Hearing Loss, Bilateral or UnilateralNCT06943976
How Parents, Children, and Clinicians Experience Digital Health Tools in Pediatric Audiology
An observational study of Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral, run by Erasmus Medical Center.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to understand how children with hearing loss, their parents, and health care providers experience digital health questionnaires that are completed before audiology follow-up appointments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 May 2025to 1 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants will be selected from the population of children and adolescents aged 7 to 18 years with unilateral or bilateral hearing loss who attend the Audiology outpatient clinic of Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Their parents or primary caregivers will also be invited to participate. Additionally, audiologists and other health care professionals working at the same clinic and using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care will be included in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Children and adolescents, aged 7-18 years old, with rehabilitated unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, attending the Audiology outpatient clinic of the Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- The corresponding parents or caregivers of these pediatric patients
- Audiologists or other health care providers who systematically use the PROMs during patient interactions at the same Audiology outpatient clinic.
Who cannot join
- Children or adolescents who are unable to complete the questionnaire, even with support in reading and understanding the items provided by their parents or caregivers.
About this study
Official title: The Value of PROMs in Children With Hearing Loss: Patients', Parents' and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives
The goal of this observational study is to understand how children with hearing loss, their parents, and health care providers experience digital health questionnaires that are completed before audiology follow-up appointments. The study focuses on children and adolescents (aged 7-18 years old) with hearing loss, and their parents, visiting the Audiology outpatient clinic of the Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- How do parents, children, and clinicians experience digital questionnaires like the HEAR-QL before an audiology visit?
- Do these digital tools help improve communication and preparation for the appointment?
Participants will:
- Be invited to complete a short feedback questionnaire about their experience with digital tools
- Share their views on how helpful or relevant the questionnaires were
- Health care providers will also give feedback on how they use and interpret the responses in clinical care
Read the detailed description
This observational study evaluates the experiences of children with hearing loss, their parents or caregivers, and audiology health care providers with digital health questionnaires that are completed before pediatric audiology follow-up visits. The study is conducted at the Audiology outpatient clinic of the Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
As part of routine clinical care, families receive electronic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) prior to their appointment, including the Dutch versions of the HEAR-QL questionnaire. These questionnaires are designed to gather insights into the child's hearing-related quality of life and relevant experiences related to hearing care.
Participants in this study include children and adolescents (ages 7-18 years) with unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, their caregivers, and health care professionals (audiologists, speech language pathologists and/or ENT specialists). All participants are invited to provide feedback on the digital questionnaires via brief evaluation surveys (PREMs). This information is collected anonymously and used to understand the usability, relevance, and clinical value of the tools from both the patient and provider perspectives.
Registry-related procedures and quality factors:
- Quality assurance plan: All data are collected using a secure digital platform. Data entry is automated via survey completion, reducing the risk of manual input errors. Registry procedures follow institutional data management standards.
- Data checks and validation: Built-in logic and range checks are applied within the digital survey software to prevent incomplete or inconsistent responses.
- Source data verification: No source data verification is applied, as this study does not use patient medical records beyond the standard demographic and audiological information collected with informed consent.
- Data dictionary: A standardized variable list is maintained, including definitions, coding schemes, and units of measurement. The HEAR-QL scoring methodology is applied as per published validation guidelines.
- Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): SOPs exist for patient approach, informed consent, survey distribution, data storage, and privacy protection. All procedures align with institutional review board approvals.
- Sample size: The study aims to include a minimum of 50 families (about 80 respondents) over a 4-month period, which is sufficient for descriptive and exploratory analyses of user experience outcomes.
- Missing data: Missing data is not expected, as all questions in the digital questionnaires are required fields. The system prevents submission of incomplete surveys. Therefore, no item-level missingness or imputation procedures are applicable.
- Statistical analysis plan: Quantitative survey responses will be summarized using descriptive statistics (e.g., means, medians, proportions). Associations between user experience scores and patient characteristics (e.g., age, hearing device type) may be explored using nonparametric tests or regression analyses as appropriate. Qualitative comments from participants will be grouped thematically.
This study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on patient and provider experiences with digital health tools in pediatric audiology. Results may inform future implementation and optimization of PROMs in routine hearing care.
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral
- Keywords
- Hearing Loss, Quality of Life, PROMs, PREMs, Children, Digital Health Care
- Medical subject headings
- Hearing Loss
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Experience with digital health questionnaires
Experience scores from a custom feedback survey completed by parents/caregivers and children aged 7-18 years, evaluating clarity, relevance, and burden of digital questionnaires.
Measured: Within 3 months after the audiology appointment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Clinician-perceived utility of digital questionnaires
Ratings from audiology/health care staff on the usefulness of digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in preparing for or guiding the consultation.
Measured: Within the time frame of the patient enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2025
- Study start1 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hearing Loss, Bilateral or UnilateralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Erasmus Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christina Batthyany, Erasmus Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06943976
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13562
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Value of PROMs in Children With Hearing Loss: Patients', Parents' and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06943976
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 13562
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral
- Keywords
- Hearing Loss, Quality of Life, PROMs, PREMs, Children, Digital Health Care
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to understand how children with hearing loss, their parents, and health care providers experience digital health questionnaires that are completed before audiology follow-up appointments. The study focuses on children and adolescents (aged 7-18 years old) with hearing loss, and their parents, visiting the Audiology outpatient clinic of the Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How do parents, children, and clinicians experience digital questionnaires like the HEAR-QL before an audiology visit?
- Do these digital tools help improve communication and preparation for the appointment?
Participants will:
- Be invited to complete a short feedback questionnaire about their experience with digital tools
- Share their views on how helpful or relevant the questionnaires were
- Health care providers will also give feedback on how they use and interpret the responses in clinical care
Detailed description
This observational study evaluates the experiences of children with hearing loss, their parents or caregivers, and audiology health care providers with digital health questionnaires that are completed before pediatric audiology follow-up visits. The study is conducted at the Audiology outpatient clinic of the Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
As part of routine clinical care, families receive electronic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) prior to their appointment, including the Dutch versions of the HEAR-QL questionnaire. These questionnaires are designed to gather insights into the child's hearing-related quality of life and relevant experiences related to hearing care.
Participants in this study include children and adolescents (ages 7-18 years) with unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, their caregivers, and health care professionals (audiologists, speech language pathologists and/or ENT specialists). All participants are invited to provide feedback on the digital questionnaires via brief evaluation surveys (PREMs). This information is collected anonymously and used to understand the usability, relevance, and clinical value of the tools from both the patient and provider perspectives.
Registry-related procedures and quality factors:
- Quality assurance plan: All data are collected using a secure digital platform. Data entry is automated via survey completion, reducing the risk of manual input errors. Registry procedures follow institutional data management standards.
- Data checks and validation: Built-in logic and range checks are applied within the digital survey software to prevent incomplete or inconsistent responses.
- Source data verification: No source data verification is applied, as this study does not use patient medical records beyond the standard demographic and audiological information collected with informed consent.
- Data dictionary: A standardized variable list is maintained, including definitions, coding schemes, and units of measurement. The HEAR-QL scoring methodology is applied as per published validation guidelines.
- Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): SOPs exist for patient approach, informed consent, survey distribution, data storage, and privacy protection. All procedures align with institutional review board approvals.
- Sample size: The study aims to include a minimum of 50 families (about 80 respondents) over a 4-month period, which is sufficient for descriptive and exploratory analyses of user experience outcomes.
- Missing data: Missing data is not expected, as all questions in the digital questionnaires are required fields. The system prevents submission of incomplete surveys. Therefore, no item-level missingness or imputation procedures are applicable.
- Statistical analysis plan: Quantitative survey responses will be summarized using descriptive statistics (e.g., means, medians, proportions). Associations between user experience scores and patient characteristics (e.g., age, hearing device type) may be explored using nonparametric tests or regression analyses as appropriate. Qualitative comments from participants will be grouped thematically.
This study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on patient and provider experiences with digital health tools in pediatric audiology. Results may inform future implementation and optimization of PROMs in routine hearing care.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants will be selected from the population of children and adolescents aged 7 to 18 years with unilateral or bilateral hearing loss who attend the Audiology outpatient clinic of Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Their parents or primary caregivers will also be invited to participate. Additionally, audiologists and other health care professionals working at the same clinic and using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care will be included in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children and adolescents, aged 7-18 years old, with rehabilitated unilateral or bilateral hearing loss, attending the Audiology outpatient clinic of the Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- The corresponding parents or caregivers of these pediatric patients
- Audiologists or other health care providers who systematically use the PROMs during patient interactions at the same Audiology outpatient clinic.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children or adolescents who are unable to complete the questionnaire, even with support in reading and understanding the items provided by their parents or caregivers.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Experience with digital health questionnaires
Time frame: Within 3 months after the audiology appointment
Experience scores from a custom feedback survey completed by parents/caregivers and children aged 7-18 years, evaluating clarity, relevance, and burden of digital questionnaires.
1 secondary outcome
Clinician-perceived utility of digital questionnaires
Time frame: Within the time frame of the patient enrollment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2025.
Related trials for Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral
Recruiting
Towards Implementation of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in Kenya
Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral, Otitis Media With Effusion in Children
RecruitingObservational study
Feasibility and Reliability of Integrating Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Threshold (eSRT) Measurement in a Pediatric Cochlear Implant Programming Center
Hearing Loss in Children With Unilateral or Bilateral Cochlear Implants
Recruiting
Evaluating How a Tinnitus Implant Affects Tinnitus Loudness in Adults With Chronic Tinnitus and Varying Levels of Hearing Loss
Tinnitus, Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral
Active, not recruiting
A Study to Explore Improved Features and a Simplified Treatment Approach for a Totally Implantable Cochlear Implant (TICI) Research System in Adults With Severe Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hearing Loss and Aid Attitudes in Health Sciences Students
Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral, Hearing Aid
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hearing Loss, Bilateral or Unilateral, run by Erasmus Medical Center.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Experience with digital health questionnaires (time frame: Within 3 months after the audiology appointment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2025.