AzTrials
AzTrials

Anxiety in PregnancyNCT06949813

Preventing Maternal Mood, Anxiety, and Trauma Symptoms After Cesarean Delivery

A study testing BE-OR: Brief Intervention to the Operating Room and Interaction: Facetime with Clinical Provider in people with Anxiety in Pregnancy and Mood Disorder Due to Specified Medical Condition, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Perinatal mental health disorders are the most prevalent perinatal comorbidity and are associated with the primary cause of maternal mortality in the United States (US) - suicide. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
What is being tested?
BE-OR: Brief Intervention to the Operating Room and Interaction: Facetime with Clinical Provider
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Oct 2025to 30 Apr 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnant Patients at 22-37 weeks gestation
  • Single or multiple gestation
  • Nulliparous or multiparous (with prior vaginal or cesarean delivery)
  • Antepartum admission for at least 3 days
  • High-risk pregnancy due to maternal/fetal comorbidities
  • Anticipated cesarean delivery at the University of Colorado

Who cannot join

  • Lack of capacity to consent
  • Medical factors prohibiting participation in the intervention as determined by the inpatient obstetric medical team.
  • Anticipated cesarean within 7 days of enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Colorado Hospital

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

    Kecia Keliiholokai, 303-724-2531, kecia.keliiholokai@cuanschutz.edu

    Cristina L Wood, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Perinatal mental health disorders are the most prevalent perinatal comorbidity and are associated with the primary cause of maternal mortality in the United States (US) - suicide. Diagnosis of a high-risk pregnancy and cesarean delivery (CD) are both associated with increased risk for perinatal mood, anxiety, and trauma symptoms (PMATS). There is a deficit in resources and access to mental health treatment for pregnant patients, with some treatments being cost-prohibitive and requiring multiple sessions. Additionally, current approaches to addressing PMATS are reactive rather than preventive. There is evidence in the non-obstetric population that single-session cognitive behavioral therapy interventions targeting anxiety sensitivity (fear of fear) can prevent the development of anxiety and trauma symptoms when individuals are exposed to trauma. The investigators developed a low-cost, 1-hour, single-session prevention intervention that included psychoeducation about anxiety sensitivity, coupled with a brief exposure to the operating room environment and CD procedures. To revise the implementation plan and intervention (CARE: Communication, Agency, Readiness, Empowerment for cesarean delivery [CD]) for use in large L\&D units with a broader population of patients, a fully powered multisite randomized control trial (RCT) is needed. Before initiating such a trial, work needs to be done to modify the intervention and implementation through a process of iterative refinement to enhance the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of implementation in L\&D units across the country, as well as its efficacy at engaging with the target mechanism (anxiety sensitivity). Using a logic model to guide the iterative refinement process through fast feedback loops and an atmosphere of co-creation, study investigators will gather critical input from stakeholders (individuals with lived experiences, community partners, front-line clinicians, and hospital staff) via 12 workgroups, 12 user-testing design sessions, and repeated engagement with a steering council. Following this refinement process, a treatment development pilot RCT at a large L\&D unit will assess the efficacy of CARE for CD by probing engagement with the target mechanism, as well as assess the feasibility of implementation. Finally, the updated logic model and pilot trial results will inform the development of a protocol for a multisite RCT through engagement with expert consultants in a community engagement studio and further feedback from the steering council.

Read the detailed description

Postpartum mental health disorders disproportionately occur among the 1 million patients with cesarean deliveries (CD) in the United States (US) each year, with 1 in 3 reporting elevated symptoms of postpartum mood, anxiety, and trauma symptoms (PMATS). Brief, single-session interventions that target anxiety sensitivity (AS) through psychoeducation + exposure have been shown to prevent the development of anxiety and trauma symptoms in non-perinatal populations. Thus, a single session AS-targeted intervention involving psychoeducation about AS + in-vivo exposure to the operating room (OR) and CD procedures may be an effective intervention to prevent the development of PMATS. The primary objective of this proposal is to refine and pilot a 1-hour, single-session brief exposure intervention in the OR (CARE) to reduce AS and thus prevent the development of PMATS among a population of patients with high-risk pregnancies and anticipated CD.

The investigators initially developed CARE for implementation in a maternal-fetal care unit at a children's hospital that has 12 beds, an average daily census of 6 patients, and 130 CDs/year. In this unit, the investigators conducted a pilot RCT study of CARE among a population of pregnant patients at very high risk for PMATS (those with anomalous fetuses). Those who received CARE reported 42% less preoperative anxiety and 40% less postpartum anxiety symptoms at 6-8 weeks following delivery, and significantly less opioid use at postoperative days 2-4 than those who received care as usual. While these results demonstrate the promise of the intervention, its scalability to large L\&D units and a broader population of patients is not established, and a fully powered, multisite randomized controlled trial (m-RCT) is needed. Before the m-RCT, the intervention must be refined to improve its acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility for implementation in broader contexts with the desired impact on the target mechanism and outcomes. The proposed project engages in Stage 1A/B activities across three phases. Phase 1 involves a process of iterative refinement using key stakeholder workgroups, user-testing design, and repeated engagement with a steering council (SC) in fast feedback loops to facilitate information flow and foster co-creation. Phase 2 involves the design and implementation of a treatment development trial with an emphasis on feasibility, fidelity, and safety, as well as probing efficacy of engagement with the hypothesized mechanism of CARE (AS) at a single large L\&D unit with 50 beds, an average daily census of 34 patients, and 1,000 CDs/year. Phase 3 will involve one additional cycle of rapid iterative refinement to prepare for a future m-RCT with L\&D units across the US. Identified future m-RCT site-based investigators and associated administrators will participate in a community engagement studio to refine/co-create a finalized implementation protocol for the m-RCT to take to the SC for final approval.

Specific Aim 1: To enhance the efficacy, responsiveness to diverse populations, scalability, and sustainability of CARE for implementation in large L\&D units by engaging in an iterative refinement process guided by an Implementation Research Logic Model (IRLM) framework,12 which allows the team to rapidly iterate based on feedback in Plan-Do-Check-Act cycles using 12 workgroups, 12 user-testing design sessions, and repeated engagement with a SC comprised of stakeholders from across the country (clinicians/hospital staff and those with lived experiences/community partners).

Hypothesis 1: Some barriers and determinants must be addressed to refine CARE and its implementation so that it is acceptable and engages the target mechanism in a diverse population of patients and may be incorporated into workflows on L\&D units.

Specific Aim 2: To probe the efficacy of CARE at reducing AS and preventing PMATS using a treatment development trial with high-risk antepartum patients anticipating CD by comparing outcomes among participants randomized to CARE (N=40), Interaction Control (N=20), or Care as Usual Control (N=20) and to establish feasibility, safety, and acceptability of CARE implementation.

Hypothesis 2a: In comparison to patients who receive either control condition, those who receive CARE will have decreased AS before CD.

Hypothesis 2b: Decreased AS before CD will be associated with fewer symptoms of PMATS at 12 weeks postpartum.

Hypothesis 2c: CARE will be administered with high fidelity, yield minimal safety events, and have high acceptability.

Impact Statement: This study is a critical step in preventing PMATS which are among the leading causes of maternal mortality in the US. This study will be the first in a long line of research broadening to additional risk groups, perinatal care settings, and intervention modalities (e.g., virtual reality, nurse- or peer-facilitated).

Being tested
BE-OR: Brief Intervention to the Operating Room, Interaction: Facetime with Clinical Provider
Keywords
perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, cesarean delivery, Single session immersive intervention, Randomized Controlled Trial
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BE-OR: Brief Intervention to the Operating RoomBehavioural

    Also called CARE-CD: Comfort, Agency, Readiness, Empowerment for Cesarean Delivery

    See intervention group section for details

  • Interaction: Facetime with Clinical ProviderOther

    See Interaction group section for details

Study groups in NCT06949813
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalIntervention: (N= 40) Participants will be scheduled to receive the 1-hour, single-session CARE intervention administered by a medical and mental health provider trained in the intervention. CARE will consist of psychoeducation and brief immersive exposure to the operating room.
Receives: Behavioral: BE-OR: Brief Intervention to the Operating Room
Interaction ControlExperimentalInteraction Control: (N = 20) Participants will receive a 1-hour, single-session meeting with a nurse educator that will occur within a single patient room on L\&D. This condition will provide the same front-line clinician facetime as the treatment condition but will not include the clinical content of the intervention (psychoeducation + exposure).
Receives: Other: Interaction: Facetime with Clinical Provider
Care as UsualNo interventionCare as Usual Control: (N = 20) Participants will receive all the standard prenatal and CD education. The participants will not receive any additional face-to-face interaction with front-line clinicians as part of the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Anxiety-sensitivity Index 3

    18-item scale that yields a primary outcome score and subscale scores. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety sensitivity. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 72.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Anxiety-sensitivity Index 3

    18-item scale that yields a primary outcome score and subscale scores. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety sensitivity. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 72.

    Measured: Approximately 3 days (range=1-5) after intervention (CARE and interaction control conditions) or approximately 5 days (range = 3-7) after enrollment (care as usual condition)

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Adverse Childhood Experience Questionnaire

    10-question scale regarding adverse social experiences in childhood. Higher score reflects higher adverse experiences. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 10.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire

    33-item measure of fear of childbirth expectancy. Higher scores are related to higher fear regarding childbirth. Higher scores indicate more fear. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 165.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

    20-item scale to assess state anxiety symptom intensity. Higher scores indicate more intense anxiety symptoms. Minimum score 20. Maximum score 80.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale

    6-item scale to assess presence of suicidal ideation, plan and intent. Answers are yes or no. With any yes answer indicating some form of suicidality.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Edinburgh postpartum depression scale

    10-item scale to assess the presence of depression symptoms in the perinatal period. Higher scores indicate higher incidence of depressive symptoms. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 30.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. DSM-5 Cross Cutting Assessment

    23-question screening tool developed by the American Psychiatric Association to help clinicians identify symptoms across multiple psychiatric domains. Higher score indicates more adverse symptoms. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 92.

    Measured: Baseline

  7. WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

    World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 is a 36-question standardized tool to measure health and disability across cultures and diseases, including physical, mental, and substance use disorders. Scale of 1-5 for each question. Minumum score 36. Maximum score 180. The higher the score, higher the disability.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    PHQ-9: A nine-question screening tool designed to assess the presence and severity of depression. Score is 0-3 per question. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 27. A score of 10 or more is often used as a clinical cutoff for identifying possible major depression.

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Cesarean Section Anxiety Sensitivity (C-SAS)

    19-question assessment of anxiety specifically related to events surrounding a cesarean delivery. Score is 1-5 for each question. Minimum score 19. Maximum score 95.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

    The 7-question screening tool used to assess the severity of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). 0-3 score per question. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 21. A score of 10 or above is commonly used as a cutoff for identifying potential GAD.

    Measured: Baseline

  11. RCADS-25

    25-question questionnaire designed to assess symptoms of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents. Score range 0-3 per question. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 75. The higher the score, the greater the likelihood of clinically significant anxiety or depression.

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Cesarean Section Anxiety Sensitivity (C-SAS)

    19-question assessment of anxiety specifically related to events surrounding a cesarean delivery. Score is 1-5 for each question. Minimum score 19. Maximum score 95.

    Measured: Approximately 3 days (range=1-5) after intervention (CARE and interaction control conditions) or approximately 5 days (range = 3-7) after enrollment (care as usual condition)

  13. Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire

    33-item measure of fear of childbirth expectancy. Higher scores are related to higher fear regarding childbirth. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 165.

    Measured: Approximately 3 days (range=1-5) after intervention (CARE and interaction control conditions) or approximately 5 days (range = 3-7) after enrollment (care as usual condition)

  14. Intervention and Interaction Control Acceptability

    Satisfaction with intervention session: Minimum score 1. Maximum score 5.

    Measured: 3 weeks post-delivery

  15. Cesarean Section Anxiety Sensitivity (C-SAS)

    19-question assessment of anxiety specifically related to events surrounding a cesarean delivery. Score is 1-5 for each question. Minimum score 19. Maximum score 95.

    Measured: 3 weeks post-delivery

  16. HCAHPS

    A 29-question standardized patient satisfaction survey is used across U.S. hospitals to measure patients' perspectives on their hospital experience. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 100, and higher scores express a more positive experience.

    Measured: 3 weeks post-delivery

  17. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

    20-item scale to assess state anxiety symptom intensity. Higher scores indicate more intense anxiety symptoms. Minimum score 20. Maximum score 80.

    Measured: 12 weeks post-delivery

  18. Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale

    6-item scale to assess presence of suicidal ideation, plan and intent. With any yes answer indicating some form of suicidality.

    Measured: 12 weeks post-delivery

  19. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5

    20-item scale to assess trauma symptoms associated with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Higher scores indicate more trauma symptoms regarding childbirth. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 80.

    Measured: 12 weeks post-delivery

  20. Edinburgh postpartum depression scale

    10-item scale to assess the presence of depression symptoms in the perinatal period. Higher scores indicate higher incidence of depressive symptoms. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 30.

    Measured: 12 weeks post-delivery

  21. Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire

    33-item measure of fear of childbirth expectancy. Higher scores are related to higher fear regarding childbirth. Minimum score 0. Maximum score 165.

    Measured: 12 weeks post-delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Apr 2025
  2. Study start13 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
2:1:1 randomization allocation of 3 study groups. Intervention: (N= 40) Participants will be scheduled to receive the 1-hour, single-session CARE intervention administered by a medical and mental health provider trained in the intervention. CARE will consist of psychoeducation and brief immersive exposure to the operating room. Interaction Control: (N = 20) Participants will receive a 1-hour, single-session meeting with a nurse educator that will occur within a single patient room on L\&D. This condition will provide the same front-line clinician facetime as the treatment condition but will not include the clinical content of the intervention (psychoeducation + exposure). Care as Usual Control: (N = 20) Participants will receive all the standard education. The participants will not receive any additional face-to-face interaction with front-line clinicians as part of the study.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06949813
Sponsor's protocol ID
23-2499
Other IDs
1R34MH133685-01A1
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
1 Nov 2024
Last updated
23 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All data will be made available to the scientific community on the date that the grant award period ends. Sharing of materials will be facilitated as part of the normal conduct of collaborative research. All terms will comply with published NIH guidelines for the dissemination of research resources. All resource tools generated in conjunction with this project will be distributed freely and shared with the scientific community via peer-reviewed publications and poster/oral presentations at national/international meetings. The investigators will also openly share unpublished results with the scientific community as opportunity presents and/or the data is requested.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing BE-OR: Brief Intervention to the Operating Room and Interaction: Facetime with Clinical Provider in people with Anxiety in Pregnancy and Mood Disorder Due to Specified Medical Condition, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Anxiety-sensitivity Index 3 (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in