The Use of Antimicrobial Stewardship in in General Practice (Family Medicine)OPTIMAS-GPNCT06953804
Optimal Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship in General Practice
A study testing Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Virtual Network and Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Integrated Network activities in people with The Use of Antimicrobial Stewardship in in General Practice (Family Medicine) and Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI), run by University of Wollongong at 4 sites in Australia.
Trial summary
This trial aims to increase the use of antimicrobial stewardship resources when treating patients with respiratory tract infections. This trial is set in Australian general practices (family medicine or primary care). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- The Use of Antimicrobial Stewardship in in General Practice (Family Medicine), Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)
- What is being tested?
- Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Virtual Network and Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Integrated Network activities
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesAustralia
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2025to 30 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- New South Wales, Queensland, Tasmania, or Victoria
- at least two GPs per practice consent to be in the study,
- that at least one member of practice staff consents to be in the study
- that a staff member from the site will be available to provide 90 minutes per fortnight of administrative support for the study. There are no exclusion criteria in addition to this.
- 1) Working at a participating practice for at least three days a week. Exclusion criteria : None
- Patients completing patient reported outcome measure survey
Show all 14Show fewer
- patients consulted with a participating GP for a RTI,
- patients re-consulted with a GP or was hospitalized. Exclusion criteria: None
- Patient reported experience measures survey
- 1) patient consulted with a participating GP for an RTI. Exclusion criteria: None
- Patients participating in interviews as part of the nested case studies
- consulted with a participating GP for a RTI,
- completed a patient survey,
- able to read and speak English Exclusion criteria: None
Who cannot join
- Participating doctors and healthcare workers
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Andrew Bonney, PhD contact
Australia4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Bond University
Gold Coast, Queensland, 4226
Shreya Cortie Patel, MSc, +67 02 4221 5610, optimas-gp@uow.edu.au
Andrew H Bonney, PhD,, +67 02 4221 5610, andrew_bonney@uow.edu.au
- Recruiting
University of Tasmania
Hobart, Tasmania, 7005
Sandra Cortie Coe, PhD, +67 02 4221 5610, optimas-gp@uow.edu.au
Andrew H Bonney, PhD,, +67 02 4221 5610, andrew_bonney@uow.edu.au
- Recruiting
Monash University
Melbourne, Victoria, 3800
Karen Cortie Nolidin, PhD, +67 02 4221 5610, optimas-gp@uow.edu.au
Andrew H Bonney, PhD,, +67 02 4221 5610, andrew_bonney@uow.edu.au
- Recruiting
University of Wollogongong
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500
Colin Cortie Cortie, PhD,, +67 02 4221 5610, optimas-gp@uow.edu.au
Andrew H Bonney, PhD,, +67 02 4221 5610, andrew_bonney@uow.edu.au
About this study
Official title: Optimal Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship in General Practice (OPTIMAS-GP) Study: A Hybrid Type 3 Implementation Trial
This trial aims to increase the use of antimicrobial stewardship resources when treating patients with respiratory tract infections. This trial is set in Australian general practices (family medicine or primary care).
The main question it aims to answer is which type of implementation activities increase the use of antimicrobial stewardship resources. Researchers will compare doctors who receive face-to-face implementation activities (the Integrated Network group) to those who received virtual or online activities (the Virtual Network group). The primary hypothesis is that there will be a difference in how often interventions are used
Read more
Participating doctors will be asked to record how often they use antimicrobial stewardship resources and which interventions they prefer. Participating practices will also provide researchers data on how many patients the doctors see.
Patients with respiratory tract infections who saw a participating doctor will be asked to give feedback on their experience using surveys. A subgroup of doctors, practice staff, and patients will interviewed about their experience in the study.
Read the detailed description
SUMMARY The OptimasGP study is a two-arm superiority cluster-randomised Hybrid type 3 pragmatic implementation trial to promote the use of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions by doctors in general practice treating adults with respiratory tract infections.
The implementation strategies used in the trial will be delivered using a Virtual Network (arm 1) and Integrated Network (arm 2) approach. Data collection will collected for five months during winter for the baseline period, followed by implementation activities, and five months in the following winter post-activities.
The primary study outcome is AMS intervention use per 100 consultations. Secondary objectives are based on the RE-AIM framework for reach, efficacy, implementation, adoption, and maintenance of the implementation.
SETTING The study sites for the implementation study comprise 40 general practices across New South Wales, Queensland, Tasmania, and Victoria in Australia.
PARTICIPANTS Participants include 120 general practice (family practice) doctors, 40 practice staff, and patients with respiratory tract infections. Informed consent will be obtained from participating doctors and practice staff in written form by members of the research team. Approximately half of participants will be recruited in 2025, with the remainder recruited in 2026.
Patients will be sent invitations to participate in the study by practice staff via SMS. For patient surveys, completion of surveys will constitute tacit consent. For patients in the case-studies sub-group, informed consent will be obtained in written form by members of the research team.
There are two subgroups. In the first subgroup, three sites from each arm will be elected for the nested case-study (individual semi-structured interviews). For each site, interviewers will construct case studies consisting of 6-8 participants (e.g., 2 doctors, 1-2 practice nurses, 1 practice manager, and 4 ARI patients per case).
In the second subgroup, 3 sites per arm (6-9 doctors) will be provided with FebriDx point of care tests to identify if respiratory tract infections are bacterial or viral in origin. These tests have been approved by the USA FDA (K230917) and by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (ref 346636).
Recruitment and retention will be facilitated by payments to participants.
INTERVENTION RESOURCES Participating doctors will be provided AMS interventions in an online AMS Toolbox (see the latest version at https://redcap.uow.edu.au/redcap/surveys/?s=37HKC3KFMLED7PY7) which they may use when treating eligible patients. The Toolbox will contain AMS interventions resource for shared decision-making between doctors and patients, delayed prescribing, and clinical decision support (including guidance for using FebriDx point of care devices for relevant members of the subgroup).
IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES Both arms will complete ~7 hours of implementation activities. These activities will be provided by MedCast, an established provider of ongoing health professional education in Australia.
Participants in the Virtual arm will receive online self-paced education modules, guided self-audit and reflection regarding antimicrobial stewardship and use of AMS Toolbox components, and reinforcement podcasts.
Participants randomised to the Integrated Network arm will receive education delivered by live interactive online webinar-based sessions, peer-group audit and reflection, and reinforcement online forum participation.
DATA COLLECTION Doctors complete data entry using the AMS Toolbox by selecting if they used an intervention, which intervention was used, and whether an antibiotic was prescribed for immediate use, delayed use, or not prescribed. In addition, the number of patients seen by each doctor will be collected based on a fortnightly record of practice records using surveys.
Demographic data will be collected using online surveys.
Patients will completed patient-reported outcome measures and patient reported experience measures using online surveys. Interviews of the nested-case study sub-group will be qualitative in nature.
All surveys will using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) forms hosted at the University of Wollongong.
RISKS As this study has a low risk of harm or death, and as no interim analyses are planned, the study will not have a Data Safety Monitoring Board. Harms will be recorded through PROMs and direct reports from participating doctors. Harms such as re-consultations and hospitalizations reported to the research team will be discussed with an independent data monitor. This monitor can cease the study at any time if concerns arise. No interim analysis is planned and thus no stopping guidelines are provided.
- Conditions
- The Use of Antimicrobial Stewardship in in General Practice (Family Medicine), Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)
- Being tested
- Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Virtual Network, Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Integrated Network activities
- Keywords
- hybrid type 3 implementation trial, cluster randomised control trial, antimicrobial stewardship, antibiotic stewardship, respiratory tract infections, general practice, family medicine, primary care, Australia
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Virtual NetworkOther
Participants will receive online self-paced education modules regarding antimicrobial interventions, guided self-audit and reflection regarding intervention use, and reinforcement podcasts (~7 hours).
Participants in the Virtual Newtwork arm will primarily receive these interventions online.
Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Integrated Network activitiesOther
Participants will receive online self-paced education modules regarding antimicrobial interventions, guided self-audit and reflection regarding intervention use, and reinforcement podcasts (~7 hours).
Participants in the Integrated Network arm will primarily receive these interventions face-to-face and active online activities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual network activities | Experimental | Participants randomised to the Virtual arm will receive online self-paced education modules regarding antimicrobial interventions, guided self-audit and reflection regarding intervention use, and reinforcement podcasts (~7 hours). Receives: Other: Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Virtual Network |
| Integrated network activities | Experimental | Participants randomised to the Integrated Network arm will receive antimicrobial intervention education delivered by live interactive online webinar-based sessions, peer-group audit and reflection, and reinforcement online forum participation. Receives: Other: Antimicrobial stewardship activities delivered through Integrated Network activities |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in use of antimicrobial interventions per 100 consults
This score is derived from the number of times an intervention is used (measured using the AMS Toolbox online form) divided by the number of participants a doctor sees (measured using an audit). Measuring periods are fortnightly.
The eligible range is 0-100, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Measured: From baseline for 5 months, from post intervention for 5 months
Secondary outcomes (17)
Reach: Number enrolled - Doctors
Enrolment
Enrolment rates of doctors will be determined for doctors by the number of online consents completed via Redcap. Higher numbers indicate better outcomes.
Measured: Enrolment
Reach: Representativeness of practices
A survey of practice size and location will be conducted.
Measured: Baseline
Reach: Completions - Doctors
Completion rates of doctors will be determined by recording participant completion rates across all phases of the trial.
Measured: 5 months post intervention
Reach: Representativeness of participating doctors and staff
A survey of participating doctors and staff will be conducted to measure demographic and workplace variables.
Measured: Baseline.
Reach: Representativeness of patients
Brief demographic questions will be asked of patients completing online surveys.
Measured: From baseline up to 5 months, from post intervention up 5 months
Effectiveness: Change in intervention use per 100 RTI consults
This score is derived from the number of times an intervention is used (measured using the AMS Toolbox online form) divided by the number of patients with a respiratory tract infection (RTI) a doctor sees (measured using an audit). Measuring periods are fortnightly. The eligible range is 0-100, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Measured: From baseline for 5 months, from post intervention for 5 months
Effectiveness: Change in antibiotics prescribed per 100 RTI consults
This score is derived from the number of times an antibiotic is prescribed (measured using the AMS Toolbox online form) divided by the number of patients with a respiratory tract infection (RTI) a doctor sees (measured using an audit). Measuring periods are fortnightly. The eligible range is 0-100, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Measured: From baseline for 5 months, from post intervention for 5 months
Effectiveness: Change in antibiotic prescriptions given for RTIs (self-report)
This score is derived from the number of times an antibiotic is dispensed (measured using the AMS Toolbox online form) divided by the number of patients with an RTI a doctor sees (measured using AMS Toolbox). The eligible range is 0-100, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Measured: From baseline for 5 months, from post intervention for 5 months
Effectiveness: Total antibiotics prescribed per 100 consults
This score is derived from the total number of times an antibiotic is prescribed (measured using the AMS Toolbox online form) per consults with patients.
The eligible range is 0-100, with lower values indicating a better outcome.
Measured: From baseline for 5 months, from post intervention for 5 months
Effectiveness: Adverse events
An adverse event is defined as a reconsult with a participating doctor or hospitalisation related to an acute respiratory tract infection or related medical problems within 30 days of the initial consultation (measured through a patient-reported outcome measure), calculated by the total number of adverse events reported by patients.
Measured: From baseline up to 5 months, from post intervention up 5 months
Implementation: Fidelity to protocol during the study
Fidelity will be measured qualitatively (using case study interviews) with participating doctors.
Measured: 5 months post-intervention
Implementation: Doctor experiences of interventions and implementation strategies
User experiences will be measured qualitatively (using case study interviews), with participating doctors.
Measured: 5 months post baseline, 5 months post intervention
Implementation: Practice staffs' experiences of interventions and implementation strategies
User experiences will be measured qualitatively (using case study interviews) with practice staff.
Measured: 5 months post baseline, 5 months post intervention
Implementation: Patients' experience of interventions and implementation strategies (qualitative)
User experiences will be measured qualitatively (using case study interviews) with patients.
Measured: 5 months post baseline, 5 months post intervention
Implementation: Change in patients' experience of interventions and implementation strategies (quantitative)
Patient-reported experience measure survey will be offered to eligible patients consulting with a participating GP. Surveys include seven questions each scored from 1-4 with higher outcomes worse. The eligible range is 7-28, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Measured: From baseline up to 5 months, from post intervention up 5 months
Adoption: Completion of implementation modules
Completion of implementation activity modules will be tracked using data supplied by MedCast.
Measured: Following the 5 months baseline period, and throughout the 5 months post intervention period.
Adoption: Change in the use of individual AMS interventions
This score is derived from the number of times an intervention is used (measured using the AMS Toolbox online form) Toolbox) per 100 consults.
The eligible range is 0-100, with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Measured: From baseline for 5 months, from post intervention for 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2025
- Study start1 Jul 2025
- Primary completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for The Use of Antimicrobial Stewardship in in General Practice (Family Medicine)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wollongong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrew Bonney, University of Wollongong
- Investigators
- Andrew Bonney, PhD,, Principal investigator, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06953804
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024/337
- Other IDs
- MRFF project 2029531, U1111-1319-2201
- Acronym
- OPTIMAS-GP
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 12 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared in-deidentified form.