Effects of Reactive Hypoglycaemia on Cognition in Earlier or Later Chronotypes

Studies in young adults indicate beneficial effects of a low-glycaemic index (GI) breakfast on cognitive performance. A meta-analysis of 17 studies revealed the benefits of a low-glycaemic (GL) load breakfast on immediate verbal memory only in the late postprandial period. No overall effect on attention in adults was reported, yet advantages for attention in children, adolescents, and young adults were suggested. Mechanisms explaining the time-dependent benefits of a low GL breakfast are not fully understood. The provision of glucose to the brain is currently discussed as a central mechanism linking meal GI/GL to cognition. Glucose is required for cognitive efforts as evidenced by decreases in local extracellular glucose concentrations in the activated brain area. Key neurotransmitter synthesis in the brain needs glucose. Glucose metabolism may influence memory through tryptophan utilization and serotonin concentrations. The memory-enhancing effect of glucose may require relatively constant blood glucose levels in the brain rather than high glucose amounts per se. Hence, whilst high GI foods elicit a transient increase in blood glucose levels, low-GI foods will result in a more sustained and longer-lasting provision of glucose. The late postprandial phase, when cognitive benefits of low GI/GL meals are most noticeable, coincides with the time after reactive hypoglycaemia following a high-GI meal. To disentangle the effects of dietary GI and reactive hypoglycaemia, it is prudent to examine beverages like fruit juices - characterized by a low GI, yet known to induce reactive hypoglycaemia even earlier postprandially. Accordingly, also detrimental effects on cognition should manifest earlier as observed for high-GI breakfast. Since recent work suggests that there may be an optimal blood glucose range for cognitive performance and that this optimal range may differ by cognitive domain, continuous glucose monitoring should be used in addition to the conventional measurement points directly before the cognitive test. However, benefits of low GI/GL breakfast for cognitive function have also been observed without differences in blood glucose levels. This may be attributable to an acutely improved postprandial insulin sensitivity and/or lower cortisol levels elicited by low-GI meals. Accordingly, concomitant examinations of all three factors, i.e. glucose, insulin and cortisol levels seem necessary to disentangle potential mechanisms. The above-mentioned meta-analysis also found greater benefits for individuals with better glucose tolerance, although age may confound this. Studies suggest that young adults with poorer glucose tolerance, even within the healthy range, may be more vulnerable to these effects. While glucose tolerance follows a circadian rhythm, being lowest in the evening due to reduced pancreatic β-cell function and insulin response, circadian misalignment-common among young adults with later chronotypes-can also impair glucose tolerance, even at breakfast, due to decreased insulin sensitivity. This misalignment, often caused by social jetlag, has been linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes, higher blood glucose, HbA1c levels, and an increased risk of depression. It remains unclear whether persons with later chronotypes are more susceptible to reactive hypoglycaemia after breakfast.

Hypothesis

1. Reactive hypoglycaemia in response to a low-GI beverage impairs memory and attention after approx. 90 minutes
2. Reactive hypoglycaemia after the consumption of low-GI beverage is more pronounced in healthy persons with a later chronotype
3. The adverse effect of a low-GI breakfast inducing reactive hypoglycaemia on memory and attention is particularly evident in those with later chronotype Aim This nutrition trial aims to investigate how low-GI beverages induce reactive hypoglycaemia and its effects on memory and attention after meals in postprandial phase. The investigators aim to explore the effects of chronotype in two student samples: those with earlier and later chronotypes. Further, the study investigate the relevance of chronotype for the postprandial course of glucose (including the occurrence of reactive hypoglycaemias), insulin and cortisol levels.

Methodology

Participants Healthy, German-speaking students at Paderborn University (early or late chronotype)

Sample size calculation:

Sample size calculation based on the difference in immediate memory and the study rated best in terms of quality in the meta-analysis. Given a standard deviation of 3.6 and 4.3 in both groups, and a standardized mean difference of 0.31 for people with a better glucose tolerance (corresponding to mean difference of 1.12) 44 participants are required in the smallest subgroup with a given power of 80% and alpha of 0.05 considering a correlation of 0.8 between both measurements (calculated with STATA, vers. 17.0). The investigator assume that 66% of invited students will participate and that 75% of those will complete the study. Hence, to have the full data set of 88 persons (44 with an early chronotype and 44 with a late chronotype) completing the trial, 117 need to start the trial and 177 people need to be invited from the GlyCoBrain Observational study which recruited 356 students from Paderborn University and screened for chronotype via MCTQ. Both chronotype samples have equal sex distribution.

Both samples will be invited to participate in the crossover nutrition trial, excluding smokers, shift workers or travelers of >2 time zones in the past 3 months, and persons taking methylphenidate or melatonin. Students will participate in 2 breakfast cognition tests, each after an overnight fast at 8 a.m. to be taken over 2 weeks including 1 week of wash-out. Participants will be assigned randomly to one of two sequence groups, differing only in the intervention sequence (isomaltulose® beverage, glucose-fructose-sucrose beverage or glucose-fructose-sucrose beverage, isomaltulose® beverage). Randomization lists are provided by an external statistical advisor from the University of Esbjerg stratified by sex and chronotype. A randomized list was generated for 4 groups, each with 30 slots, using a block randomization approach. The randomization was performed using STATA with 5 blocks, ensuring balance across the groups.

Participants will receive two different simple beverage breakfasts:

1. low-GI beverage causing reactive hypoglycaemia ("glucose-fructose-sucrose beverage") consisting of a 75 g glucose-fructose-sucrose mixture dissolved in 500 ml tap water
2. low-GI beverage inducing no reactive hypoglycaemia ("isomaltulose® beverage") consisting of 75 g isomaltulose dissolved in 500 ml tap water

The intervention follows a 2-week schedule:

Week 1: Participants are invited for preparation day 1 (Friday), during which a venous fasted blood sample is taken to determine fasting lipids, high-sensitivity-C-reactive protein, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase to metabolically characterize the recruited participants. To validate the previously determined chronotype in the GlyCoBrain Observational study, participants' chronotype will be assessed again using the Munich chronotype questionnaire. (MCTQ, © Roenneberg and co-workers, 2003). Body composition will be reassessed by Bioimpedance Analysis (mBCA 515, SECA, Germany) to estimate individual percentages of body fat, muscle mass, total body water and extracellular water. Body weight will be measured using the medical Body Composition Analyzer (mBCA). Body height will be measured using an ultrasound measuring station (seca 287 db). Waist circumference will be measured at the midpoint between the lower ribcage and hip bone of the exposed upper body.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM, G7, Dexcom, Inc., San Diego,CA) is activated, and an accelerometer will be used to measure movement and sleep/wake conditions (also allowing to corroborate chronotype). A standardized evening meal will be provided to be consumed in the evening before the intervention to avoid secondary meal effects e.g. caused by pulse consumption. Participants will be asked to perform a training session on the cognition battery (see below).

The actual intervention starts three to five days later at 8 a.m. with each day running as follows:

• Heart rate belt to measure the heart rate variability in combination with the fitness watch (Polar Electro, Finland).
• minimal invasive capillary blood samples collected at -40, 30, 80 and 140 minutes (in relation to the time point of drinking the beverage) will be used to determine glucose and insulin levels
• non-invasively cortisol samples from saliva at -40, 80 and 140 minutes
• continuous glucose measurements
• Cognition test at -30, 90 and 150 minutes
• test beverage breakfast including either glucose-fructose-sucrose or Isomaltulose to be drunk at time point 0, i.e. 09:00 a.m.
• other measurements: appetite, thirst and mood will be assessed at -40, 30, 80 and 140 minutes each using a validated visual analogue scale
• removal of all devices and provision of a voluntary breakfast at 180 minutes Glucose levels will be directly determined using HemoCue Glucose 201 RT Analyzer (HemoCue AB, Sweden). Plasma insulin concentration and cortisol concentration in saliva will be determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a kit from IBL/Tecan.

Week 2: Again, participants repeat the preparation day as before (day 2), except for BIA, MCTQ and venous blood sample measurements. The intervention then continues 3 to 5 days after the preparation day following the same time scale as on intervention day 1.

Cognition tests Assessment using the test battery is expected to last approximately 25 minutes in total each time. Tests will include a set of tests developed by the ALA Institute Bochum, that was applied in previous studies.

• (Delayed) verbal memory test (ability to correctly recall a total of 30 words immediately (recall) and after 20 minutes (delayed recall))
• Visual-spatial short-term working memory test (a Corsi-block tapping test equivalent, i.e., tapping a sequence of up to nine identical spatially separated blocks, sequentially increasing the difficulty by the number of presented blocks).
• Test of selective and sustained attention and visual scanning speed (a modified version of the d2 Test of attention, during which the reaction-specific signs within a series of presented signs will be assessed)
• Test of spatial attention and switching abilities between two different tasks (alternative version of the Trail Making Task)
• Test of tonic alertness (simple reaction time test)
• Test of inhibition, i.e. the ability to inhibit a prepotent response, using a flanker task. In each trial, three superposed triangles will be presented to the participants. The upper and lower triangles (flankers) will be pointing in the same direction but independent from the middle triangle (target). During the no-go trials, a circle replaces the target. The participants will be supposed to press the buttons left or right according to the direction of the target or not to react in the case of a no-go condition. Each trial will be categorized as compatible-go, incompatible-go or no-go.
• A dummy test to ensure that delayed recall starts exactly 20 minutes after the immediate recall

Statistical analysis Multilevel regression models will be employed to assess the effect of the interventions on immediate verbal memory at 90 minutes. Identical models will be used for the other cognitive outcomes. Interactions between the intervention effect and the chronotype will be tested, and stratified analyses based on the chronotype will be conducted. Further analyses will account for the sensitivity of insulin, and other factors such as cortisol, appetite, thirst and/or mood, to investigate whether the observed effects could be partially explained by these factors. Multilevel regression analyses with repeated measurements will assess the relevance of chronotype to reactive hypoglycaemia.