overall scores range from 8-32, where in higher scores are indicative of greater overall user satisfaction. Scores will be summarized by using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to assess changes between post-refinement baseline and 2 months and baseline and 6 months within the arm.
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, and 6 months after randomization
Change in Shared Decision Making
Patient-reported degree of shared decision making will be assessed using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The SDM-Q-9 consists of 9 statements which asks the patient to assess the extent to which they agree or disagree with elements and perceptions of shared decision-making during clinical encounters. Each statement on the SDM-Q-9 is scored on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scores are summed to yield an overall possible scoring range of 0-45, with higher values being indicative of greater perceived shared decision making. Scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to assess changes between post-refinement baseline and 2 months and 6 months within the arm
Measured: Baseline to 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Change in Asthma-related Quality of Life
Change in Asthma-related Quality of Life will be assessed using the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ). The MiniAQLQ is a 15-item questionnaire that assesses asthma-related quality of life. Participants are asked to evaluate each of the questions/statements to describe how much (relative) time has been spent attending to symptoms of asthma or how much asthma has limited activities over the past 2 weeks. Each of the 15 items is scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (severe impairment) to 7 (no impairment), such that higher scores are associated with a better overall quality of life. Scores for the 15-items are summed and divided by 15 to express as a score out of 7 (mean or average score). Change in asthma quality of life scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to assess changes in asthma-related quality of life between baseline and 2 months and baseline and 6 months within each arm.
Measured: Baseline to 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Asthma Healthcare Utilization - Emergency Department (ED) Visits
The number of asthma-related ED visits at 2 months and 6-months post-randomization will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Asthma Healthcare Utilization - Hospitalizations
The number of asthma-related hospitalizations at 2 months and 6-months post-randomization will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Change in Self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases
Self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases will be evaluated using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item (SEMCD-6) Scale. The SEMCD-6 assesses the level of confidence in managing six areas related to chronic disease: fatigue, physical discomfort/pain, emotional distress, other symptoms/health problems, tasks/activities needed to manage health conditions, and things other than just taking medication. Each question is rated on a 10-point scale ranging from 1 (not confident at all) to 10 (totally confident). Scores for all six items are summed, and then the total score is divided by six to calculate a mean or average score. Higher scores are associated with greater self-efficacy. Group scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to assess changes between post-refinement baseline and 2 months and 6 months within the arm.
Measured: Baseline to 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Change in Self-reported Medication Adherence
Medication Adherence will be evaluated using the 5-Item Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). The MARS-5 is a self-reported tool used to assess medication adherence and consists of 5 questions including items related to forgetting, changing dosage, stopping, skipping, and taking less medication. Each question is answered on a 5-point Likert scale (1=always, 2=often, 3=sometimes, 4=rarely, and 5=never), resulting in an overall possible score of 5-25, with higher scores indicating a higher level of adherence. Group scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to assess changes between post-refinement baseline and 2 months and 6 months within the arm
Measured: Baseline to 2 months and 6 months after randomization
SDoH Screening
SDoH Screening will be determined by the number of SDoH positive screens over the prior month. Group scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
SDoH Referral
SDoH Referral will be determined by the number of completed SDoH referrals over the prior month. Group scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Referral Completion Rate
SDoH Referral Completion Rate will be assessed by the number of SDoH referral completions over the prior month. Group scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2025
- Study start18 Sep 2025
- Primary completionSep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into one of two arms: ASTHMAXcel Voice or Usual Care (UC) arms. Block randomization (block size: 10) will be used for the purpose of balancing arms within each block. The randomization scheme will be prepared by the study statistician who will not be on study site.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Yeshiva University, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sunit Jariwala, MD, Principal investigator, Montefiore Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06935084
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-16587
- Other IDs
- 2025
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Once primary study findings have been published, deidentified data publicly available along with its associated documentation. Public Use Data: All de-identified study data that are not designed as restricted use will be made publicly available as supplementary material of articles in PubMed Central. All datasets will require detailed metadata documentation (Word documents), including (but not limited to) the methodology and procedures used to collect the data, details about codes (codebooks), definitions of variables, variable field locations, frequencies, etc. All data sets that are shared will be accompanied by the relevant metadata. No other specialized tools will be needed to access or manipulate shared scientific data to support replication or reuse. Participant-level data from this study will be fully de-identified and represented as an OMOP-CDM v5.3.1 dataset (mapped to OHDSI/Athena vocabulary system)
Publications
Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, Murray JJ, Pendergraft TB. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jan;113(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.008.
PubMed 14713908Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6. No abstract available.
PubMed 10245370Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
PubMed 19879711Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Eur Respir J. 1999 Jul;14(1):32-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a08.x.
PubMed 10489826Chan AHY, Horne R, Hankins M, Chisari C. The Medication Adherence Report Scale: A measurement tool for eliciting patients' reports of nonadherence. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;86(7):1281-1288. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14193. Epub 2020 May 18.
PubMed 31823381Ritter PL, Lorig K. The English and Spanish Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale measures were validated using multiple studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;67(11):1265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
PubMed 25091546Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
PubMed 10474547Leventhal H, Brissette, I., Leventhal, E. A. The common sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal, H., ed. The self-regulation of health and illness behavior. London, UK: Taylor and Francis Books; 2003:42-65.
Sofianou A, Martynenko M, Wolf MS, Wisnivesky JP, Krauskopf K, Wilson EA, Goel MS, Leventhal H, Halm EA, Federman AD. Asthma beliefs are associated with medication adherence in older asthmatics. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2160-z. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
PubMed 22878848Arcoleo KJ, McGovern C, Kaur K, Halterman JS, Mammen J, Crean H, Rastogi D, Feldman JM. Longitudinal Patterns of Mexican and Puerto Rican Children's Asthma Controller Medication Adherence and Acute Healthcare Use. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jun;16(6):715-723. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201807-462OC.
PubMed 30860858U B. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist. 1977;32(7):513 531.
Kolff CA, Scott VP, Stockwell MS. The use of technology to promote vaccination: A social ecological model based framework. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jul 3;14(7):1636-1646. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1477458. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
PubMed 29781750Venkatesh V MM, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly. 2003;1:425-478.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIoH. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma (EPR-3). 2007 Jul.
Schatz M, Kosinski M, Yarlas AS, Hanlon J, Watson ME, Jhingran P. The minimally important difference of the Asthma Control Test. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Oct;124(4):719-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.053. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
PubMed 19767070
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial for A Novel Patient-Facing Mobile Platform to Collect and Implement Patient-Reported Outcomes and Voice Biomarkers in Underserved Adult Patients With Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06935084
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025-16587
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- Mobile Health Application, Asthma Management, Asthma Control
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Yeshiva University, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Study start
- 18 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the adapted and refined ASTHMAXcel Voice platform to usual care (UC). It is hypothesized by the investigator team that ASTHMAXcel Voice will be associated with improved clinical and process outcomes, asthma quality of life (QOL), medication adherence, and self-efficacy as compared to UC.
Detailed description
Poor outcomes for minority patients with asthma have been linked to poverty and other social determinants of health (SDOH), environmental exposures, and poor self-management. In a previous Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded study, the researchers developed and pilot tested ASTHMAXcel PRO, a mobile app that promotes self-management of asthma (NCT03847142). The app was optimized for outpatient settings and promoted asthma self-management through the collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), animated videos, goal setting, personalized algorithms, and push notifications. The use of the app led to significant decreases in the need for steroids, visits for asthma to the emergency department, and hospitalizations for asthma.
In this current research, ASTHMAXcel Voice, an app developed and refined during enhancement of ASTHMAXcel PRO, will make use of voice biomarkers to detect worsening symptoms. This technology uses machine learning to assess respiratory dysfunction, including asthma, based on a 6-second voice sample. From the sample, a Respiratory Symptoms Risk Score (RSRS) is calculated that correlates with the speaker's risk of respiratory impairment. The updated platform will calculate the patient's RSRS; facilitate shared decision making, screen for SDoH, and referrals; improve the ability of patients to self-manage; and allow for remote care coordination.
This program draws upon the Common Sense Model (CSM) of Self-Regulation which describes a cognitive processing system that includes situational stimuli (asthma symptoms), objective representation of the health threat (illness representations) with its treatment decision (controller medication use), and appraisal of outcomes (asthma control) for the success/failure of those treatment decisions. The model contains a feedback loop with illness representations changing over time as patients gain experience with asthma management. Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) may also affect the representation of the health threat, treatment decisions, and appraisal of outcomes. As an example, a patient with depression, a poor social support network, insecure housing, and financial stress may view asthma as an acute disease that is uncontrollable, which in turn leads to negative beliefs about medications and low self-efficacy towards asthma management. ASTHMAXcel Voice strives to shift illness representations away from the belief that asthma only exists when there are active symptoms and change behavior towards daily controller medication use over the long term to prevent asthma symptoms. Realtime feedback based on voice samples that yield a RSRS (voice biomarker) will help the patient to accurately detect perceived threats and manage asthma exacerbations during earlier stages. ASTHMAXcel Voice is also based on the SEM that addresses causes of poor asthma control across four interconnected domains: community, medical system, interpersonal, and individual level factors. ASTHMAXcel Voice is a multilevel approach to address these barriers with intervention components that are directly applied at each level.
There is growing recognition that mobile health interventions can be applied across all these levels to facilitate health behavior change through the use of push notifications and interactive educational content. ASTHMAXcel Voice works on the individual and interpersonal levels by providing targeted asthma education and push notifications to assist with medication adherence and asthma management. Worse outcomes assessed by PROs (asthma control) and voice biomarkers may heighten the perceived threat level of asthma and prompt Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) to seek out the educational content more frequently to improve asthma control. On the organizational (medical system) level, ASTHMAXcel Voice will facilitate shared decision-making and ongoing communication between the patient, Community Health Worker (CHW) or Social Worker (SW), and Health Care Provider (HCP). For example, a monthly visual dashboard display will increase HCP awareness of deteriorating trends assessed from PROs and voice biomarkers. On the community level, the CHW or SW will provide patients with SDoH relevant community resources (e.g., pest remediation services, smoking cessation programs, support groups, food pantries) to address SDoH concerns reported in the mobile platform. Finally, to inform more effective design and implementation of ASTHMAXcel Voice, the study team will use the Unified Theory of Acceptance and use of Technology (UTAUT) health IT framework in determining a user's technology acceptance and adoption behavior.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into one of two arms: ASTHMAXcel Voice or Usual Care (UC) arms. Block randomization (block size: 10) will be used for the purpose of balancing arms within each block. The randomization scheme will be prepared by the study statistician who will not be on study site.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ASTHMAXcel | Experimental | Other: ASTHMAXcel Voice platformParticipants in this arm will be provided with the adapted and refined ASTHMAXcel Voice platform. |
| Usual Care (UC) | No intervention | –Participants in this arm will receive standard care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- English speaking
- Persistent asthma (diagnosed by a healthcare provider) on a daily controller medication
- Able to provide informed consent
- Smartphone access (iOS or Android) with data plan
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Severe psychiatric or cognitive problems that would prohibit completion of protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ASTHMAXcel Voice platformASTHMAXcel Voice is a mobile health application with a multi-level approach to address barriers with intervention components and facilitate health behavior change through the use of push notifications and interactive educational content. | Other | ASTHMAXcel |
Primary outcome
Change in Asthma Control
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 6 months after randomization
Change in asthma control will be assessed and measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT). The ACT is a 5-item questionnaire administered to assess asthma control. Participants will score each item on the ACT based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (poor control) to 5 (excellent control) yielding an overall possible scoring range of 5-25, such that higher overall scores are associated with increased levels of asthma control. Change in ACT scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Paired t-tests will also be used to compare ACT scores between baseline and 2 months and baseline and 6 months within each arm.
14 secondary outcomes
Change in Asthma Control
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 2 months after randomization
Change in User Acceptance of ASTHMAXcel Voice Application
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, and 6 months after randomization
Change in User Satisfaction of Interaction with the ASTHMAXcel Voice application
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, and 6 months after randomization
ASTHMAXcel Voice application Usage
Time frame: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Change in Overall User Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, and 6 months after randomization
Change in Shared Decision Making
Time frame: Baseline to 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Change in Asthma-related Quality of Life
Time frame: Baseline to 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Asthma Healthcare Utilization - Emergency Department (ED) Visits
Time frame: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Asthma Healthcare Utilization - Hospitalizations
Time frame: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Change in Self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases
Time frame: Baseline to 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Change in Self-reported Medication Adherence
Time frame: Baseline to 2 months and 6 months after randomization
SDoH Screening
Time frame: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
SDoH Referral
Time frame: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Referral Completion Rate
Time frame: 2 months and 6 months after randomization
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 14713908Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, Murray JJ, Pendergraft TB. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jan;113(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.008.
- Background: PubMed 10245370Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19879711Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 10489826Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Eur Respir J. 1999 Jul;14(1):32-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a08.x.
- Background: PubMed 31823381Chan AHY, Horne R, Hankins M, Chisari C. The Medication Adherence Report Scale: A measurement tool for eliciting patients' reports of nonadherence. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;86(7):1281-1288. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14193. Epub 2020 May 18.
- Background: PubMed 25091546Ritter PL, Lorig K. The English and Spanish Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale measures were validated using multiple studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;67(11):1265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
- Background: PubMed 10474547Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
- BackgroundLeventhal H, Brissette, I., Leventhal, E. A. The common sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal, H., ed. The self-regulation of health and illness behavior. London, UK: Taylor and Francis Books; 2003:42-65.
- Background: PubMed 22878848Sofianou A, Martynenko M, Wolf MS, Wisnivesky JP, Krauskopf K, Wilson EA, Goel MS, Leventhal H, Halm EA, Federman AD. Asthma beliefs are associated with medication adherence in older asthmatics. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2160-z. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 30860858Arcoleo KJ, McGovern C, Kaur K, Halterman JS, Mammen J, Crean H, Rastogi D, Feldman JM. Longitudinal Patterns of Mexican and Puerto Rican Children's Asthma Controller Medication Adherence and Acute Healthcare Use. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jun;16(6):715-723. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201807-462OC.
- BackgroundU B. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist. 1977;32(7):513 531.
- Background: PubMed 29781750Kolff CA, Scott VP, Stockwell MS. The use of technology to promote vaccination: A social ecological model based framework. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jul 3;14(7):1636-1646. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1477458. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Once primary study findings have been published, deidentified data publicly available along with its associated documentation. Public Use Data: All de-identified study data that are not designed as restricted use will be made publicly available as supplementary material of articles in PubMed Central. All datasets will require detailed metadata documentation (Word documents), including (but not limited to) the methodology and procedures used to collect the data, details about codes (codebooks), definitions of variables, variable field locations, frequencies, etc. All data sets that are shared will be accompanied by the relevant metadata. No other specialized tools will be needed to access or manipulate shared scientific data to support replication or reuse. Participant-level data from this study will be fully de-identified and represented as an OMOP-CDM v5.3.1 dataset (mapped to OHDSI/Athena vocabulary system)
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingObservational study
Asthma and Primary Arterial Hypertension: an Inflammatory Link?
Asthma Bronchial
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Severe Asthma
Asthma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Dose Range Finding Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Adults With Uncontrolled Asthma on Medium-to-High Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids
Asthma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating AMG 691 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Mild-to-Moderate Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Sunit Jariwala, MD principal investigator
Montefiore Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ASTHMAXcel Voice platform in people with Asthma, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sunit Jariwala, MD (609-937-1023, sjariwal@montefiore.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Asthma Control (time frame: Change from Baseline to 6 months after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06935084, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.