AzTrials
AzTrials

Post Operative PainPhase 4NCT06958718

Ultrasound vs. Surgical ESP Block With Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine in Lumbar Fusion Surgery

A Phase 4 study testing Ultrasound Guided erector spinae plane block (UB), Surgical erector spinae plane block (SB) and Dexmedetomidine in people with Post Operative Pain, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Lumbar spine surgery causes intense post-op pain, peaking within 12 hours and improving by day three. Traditional spinal procedures involve extensive tissue dissection, leading to severe pain and potential complications like delayed mobilization, respiratory issues, and chronic pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Post Operative Pain
What is being tested?
Ultrasound Guided erector spinae plane block (UB), Surgical erector spinae plane block (SB) and Dexmedetomidine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
6 May 2025to 31 Aug 2025
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-Ⅲ patients scheduled for elective two or three levels of lumbar spinal fusion surgeries by the same surgical team.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal.
  • Body mass index > 30 kg/m2
  • Significant renal, hepatic, or cardiovascular diseases.
  • History of allergy to one of the study drugs (local anesthetics, opioids, or dexmedetomidine).
  • Any contraindications to regional anesthesia like local infection or abnormal coagulation function.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain, or cognitive disorders.
  • Emergent surgeries.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Fayoum University hospital

    Al Fayyum, Fayoum Governorate, 63514

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Versus Surgical Erector Spinae Plane Block With a Mixture of Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine in Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

Lumbar spine surgery causes intense post-op pain, peaking within 12 hours and improving by day three. Traditional spinal procedures involve extensive tissue dissection, leading to severe pain and potential complications like delayed mobilization, respiratory issues, and chronic pain. Effective pain management is crucial. Opioid-based relief is standard but comes with side effects (nausea, respiratory depression), increasing hospital stays and costs.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist that enhances nerve block duration when combined with local anesthetics (LAs). It works by inhibiting sodium and potassium channels, leading to prolonged hyperpolarization.

Read more

Regional nerve blocks, such as thoracic epidurals and fascial plane blocks, improve postoperative pain management and help reduce opioid use, minimizing complications. Various techniques, including ESP blocks, paravertebral Block (PVB), and Serratus anterior Block (SAB) have been explored for acute pain relief.

The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), initially used for thoracic neuropathic pain, has expanded to thoracic, breast, and abdominal surgeries.

The ESP block is done by injecting a local anesthetic between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle. Ultrasound guidance helps visualize the spread of the anesthetic and the surrounding anatomy. Previous studies indicate that the ESP block can effectively relieve pain after lumbar spine surgery and may reduce postoperative opioid use when local anesthetics are applied to the wound and deep tissues. Based on this, performing the ESP block directly by the surgical team, using a local anesthetic between the erector spinae muscle and transverse process with direct view and free hand, may yield similar results to the ultrasound guided technique. The current study aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in comparison with surgical Erector Spinae Plane Block using a mixture of bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine in lumbar Spinal fusion Surgeries.

Read the detailed description

After approval of the local institutional ethics committee and local institutional review board. Patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal Fusion surgeries and fulfilling the inclusion criteria in Fayoum University Hospital starting from February 2025 will be enrolled in this prospective randomized study until fulfilling the sample size. The eligible participants will sign a detailed informed consent before recruitment.

Randomization will be done using computer-generated random numbers placed in separate opaque envelopes and opened by the anesthesiologist just before induction of anesthesia, eligible patients will be randomized with 1:1 allocation ratio into two groups:

  • The surgical ESPB group (SB)
  • The Ultrasound guided ESPB group (UB) Both the anesthesiologist and the surgeons performing the US guided ESP block and surgical ESP block will not be further involved in the study. Another anesthesiologist will be responsible for further patient care and data collection. This anesthesiologist and the patient will be blinded from the group assignments.

General anesthesia:

Upon arrival at the operating theatre, all patients will be monitored using electrocardiography, pulse-oximetry, capnography, and Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP). After routine history, examination, and review of laboratory results, General anesthesia will be induced with intravenous propofol (2 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 μg/kg), and atracurium (0.5mg/kg). After that, patients will be intubated and placed in a prone position. Anesthesia will be maintained using IV atracurium and inhalational anesthesia (isoflurane) in an oxygen and fresh air mixture. All patients will receive intravenous Ketorolac (30 mg), Nalbuphine (10 mg), and Ondansetron 8 mg approximately 30 min before the end of the surgery.

Block technique:

For patients in Group UB, an ultrasound-guided ESP block will be performed after the surgical incision is closed and before extubation, while the patient remains in the prone position. A linear high-frequency transducer (L6-12 linear array transducer (6-12 MHz) on GE Healthcare logiq p7, made in Korea) will be positioned in a sagittal orientation, 4 cm lateral to the L3 transverse process. A 22 G × 88 mm block needle will be inserted in the craniocaudal direction, with the needle tip placed beneath the erector spinae muscle and above the hyperechoic transverse process. The needle tip position will be confirmed via saline injection. Once correct needle placement is verified, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, combined with 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine 15 will be administered divided on both sides. For patients in group SB, the injectate will be prepared with the help of the anesthetist by adding 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine to 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. This volume will be divided into 8 injections, four 5 ml injections on each side. The surgeons will perform the block just before starting the wound closure stage. The surgical ESP block technique consists of injections at four bilateral levels, starting from one level above the operated vertebra and covering all surgical segments using a 22G × 88 mm needle. The needle will be inserted to contact the transverse process, and the injectate will be delivered between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process at each level.

Postoperative pain management:

After discharge to ward, all patients will receive paracetamol 1g / 8hrs, ketorolac 30 mg/ 12hrs and nalbuphine 5mg as a rescue analgesia. The patient's pain will be evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 0 denotes no pain, and 10 represents the most intense pain ever experienced. Dynamic and static VAS scores will be recorded in the postoperative period at 1, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours. Patients with VAS scores of 4 or higher will receive Nalbuphine (5 mg) for rescue analgesia.

sample size calculation and statistical analysis : Sample size was calculated using IBM SPSS 29 software for windows (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Calculation of the sample size was based on the ability to detect a difference of one point in the VAS score between the two groups based on the results of a study by Kaciroglu, A. et al. At least 23 patients are needed per group to detect this difference at α level of 0.05 and study power of 80%. We decided to recruit 26 patients per group to compensate for any possible withdrawals up to 10% and to increase the study power. The sample size calculation was based on the independent samples t test. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS for Windows, version 29 (IBM Corp., and Armonk, New York, USA). Descriptive statistics will be presented in the form of (mean ± SD), or (median with interquartile range) for numerical data, while numbers and percentages will be used for categorical data. Testing for normality of distribution will be done using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Categorical variables will be analyzed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Differences in parametric normally distributed numerical data will be compared using Student's t tests, While the non-parametric data will be compared using Mann Whitney U-test. Results will be considered statistically significant if the p value is less than 0.05.

Being tested
Ultrasound Guided erector spinae plane block (UB), Surgical erector spinae plane block (SB), Dexmedetomidine, Bupivacaine Hcl 0.5% Inj
Keywords
lumbar spinal surgery, Pain, ESPB, Ultrasound guided ESPB, Surgical ESPB, Dexmedetomidine
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound Guided erector spinae plane block (UB)Procedure or surgery

    Ultrasound Guided erector spinae plane block (UB) with 40 ml Bupivacaine HCL mixed with 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine .. After the surgical incision is closed and before extubation, while the patient remains in the prone position. A linear high-frequency transducer (L6-12 linear array transducer (6-12 MHz) on GE Healthcare logiq p7, made in Korea) will be positioned in a sagittal orientation, 4 cm lateral to the L3 transverse process. A 22 G × 88 mm block needle will be inserted in the craniocaudal direction, with the needle tip placed beneath the erector spinae muscle and above the hyperechoic transverse process. The needle tip position will be confirmed via saline injection. Once correct needle placement is verified, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, combined with 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine 15 will be administered divided on both sides.

  • Surgical erector spinae plane block (SB)Procedure or surgery

    Surgical erector spinae plane block (SB) with 40 ml Bupivacaine HCL mixed with 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine ..This volume will be divided into 8 injections, four 5 ml injections on each side. The surgeons will perform the block just before starting the wound closure stage. The surgical ESP block technique consists of injections at four bilateral levels, starting from one level above the operated vertebra and covering all surgical segments using a 22G × 88 mm needle. The needle will be inserted to contact the transverse process, and the injectate will be delivered between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process at each level.

  • DexmedetomidineDrug

    Also called precedex

    0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine added to block solution

  • Bupivacaine Hcl 0.5% InjDrug

    Also called Marcaine

    40 ml Bupivacaine HCL

Study groups in NCT06958718
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound Guided erector spinae plane block (UB)Active comparatorthe block will be done using ultrasound device after wound closure
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound Guided erector spinae plane block (UB); Drug: Dexmedetomidine; Drug: Bupivacaine Hcl 0.5% Inj
Surgical erector spinae plane block (SB)Active comparatorthe block will be done surgically before wound closure
Receives: Procedure: Surgical erector spinae plane block (SB); Drug: Dexmedetomidine; Drug: Bupivacaine Hcl 0.5% Inj

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. QAQStatic VAS score one hour postoperatively.

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) tool used to measure pain of patients after surgery, consist of 100mm length scale where 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "worst imaginable pain". static VAS score to be obtained one hour after surgery.

    Measured: one hour after surgery

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Postoperative static VAS scores.

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) tool used to measure pain of patients after surgery, consist of 100mm length scale where 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "worst imaginable pain". static VAS score to be obtained at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 hours after the block.

    Measured: At 48 hours after the block

  2. Postoperative dynamic VAS scores.

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS) tool used to measure pain of patients after surgery, consist of 100mm length scale where 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "worst imaginable pain". Dynamic VAS score to be obtained at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 hours after the block.

    Measured: At 48 hours after the block

  3. Time consumed in the block.

    Time of the block procedure

    Measured: the time After starting blocking procedure till finishing procedure up to 1 hour

  4. The time of the first postoperative analgesic request.

    The time consumed after block until first request of analgesia.

    Measured: the time After blocking procedure till the first request of analgesia up to 48 hours

  5. Total postoperative needs of nalbuphine.

    amount of nalbuphine used in milligrams.

    Measured: At first 24 hours after ESP block.

  6. Heart rate (HR)

    at 0 (block time), 5min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1h, 2h, 4h, 8h, 16h, 24h, 36h, and 48h after ESP block.

    Measured: Assessed up to 48 hours after block.

  7. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)

    at 0 (block time), 5min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1h, 2h, 4h, 8h, 16h, 24h, 36h, and 48h after ESP block.

    Measured: Assessed up to 48 hours after block.

  8. number of participants with nausea and vomiting.

    Complications related to the block or study medications.

    Measured: Assessed up to 48 hours after block.

  9. Incidence of respiratory depression

    Respiratory Rate < 8 bpm.

    Measured: At first 24 hours after ESP block.

  10. number of participants with pruritus

    Complications related to the block or study medications

    Measured: At first 24 hours after ESP block.

  11. number of participants with manifestations of systemic toxicity from local anesthetic drugs

    Assess for neurological or cardiovascular toxicity symptoms

    Measured: At first 24 hours after ESP block.

  12. Sedation level

    Assess sedation level, using a four-point sedation scale (score 1 = spontaneous eye opening [awake and alert]; score 2 = drowsy, responsive to verbal stimuli.

    score 3 = drowsy, arousable to physical stimuli; score 4 = unresponsive) ِِAssessed at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 hours after the block

    Measured: Assessed up to 24 hours after block.

  13. 24h Quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15)

    15 items questionnaire used to evaluate the quality of recovery 24h after surgery, an aggregate score from 0 (no recovery) to 150 (total recovery)

    Measured: 24 hours after surgery.

  14. Length of hospital stay

    measured in days, from day 0, the day of surgery, until discharge

    Measured: The Time of stay (surgery day) until hospital discharge up to 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2025
  2. Study start6 May 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2025
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06958718
Sponsor's protocol ID
M762
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
21 Apr 2025
Last updated
17 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kleif J, Gogenur I. Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 score-An observational study. J Surg Res. 2018 May;225:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.040. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

    PubMed 29605019
  • Kraiwattanapong C, Arnuntasupakul V, Kantawan R, Woratanarat P, Keorochana G, Langsanam N. Effect of Multimodal Drugs Infiltration on Postoperative Pain in Split Laminectomy of Lumbar Spine: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Dec 15;45(24):1687-1695. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003679.

    PubMed 32890299
  • Singh S, Choudhary NK, Lalin D, Verma VK. Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;32(4):330-334. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000603.

    PubMed 31033625
  • Devin CJ, McGirt MJ. Best evidence in multimodal pain management in spine surgery and means of assessing postoperative pain and functional outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jun;22(6):930-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

    PubMed 25766366
  • Qiu Y, Zhang TJ, Hua Z. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 1;13:1611-1619. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256205. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32669870
  • Liang X, Zhou W, Fan Y. Erector spinae plane block for spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Pain. 2021 Oct 1;34(4):487-500. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.4.487.

    PubMed 34593667
  • Chitnis SS, Tang R, Mariano ER. The role of regional analgesia in personalized postoperative pain management. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;73(5):363-371. doi: 10.4097/kja.20323. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

    PubMed 32752602
  • Bajwa S, Kulshrestha A. Dexmedetomidine: an adjuvant making large inroads into clinical practice. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Oct;3(4):475-83. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.122044.

    PubMed 24379995
  • Prabhakar NK, Chadwick AL, Nwaneshiudu C, Aggarwal A, Salmasi V, Lii TR, Hah JM. Management of Postoperative Pain in Patients Following Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Int J Gen Med. 2022 May 2;15:4535-4549. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S292698. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35528286
  • Bianconi M, Ferraro L, Ricci R, Zanoli G, Antonelli T, Giulia B, Guberti A, Massari L. The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation after spine fusion surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):166-172. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093310.47375.44.

    PubMed 14693613

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Ultrasound Guided erector spinae plane block (UB), Surgical erector spinae plane block (SB) and Dexmedetomidine in people with Post Operative Pain, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

QAQStatic VAS score one hour postoperatively. (time frame: one hour after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06958718, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in