Disorders of ConsciousnessMemoDoCNCT06959212
Investigation of Mnesic Capacities in Patients With a Disorder of Consciousness
A study testing Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales in people with Disorders of Consciousness, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
Following severe brain damage, some individuals lose partial or total awareness of themselves and their environment, falling into a coma that can evolve towards a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Disorders of Consciousness
- What is being tested?
- Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 175 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2025to 30 Aug 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients suffering from a Disorder of Consciousness:
- Patient not conscious according to the CRS-R scale (Kalmar \& Giacino, 2005)
- Age over 15 years and 3 months
- Free and informed consent signed by a third party (parental authority, trusted support person)
- Conscious patients (controls) :
- Age over 15 years and 3 months
Show all 16Show fewer
- Cared for in an Intensive Care Unit
- Free and informed consent signature
- Patients who have regained consciousness after having suffered from a Disorder of Consciousness (if not included during their disorder):
- Age over 15 years and 3 months
- Free and informed consent signature if able, otherwise signature of relative (holders of parental authority for minors)
- Patient who has been unconscious for at least 3 days according to the CRS-R scale Exclusion criteria: - Deep sedation (Intracranial hypertension, refractory status epilepticus)
- Previous severe neurodegenerative disease (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia)
- Deafness
- Patients under guardianship or trusteeship
- Pregnant and breast-feeding women
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, NeuroSurgery ICU
Paris, 75013
Alice Jacquens, MD PhD, 01.84.82.76.02 ext. +33, alice.jacquens@aphp.fr
- Recruiting
APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Neurology, Neuro-ICU
Paris, 75013
Benjamin Rohaut, MD PhD, 01 84 82 78 88 ext. +33, benjamin.rohaut@icm-institute.org
About this study
Official title: Investigation of Mnesic Capacities in Patients With a Disorder of Consciousness - MemoDoC
Following severe brain damage, some individuals lose partial or total awareness of themselves and their environment, falling into a coma that can evolve towards a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). Accurately diagnosing the depth of consciousness alteration, and thus characterizing the patient's residual state of consciousness, is a real medical challenge, yet crucial for establishing a neurological prognosis, predicting cognitive outcome, and guiding medical decisions. Clinicians attempt to classify DoC patients into different global states (e.g. coma, Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS), Minimally Conscious State (MCS)) depending on their residual level of arousal and awareness.
In recent years, the improvement of diagnostic tools and the use of a multimodal approach combining clinical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging examinations, have greatly refined this assessment and revealed the existence of possible discrepancies between clinical observation (e.g. poor consciousness state like UWS) and brain activity (richer, MCS+ type, or even conscious) so-called Cognitive-Motor Dissociation, making it essential to search for any 'hidden cognition' not revealed by the clinical behavioral examination. It is therefore essential to have tools that can not only probe consciousness level, but also provide a detailed profile of patients' residual cognitive abilities - such as language, attention or memory - which are essential dimmensions of conscious experience and shape waking cognitive life. This could crucially improve the neurological diagnostic and prognostic' accuracy of these disorders, as well as allowing to infer the eventual subjective experience of these patients. Indeed, The investigator still know very little about the possible conscious 'contents' involved in these states. What does the possible 'mental life' of DoC patients look like? A multidimensional exploration of their cognition is needed, requiring the development of innovative methods capable of probing cognitive functions in the absence of any communication with the patient.
Read more
Thus, the general aim of this study lies in the development of tools for the cognitive exploration of DoC patients and their application at patients' bedside in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We're particularly interested in assessing memory capacities in these patients, as exploration of memory has immediate clinical implications, since memory encoding during DoC could impact patients' quality of life and be implicated in the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in case of consciousness recovery. More specifically, the investigator want to tackle the following questions: Are patients suffering from a DoC able to form, consolidate and retrieve new memories (anterograde memory)? Are they able to recall memories from their 'past life' (retrograde memory)? Previous research suggests that some DoC patients retain the ability to reactivate old autobiographical memory traces, and to present automatic short-term sensory memory processes, or residual working memory. Nevertheless, DoC patients' memory abilities have been little studied to date, despite their clinical relevance.
The investigator postulate that memory could be differentially preserved between different clinical states of DoC such as UWS and MCS. At the group level, we expect MCS patients to have better learning and memory retrieval abilities than UWS patients. The investigator therefore expect memory functions to be affected by brain lesions and, consequently, by consciousness alteration, although the invenvisage the preservation of unconscious memory processes (e.g. in non-declarative memory subtypes such as perceptual memory) in UWS patients. We hypothesize that the presence of robust markers of memory processes will vary, at the single-patient level, according to the types and stages of memory tested, informing the cognitive profile of the patient suffering from a DoC.
By providing information on the potential presence of memory capacities that cannot be revealed by clinical examination, the physiological tools we are developing in this study will open a crucial window onto non-communicating patients' cognition. Defining DoC patients' memory profile could not only improve their care during and after the disorder (reflection on the quality of life in ICU; better understanding of cognitive and psychological symptoms occurring after a DoC (e.g. amnesia, PTSD); orientation of rehabilitation strategies), but also improve the diagnostic accuracy of these troubles if memory proves to be differentially preserved between different DoC states such as UWS and MCS. Ultimately, we aim to refine the neurological prognosis of these non-responsive patients, by predicting their cognitive outcome thanks to these innovative physiological tools. On a more fundamental level, this project questions the interplay of memory and consciousness, exploring which forms of memory do and do not require a conscious state.
Read the detailed description
This study investigates the memory capacities of Intensive Care Unit patients suffering from a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC) resulting from severe brain injury. Given the complexity of human memory, this study was designed to provide a nuanced profile of mnesic abilities by examining various types, stages, and temporal dimensions of memory. Specifically, the protocol targets progressively complex types of memory-perceptual, episodic, and autobiographical-alongside two key stages: encoding and retrieval. It also considers two temporal perspectives: (1) memory processes during the DoC (assessed indirectly through physiological markers) and (2) memory retrieval after the DoC, in patients who regain consciousness (assessed directly through subjective reports).
- The investigator first aim to identify robust and specific physiological markers of memory processes occurring during the period of altered consciousness in the ICU. To this end, the investigator developed two auditory protocols using high-density electroencephalography (hdEEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) to assess the formation of new memories in non-communicating DoC patients (1a; anterograde memory). These protocols focus on two types of memory: perceptual memory, which enables the storage and interpretation of sensory information (e.g., recognition of the sounds of the artificial respirator or the voices of caregivers), and episodic memory, which allows individuals to recall specific events within their context (e.g., family visits, painful procedures) and serves as a foundation for autobiographical memory which supports the sense of identity. In practice, these protocols are conducted over two consecutive days in the ICU: Day 1 is dedicated to the putative encoding of new memories through exposure to specific auditory stimuli, while Day 2 assesses their long-term retrieval using 'old-new' paradigms, which contrast brain responses to stimuli presented on Day 1 ('old') with responses to novel stimuli introduced only on Day 2 ('new'). The investigator also developed a complementary protocol based on hdEEG, ECG and electrodermal and respiratory activity recordings, using auditory and olfactory stimuli, to investigate the retrieval of past autobiographical memories (1b; retrograde memory), that is memories from the patient's life prior to the onset of the disorder.
- In parallel with this detection of implicit physiological correlates of memory, The investigator will also employ a direct approach in patients who have emerged from a DoC. Using semi-structured interviews, the investigator will gather explicit evidence of their subjective experiences and memories of the period of impaired consciousness. These may include internal conscious experiences (e.g., memories of dreams, hallucinations, emotions, or thoughts), external conscious experiences (e.g., family visits, painful procedures), as well as memories related to stimuli from experimental paradigms (e.g., auditory cues presented during physiological recordings) and memories of a musical memory probe played during the DoC. These interviews will be accompanied by neuropsychological tests assessing overall memory and cognitive functioning and the occurrence of PTSD.
The investigator will apply supervised machine learning techniques, including classification methods, to detect the presence or absence of memory processes at the individual patient level, based on predefined mnesic markers used as evaluation criteria. In parallel, The investigator will conduct second-order analyses, involving group-level comparisons between DoC patients and conscious ICU control patients, as well as between subgroups of DoC patients (e.g., UWS vs. MCS patients; focal vs. diffuse etiologies). These comparisons will be carried out using permutation statistics, statistical modeling, and/or parametric or non-parametric tests (e.g., Student's t-test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test).
- Conditions
- Disorders of Consciousness
- Being tested
- Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales
- Keywords
- DoC, hidden cognition, subjective experience, memory, neurophysiology
- Medical subject headings
- Consciousness Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scalesOther
(Neuro)-physiological paradigms based on EEG, ECG, electrodermal activity, and respiratory activity recordings, and auditory and olfactive stimuli, to assess memory processes without the need to communicate ('no report' approach) in patients suffering from a Disorder of Consciousness and conscious controls. Semi-structured interviews and neuropsychological assessments (scales) in patients who have recovered from a Disorder of Consciousness and conscious controls to explore memories and subjective experience of the ICU
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients suffering or who have suffered from a Disorder of Consciousness | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales |
| Conscious Patients treated in Intensive Care Unit | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
EEG-Electrodermal activity
Composite primary outcome measure: Presence of at least one of the following three predifined markers of memory processes:
- EEG cognitive evoked potentials
- Significant modulation of electrodermal activity
- Evidence of recollection of an auditory memory probe delivered during the Disorder of Consciousness
Measured: during hospitalization and at a distance during a post-resuscitation follow-up consultation for the second semi-structured interview assessing the recovery of the musical memory probe, generally between 3 and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2025
- Study start30 Sep 2025
- Primary completion30 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Aug 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Disorders of ConsciousnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Benjamin Rohaut, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06959212
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP240232
- Acronym
- MemoDoC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of Mnesic Capacities in Patients With a Disorder of Consciousness - MemoDoC
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06959212
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MemoDoC / APHP240232
- Conditions
- Disorders of Consciousness
- Keywords
- DoC, hidden cognition, subjective experience, memory, neurophysiology
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Following severe brain damage, some individuals lose partial or total awareness of themselves and their environment, falling into a coma that can evolve towards a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). Accurately diagnosing the depth of consciousness alteration, and thus characterizing the patient's residual state of consciousness, is a real medical challenge, yet crucial for establishing a neurological prognosis, predicting cognitive outcome, and guiding medical decisions. Clinicians attempt to classify DoC patients into different global states (e.g. coma, Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS), Minimally Conscious State (MCS)) depending on their residual level of arousal and awareness.
In recent years, the improvement of diagnostic tools and the use of a multimodal approach combining clinical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging examinations, have greatly refined this assessment and revealed the existence of possible discrepancies between clinical observation (e.g. poor consciousness state like UWS) and brain activity (richer, MCS+ type, or even conscious) so-called Cognitive-Motor Dissociation, making it essential to search for any 'hidden cognition' not revealed by the clinical behavioral examination. It is therefore essential to have tools that can not only probe consciousness level, but also provide a detailed profile of patients' residual cognitive abilities - such as language, attention or memory - which are essential dimmensions of conscious experience and shape waking cognitive life. This could crucially improve the neurological diagnostic and prognostic' accuracy of these disorders, as well as allowing to infer the eventual subjective experience of these patients. Indeed, The investigator still know very little about the possible conscious 'contents' involved in these states. What does the possible 'mental life' of DoC patients look like? A multidimensional exploration of their cognition is needed, requiring the development of innovative methods capable of probing cognitive functions in the absence of any communication with the patient.
Thus, the general aim of this study lies in the development of tools for the cognitive exploration of DoC patients and their application at patients' bedside in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We're particularly interested in assessing memory capacities in these patients, as exploration of memory has immediate clinical implications, since memory encoding during DoC could impact patients' quality of life and be implicated in the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in case of consciousness recovery. More specifically, the investigator want to tackle the following questions: Are patients suffering from a DoC able to form, consolidate and retrieve new memories (anterograde memory)? Are they able to recall memories from their 'past life' (retrograde memory)? Previous research suggests that some DoC patients retain the ability to reactivate old autobiographical memory traces, and to present automatic short-term sensory memory processes, or residual working memory. Nevertheless, DoC patients' memory abilities have been little studied to date, despite their clinical relevance.
The investigator postulate that memory could be differentially preserved between different clinical states of DoC such as UWS and MCS. At the group level, we expect MCS patients to have better learning and memory retrieval abilities than UWS patients. The investigator therefore expect memory functions to be affected by brain lesions and, consequently, by consciousness alteration, although the invenvisage the preservation of unconscious memory processes (e.g. in non-declarative memory subtypes such as perceptual memory) in UWS patients. We hypothesize that the presence of robust markers of memory processes will vary, at the single-patient level, according to the types and stages of memory tested, informing the cognitive profile of the patient suffering from a DoC.
By providing information on the potential presence of memory capacities that cannot be revealed by clinical examination, the physiological tools we are developing in this study will open a crucial window onto non-communicating patients' cognition. Defining DoC patients' memory profile could not only improve their care during and after the disorder (reflection on the quality of life in ICU; better understanding of cognitive and psychological symptoms occurring after a DoC (e.g. amnesia, PTSD); orientation of rehabilitation strategies), but also improve the diagnostic accuracy of these troubles if memory proves to be differentially preserved between different DoC states such as UWS and MCS. Ultimately, we aim to refine the neurological prognosis of these non-responsive patients, by predicting their cognitive outcome thanks to these innovative physiological tools. On a more fundamental level, this project questions the interplay of memory and consciousness, exploring which forms of memory do and do not require a conscious state.
Detailed description
This study investigates the memory capacities of Intensive Care Unit patients suffering from a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC) resulting from severe brain injury. Given the complexity of human memory, this study was designed to provide a nuanced profile of mnesic abilities by examining various types, stages, and temporal dimensions of memory. Specifically, the protocol targets progressively complex types of memory-perceptual, episodic, and autobiographical-alongside two key stages: encoding and retrieval. It also considers two temporal perspectives: (1) memory processes during the DoC (assessed indirectly through physiological markers) and (2) memory retrieval after the DoC, in patients who regain consciousness (assessed directly through subjective reports).
- The investigator first aim to identify robust and specific physiological markers of memory processes occurring during the period of altered consciousness in the ICU. To this end, the investigator developed two auditory protocols using high-density electroencephalography (hdEEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) to assess the formation of new memories in non-communicating DoC patients (1a; anterograde memory). These protocols focus on two types of memory: perceptual memory, which enables the storage and interpretation of sensory information (e.g., recognition of the sounds of the artificial respirator or the voices of caregivers), and episodic memory, which allows individuals to recall specific events within their context (e.g., family visits, painful procedures) and serves as a foundation for autobiographical memory which supports the sense of identity. In practice, these protocols are conducted over two consecutive days in the ICU: Day 1 is dedicated to the putative encoding of new memories through exposure to specific auditory stimuli, while Day 2 assesses their long-term retrieval using 'old-new' paradigms, which contrast brain responses to stimuli presented on Day 1 ('old') with responses to novel stimuli introduced only on Day 2 ('new'). The investigator also developed a complementary protocol based on hdEEG, ECG and electrodermal and respiratory activity recordings, using auditory and olfactory stimuli, to investigate the retrieval of past autobiographical memories (1b; retrograde memory), that is memories from the patient's life prior to the onset of the disorder.
- In parallel with this detection of implicit physiological correlates of memory, The investigator will also employ a direct approach in patients who have emerged from a DoC. Using semi-structured interviews, the investigator will gather explicit evidence of their subjective experiences and memories of the period of impaired consciousness. These may include internal conscious experiences (e.g., memories of dreams, hallucinations, emotions, or thoughts), external conscious experiences (e.g., family visits, painful procedures), as well as memories related to stimuli from experimental paradigms (e.g., auditory cues presented during physiological recordings) and memories of a musical memory probe played during the DoC. These interviews will be accompanied by neuropsychological tests assessing overall memory and cognitive functioning and the occurrence of PTSD.
The investigator will apply supervised machine learning techniques, including classification methods, to detect the presence or absence of memory processes at the individual patient level, based on predefined mnesic markers used as evaluation criteria. In parallel, The investigator will conduct second-order analyses, involving group-level comparisons between DoC patients and conscious ICU control patients, as well as between subgroups of DoC patients (e.g., UWS vs. MCS patients; focal vs. diffuse etiologies). These comparisons will be carried out using permutation statistics, statistical modeling, and/or parametric or non-parametric tests (e.g., Student's t-test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients suffering or who have suffered from a Disorder of Consciousness | Experimental | Other: Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales |
| Conscious Patients treated in Intensive Care Unit | Active comparator | Other: Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patient not conscious according to the CRS-R scale (Kalmar \& Giacino, 2005)
- Age over 15 years and 3 months
- Free and informed consent signed by a third party (parental authority, trusted support person)
- Age over 15 years and 3 months
- Cared for in an Intensive Care Unit
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales(Neuro)-physiological paradigms based on EEG, ECG, electrodermal activity, and respiratory activity recordings, and auditory and olfactive stimuli, to assess memory processes without the need to communicate ('no report' approach) in patients suffering from a Disorder of Consciousness and conscious controls. Semi-structured interviews and neuropsychological assessments (scales) in patients who have recovered from a Disorder of Consciousness and conscious controls to explore memories and subjective experience of the ICU | Other | Conscious Patients treated in Intensive Care Unit, Patients suffering or who have suffered from a Disorder of Consciousness |
Primary outcome
EEG-Electrodermal activity
Time frame: during hospitalization and at a distance during a post-resuscitation follow-up consultation for the second semi-structured interview assessing the recovery of the musical memory probe, generally between 3 and 12 months
Composite primary outcome measure: Presence of at least one of the following three predifined markers of memory processes: * EEG cognitive evoked potentials * Significant modulation of electrodermal activity * Evidence of recollection of an auditory memory probe delivered during the Disorder of Consciousness
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Disorders of Consciousness
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures FOCUS-1
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Restoring Awareness
Vegetative State, Minimally Conscious State
RecruitingObservational study
Smartphone Enabled Detection of Cognitive Motor Dissociation in the ICU
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Benjamin Rohaut, MD PhD principal investigator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Physiological recordings, Semi-structured interviews, Psychological scales in people with Disorders of Consciousness, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Benjamin Rohaut, MD PhD (01 84 82 78 88 ext. +33, benjamin.rohaut@icm-institute.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
EEG-Electrodermal activity (time frame: during hospitalization and at a distance during a post-resuscitation follow-up consultation for the second semi-structured interview assessing the recovery of the musical memory probe, generally between 3 and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2026.