AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergic Contact DermatitisNCT06957444

Rate of Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Cosmetic Outcomes

A study testing Sylke Adhesive Dressing, Exofin Skin Glue and Suture Strip Plus in people with Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by West Virginia University at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The patients from the Department of Orthopaedics Center for Joint Replacement will be asked to participate in the study. These patients will be randomized to one of three wound closure products, Sylke adhesive dressing, Exofin skin glue, or Suture Strip Plus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Sylke Adhesive Dressing, Exofin Skin Glue and Suture Strip Plus
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Oct 2025to Sep 2028
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Willing and able to sign the informed consent
  • Patients presenting to the WVU Medicine Center for Joint Replacement who have a primary TKA or THA surgery scheduled
  • Patients with surgical wounds closed by 2-0 vicryl and barbed, running v-loc suture (assessed in OR)
  • Active MyChart account and the ability to take and upload a photo in that system

Who cannot join

  • Patients scheduled for a revision THA or revision TKA
  • THA used for treatment of a fracture
  • Patients participating in other studies that might have involve medications such as antibiotics

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • West Virginia University

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Rate of Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Cosmetic Outcomes for Three Wound Closure Techniques in Joint Arthroplasty Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

The patients from the Department of Orthopaedics Center for Joint Replacement will be asked to participate in the study. These patients will be randomized to one of three wound closure products, Sylke adhesive dressing, Exofin skin glue, or Suture Strip Plus. Participants will be asked to take a photograph of the incision 4 days after surgery to submit via MyChart for review by the WVU Department of Dermatology Team. All patients will be evaluated at their regular 2-week, 6-week, and 3-month post-operative visits where clinical photographs will be submitted for independent review by the WVU Department of Dermatology Team to assess outcomes.

Being tested
Sylke Adhesive Dressing, Exofin Skin Glue, Suture Strip Plus
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sylke Adhesive DressingProcedure or surgery

    Topical wound closure device, made from silk fibroin woven mesh coated with a pressure-sensitive acrylic adhesive.

  • Exofin Skin GlueProcedure or surgery

    2-octil cyanoacrylate formulation, applied using a soft and flexible applicator.

  • Suture Strip PlusProcedure or surgery

    Flexible wound closure strip designed for primary wound closure made up of macroporous non-woven polyamide with a pressure sensitive adhesive.

Study groups in NCT06957444
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sylke Adhesive DressingActive comparatorTopical Wound Closure to be applied once the deep wound closure is secured after Total Knee or Total Hip Arthroplasty
Receives: Procedure: Sylke Adhesive Dressing
Exofin Skin GlueActive comparatorTopical Wound Closure to be applied once the deep wound closure is secured after Total Knee or Total Hip Arthroplasty
Receives: Procedure: Exofin Skin Glue
Suture Strip PlusActive comparatorTopical Wound Closure to be applied once the deep wound closure is secured after Total Knee or Total Hip Arthroplasty
Receives: Procedure: Suture Strip Plus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of allergic contact dermatitis (4 Days Post Op)

    Percentage of participants exhibiting allergic contact dermatitis as determined by using the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) scale with any reaction including and above "Weak Positive" being included in this rate of allergic contact dermatitis:

    Negative (0): No reaction. Doubtful (+?): Slight erythema (redness) without infiltration. Weak positive (+): Erythema, infiltration, possibly papules. Strong positive (++): Erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles. Extreme positive (+++): Intense erythema, infiltration, coalescing vesicles, bullous reaction.

    Measured: 4 Days Post-Op

  2. Rate of allergic contact dermatitis (2 Weeks Post Op)

    Percentage of participants exhibiting allergic contact dermatitis as determined by using the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) scale with any reaction including and above "Weak Positive" being included in this rate of allergic contact dermatitis:

    Negative (0): No reaction. Doubtful (+?): Slight erythema (redness) without infiltration. Weak positive (+): Erythema, infiltration, possibly papules. Strong positive (++): Erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles. Extreme positive (+++): Intense erythema, infiltration, coalescing vesicles, bullous reaction.

    Measured: 2 Weeks Post-Op

  3. Rate of allergic contact dermatitis (6 Weeks Post Op)

    Percentage of participants exhibiting allergic contact dermatitis as determined by using the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) scale with any reaction including and above "Weak Positive" being included in this rate of allergic contact dermatitis:

    Negative (0): No reaction. Doubtful (+?): Slight erythema (redness) without infiltration. Weak positive (+): Erythema, infiltration, possibly papules. Strong positive (++): Erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles. Extreme positive (+++): Intense erythema, infiltration, coalescing vesicles, bullous reaction.

    Measured: 6 Weeks Post-Op

  4. Rate of allergic contact dermatitis (3 Months Post Op)

    Percentage of participants exhibiting allergic contact dermatitis as determined by using the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) scale with any reaction including and above "Weak Positive" being included in this rate of allergic contact dermatitis:

    Negative (0): No reaction. Doubtful (+?): Slight erythema (redness) without infiltration. Weak positive (+): Erythema, infiltration, possibly papules. Strong positive (++): Erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles. Extreme positive (+++): Intense erythema, infiltration, coalescing vesicles, bullous reaction.

    Measured: 3 Months Post-Op

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Difference in Cosmetic Outcome (4 Days Post-Op)

    The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale is a validated tool used to assess the quality of postoperative scars. The SCAR scale measures postoperative scar cosmesis with scores ranging from 0 (best possible scar) to 15 (worst possible scar). The assessment includes both clinician and patient items, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation.

    Measured: 4 Days Post-Op

  2. Difference in Cosmetic Outcome (2 Weeks Post-Op)

    The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale is a validated tool used to assess the quality of postoperative scars. The SCAR scale measures postoperative scar cosmesis with scores ranging from 0 (best possible scar) to 15 (worst possible scar). The assessment includes both clinician and patient items, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation.

    Measured: 2 Weeks Post-Op

  3. Difference in Cosmetic Outcome (6 Weeks Post-Op)

    The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale is a validated tool used to assess the quality of postoperative scars. The SCAR scale measures postoperative scar cosmesis with scores ranging from 0 (best possible scar) to 15 (worst possible scar). The assessment includes both clinician and patient items, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation.

    Measured: 6 Weeks Post-Op

  4. Difference in Cosmetic Outcome (3 Months Post-Op)

    The Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale is a validated tool used to assess the quality of postoperative scars. The SCAR scale measures postoperative scar cosmesis with scores ranging from 0 (best possible scar) to 15 (worst possible scar). The assessment includes both clinician and patient items, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation.

    Measured: 3 Months Post-Op

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 May 2025
  2. Study start13 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completionMay 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06957444
Sponsor's protocol ID
2503134113
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
25 Apr 2025
Last updated
12 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Zhao E, Tarkin IS, Moloney GB. Subcuticular Barbed Suture and Skin Glue Wound Closure Decreases Reoperation and Length of Stay in Geriatric Hip Fractures When Compared With Staples. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Oct 4;5(10):e21.00205. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00205.

    PubMed 34605793
  • Ali E, Makhdom AM. Association of Surgical Adhesive and Glue System With Incidence of Allergic Dermatitis Post Unilateral and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. Cureus. 2024 Apr 23;16(4):e58827. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58827. eCollection 2024 Apr.

    PubMed 38654960
  • Ricciardo BM, Nixon RL, Tam MM, Radic RR, Ricciardo BJ. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Dermabond Prineo After Elective Orthopedic Surgery. Orthopedics. 2020 Nov 1;43(6):e515-e522. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200827-01. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

    PubMed 32882052
  • Pannu CD, Farooque Md K. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Octyl Cyanoacrylate Skin Glue After Surgical Wound Closure: A Systematic Review. Dermatitis. 2024 Sep-Oct;35(5):443-466. doi: 10.1089/derm.2023.0342. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

    PubMed 38386590
  • Kim D, Lee NR, Park SY, Jun M, Lee K, Kim S, Park CS, Liu KH, Choi EH. As in Atopic Dermatitis, Nonlesional Skin in Allergic Contact Dermatitis Displays Abnormalities in Barrier Function and Ceramide Content. J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Mar;137(3):748-750. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.10.034. Epub 2016 Nov 5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27826010
  • Zhang W, Xu J, Qu S, Peng H. The impact of allergic contact dermatitis on the inflammatory response and repair in wound healing process. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 19;12:1524198. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1524198. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 40046929
  • Rouhani DS, Singh NK, Chao JJ, Almutairi A, Seradj MH, Badowski-Platz R, Toranto JD, Mofid MM. Superiority of a Silk Surgical Site Wound Closure Device over Synthetic Dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Dec 1;154(6):1233-1244. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011316. Epub 2024 Feb 7.

    PubMed 38330504
  • Rouhani DS, Singh NK, Chao JJ, Almutairi A, Badowski-Platz R, Seradj MH, Mofid MM. Silk Bioprotein as a Novel Surgical-Site Wound Dressing: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Superiority Clinical Trial. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Oct 20;5:ojad071. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad071. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37899912
  • Custis T, Armstrong AW, King TH, Sharon VR, Eisen DB. Effect of Adhesive Strips and Dermal Sutures vs Dermal Sutures Only on Wound Closure: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Aug;151(8):862-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.0174.

    PubMed 25875131
  • Takayama S, Yamamoto T, Tsuchiya C, Noguchi H, Sato J, Ishii Y. Comparing Steri-Strip and surgical staple wound closures after primary total knee arthroplasties. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Jan;27(1):113-118. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1848-x. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

    PubMed 27600333
  • Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, Cannavo A, Gimenez-Arnau A, Goncalo M, Goossens A, John SM, Liden C, Lindberg M, Mahler V, Matura M, Rustemeyer T, Serup J, Spiewak R, Thyssen JP, Vigan M, White IR, Wilkinson M, Uter W. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Oct;73(4):195-221. doi: 10.1111/cod.12432. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

    PubMed 26179009
  • Kantor J. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jan 1;153(1):55-60. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3757.

    PubMed 27806156

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in